All "exclusive" gestures listen for either pointer events, or
"pointer emulating" touch events, so only a single sequence at
a time can make these run.
This signal will always be paired with a ::pressed signal, unless
the sequence is cancelled, or the controller is reset. the n_press
argument in the signal always matches the ::press signal one, even
if GtkGestureMultiPress::stopped was emitted in between.
The current sequence (as per gtk_gesture_single_get_current_sequence)
is used to find out the coordinates. And only emit ::pressed if the
gesture began through a GDK_BUTTON_PRESS/TOUCH_BEGIN (eg. not due to
an extra touch being lifted)
Just call the controllers on that phase if the default widget handlers
are run.
For compatibility reasons, in the touch event handler, let the pointer
emulating touch be transformed to a pointer event as usual, in order to
have widget handlers a chance to run at all. If they have to be managed
by a controller in that phase, it'll have to be through the default pointer
event handlers.
This phase is meant to run in the default widget handlers, as opposed
to externally as in the bubble/capture phase. This will be most usually
the expected phase for every controller replacing code in event handlers
in GTK+, just so invocation and triggering order is kept unaltered.
That may happen separately from grab-notify, and also due to external
reasons, so ensure all sequences are cancelled if a grab is taken
in some GdkWindows that would obscure events on the controller.
We can end up with _gtk_widget_remove_controller getting called
while we are iterating over the list in _gtk_widget_run_controllers.
To avoid trouble, only mark the event controller as dead by
setting data->controller to NULL, and defer the actual freeing
and list manipulation to the loop in _gtk_widget_run_controllers.
Update other places that operate on controllers to handle
data->controller being NULL.
Make it really sure that the event is only emitted after every gesture
that consumed the button press is done with the sequence.
The event must only be emulated if a gesture in the capture phase happened
to consume the event, be cancelled, and
Sequences may be cancelled within the ::sequence-state-changed handler, which
would change the points hashtable as it's being iterated in this function. So
iterate over a list of sequences and let the hashtable change freely.
The propagation phase property/methods in GtkEventController are gone,
This is now set directly on the GtkWidget add/remove controller API,
which has been made private.
The only public bit now are the new functions gtk_gesture_attach() and
gtk_gesture_detach() that will use the private API underneath.
All callers have been updated.
Within a widget, if a gesture accepts a sequence, it would previously
cancel every other gesture that not in the same group. Change this to
only cancelling gestures that previously claimed the gesture, and let
gestures with state=NONE for that sequence remain like that.
This enables late recognition of gestures, even on the presence of
another gesture group that was more eager at claiming the gesture.
One usecase is user-defined panning gestures on scrolledwindows,
if ::capture-button-press is TRUE (eg. the default), the gesture is
claimed early in order to consume the button press, but that would
tipically make every other gesture group deny the sequence. With
this change, the pan gesture can keep state=NONE, and later claim
the sequence for itself if the panning gesture is recognized.
Also, do not propagate state=DENIED to every gesture in the widget,
that was unintended.
If no match is found with the gesture widget when poking the event
window parents, bail out safely instead of falling in an infinite
loop. This was seen on Mutter.
The utility of those signals is somewhat dubious now that there is
gtk_gesture_group(), so make that the only way to coordinate gestures.
The cooperation model offered by gtk_gesture_group() is flexible
enough,
