* Fast runtime calls for div and mod.
* Fix assembly and disassembly of multiply instructions.
* Strength reduce and inline multiplications to shift-add.
* Strength reduce and inline mod by power of 2.
* Strength reduce mod by other small integers to mul.
* Strength reduce div by 2 and 3.
Review URL: http://codereview.chromium.org/155047
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@2355 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
Marsaglia's multiply-with-carry instead of mixing the
bits obtained from calling the system random() twice.
This seems to be a bit faster and gives a better
distribution than the system random() in particular on
Windows.
Review URL: http://codereview.chromium.org/126113
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@2159 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
called from within a loop or not. In the past we lost the
information if a call site went megamorphic before a lazily
compiled callee was called for the first time. Now we track
that correctly (this is an issue that affects richards).
We still don't manage to track the in-loop state through a
constructor call, since constructor calls use LoadICs instead
of CallICs. This issue affects delta-blue. So in this patch
we assume that lazy compilations that don't happen through a
CallIC happen from inside a loop. I have an idea to fix this
but this patch is big enough already.
With our improved tracking of in-loop state I have switched
off the inlining of in-object loads for code that is not in
a loop. This benefits compile speed. One issue is that
eagerly compiled code now doesn't get the in-object loads
inlined. We need to eagerly compile less code to fix this.
Review URL: http://codereview.chromium.org/115744
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@2046 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
This issue was raised by Brett Wilson while reviewing my changelist for readability. Craig Silverstein (one of C++ SG maintainers) confirmed that we should declare one namespace per line. Our way of namespaces closing seems not violating style guides (there is no clear agreement on it), so I left it intact.
Review URL: http://codereview.chromium.org/115756
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@2038 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
