This is a reland of 6202c4458b.
Moved skipped test from 'variant == jitless' to
'lite_mode or variant == jitless'.
Original change's description:
> [inspector] Add wasm profiling test
>
> This adds a first simple test to check that CPU profiles contain wasm
> function names.
>
> R=herhut@chromium.org, kozyatinskiy@chromium.org
>
> Bug: v8:8783
> Change-Id: I26b1fd2b7ec555c073d80a464ee8a799b017b07a
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1454597
> Commit-Queue: Clemens Hammacher <clemensh@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Stephan Herhut <herhut@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#59703}
TBR=herhut@chromium.org
Bug: v8:8783
Change-Id: I4f68db86bf1caa4f0d68dd4fa227ded25bf5145a
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1477678
Reviewed-by: Clemens Hammacher <clemensh@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Clemens Hammacher <clemensh@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#59730}
This adds a first simple test to check that CPU profiles contain wasm
function names.
R=herhut@chromium.org, kozyatinskiy@chromium.org
Bug: v8:8783
Change-Id: I26b1fd2b7ec555c073d80a464ee8a799b017b07a
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1454597
Commit-Queue: Clemens Hammacher <clemensh@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephan Herhut <herhut@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#59703}
In addition to the previous change enabling forced FunctionDeclaration
allocation when block code coverage is enabled, enable it now for all
(non-best-effort) code coverage by reading off the coverage mode from
the isolate (rather than relying on the presence of a source range map).
Bug: chromium:927464
Change-Id: I26f86c9fbebc0df52d5cdeff3ca1095215a6d912
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1456041
Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#59626}
Preserve coverage for unused functions by force marking them used when
code coverage is enabled.
Bug: chromium:927464
Change-Id: Ia973467d06f7268f4e98cc76d0bb98cc591e979c
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1454717
Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#59373}
Declare Variables with a name and position, rather than by passing
through a VariableProxy. This allows us to not create dummy proxies
for things like function declarations, and allows us to consider those
declarations unused.
As a side-effect, we also have to check if a variable is unused in the
bytecode generator (as it will no longer be allocated), and we end up
skip generating code/SFIs for dead variables/functions.
Change-Id: I4c2c872473f23e124f9456b4b92f87159658f8e0
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1414916
Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#59088}
This changes a few bits about how continuation counters are handled.
It introduces a new mechanism that allows removal of a continuation
range after it has been created. If coverage is enabled, we run a first
post-processing pass on the AST immediately after parsing, which
removes problematic continuation ranges in two situations:
1. nested continuation counters - only the outermost stays alive.
2. trailing continuation counters within a block-like structure are
removed if the containing structure itself has a continuation.
R=bmeurer@chromium.org, jgruber@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org
Bug: v8:8381, v8:8539
Change-Id: I6bcaea5060d8c481d7bae099f6db9f993cc30ee3
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1339119
Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#58443}
Also disables --stress-flush-bytecode on some mjsunit tests which fail
when bytecode flushing is stressed due to test invariants.
Bug=v8:8395
Change-Id: If627910214b3c266e7776340ba182829148e8289
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1372071
Reviewed-by: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#58230}
This reverts commit 003159e777.
Reason for revert: breaks roll into Chromium: https://ci.chromium.org/p/chromium/builders/luci.chromium.try/linux_chromium_headless_rel/3140
Original change's description:
> [inspector] RemoteObject.description should be empty for primitive type
>
> We currently report description field for numbers. On client side user
> can calculate description as remoteObject.unserializableValue ||
> (remoteObject.value + ''). Let's report description only for objects to
> simplify value -> remoteObject logic a bit.
>
> R=dgozman@chromium.org
> TBR=jgruber@chromium.org
>
> Bug: chromium:595206
> Cq-Include-Trybots: master.tryserver.blink:linux_trusty_blink_rel
> Change-Id: I91356a44aa3024e20c8f966869abf4a41b88e4bc
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/737485
> Commit-Queue: Aleksey Kozyatinskiy <kozyatinskiy@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Pavel Feldman <pfeldman@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53453}
TBR=dgozman@chromium.org,pfeldman@chromium.org,kozyatinskiy@chromium.org
Change-Id: Ifc184e1ac158d9ea7034922a7250444448fac49f
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: chromium:595206
Cq-Include-Trybots: master.tryserver.blink:linux_trusty_blink_rel
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1081207
Reviewed-by: Sergiy Byelozyorov <sergiyb@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Sergiy Byelozyorov <sergiyb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53461}
We currently report description field for numbers. On client side user
can calculate description as remoteObject.unserializableValue ||
(remoteObject.value + ''). Let's report description only for objects to
simplify value -> remoteObject logic a bit.
