Running this in x64.release mode on a powerful HP620 takes 4 seconds,
this is at least 2 orders of magnitude too slow and leads to tons of
false positives on our build bots due to timeouts. As it is, the
cost-benefit ratio is far too low.
The whole approach needs to be changed: Instead of trying to exhaust
some search space in unit tests, this should be turned into a fuzzing
test where only a small but random number of things are tested. The
exhaustive approach can be done separately, but definitely not in the
unit tests.
BUG=v8:3707
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/762743002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#25510}
cctest/test-threads/ThreadJoinSelf is suppressed for Android, but the
test has since been moved to unittests/Thread.SelfJoin. Move the
suppression to unittests.status.
unittests/ThreadLocalStorageTest.DoTest fails on older Android devices
as it assumes the availability of more TLS slots than many devices
implement. Test a smaller number of slots (32) on Android. Remove old
suppression of test-platform-tls/FastTLS (which no longer exists).
cctest/test-mark-compact/RegressJoinThreadsOnIsolateDeinit can't deal
with shared mappings. Check for 's' instead of '-'.
BUG=v8:3706
LOG=
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/735863003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#25492}
If we run out of code range, then GC wouldn't be able to compact code space,
because it wouldn't be able to allocate a new page. This can cause code space
fragmentation and OOM crashes.
BUG=chromium:430118
LOG=Y
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/742733002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#25441}
JavaScript shifts perform an implicit '& 0x1F' on their right operand, this
patch removes it when the underlying architecture already does it.
BUG=
R=bmeurer@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/732103002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#25438}
Since checking all possible combinations is taking so long this
reduces the test to test the odd cases (let, yield and static) as
well as a single ordinary case.
BUG=v8:3707
LOG=n
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/724713004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#25428}
Skip one hard fail, and two frequent flakes while we investigate.
BUG=
NOTRY=true
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/728653004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#25418}
This essentially performs the following transformation
JSToNumber(phi(x1,...,xn,control):primitive)
=> phi(JSToNumber(x1),...,JSToNumber(xn),control):number
which is similar to what we already do for JSToBoolean.
TEST=mjsunit/asm
R=svenpanne@chromium.org
BUG=
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/732463003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#25390}
We add a new ScopeType, ScopeType.Script. The scope with
ScopeType.Script is always present in the scope chain (ScopeIterator
fakes it if neededi - i.e. if ScriptContext for a script has not been
allocated since that script has no lexical declarations).
ScriptScope reflects ScriptContextTable.
R=yurys@chromium.org,yangguo@chromium.org
BUG=v8:3690
LOG=N
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/726643002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#25383}
Don't use the generic algorithm, but instead start going into the
direction of ControlReducer, using a stack plus a revisit queue to
not miss any more possibilities for reductions anymore.
TEST=cctest,unittests
R=dcarney@chromium.org
Committed: f047507370
Committed: 6e148989a4
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/726513002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#25377}
With Int32Add we lose the int/uint distinction, so later, in simplified lowering we can make a wrong decision. E.g., see the attached test case, where we lower NumberAdd -> Int32Add because inputs are Uint32, but during simplified lowering we change the inputs to Int32, so we get a wrong result.
Simplified lowering will lower the NumberAdd operations anyway, so we should lose performance.
BUG=
R=bmeurer@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/721723004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#25368}
Don't use the generic algorithm, but instead start going into the
direction of ControlReducer, using a stack plus a revisit queue to
not miss any more possibilities for reductions anymore.
TEST=cctest,unittests
R=dcarney@chromium.org
Committed: f047507370
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/726513002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#25345}
