... that started failing on AIX where the allocation of a huge
ArrayBuffer succeeds.
Bug: v8:4153
Change-Id: I322c71e01edccb254a523f7f85817971b6c68242
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1914561
Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Igor Sheludko <ishell@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64960}
It was included accidentally. It is not in the ES spec, nor is it
provided by any other browser.
BUG=chromium:793095
Change-Id: I2370a6d2b8d14def8dbd47ff4a1ffb4f5f65f097
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/815757
Commit-Queue: Ben Smith <binji@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50491}
This revealed a bug in the TypedArray(typedArray) constructor when the arg is backed by a SharedArrayBuffer.
Also install the species getter and add a test, since it's not tested in
test262 presently.
BUG=v8:5983,v8:5984
R=adamk@chromium.org
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2798403004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44500}
Drive-by-fix: hydrogen code does not blindly return the
byteLength offset, instead it executes what is defined
in the byteLength getter.
BUG=
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2123263002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#37595}
ES2015 Object.prototype.toString semantics were enabled in version 4.9,
which has been in stable Chrome for nearly two weeks at this point.
R=littledan@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1784033002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34732}
Reason for revert:
Should be fixed again with this Blink change to add NeedsManualRebaseline
Original issue's description:
> Revert of Use ES2015-style TypedArray prototype chain (patchset #5 id:80001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/1541233002/ )
>
> Reason for revert:
> [Sheriff] Changes layout tests. Please fix upstream first if intended.
>
> https://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8.fyi/builders/V8-Blink%20Linux%2064/builds/3689
>
> Original issue's description:
> > Use ES2015-style TypedArray prototype chain
> >
> > This patch switches TypedArrays to use the prototype chain described
> > in the ES2015 specification, which adds a %TypedArray% superclass above
> > all individual TypedArray types. Most methods are defined on the
> > superclass rather than the subclasses.
> >
> > In order to prevent a performance regression, a few methods are
> > marked as inline. Inlining might prevent code which was previously
> > monomorphic from becoming polymorphic, and it was specifically
> > applied in places where methods became more polymorphic than before.
> > Tests with realistic workloads would be nice to do before this
> > ships in stable.
> >
> > This patch does not bring TypedArrays up to full spec compliance. In
> > particular, @@species is not yet supported.
> >
> > R=cbruni
> > BUG=v8:4085
> > LOG=Y
> >
> > Committed: https://crrev.com/07c91dccbe55c7be3ec75857dee5ad59873330b7
> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33050}
>
> TBR=caitpotter88@gmail.com,cbruni@chromium.org,littledan@chromium.org
> NOPRESUBMIT=true
> NOTREECHECKS=true
> NOTRY=true
> BUG=v8:4085
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/28b55ffd1e32e09aaf42b8bbb407944d4808e07c
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33053}
TBR=caitpotter88@gmail.com,cbruni@chromium.org,machenbach@chromium.org
BUG=v8:4085
LOG=Y
CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS=tryserver.chromium.linux:linux_chromium_rel_ng;tryserver.blink:linux_blink_rel
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1558663002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33067}
Reason for revert:
[Sheriff] Changes layout tests. Please fix upstream first if intended.
https://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8.fyi/builders/V8-Blink%20Linux%2064/builds/3689
Original issue's description:
> Use ES2015-style TypedArray prototype chain
>
> This patch switches TypedArrays to use the prototype chain described
> in the ES2015 specification, which adds a %TypedArray% superclass above
> all individual TypedArray types. Most methods are defined on the
> superclass rather than the subclasses.
>
> In order to prevent a performance regression, a few methods are
> marked as inline. Inlining might prevent code which was previously
> monomorphic from becoming polymorphic, and it was specifically
> applied in places where methods became more polymorphic than before.
> Tests with realistic workloads would be nice to do before this
> ships in stable.
>
> This patch does not bring TypedArrays up to full spec compliance. In
> particular, @@species is not yet supported.
