port 83a0af5500 (r28165).
original commit message:
VectorICs: built-in function apply should use an IC.
Handled a TODO that sent builtin function apply to the runtime on property get.
BUG=
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1119263002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28189}
Reason for revert:
[Sheriff] Speculative revert. This seems to block the current roll:
https://codereview.chromium.org/1124463003/
This bisect also points at this CL:
https://codereview.chromium.org/1124523002/
Please prepare the chromium side tests before a reland.
Original issue's description:
> [V8] Use previous token location as EOS token location
>
> EOS token location is useless for users and messages.js are not ready for its location.
> With this CL we use location of token before EOS for it.
>
> LOG=Y
> BUG=chromium:480652
> R=yurys@chromium.org,yangguo@chromium.org
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/81afc9313ce84350bcba9f84b255a77e97cd3726
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28164}
TBR=yangguo@chromium.org,yurys@chromium.org,kozyatinskiy@chromium.org
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=chromium:480652
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1116233004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28187}
- all RegisterAllocatorTest unit tests passing, when unittest has the flags: --turbo-filter=* --always-opt --turbo-deoptimization --turbo-verify-allocation --turbo_greedy_regalloc
./tools/run-tests.py passing when providing --turbo_greedy_regalloc, but still having some failing (more than the "normal" 43) when passing all the flags. I realize just passing --turbo_greedy_regalloc does not provide full coverage, but it did uncover some bugs, still
The CL centralizes the computing of split points (for "losing" intervals) with the determination of whether an interval is irreducible, and, therefore, of infinite spill weight (if an interval can't be split or spilled, it can't lose in weight comparison because there's nothing we can do to it and make progress).
There are allocator efficiency opportunities I haven't yet taken (this refers to the code itself, not the generated code). For example, the above split/spill computation can be cached. My plan is to defer this to at least after we see numbers showing the value of the algorithm, and potentially do at the same time we remove the linear algorithm, if that is still the plan. At that time, we can look where some APIs best belong (e.g. weight computation may fully live and cache itself on LiveRange)
In addition, the CL adds a few debug-time-only Print APIs I found very useful: on demand (while in GDB) dump of the code, live range info (use positions & operand description, and intervals), etc.
BUG=
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1105793002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28185}
Just give internal ones an ArrayBuffer with a NULL backing store. This
simplifies the access checks a lot.
BUG=v8:3996
R=hpayer@chromium.org,verwaest@chromium.org
LOG=n
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1109353003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28168}
EOS token location is useless for users and messages.js are not ready for its location.
With this CL we use location of token before EOS for it.
LOG=Y
BUG=chromium:480652
R=yurys@chromium.org,yangguo@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1100993003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28164}
An initial 'code age' state that will turn into a 'pre-aging' code age only after it was executed the first time.
BUG=470930
LOG=Y
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1107233004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28162}
Implements the strong mode proposal's restrictions on implicit conversions
for the binary + operator. Test suite is also cleaned up/refactored to allow
easier testing of the comparison operators in the future.
BUG=v8:3956
LOG=N
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1109223004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28159}
Original issue's description:
> Remove the weak list of array buffers
>
> Instead, collect live array buffers during marking and free pointers we
> no longer found.
>
> BUG=v8:3996
> R=hpayer@chromium.org
> LOG=n
BUG=v8:3996
TBR=hpayer@chromium.org
LOG=n
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1115853004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28156}
This CL contains the first steps towards tail call optimization:
* Structurally detect tail calls during instruction selection,
looking for special return/call combinations.
* Added new architecture-specific instructions for tail calls which
jump instead of call and take care of frame adjustment.
* Moved some code around.
Currently we restrict tail calls to callees which only use registers
for arguments/return value and to call sites which are explicitly
marked as being OK for tail calls. This excludes, among other things,
call sites in sloppy JS functions and our IC machinery (both need in
general to be able to access the caller's frame).
All this is behind a flag --turbo-tail-calls, which is currently off
by default, so it can easily be toggled.
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1108563002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28150}
The method is not used anywhere, and it is a bad idea in general anyway.
If you see a need to call YieldCPU, then you're code is probably in need
of a redesign!
R=svenpanne@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1116853002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28147}
