If you're on a Unix platform which don't have the necessary defines then
the thread will never be launched due to an error. Skip the test
instead.
Change-Id: I83159988b8f330a750c7aa328a8805e4fa478070
Reviewed-by: Eskil Abrahamsen Blomfeldt <eskil.abrahamsen-blomfeldt@qt.io>
This only enables compilation, it doesn't fix any test.
Qt on Android supports process, but not TEST_HELPER_INSTALLS. See also
acdd57cb for winrt.
android-ndk-r10e is used to compile, see
http://doc-snapshots.qt.io/qt5-5.11/androidgs.html .
corelib/io/{qdir,qresourceengine} need to be fixed later.
Done-with: Frederik Gladhorn <frederik.gladhorn@qt.io>
Done-with: Mårten Nordheim <marten.nordheim@qt.io>
Change-Id: I34b924c8ae5d46d6835b8f0a6606450920f4423b
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Frederik Gladhorn <frederik.gladhorn@qt.io>
"terminate" and "terminated" both fail on Android since
QThread::terminate not supported on Android. So we should skip them.
Task-number: QTBUG-68596
Change-Id: Id0d1dde2cfa02bb2978e5dd16087bf8f3bf112b0
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
This was originally added so that you could replace a T with
QAtomicInteger<T> in the same class and still keep ABI. However, for
legacy reasons, on 32-bit x86, types larger than 4 bytes keep an old
1990s alignment of only 4 bytes, but modern std::atomic<T> for those 8-
byte types enforces an alignment of 8 bytes. Therefore, the requirement
to keep alignment is not possible to guarantee.
In other words: you may not replace T with QAtomicInteger<T> or
std::atomic<T> and assume no ABI breakages in all platforms.
This is a requirement to implement atomicity. An 8-byte type aligned to
only a 4-byte boundary could cross a 16-byte boundary or, worse, cross a
cacheline boundary. Crossing the 16-byte boundary could be bad on some
processors, but crossing the cacheline boundary (addresses ending in
0x3C, 0x7C, 0xCC and 0xFC, or 4 out of 64 possible addresses or 6.25%)
is always bad: the CPUs cannot guarantee an atomic load or store
operation.
See also <https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71660>.
Task-number: QTBUG-67858
Change-Id: If90a92b041d3442fa0a4fffd15283e4615474582
Reviewed-by: Frederik Gladhorn <frederik.gladhorn@qt.io>
These two places were sort of manually implementing QTRY_VERIFY except that they
never time out.
Change-Id: I136e6c7400194327c0475c6acfc019825ccec1b5
Reviewed-by: Friedemann Kleint <Friedemann.Kleint@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Olivier Goffart (Woboq GmbH) <ogoffart@woboq.com>
Reviewed-by: Sami Nurmenniemi <sami.nurmenniemi@qt.io>
Use QSignalSpy::wait or QTRY_VERIFY instead. This shaved off ~200 ms of the
running time of the test and is more reliable.
Some unconditional qWait()s still remain in this test. They are giving an
opportunity for the wrong thing to happen and thus are not waiting for any
specific condition to be fulfilled.
Task-number: QTBUG-63992
Change-Id: I25a4470fe8d6a5b8b5039b3ed77321d24faa1707
Reviewed-by: Morten Johan Sørvig <morten.sorvig@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Sami Nurmenniemi <sami.nurmenniemi@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Edward Welbourne <edward.welbourne@qt.io>
When the thread that got woken up by release() is supposed to release()
to wake up another thread, we were deadlocking. This happened because we
cleared the bit indicating that there was contention when the first
release(). Instead of storing a single bit, we now store the number of
threads waiting.
Task-number: QTBUG-66875
Change-Id: I72f5230ad59948f784eafffd15193873502ecba4
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@qt.io>
Also drops a few instances where the dependency was purely runtime,
especially for examples.
Change-Id: I2a0476f79928143596bdb3b8f01193af90574ae8
Reviewed-by: Oswald Buddenhagen <oswald.buddenhagen@qt.io>
This test makes sure that we do not introduce a regression where the
threads exited the inner loop over the queue before the queue was
empty. This was triggered by calling tryTake at least maxThreadCount
times, which left the same number of null pointers in the queue
and caused the inner loop to exit too soon for all the threads.
Change-Id: I3a9d800149b88d09510ddc424667670b60f06a33
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@qt.io>
The issue was introduced by eaee1209f0, so
it affected only 5.9.2.
[ChangeLog][QtCore][QSemaphore] Fixed a regression that would make
tryAcquire() not to wait forever if the timeout was a negative
value. Note: new code is advised to only use -1 to indicate "forever",
as some other functions taking timeout periods do not accept other
values.