>
> R=cbruni
> BUG=v8:4085
> LOG=Y
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/07c91dccbe55c7be3ec75857dee5ad59873330b7
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33050}
TBR=caitpotter88@gmail.com,cbruni@chromium.org,littledan@chromium.org
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=v8:4085
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1554523002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33053}
This patch switches TypedArrays to use the prototype chain described
in the ES2015 specification, which adds a %TypedArray% superclass above
all individual TypedArray types. Most methods are defined on the
superclass rather than the subclasses.
In order to prevent a performance regression, a few methods are
marked as inline. Inlining might prevent code which was previously
monomorphic from becoming polymorphic, and it was specifically
applied in places where methods became more polymorphic than before.
Tests with realistic workloads would be nice to do before this
ships in stable.
This patch does not bring TypedArrays up to full spec compliance. In
particular, @@species is not yet supported.
R=cbruni
BUG=v8:4085
LOG=Y
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1541233002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33050}
Reason for revert:
Blocks the roll:
https://codereview.chromium.org/1497763004/
Original issue's description:
> [es6] Correctify and unify ArrayBuffer and SharedArrayBuffer constructors.
>
> The ArrayBuffer and SharedArrayBuffer constructors should raise an
> exception when called with no arguments or undefined length. Also
> unified the ArrayBuffer and SharedArrayBuffer implementations as C++
> builtins, and removed some (now) obsolete runtime entries.
>
> R=yangguo@chromium.org
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/3235ccbb7826ceec2188f6ebab98fc851b54f60e
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#32590}
TBR=yangguo@chromium.org,cbruni@chromium.org,adamk@chromium.org,bmeurer@chromium.org
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1501673002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#32606}
The ArrayBuffer and SharedArrayBuffer constructors should raise an
exception when called with no arguments or undefined length. Also
unified the ArrayBuffer and SharedArrayBuffer implementations as C++
builtins, and removed some (now) obsolete runtime entries.
R=yangguo@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1500543002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#32590}
According to the ES6 spec, the main methods and getters shouldn't
be properties of the individual TypedArray objects and prototypes
but instead on %TypedArray% and %TypedArray%.prototype. This
difference is observable through introspection. This patch moves
some methods and getters to the proper place, with the exception
of %TypedArray%.prototype.subarray and harmony methods. These will
be moved in follow-on patches.
BUG=v8:4085
LOG=Y
R=adamk
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1186733002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29057}
This adds a new external type (v8::SharedArrayBuffer) that uses a JSArrayBuffer
under the hood. It can be distinguished from an ArrayBuffer by the newly-added
is_shared() bit.
Currently there is no difference in functionality between a SharedArrayBuffer
and an ArrayBuffer. However, a future CL will add the Atomics API, which is
only available on an SharedArrayBuffer. All non-atomic accesses are identical
to ArrayBuffer accesses.
LOG=N
BUG=
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1136553006
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28594}
Reason for revert:
breaks build
Original issue's description:
> Implement SharedArrayBuffer.
>
> This adds a new external type (v8::SharedArrayBuffer) that uses a JSArrayBuffer under the hood. It can be distinguished from an ArrayBuffer by the newly-added is_shared() bit.
>
> Currently there is no difference in functionality between a SharedArrayBuffer and an ArrayBuffer. However, a future CL will add the Atomics API, which is only available on an SharedArrayBuffer. All non-atomic accesses are identical to ArrayBuffer accesses.
>
> BUG=
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/57170bff7baf341c666252a7f6a49e9c08d51263
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28588}
TBR=jarin@chromium.org,jochen@chromium.org,binji@chromium.org
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1149203003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28589}
This adds a new external type (v8::SharedArrayBuffer) that uses a JSArrayBuffer under the hood. It can be distinguished from an ArrayBuffer by the newly-added is_shared() bit.
Currently there is no difference in functionality between a SharedArrayBuffer and an ArrayBuffer. However, a future CL will add the Atomics API, which is only available on an SharedArrayBuffer. All non-atomic accesses are identical to ArrayBuffer accesses.
BUG=
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1136553006
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28588}
