The old code was ordering visuals by depth, but considering that these
days we either use the default visual or a 32bit RGBA visual, that
reordering does not have an effect anymore.
In theory, the only effect is that the GLX Visual selection might select
a different replacement Visual when it checks for improved GL Visuals, but
even there I can't come up with a case where that matters, because
again, the visuals are only reordered by depth and we want to keep the
depth.
In any case, make this a separate commit so bisecting can find this
problem if it ever shows up.
Instead of the display telling the screen to tell the visuals to tell
the display to initialize itself, just init the display directly.
What a concept.
That's a sneaky trick so my edit/compile/test cycle goes faster:
I usually use demos for testing so the tools don't have to be linked for
me to start testing.
If the pointer capability is added, pointer swipe and pinch gestures
will be created. However, if the pointer capability is removed, the
gesture objects won't be destroyed.
If the pointer capability is removed and added several times in a row,
for example due to plugging and unplugging physical mouse, this can lead
to leaking the old gesture objects.
In order to prevent that, this change makes the seat destroy swipe and
pinch gestures when the pointer capability is withdrawn.
It's only used during DND to allow use of the root window's cow window
as a DND target, because apparently gnome-shell used to think that was a
great idea to DND to the overview.
Somebody complain to gnome-shell devs about it not being a good idea if
they want it fixed.
Potentially using Wayland is a better idea though.
This reverts 85ae875dcb
Related: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=601731
It's not 2011 anymore, and we shouldn't randomly build one of 10.000
different combinations of X11 backends (I counted the possibilities) but
exactly the one we expect people to use.
Instead, ensure that sassc is made madatory on git builds (because
it is, we don't ship CSS files anymore) and not even looked for in
release builds (because do ship CSS files there).
We don't want people to build Vulkan support when they just want to get
GTK built.
This is in particular true for GTK as a CI subproject or for people
using jhbuild.
Worse, just having Vulkan support compiled in tends to cause crashes
in the Inspector, even if you are not using it.
GTK supports webm playback, which means a backend should always be
compiled.
The ffmpeg backend however is incomplete (no audio) and as such, we
don't want people to end up with it accidentally.
Since we don't want to drag an entire gstreamer build into our ci
on MacOs or msvc, explicitly disable the gstreame media backend there.
Set all settings to their default values, so we
are less dependent on the environment to be set
up just right. In particular, this fixes animations
being disabled when we happen to run in a vm.
Make _gdk_win32_display_get_monitor_scale_factor() less complex, by:
* Drop the preceding underscore.
* Dropping an unused parameter.
* Using a GdkSurface instead of a HWND, as the HWND that we pass into
this function might have been taken from a GdkSurface, which are now
always created with CS_OWNDC. This means if a GdkSurface was passed
in, we ensure that we only acquire the DC from the HWND once, and do
not attempt to call ReleaseDC() on it.
* Store the HDC that we acquire from the GdkSurface's HWND into the
surface, and use that as the HDC we need for our GdkGLContext.
* Drop the gl_hwnd from GdkWin32Display, as that is really should be
stored in the GdkSurface.
* For functions that were updated, name GdkWin32Display variables as
display_win32 and GdkSurface variables as surface, to unify things.
* Stop calling ReleaseDC() on the HDC that we use for OpenGL, since
they were acquired from HWND's created with CS_OWNDC.
Scale factors can be negative, but we were not
looking out for that, triggering an assertion when
trying to create a render target with negative
width of height. Avoid that.
Fixes: #4096
Eliding totally transparent content from the node tree is
not 100% correct, since filters can make things visible, so
we need to at least preserve the bounds. We can do that by
creating a transparent color node.
