The simulator uses a separate JS stack, exhaustion of the C stack
however is not caught by JS limit checks. This change now lowers the
limit of the JS stack accordingly on function calls.
R=mvstanton@chromium.org
BUG=chromium:522380
TEST=mjsunit/regress/regress-crbug-522380
LOG=n
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1314623002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30334}
Passes the current context to bytecode interpreter handlers. This is held in the
context register on all architectures except for ia32 where there are too few
registers and it is instead spilled to the stack.
Also changes Load/StoreRegister to use kMachAnyTagged representation since they
should only ever hold tagged values.
BUG=v8:4280
LOG=N
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1294133004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30325}
Replaces all instances of the code which computed the debug
name of a stub or function with calls to CompileInfo::GetDebugName instead.
Also:
- Removes useless parameter on CodeStub::GetMajorName
- Removes FakeStubForTesting since it is no longer required
- Adds CompileInfo::ShouldEnsureSpaceForLazyDeopt() to replace unclear calls to IsStub().
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1297203002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30324}
Adds Uint32x4, Uint16x8, and Uint8x16 types.
Adds all functions in the current spec, except for loads and stores.
LOG=Y
BUG=v8:4124
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1294513004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30322}
These two test cases introduced by 8525136b require that the double register is >=2.
But currently on x87 turbofan implementation only 1 double register is supported.
BUG=
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1308763003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30321}
Reason for revert:
Breaks cctest/test-cpu-profiler/SourceLocation on nosnap
Original issue's description:
> Add a separate scope for switch
>
> The ES2015 specification for switch statements 13.12.11 specifies that
> they get their own lexical scope. This patch introduces such a scope
> through a complex desugaring in terms of blocks, done so that Crankshaft
> does not have to be updated to support multiple constructs providing
> scopes.
>
> BUG=v8:4377
> LOG=Y
> R=adamk
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/9edbc1f21eb1050cabbe3b8bc9aebf89ada7ebd7
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30314}
TBR=adamk@chromium.org
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=v8:4377
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1309043004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30316}
The parser has special behavior with respect to the bindings
of inner functions in sloppy mode which are not at the top
level of scopes. This behavior should be turned off when the
--harmony-sloppy-function flag is set, as lexical scoping
rules are used instead. Previously, the incorrect flag
--harmony-sloppy was used, resulting in a crashing bug.
BUG=chromium:520029
LOG=Y
R=adamk
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1303033003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30315}
The ES2015 specification for switch statements 13.12.11 specifies that
they get their own lexical scope. This patch introduces such a scope
through a complex desugaring in terms of blocks, done so that Crankshaft
does not have to be updated to support multiple constructs providing
scopes.
BUG=v8:4377
LOG=Y
R=adamk
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1293283002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30314}
While the class Type objects the AstTyper generates should be
allocated to zone memory, there's no particular reason
the typer object itself needs to be.
BUG=None
TEST=None
R=rossberg@chromium.org,titzer@chromium.org
LOG=N
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1303843003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30313}
FutexEmulation::Wait can potentially block forever on a condition variable. We
want to allow this to be interrupted (for a debugger, or to terminate the
thread, for example).
The previous implementation would periodically wake up the waiter to check for
interrupts. This CL modifies the StackGuard so it wakes the blocked futex if
the thread should be interrupted.
BUG=chromium:497295
R=jarin@chromium.org
LOG=n
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1230303005
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30311}
Reason for revert:
Several tests on V8 Linux64 TSAN bot are broken, due to data races between allocation & GC.
A bisect points to this CL, and the CL description sounds pertinent to the observed breakage.
Original issue's description:
> Concurrently unmap free pages.
>
> BUG=
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/d1aeb45d96123d47023066b244c0f450fbe57d2d
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30306}
TBR=mlippautz@chromium.org,hpayer@chromium.org
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1306213002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30310}
Calls should have control and effect inputs, which were previously missing
for RawMachineAssembler call operations. Add control and effect edges to
graph()->start().
BUG=v8:4280
LOG=N
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1283193007
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30307}
This CL is a nightmare! For the utterly irrelevant edge case of a sloppy function with non-simple parameters and a call to direct eval, like here,
let x = 1;
function f(g = () => x) {
var y
eval("var x = 2")
return g() + x // f() = 3
}
we have to do all of the following, on top of the declaration block ("varblock") contexts we already introduce around the body:
- Introduce the ability for varblock contexts to have both a ScopeInfo and an extension object (e.g., the body varblock in the example will contain both a static var y and a dynamic var x). No other scope needs that. Since there are no context slots left, a special new struct is introduced that pairs up scope info and extension object.
- When declaring lookup slots in the runtime, this new struct is allocated in the case where an extension object has to be added to a block scope (at which point the block's extension slot still contains a plain ScopeInfo).
