The dummy Win32 window that we use to capture display change events and
to create dummy WGL contexts was created with CS_OWNDC, so we really do
not need to (and should not) call ReleaseDC() on the HDC that we
obtained from it, so drop these calls.
Since the shaders need to be updated for using with GLES (libANGLE at
least), default to WGL for now. Unfortunately it is not that common for
Windows to have GLES support, in which the easiest way to obtain such
support is via Google's libANGLE.
It turns out that the problem of the WGL window not drawing was due to
the fact that I messed up where I placed SwapBuffers() during the
conversion... doh:|
At the same time, stop storing the HDC in the GdkWin32GLContextWGL, but
instead always create it along the surface we created, so that it is ready
for use for operating with WGL when we are not dealing with "surfaceless"
contexts. If we are dealing with "surfaceless" contexts, just use the
HDC of the dummy window that we created when we created the
Gdk(Win32)Display.
WGL contexts should now be in working order at this point.
This commit attempts to split GdkWin32GLContext into two parts, one for
WGL and the other for EGL (ANGLE), and attempts to simplify things a
bit, by:
* We are already creating a Win32 window to capture display changes,
so we can just use that to act as our dummy window that we use to
find out the pixel format that the system supports for WGL. We also
use it to obtain the dummy legacy WGL context that we will always
require to create our more advanced Core WGL contexts.
* Like what is done in X11, store up the WGL pixel format or the
EGLConfig in our GdkWin32Display.
* Ensure we do not create the dummy WGL context unnecessarily.
In this way, we can successfully create the WGL/EGL contexts, however
there are some issues at this point:
* For WGL, the code successfully initializes and realizes the WGL
Contexts, but for some reason things became invisible. When running
gtk4-demo, this can be verified by seeing the mouse cursor changing
when moved to spots where one can resize the window, although they
were invisible.
* For EGL, the code initializes EGL but could not realize the EGL
context as shaders failed to compile. It seems like the shader issue
is definitely outside the scope of this MR.
nvidia sets the default draw buffer to GL_NONE if EGL contexts are
initially bound to EGL_NO_SURFACE which is exactly what we are doing. So
bind them to GL_BACK when drawing, as they should be.
See https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D118743 for a discussion
about EGL_NO_CONTEXT and draw buffers.
This way, one can force using WGL on Windows even if EGL support was
enabled. Also update the help text for gl-egl as it will apply for
Windows, albeit a bit later.
This has the benefit that we can refactor it and make sure we deal with
GdkDisplay::init_gl() not being called at all because
GDK_DEBUG=gl-disable had been specified.
It's not used there, but both backends have independent
immplementationgs for it.
I want to get rid of GdkGLContextX11 and moving code from it is the
first step.
Now that we have the display's context to hook into, we can use it to
construct other GL contexts and don't need a GdkSurface vfunc anymore.
This has the added benefit that backends can have different GdkGLContext
classes on the display and get new GLContexts generated from them, so
we get multiple GL backend support per GDK backend for free.
I originally wanted to make this a vfunc on GdkGLContextClass, but
it turns out all the abckends would just call g_object_new() anyway.
Instead of
Display::make_gl_context_current()
we now have
GLContext::clear_current()
GLContext::make_current()
This fits better with the backends (we can actually implement
clearCurrent on macOS now) and makes it easier to implement different GL
backends for backends (like EGL/GLX on X11).
We also pass a surfaceless boolean to make_current() so the calling code
can decide if a surface needs to be bound or not, because the backends
were all doing whatever, which was very counterproductive.
The code to create and manage a fake egl surface to bind to is
complex and completely untested because everyone seems to support this
extension.
nvidia and Mesa do support it and according to Mesa devs, adding support
in a new driver is rather simple and Mesa drivers gain that feature
automatically, so all future drivers shoould have it.
... or more exactly: Only use paint contexts with
gdk_cairo_draw_from_gl().
Instead of paint contexts being the only contexts who call swapBuffer(),
any context can be used for this, when it's used with
begin_frame()/end_frame().
This removes 2 features:
1. We no longer need a big sharing hierarchy. All contexts are now
shared with gdk_display_get_gl_context().
