The common GDK code accounts for "pointer emulating" touch sequences to be
synchronized with the pointer position by the windowing system.
However on Wayland pointer and touch are completely independent, the backend
attempts to implement pointer emulation, but doesn't account for the
possible crossing events happening when the user switches from pointer to
touch or the opposite.
In order to fix this, and to ensure we don't have to interact with the
master pointer (which backs the wl_pointer), separate the touch interface
to have its own master pointer, and ensure crossing events are emitted on
it, so the picture of an "emulated pointer" is complete above the backend.
Inspired in a former patch by Jonny Lamb <jonnylamb@gnome.org>
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=750845
The window button setup depends on properties of the toplevel window.
Instead of updating the setup on realize, do it when the toplevel
changes.
This makes sure that when a GtkHeaderBar is added to a window
all the widgets are present and get_preferred_height() will return
the height the widget will have when finally shown. This allows
the logic in gtkwindow to select the right window size so that
the content size will match the requested default size.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=756618
Before the resulting window size would differ if the default size was set
before adding a headerbar vs after. Now the saved state is again the actual
requested size and it is adjusted at the time we request a window size.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=756618
GtkHeaderBar will not show the maximize button if the window in not of
type normal or not resizeable.
Use the same restriction for double-click actions as well.
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=757530
Currently GtkStack has some G_PARAM_CONSTRUCT properties. That means,
the properties are set with its default value after the initializacion
of the object.
When using GtkBuilder to build objects, GtkBuilder creates them and
after that sets the properties found on the xml definition.
However, this is not true for templates because the template is initialized
in the init() function of the actual object, and after that, the construct
properties will be set.
This is a problem when someone wants to use templates with GtkStack and
set those properties, since they will be set on the tempalt initialization
and set again to its default values afterwards.
To fix this, make those properties not G_PARAM_CONSTRUCT.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=758086
There is no GNU Lesser General Public License version 2; it's either GNU
Library General Public License version 2, or GNU Lesser General Public
License version 2.1.
Copy-pasta from GPL instead of LGPL.
Also, there is no GNU Lesser General Public License version 2; either
it's the GNU Library General Public License version 2, or it's the GNU
Lesser General Public License version 2.1.
If the window has not yet been created, then we can't set the invisible
cursor yet. This can happen in situations where the widget is in a
revealer with type-to-search functionality.
An application may use gtk_window_get_size() to retrieve the current
window size and later reuse that size with
gtk_window_set_default_size().
gtk_window_set_default_size() and gtk_window_get_default_size() should
also take client side decorations offset into account.
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=756618
We were using that range for the extra buttons after left/right/middle,
while this is harmless for clients not handling extra buttons (we
used to translate those button events into scroll events in x11 anyway)
this will be unexpected for clients that do handle additional mouse
buttons themselves (eg. back/forward buttons present in some mice).
In order to remain compatible with X11, those need to be assigned from
button 8 onwards.
Also, include input.h, and stop using magic numbers here.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=758072
Commit 1266d15c4 also broke Xwayland, as it does the same trick
than VMWare pointers. Let's extend the heuristic to check for "pointer"
in the device name, what can possibly go wrong...
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=757358
We currently just look for a master device with input source MOUSE.
After recent changes to the way input devices are classified, xwayland
on my system comes up with a virtual core pointer that has input
source TOUCHSCREEN. This was causing assertion failures. Be a little
more careful and accept a touchscreen as core pointer, if there is
no mouse.
Use G_PARAM_DEPRECATED with deprecated style properties.
This will make it easier to identify and remove such stale
properties from css, since it will now trigger warnings.
When loading a nonexisting CSS file using
gtk_css_provider_load_from_file() or gtk_css_provider_load_from_path()
we would emit the error using a NULL scanner. Don't do that, because
we'll have a NULL section in that case and error handlers don't like
that.
Testcase attached.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277959