R=dgozman@chromium.orgTBR=jgruber@chromium.org
Bug: chromium:595206
Cq-Include-Trybots: master.tryserver.blink:linux_trusty_blink_rel
Change-Id: I91356a44aa3024e20c8f966869abf4a41b88e4bc
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/737485
Commit-Queue: Aleksey Kozyatinskiy <kozyatinskiy@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Pavel Feldman <pfeldman@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53453}
When collecting source ranges for conditionals (`a ? b : c`), include
the '?' and ':' tokens in the then- and else ranges, respectively.
Bug: v8:7098
Change-Id: I22315e2040c96c977e0b49e1fafe4228a6558471
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/778321
Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#49484}
JavaScript is a dynamically typed language. But most code is
written with fixed types in mind. When debugging JavaScript,
it is helpful to know the types of variables and parameters
at runtime. It is often hard to infer types for complex code.
Type profiling provides this information at runtime.
Node.js uses the inspector protocol. This CL allows Node.js users
to access and analyse type profile for via Node modules or the
in-procress api. Type Profile helps developers to analyze
their code for correctness and performance.
Design doc: https://docs.google.com/a/google.com/document/d/1O1uepXZXBI6IwiawTrYC3ohhiNgzkyTdjn3R8ysbYgk/edit?usp=sharing
Add `takeTypeProfile` to the inspector protocol. It returns a list
of TypeProfileForScripts, which in turn contains the type profile for
each function. We can use TypeProfile data to annotate JavaScript code.
Sample script with data from TypeProfile:
function f(/*Object, number, undefined*/a,
/*Array, number, null*/b,
/*boolean, Object, symbol*/c) {
return 'bye';
/*string*/};
f({}, [], true);
f(3, 2.3, {a: 42});
f(undefined, null, Symbol('hello'));/*string*/
Bug: v8:5933
Cq-Include-Trybots: master.tryserver.blink:linux_trusty_blink_rel;master.tryserver.chromium.linux:linux_chromium_rel_ng
Change-Id: I626bfb886b752f90b9c86cc6953601558b18b60d
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/508588
Commit-Queue: Franziska Hinkelmann <franzih@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Pavel Feldman <pfeldman@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Aleksey Kozyatinskiy <kozyatinskiy@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#47920}
This is so that precise coverage starts with a clean slate.
The old behavior can be emulated by calling getBestEffortCoverage
before starting precise coverage.
R=jgruber@chromium.org
Bug: chromium:757998
Change-Id: Ib3ee2316966f676456198159bdcf8ba8b9d3896f
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/635084
Commit-Queue: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#47629}
Add "detailed" flag to Profiler.startPreciseCoverage to specify
granularity (block coverage vs function coverage).
The default value is currently set to FLAG_block_coverage, which
is currently true. This is so that the V8 roll does not break
LayoutTests. I'll set it to false once I made changes to Blink.
R=jgruber@chromium.org, pfeldman@chromium.org
Bug: v8:6738
Cq-Include-Trybots: master.tryserver.blink:linux_trusty_blink_rel
Change-Id: I7242e897ab02713188a5292ca8c8bb58985e3a9b
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/625616
Reviewed-by: Pavel Feldman <pfeldman@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#47533}
This is in preparation to the removal of the FullCodeGenerator, we no
longer need the ability to stress the underlying implementation.
R=rmcilroy@chromium.org
BUG=v8:6409
Cq-Include-Trybots: master.tryserver.v8:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng
Change-Id: Iad3177d6de4a68b57c12a770b6e85ed7a9710254
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/584747
Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#47276}
Consider:
function f() {
return;
}
This CL ensures that the closing brace is considered as covered by
introducing a special case for open-ended range rewrites when the
parent range is the function range itself.
