It was only testing the default configuration where overlay-scrolling is
TRUE and the policy is POLICY_AUTOMATIC. We should also test FALSE and
POLICY_ALWAYS. This commit adds those tests and makes the !overlay &&
POLICY_ALWAYS case pass by excluding the size of the relevant scrollbar,
as we are only interested in whether the content size is as requested.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=778853
POLICY_AUTOMATIC means scrollbars are only shown when needed, i.e. when
the size of the window is not large enough to show the entire child. So
when measuring the preferred size, such scrollbars should be ignored.
But measure() was adding size for bars for which policy_may_be_visible()
was TRUE, which it returns for POLICY_ALWAYS (good) & _AUTOMATIC (bad).
So we reserved space for child plus scrollbars, & because we have enough
space for the child, POLICY_AUTOMATIC hides the scrollbar, leaving the
extra reserved space empty at the right/bottom sides of the child. This
is very noticeable/inconvenient for non-overlay, automatic scrollbars.
Fix this by only requesting size for scrollbars that use POLICY_ALWAYS,
rather than basing the decision on policy_may_be_visible().
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=778853
Using Ctrl + left/right to skip between words, or left/right to cancel a
selection, were causing movement on the screen in the opposite direction
of the glyph on the key. This was surprising and awful UX for RTL users.
This is based on a patch covering the former case by:
Author: Mehdi Sadeghi <mehdi@mehdix.org>
Date: Sat Feb 18 02:16:00 2017 +0000
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136059
Using Ctrl + left/right to skip between words, or left/right to cancel a
selection, were causing movement on the screen in the opposite direction
of the glyph on the key. This was surprising and awful UX for RTL users.
This is based on a patch covering the former case by:
Author: Ori Avtalion <ori@avtalion.name>
Date: Tue Apr 20 08:06:23 2010 +0000
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136059
It was "Missing name of pseudo-class", but the real problem is exactly
the opposite: we /have/ been given a name, but it is not a valid one.
Change it to "Invalid name of pseudo-class" to minimise confusion.
gboolean ret for whether gtk_text_iter_backward_line() moved the iter
was declared but not used anywhere. I presume it was meant to be
checked, and it passes now, so let’s do it.
the scrollbar passed in better be either priv->hscrollbar or
priv->vscrollbar. Ensure that by using a simple else instead of an
else-if and a g_assert.
When a widget is created, its default scale is the scale of the
primary screen (for instance 2). But once parented to another widget
its scale factor should be the one of its parent (if parented to a
widget on a screen at scale factor 1, it should be 1).
The problem is that we don't emit the notify::scale-factor signal when
reparenting happens.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=776821
Otherwise we wait for the next gdk_drag_motion() call, which will
happen on the next motion event, making the drag window briefly visible
on the 0,0 root coordinates.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=778203
gtk_text_iter_backward_line() checks the value of
real->line_char_offset without previously calling
ensure_char_offsets (real) to make sure the former
is up-to-date.
As a consequence of this, when gtk_text_iter_backward_line()
is called after a gtk_text_buffer_insert_range() in the
first line of buffer, the iter is not moved to the start of
the line, and the return value is wrong.
Fixed by adding the ensure_char_offsets() call.
A test case for this bug is added to the textiter gtk testsuite.
priv->trigger_event is never set, so it is always NULL. This means the
gtk_menu_popup*() methods use the current event. The only way to get any
other event to combobox_menu_popup() was from the button-press-event
handler I just removed, which would end up being the current one anyway.
So, bin priv->trigger_event & explicitly pass NULL to gtk_menu_popup*().