2. There is no longer a difference between attached and non-attached
contexts. All contexts work the same way.
Do not treat the context as already current when the value
of context::in-frame changes.
This is so we can bind to EGL_NO_SURFACE if context::in-frame == false
and to context::surface if context::in-frame == true.
This allows getting rid of the attached property in future commits.
The vfunc is called to initialize GL and it returns a "base" context
that GDK then uses as the context all others are shared with. So the GL
context share tree now looks like:
+ context from init_gl
- context1
- context2
...
So this is a flat tree now, the complexity is gone.
The only caveat is that backends now need to create a GL context when
initializing GL so some refactoring was needed.
Two new functions have been added:
* gdk_display_prepare_gl()
This is public API and can be used to ensure that GL has been
initialized or if not, retrieve an error to display (or debug-print).
* gdk_display_get_gl_context()
This is a private function to retrieve the base context from
init_gl(). It replaces gdk_surface_get_shared_data_context().
Create it during init and then reuse it for all contexts.
While doing that, also improve error reporting - that's not used yet but
will in later commits.
This is not used yet, but it allows surfaceless GL contexts.
For that purpose, we need to make the display a construct-only property,
so that it can be set when the surface isn't.
This adds a bunch of very picky checks in the constructor so nothing bad
can happen.
... and move some members from the GdkDisplay struct.
We've always wanted to add one to isolate the display from the backends
a bit more, but so far it's never happened.
Now that I'm about to add more data to GdkDisplay, it's a good excuse to
start.
We try EGL first, but are very picky about what we accept.
If that fails, we try to go with GLX instead.
And if that also fails, we try EGL again, but this time accept anything.
The idea here is that EGL is the preferred method going forward, but GLX is
the tried and tested method that we know works. So if we detect issues with
EGL, we want to avoid using it in favor of GLX.
Also add a GDK_DEBUG=gl-egl option to force EGL at all costs and not try
GLX.
That way, we can give a useful error message when things break down for
users.
These error messages could still be improved in places (like looking at
the actual EGL error codes), but that seemed overkill.
Query the EGL_VISUAL_ID from the egl Config and select a config with the
matching Visual.
This is currently broken on Mesa because it does not expose any RGBA
X Visuals in any EGL config, so we always end up with opaque Windows.
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/issues/149
This reverts commit c35a6725b9.
This approach doesn't work because if NVIDIA doesn't work for EGL, the
EGL implementation won't be provided by NVIDIA, so checking the vendor
doesn't work.
Instead, use the display's "leader surface" when no surface is required,
because we have it lying around.
Really, we want to use EGL_NO_SURFACE, but if that's not supported...
Instead of going via GdkVisual, doing a preselection and letting the GL
initialization improve it, let the GL initialization pick an X Visual
directly using X Visual code directly.
The code should select the same visuals as before as it tries to apply
the same logic, but it's a rewrite, so I expect I messed something up.
1. We're using EGL most of the time anyway, so if we wanted to cache
things, we'd need to port it there.
2. Our GL handling is massively configurable, so determining when to use
the cache and when not is a challenge.
3. It makes startup nondeterministic and depend on whether a GTK4 app
has previously been started on this display and nobody thinks about
that when debugging.
4. The only benefit of the caching is delaying GL initialization - which
made sense in GTK3 where almost no app used GL but doesn't make sense
in GTK4 where almost every app uses GL.
So unless I find a big benefit to reintroducing it, this cache will be
gone for good.
Avoids having to use private data, though the benefit is somewhat
limited as we still have to put the destructor in the egl code and can't
just put it in gdk_surface_x11_finalize().
We only have one config, because we use the same Visual everywhere.
Store this config in the GdkDisplayX11 struct for easy access.
Also do this on initialize, because if creating the config fails, we
want to switch to GLX instead of failing to do GL at all.
This also simplifies a lot of code as we can share Visual, Colormap, etc
across surfaces.
There's no need to use g_object_set_data() for it.
We can also stop caching it elsewhere because we know the display has
it.
And finally, we can remove the display->have_egl boolean and use
display->egl_display != NULL instead. We initialize the display at
startup, so that variable is the perfect indicator.
