Like the other GtkSettings already registered, these are influenced from
the outside and cannot be properly tested. The defaultvalues test
passes again now.
gtk_tree_model_build_level() always needs to emit row-inserted when
requested, this should not depend on whether the level has a parent
level or a virtual root, which is a check whether or not we need to
reference the node in the child model. Furthermore, we also need
to emit row-has-child-toggled after row-inserted when appropriate.
When gtk_tree_model_filter_row_changed() pulls in the root level, it
must request build_level() to emit signals for this. The refilter
function uses row_changed to process the changes, so build_level() in
the first call to row_changed() might pull in multiple new nodes in this
scenario, for all of these signals need to be emitted. Of course,
build_level() will then also emit the signals for the node row_changed()
is processing, we should not emit a duplicate signal, this is now
accounted for.
Add a unit test for this. For this small functionality to block the
row-changed signal has been implemented, so that we can simulate calls
to the refilter function using the current visible column setup.
_gtk_tooltip_handle_event, which is called for many events in the GTK+
main loop, calls gtk_tooltip_set_last_window, which keeps a weak
reference to the last window we passed through. If the window being
set is the same than the last one there's really no need to update our
weak reference, so add a check for that and exit early.
These event types propagate up the hierarchy anyway, so this means
we avoid setting it unnecessarily. This is especially important
for button press event, since only one client can select for this
on each window, causing X errors if two clients do it.
This detection code is not 100% reliable, but it should fare much better
than the current code, which just compares the device name to a fixed
set of strings. Many applications depend on erasers being recognized
reliably, so we start by checking for a device name containing the
substring 'eraser'.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Jaeger <ThJaeger@gmail.com>
This has two advantages:
1) In many backends, this is faster as we can terminate the window
hierarchy traversal earlier
2) When used in gdkdisplay.c::get_current_toplevel() to get the
current toplevel that has the pointer we now correctly return
a toplevel with the pointer in it where the pointer is inside
some foreign subwindow of a toplevel window.
The second advantage fixes some bugs in client side event generation
when the pointer is inside such a foreign child window.
Based on first patches by Christian Hergert. Change
screen_get_monitor_geometry() so that it translates the layout of the screens
from Cocoa layout to GDK layout. In Cocoa, the screen locations
are specified in Cocoa geometry, as well as that GDK uses a different way
to place individual monitors in the root window. For now only monitors
that are laid out horizontally are supported (see the FIXMEs in the source),
in bug 596238 we will track future work to get things fully right.
Modify _gdk_quartz_window_get_inverted_screen_y() to take the differences
in screen layout between Cocoa and GDK into account. Also this function
is subject to future work.
Explicitly handle resizing by leaving all events in the lower right 15x15
corner to Cocoa, if the window shows a resizing indicator. Some
applications may have widgets allocated in this area. Generally, these
widgets are likely larger than 15x15 so they can still be hit. Often
scroll bars are found in this area and these can also be manipulated by
other means. Since this is the only way of resizing windows on Mac OS X,
it is too important to keep it broken.
When we grab the pointer we need to request more events than what is
specified, otherwise our event emulation stop working and you won't
e.g. get crossing event unless you specified motion event mask.
F-Spot needs this as it draws on a foreign (screensaver) window, which
used to work.
I believe this is safe, because in all typical cases the expose
mask will not be set, so we won't do anything, and its what we used to
do.
Check for 'auth-info-required' attribute from printer attributes to
find out whether an authentization of user is needed.
Change password dialog of print backend to be able to require informations
requested thru 'auth-info-required' (#566522).
