if (orientation) doesn't make a lot of sense but C doesn't complain and
instead evaluates orientation to TRUE for GTK_ORIENTATION_VERTICAL
(since that's 1), thus inverting the value sizes.
commit c3dc0d80f1 fixed the behavior of
GtkContainer widgets requesting an IMMEDIATE resize-mode.
However, GtkWindow has been stomping on resize-mode during realize()
since commit addcc64b9c. The combination
of factors that led to this not being a visible problem during all this
while is uncertain, but this now causes the Shell to continuously try to
relayout its ShellEmbeddedWindow (a GtkWindow subclass).
This commit separates the resize-mode as set internally by GtkWindow
from the one set with the external API, so that GtkWindow only changes
it when it had not been set before by the subclass.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=763650
The implicit grab may be finished so the pointer lies on top of the other
scrollbar, in this case one scrollbar should lose the hovering state, and
the other should gain it. So we must check for proximity in both indicators.
Two errors here:
1) A typo in splashscreen rectangle calculation - sets right twice
instead of setting top
2) Centering for dialogs is off because it doesn't convert
GDK virtual desktop coordinates to Windows WM virtual desktop
coordinates by adding _gdk_offset_*
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=763628
The way gdk_drag_status() may be called multiple times during the
processing of drag and drop events throughout the widget hierarchy
brings some superfluous messaging going in, esp. when it's the last
request the one we want to honor, yet we emit messaging requests on
all.
This is barely appreciable in the X11 backend, but due to the design
of the wayland protocol, quick series of changes like this it have
some self-amplificating consequences which may end up flooding the
connection.
We can delegate this to a late "commit" call, performed within GDK
event management. This way gdk_drag_status() calls may be cached
and only result in windowing messaging once per ::drag-motion or
::drag-data-received event. Emitting the final status will also
avoid spurious action changes on the compositor and the other peer.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=763298
Besides the ::drag-failed handling in order to trigger the window creation
hook, add some handling of the application/x-rootwindow-drop mimetype, so
the same effect is achieved if the tab could be dropped in a destination
accepting this mimetype.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=763387
This makes toplevels pseudo-transparent wrt this mimetype, so if
the drag source offers this mimetype and not another that was
managed by the destination-side widget hierarchy, the window will
be an acceptable target for this mimetype, allowing it to trigger
whatever is meant to in the source side.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=763387
This code:
> gdk_window_get_root_origin (window, &x, &y);
> x -= root_x;
> y -= root_y;
> pointer_window = gdk_device_get_window_at_position (device, &x, &y);
was meant to find the child gdk window at coordinates root_x and root_y.
These 4 lines had 2 bugs:
1) x = x - root_x (same for y) is wrong, it should be x = root_x - x
2) gdk_device_get_window_at_position() does not give you the window
at position x and y. It gives you the window under the device
(mouse pointer) and the returns the device coordinates in x and y.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=763533