Bug: v8:6000, v8:6661
Change-Id: I0be307759967e9f4df245a4f367326a37dda86fd
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/597651
Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#47079}
Function-granularity coverage skips functions that are both uncovered
and have an uncovered parent. This optimization needs to be tweaked once
block coverage and incremental collection is in play, as it is possible
to have a function with invocation_count == 0 (i.e. uncovered at
function granularity) that still has relevant block-granularity
coverage.
Bug: v8:6000
Change-Id: I4cc81b8a6935aa58e29d383ed4fa749cbfe69352
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/589508
Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#46991}
Bug: v8:6000
Change-Id: I8c068383300ba869a87f836504c84ea08fcff87e
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/568307
Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#46675}
Removes the --ignition flag which is now on by default. Adds a
--stress-fullcodegen flag which enables running all functions supported
by fullcodegen to be compiled by fullcodegen.
This will enable moving parser internalization later when we are not
stressing fullcodegen or compiling asm.js functions.
BUG=v8:5203, v8:6409, v8:6589
Change-Id: I7fa68016d4e734755434ec0b4e749ef65ffa7f4e
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/565569
Commit-Queue: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#46635}
This adds a new binary block coverage mode (in addition to the existing count
block coverage), as well as a few transformation passes to reduce the number of
uselessly reported ranges.
Bug: v8:6000
Change-Id: I4fb234ca015990d00aa2f1dccb87f76ba4748994
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/552642
Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Aleksey Kozyatinskiy <kozyatinskiy@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#46463}
This CL adds a few transformations that clean up the set of reported
source ranges. Duplicates, empty, and uncovered ranges are removed, and
nested/consecutive ranges are merged if possible.
BUG=v8:6000
Change-Id: I421ee35ce8292cfe84c1eea4f653762cea5d909d
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/558411
Reviewed-by: Aleksey Kozyatinskiy <kozyatinskiy@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#46450}
This piggy-backs on top of existing precise and best-effort coverage to expose
block coverage through the inspector protocol.
Coverage collection now implicitly reports block-granularity coverage when
available. A new 'isBlockCoverage' property on Inspector's FunctionCoverage
type specifies the granularity of reported coverage.
For now, only count-based block coverage is supported, but binary block
coverage should follow soon.
Support is still gated behind the --block-coverage flag.
Bug: v8:6000
Cq-Include-Trybots: master.tryserver.chromium.linux:linux_chromium_rel_ng
Change-Id: I9c4d64e1d2a098e66178b3a68dcee800de0081af
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/532975
Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Aleksey Kozyatinskiy <kozyatinskiy@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Gozman <dgozman@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#46157}
This refactoring makes it easier to write advanced tests and
gives full control over what's happening to the test code.
It also forces description for every test.
BUG=none
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2891213002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45412}
1. Replaces --crankshaft with --opt in tests.
2. Also fixes presubmit to check for --opt flag when
assertOptimized is used.
3. Updates testrunner/local/variants.py and
v8_foozie.py to use --opt flag.
This would mean, nooptimize variant means there are
no optimizations. Not even with %OptimizeFunctionOnNextCall.
Bug:v8:6325
Change-Id: I638e743d0773a6729c6b9749e2ca1e2537f12ce6
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/490206
Commit-Queue: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44985}
With precise binary code coverage, the reported count is either 0 or 1.
We only report 1 the first time we collect coverage data after the
function has been executed.
Since we do not care about the accurate execution count, we can optimize
the function once it has been executed once.
Also change best effort coverage to be implicitly binary.
R=caseq@chromium.org, jgruber@chromium.org, pfeldman@chromium.org
BUG=v8:5808
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2766573003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44074}
We used to clear invocation counts when enabling precise coverage.
This is not necessary, and we could continue to use the existing
invocation counts on the heap. The old behavior can be achieved
by explicitly resetting the counts by polling coverage data.
R=jgruber@chromium.org,caseq@chromium.org
BUG=v8:5808
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2768453002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43964}
If the top-level function cannot be found, we previously assumed an
invocation count of 1. This is wrong when we expect the invocation
counts to be reset for precise coverage.
TBR=jgruber@chromium.orgR=caseq@chromium.org,pfeldman@chromium.org
BUG=v8:5808
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2723003007
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43620}
