The border and icon highlight are useful feedback that was defeated by
CSS precedence. It worked for .titlebuttons due to their implementation,
but the same was not true for custom .flat buttons. This makes it so.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=788580
When the window was backdropped, they suddenly regained their border.
This was clearly not intentional or of any practical use to anyone.
Shuffle around some selectors so that the backdrop ones do not override
the flat ones and make the borders magically reappear when backdropped.
Note that, whereas standard titlebuttons get the border on :hover, other
.flat buttons in the headerbar do not. That should probably be fixed too
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=788580
…from priv->button. My refactor to g_signal_disconnect_by_data()
included this widget, when I shouldn’t have as both modes use it.
This e.g. broke opening a CB by keyboard that was currently in menu
mode, if it had been in list mode initially (e.g. due to the theme).
Fix by moving to disconnect_by_func() and only removing in each mode’s
destroy() method the signals that it set on the button in its setup().
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=788577
They were hard-coded to a transparent black, but that is our bg colour
in HC Inverse, so windows stacked on top of each other or a dark
background blended together into a mush.
Fix this by making the $_wm_border* colours relative to the fg colour,
so that HighContrastInverse gets borders that are transparentised white.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=788575
A missing decoration selector meant that we got a solid black background
behind the rounded corners of the dialog.
Copy the equivalent code from Adwaita, including nicely rounding the
focus outline too (& sorry, but this needs more newlines to be readable)
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=788574
by migrating the relevant code from Adwaita, to dodge unwanted doubling
up of the bottom border and such.
It also hopefully still encompasses whatever commit
b4371728de was trying to do; certainly, it
retains the resolution of the main bug/patch that one was attached with.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=769877
There were various problems, like only selecting on .tooltip and not the
widget node tooltip, not being specific enough for tooltip.csd, etc. So,
specific theming was absent, and default popup window styles got applied
This commit copies in the better working tooltip CSS from Adwaita, but
applies a couple of changes to make it work better in the HC themes:
• Reduce the transparency of the tooltip, so we achieve higher contrast
• Drop the black text-shadow, as it is not useful on this more black bg
Note: we may then need to re-add some of this to the .tooltip class. But
it is unclear what needs done there. While Adwaita is not doing it, we
are better not to confuse by keeping it in HC only; we should try to be
as close as possible, to make it easier for HC to keep up with Adwaita.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=769879
We need
.window-classes decoration
but within the decoration parent selector, we were doing
&.window-classes, which gave us
decoration.window classes
We need to fix this by selecting on .window-classes &
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=788496
n_attach_points is the result of g_strv_length(): the index at which the
string vector ends in NULL. So by definition, when i == n_attach_points,
string[i] == NULL, and there is no need to check for the latter. The
fact that we did appears to confuse static analysers, as the dereference
and index check were inverted from what would normally be safe. We could
reverse them, but we may as well just remove the unnecessary NULL check.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=788458
This gives consistent behavior with e.g. Qt, Mozilla's suites and
LibreOffice (with non-truly native backends like "gen" and "gtk",
but unlike "gtk2" and "gtk3" ones that probably use true GTK menus).
This behavior is expected by at least some accessibility users, and
it seems good to behave like other common applications and toolkits
in this area. There should be no issue in doing so either for current
users, as it only enters the submenu instead of not doing anything.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=778811
This reverts commit 1301723905.
This only appeared to fix the two bugs it linked because, rather than
being superfluous, the GTK+ grabs resulted in effectively having *none*,
or something, and could cause a critical when closing during a scroll.
This also reverts commit b9989e554b, which
depended on the above.
See next commit, which *should* properly fix what this one claimed to…
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=787274
On clicking release, we call TreeView.get_path_at_pos() &, if we hit a
row, select it (if sensitive) & close the popup. But this alone does
not account for clicks on the expanders within the TreeView, so in
addition to expanding/collapsing, clicking them would close the list.
Check if the click is in the cell_area() & thus “excluding surrounding
borders and the tree expander area” but still including the background
(which TreeView.is_blank_at_pos() doesn’t); if TRUE, don’t select/close.
The popup doesn’t always resize enough… so there’s still breakage here.
The XXX comment on TreeView requests in list_position() may be relevant
to this. But at least this drags such CBs one step closer to adequacy:
expanding by mouse now works ~no worse~ than by keyboard already did.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=788505
Commit c415bef5de introduced support for the new _GTK_EDGE_CONSTRAINTS
atom. If the compositor supports that atom, however, we were always
setting the tiled state, even if no actual tiling information is
available, where the correct action is to completely remove any traces
of the tiled state.
Fix that by correctly removing the tiled state when compositor supports
_GTK_EDGE_CONSTRAINTS Xatom.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=788516
Ditch two items that were white and so weren’t visible on our standard
theme anyway, and use the new space to test extra grid-mode properties.
Note that if we do this then, as before, we set the ListStore on the
ComboBox before appending to it, that produced runtime warnings like:
Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_menu_attach: assertion 'left_attach < right_attach' failed
I didn’t look into that yet, but it may indicate that attaching items
vs. recognising their spans don’t occur in the correct order. For the
purposes of testing this, I just create the CB after filling its model.
ComboBox and TreeMenu warned in the doc for :row-span-column that the
value must not exceed :wrap-width, but :wrap-width does not interact
with the number of rows; it’s the :column-span-column that’s relevant.
Also: Warn that spans must be > 0 for rows too, and that column spans <=
:wrap-width are also not useful for items at menu column positions > 0.
Finally, refer to items having spans, not values, as we were already
talking about values in the model (and rows in the menu).
The last touch on this patch series is making GtkWindow able to
selectively adjust various UI details based on the different
tiled edges. The main driver here is that we don't want to show
shadows on edges that are constrained.
This patch adds the necessary code to do that, while still
maintaining compatibility with the old ways.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=783669
Following the previous patch, where edge constraints support
was added to the Wayland backend, this patch introduces the
necessary code to handle the _GTK_EDGE_CONSTRAINTS atom from
X11 backend.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=783669
Now that GTK windows have the ability to properly handle
per-edge tiling constraints, this patch extends GTK's
internal Wayland protocol to have a proper enum with the
relevant edge data.
Once this approach is validated, we can think of upstreaming
this work as an official Wayland protocol extension.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=783669
GTK windows don't have their tiling states really
hooked into the client-side decoration code, and
the only effect it has is disabling the resizing
edges.
With the introduction of per-edge tiling information,
we are backed by much more precise data on how the
window manager wants the app to behave.
This patch, then, fixes GtkWindow to take into account
per-edge tiling information. For compatibility purposes,
the previous tiled field was kept, and thing will just
continue working if no edge information is supplied.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=783669
These states will be consumed by GtkWindow in order to
have better edge management on tiling situations. Their
values are supplied by the compositor, and will be send
through and X11 Atom or a Wayland protocol extension.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=783669
This reverts commit 15a3747406.
There is a way to get different kinds of borders: it's CSS. It's better
to keep the 4 Frames and demo the different styles we can do using CSS.
The GtkFlowBoxCreateWidgetFunc type lacked GObject Introspection
annotations for its arguments. This made gtk_flow_box_bind_model()
unusable from Python as the callback function would be passed useless
values.
The annotations that I've added match those of the similar callback
type GtkListBoxCreateWidgetFunc.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=780758