Task-number: QTBUG-64413
Change-Id: I57a1bd6e0c194530b732fffd14f58fce60d5dfc9
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@qt.io>
The vast majority is actually switched to QRandomGenerator::bounded(),
which gives a mostly uniform distribution over the [0, bound)
range. There are very few floating point cases left, as many of those
that did use floating point did not need to, after all. (I did leave
some that were too ugly for me to understand)
This commit also found a couple of calls to rand() instead of qrand().
This commit does not include changes to SSL code that continues to use
qrand() (job for someone else):
src/network/ssl/qsslkey_qt.cpp
src/network/ssl/qsslsocket_mac.cpp
tests/auto/network/ssl/qsslsocket/tst_qsslsocket.cpp
Change-Id: Icd0e0d4b27cb4e5eb892fffd14b5285d43f4afbf
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@qt.io>
<future> is needed by QThread::create. Instead of a fragile series
of preprocessor tests, move its detection to a configure test.
This dramatically simplifies the code, but on the other hand ties
the availability of QThread::create() to the system used to compile
Qt (rather the one used to compile an application).
Change-Id: If1b06363379bf29126cfa68f2a0651cbb78a67f7
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
When many runnables are executed, this improves the
performance by not resizing the queue for each runnable,
which was the case in the previous version, because of
many calls to QVector::takeFirst().
Also add a test that makes sure tryTake() is safe to
call and does not leave the queue in a bad state that
tries to use nullptr entries.
Change-Id: I608134ecfa9cfc03db4878dcbd6f9c1107e13e90
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@qt.io>
Remaining uses of Q_NULLPTR are in:
src/corelib/global/qcompilerdetection.h
(definition and documentation of Q_NULLPTR)
tests/manual/qcursor/qcursorhighdpi/main.cpp
(a test executable compilable both under Qt4 and Qt5)
Change-Id: If6b074d91486e9b784138f4514f5c6d072acda9a
Reviewed-by: Ville Voutilainen <ville.voutilainen@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Olivier Goffart (Woboq GmbH) <ogoffart@woboq.com>
Remaining uses of Q_DECL_OVERRIDE are in:
src/corelib/global/qcompilerdetection.h
src/corelib/global/qglobal.cpp
doc/global/qt-cpp-defines.qdocconf
(definition and documentation of Q_DECL_OVERRIDE)
tests/manual/qcursor/qcursorhighdpi/main.cpp
(a test executable compilable both under Qt4 and Qt5)
Change-Id: Ib9b05d829add69e98a86238274b6a1fcb19b49ba
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Ville Voutilainen <ville.voutilainen@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Olivier Goffart (Woboq GmbH) <ogoffart@woboq.com>
Since MSVC doesn't have <chrono> (according to QT_HAS_INCLUDE), the QSKIP
in the test was printed for every line in the table. Instead, add the
skip in the _data() function.
Change-Id: I6e9274c1e7444ad48c81fffd14dbcee5e5a322aa
Reviewed-by: Mårten Nordheim <marten.nordheim@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Olivier Goffart (Woboq GmbH) <ogoffart@woboq.com>
Allows setting the stack size for the thread pool
worker threads. Implemented using QThread::stackSize.
Task-number: QTBUG-2568
Change-Id: Ic7f3981289290685195bbaee977a23e0c3c49bf0
Reviewed-by: Morten Johan Sørvig <morten.sorvig@qt.io>
Qemu uses some memory for each generated thread. This test creates
> 80000 threads and consumes about 10Gb of memory which is too
heavy for a VM.
Task-number: QTBUG-59966
Change-Id: I1bb8a0d7955778f5201948b41befcb9f1f391514
Reviewed-by: Simon Hausmann <simon.hausmann@qt.io>
tryAcquireWithTimeout(0.2s) was already blacklisted and
now the same failed with "(2s)".
Task-number: QTBUG-58745
Change-Id: I82363238c08056d2969a7616e3a6e5af080d537d
Reviewed-by: Liang Qi <liang.qi@qt.io>
In the spirit of std::thread, which takes a function to call and its
parameters, and runs it in a new thread. Since the user might want to
connect to signals, move QObjects into the new thread, etc., the new
thread is not immediately started.
Although technically all of this _should_ be implementable in pure
C++11, there is nothing in the Standard to help us not reinvent all the
plumbing: packing the decay'd parameters, storing them, invoking the
function over the parameters (honoring INVOKE/std::invoke semantics).
std::function does not do the job, as it's copiable and therefore does
not support move-only functors; std::bind does not have INVOKE
semantics.
I certainly do not want to reimplement all the required facilities
inside of Qt. Therefore, the full blown implementation requires C++17
(std::invoke).
In order to make this useful also in pre-C++17, there are two additional
implementations (C++11 and C++14) that support just a callable, without
any arguments passed to it. The C++11 implementation makes use of a
class to store and call the callable (even move-only ones); basically,
it's what a closure type for a C++14 lambda would look like.