- While at it, introduce some abstraction to access context extension slots in a more controlled manner, in order to keep special-casing to a minimum.
- Make sure that even empty varblock contexts do not get optimised away when they contain a sloppy eval, so that they can host the potential extension object.
- Extend dynamic search for declaration contexts (used by sloppy direct eval) to recognize varblock contexts.
- In the parser, if a function has a sloppy direct eval, introduce an additional varblock scope around each non-simple (desugared) parameter, as required by the spec to contain possible dynamic var bindings.
- In the pattern rewriter, add the ability to hoist the named variables the pattern declares to an outer scope. That is required because the actual destructuring has to be evaluated inside the protecting varblock scope, but the bindings that the desugaring introduces are in the outer scope.
- ScopeInfos need to save the information whether a block is a varblock, to make sloppy eval calls work correctly that deserialise them as part of the scope chain.
- Add the ability to materialize block scopes with extension objects in the debugger. Likewise, enable setting extension variables in block scopes via the debugger interface.
- While at it, refactor and unify some respective code in the debugger.
Sorry, this CL is large. I could try to split it up, but everything is rather entangled.
@mstarzinger: Please review the changes to contexts.
@yangguo: Please have a look at the debugger stuff.
R=littledan@chromium.org, mstarzinger@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org
BUG=v8:811,v8:2160
LOG=N
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1292753007
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30295}
- Introduce a proper bit for SIMD primitive values.
- Introduce constructors for individual SIMD types. These are currently just classes, which seems good enough for now, given that we always have exactly one global map per SIMD type.
The only problem with using class types for SIMD is that a SIMD constant won't be a subtype of its specific type, only of the general SIMD type. But until we actually introduce SIMD constants into the compiler that shouldn't matter.
R=jarin@chromium.org
BUG=
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1303863002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30294}
port cbbaf9ea6a (r30224).
original commit message:
[turbofan] Unify referencing of stack slots
Previously, it was not possible to specify StackSlotOperands for all
slots in both the caller and callee stacks. Specifically, the region
of the callee's stack including the saved return address, frame
pointer, function pointer and context pointer could not be addressed
by the register allocator/gap resolver.
In preparation for better tail call support, which will use the gap
resolver to reconcile outgoing parameters, this change makes it
possible to address all slots on the stack, because slots in the
previously inaccessible dead zone may become parameter slots for
outgoing tail calls. All caller stack slots are accessible as they
were before, with slot -1 corresponding to the last stack
parameter. Stack slot indices >= 0 access the callee stack, with slot
0 corresponding to the callee's saved return address, 1 corresponding
to the saved frame pointer, 2 corresponding to the current function
context, 3 corresponding to the frame marker/JSFunction, and slots 4
and above corresponding to spill slots.
The following changes were specifically needed:
* Frame has been changed to explicitly manage three areas of the
callee frame, the fixed header, the spill slot area, and the
callee-saved register area.
* Conversions from stack slot indices to fp offsets all now go through
a common bottleneck: OptimizedFrame::StackSlotOffsetRelativeToFp
* The generation of deoptimization translation tables has been changed
to support the new stack slot indexing scheme. Crankshaft, which
doesn't support the new slot numbering in its register allocator,
must adapt the indexes when creating translation tables.
* Callee-saved parameters are now kept below spill slots, not above,
to support saving only the optimal set of used registers, which is
only known after register allocation is finished and spill slots
have been allocated.
BUG=
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1293103003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30292}
port 00df60d1c6 (r30219).
original commit message:
Makes the following modifications to the interpreter builtins and
InterpreterAssembler:
- Adds an accumulator register and initializes it to undefined()
- Adds a register file pointer register and use it instead of FramePointer to
access registers
- Modifies builtin to support functions with 0 regiters in the register file
- Modifies builtin to Call rather than TailCall to first bytecode handler.
BUG=
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1304593002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30289}
port f4c079d450 (r30107).
This is the appendix of 458dfe3b943edb3238917edfe9e2dde326cd1adb which misses
one modified file.
original commit message:
There's no need to have one InstanceType per SIMD primitive type (this
will not scale long-term). Also reduce the amount of code duplication
and make it more robust wrt adding new SIMD types.
BUG=
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1304963003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30288}
Not all parenthesized AssignmentExpressions whose components are valid
binding patterns are valid arrow function formal parameters. In
particular (a,b,c)() is not valid, and in general the existing code
wasn't catching the tail productions of ConditionalExpression,
BinaryExpression, PostfixExpression, LeftHandSideExpression,
and MemberExpression.
Thanks to Adrian Perez for the test case.
BUG=v8:4211
LOG=Y
R=rossberg@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1306583002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30286}