An alternative implementation could've used some of the existing
facilities inside QObject::connect implementation that store a functor
(for the connect() overload connecting to free functions), namely:
the QtPrivate::QFunctorSlotObject class. However:
* QFunctorSlotObject does not support move-only callables (see
QTBUG-60339);
* QFunctorSlotObject itself is not a callable (apparently by design),
and requires to be wrapped in a lambda that calls call() on it;
* the moment QTBUG-60339 is solved, we'd need the same handwritten
closure to keep QFunctorSlotObject working with move-only callabes.
So: just use the handwritten one.
The C++14 implementation is a simplified version of the C++11 one,
actually using a generalized lambda capture (corresponding to the
handwritten C++11 closure type).
All three implementations use std::async (with a deferred launch policy,
a nice use case for it!) under the hood. It's certainly an overkill for
our use case, as we don't need the std::future, but at least std::async
does all the plumbing for us.
[ChangeLog][QtCore][QThread] Added the QThread::create function.
Change-Id: I339d0be6f689df7d56766839baebda0aa2f7e94c
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
If the respective modules aren't available we cannot build the tests
and examples. We drop the qtConfig(opengl) requirement for the opengl
examples as
a, we would need to make the QtGui configuration available for that to
work, and
b, we should not add too much detail to the tests and examples build
configurations. Checking each test and example for every feature it
uses would be too much.
Task-number: QTBUG-57255
Change-Id: Ifb043c81ec9e5c487765297bd65704812cd281fc
Reviewed-by: Oswald Buddenhagen <oswald.buddenhagen@qt.io>
It has started failing recently on the CI, too.
Task-number: QTBUG-58745
Change-Id: I4c8834917e6455d00c300549ed448b06da75d5bc
Reviewed-by: Rafael Roquetto <rafael.roquetto@kdab.com>
Let's take the beginning of the description: WaitForSingleObjectEx can
be up to 16 milliseconds early. This is proven by the fact that there
are tests doing:
wait(waitTime);
QVERIFY(timer.elapsed() >= waitTime - systemTimersResolution);
and failing.
Task-number: QTBUG-59337
Change-Id: Iae839f6a131a4f0784bffffd14a9a79523d69d94
Reviewed-by: Olivier Goffart (Woboq GmbH) <ogoffart@woboq.com>
ResultStore never actually exists, only ResutStoreBase does. So casting to
ResultStore<T> and calling its member functions is UB. Put the type dependent
function as template member functions within ResultStoreBase and so we don't
need QtPrivate::ResultStore anymore.
Same goes for the iterator.
Change-Id: I739b9d234ba2238977863df77fde3a4471a9abd2
Reviewed-by: Marc Mutz <marc.mutz@kdab.com>
Replace all QT_NO_PROCESS with QT_CONFIG(process), define it in
qconfig-bootstrapped.h, add QT_REQUIRE_CONFIG(process) to the qprocess
headers, exclude the sources from compilation when switched off, guard
header inclusions in places where compilation without QProcess seems
supported, drop some unused includes, and fix some tests that were
apparently designed to work with QT_NO_PROCESS but failed to.
Change-Id: Ieceea2504dea6fdf43b81c7c6b65c547b01b9714
Reviewed-by: Oswald Buddenhagen <oswald.buddenhagen@qt.io>
The cancel() function added in 5b11e43e for Qt 5.5 suffers from a
number of problems:
First, if runnable->autoDelete() is true, then the function suffers
from the ABA problem (see documentation written for trytake()).
Second, if runnable->autoDelete() is false, due to cancel() throwing
away crucial information instead of returning it, the caller cannot
know whether the runnable was canceled (and thus has to be deleted),
wasn't found or is currently executing (and thus mustn't be deleted),
or has finished executing (and can be used to extract the result).
Deprecate this dangerous API and replace it with the much more useful
Private::stealRunnable(), promoted to public API and renamed to
tryTake() for consistency with the rest of Qt.
Described the various caveats in the function's documentation.
[ChangeLog][QtCore][QThreadPool] The cancel() function suffers from
several subtle issues and has been replaced with a new tryTake()
function.
Change-Id: I93125935614087efa24b3e3969dd6718aeabaa4f
Reviewed-by: Edward Welbourne <edward.welbourne@qt.io>
We keep the runnables from finishing by having them block
on a QSemaphore::acquire() call inside run().
If we fail a test that precedes the call to sem.release()
further into the test, the early return will cause the
thread pool to be destroyed, which will then attempt to
wait for the runnables to finished, which, in turn wait
for the semaphore to be released.
-> dead lock
Fix by introducing a RAII object to release the semaphore
with a sufficiently large number to unblock all runnables.
That number will in some situations be too large, but that
does not matter.
Change-Id: I1ec7e29b37bc36309e93e6e30708cc7db3c9579c
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
