This is in preparation for GrTextureContext and GrSurfaceContext
BUG=skia:
GOLD_TRYBOT_URL= https://gold.skia.org/search?issue=4030
Change-Id: Ie58c93052e68f3f1f5fe8d15d63760de274a6fbd
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/4030
Commit-Queue: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Salomon <bsalomon@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Phillips <robertphillips@google.com>
'static const' means, there must be at most one of these, and initialize it at
compile time if possible or runtime if necessary. This leads to unexpected
code execution, and TSAN* will complain about races on the guard variables.
Generally 'constexpr' or 'const' are better choices. Neither can cause races:
they're either intialized at compile time (constexpr) or intialized each time
independently (const).
This CL prefers constexpr where possible, and uses const where not. It even
prefers constexpr over const where they don't make a difference... I want to have
lots of examples of constexpr for people to see and mimic.
The scoped-to-class static has nothing to do with any of this, and is not changed.
* Not yet on the bots, which use an older TSAN.
BUG=skia:
GOLD_TRYBOT_URL= https://gold.skia.org/search?issue=2300623005
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2300623005
This shouldn't really make any difference but allocating and holding on to a GrRenderTarget for each test target generates image differences for Mali GPUs. This CL allows an existing render target to be used for the test target.
TBR=bsalomon@google.com
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1447113002
I have verified locally that nothing draws differently.
Motivation:
* SK_SIMPLE_GM makes it easier to write a GM.
* Reducing 1100 lines of code makes maintenance easier.
* Simple GMs are easy to convert to Fiddles.
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1333553002
This change is motivated by a recent switch in how chromium handles
<video> color spaces, making rec709 more commonly used. This will
allow video -> canvas copies to take the fast GPU path when we're using
709, just as we do with 601 and jpeg.
Chromium-side change: https://codereview.chromium.org/1236313002
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1241723005
There was a scaling mistake visible in some JPEG images because the ratio between Y, U and V planes were assumed to be the same ratios as the ratio between texture sizes, which was wrong because texture have a minimum size of 16 and are rounded up to the next POT. Since the ratios between Y and UV planes are generally 1, 2 or 4, rounding up to the next POT would generally preserve this ratio, so that this bug was not very visible, apart from very small jpeg images of 8 or less pixels in either width or height.
BUG=457954
Committed: https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/e6eddf7dd85add7da41f22f2643bdd573ad1f1cf
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/922273002
Reason for revert:
Turning Windows compile bots red.
Original issue's description:
> YUV scale fix
>
> There was a scaling mistake visible in some JPEG images because the ratio between Y, U and V planes were assumed to be the same ratios as the ratio between texture sizes, which was wrong because texture have a minimum size of 16 and are rounded up to the next POT. Since the ratios between Y and UV planes are generally 1, 2 or 4, rounding up to the next POT would generally preserve this ratio, so that this bug was not very visible, apart from very small jpeg images of 8 or less pixels in either width or height.
>
> BUG=457954
>
> Committed: https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/e6eddf7dd85add7da41f22f2643bdd573ad1f1cfTBR=bsalomon@google.com,sugoi@chromium.org
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=457954
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/926123002
There was a scaling mistake visible in some JPEG images because the ratio between Y, U and V planes were assumed to be the same ratios as the ratio between texture sizes, which was wrong because texture have a minimum size of 16 and are rounded up to the next POT. Since the ratios between Y and UV planes are generally 1, 2 or 4, rounding up to the next POT would generally preserve this ratio, so that this bug was not very visible, apart from very small jpeg images of 8 or less pixels in either width or height.
BUG=457954
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/922273002
This fixes every case where virtual and SK_OVERRIDE were on the same line,
which should be the bulk of cases. We'll have to manually clean up the rest
over time unless I level up in regexes.
for f in (find . -type f); perl -p -i -e 's/virtual (.*)SK_OVERRIDE/\1SK_OVERRIDE/g' $f; end
BUG=skia:
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/806653007
In addition, NVPR makes this very complicated, and I haven't quite figured out a good way to handle it, so for now color and coverage DO live on optstate, but I will figure out some way to refactor that in future CLs.
BUG=skia:
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/783763002
This is a first piece of the GPU YUV decoder, which is the actual effect that performs the conversion. For now, it simply applies the conversion matrix, since it is all I need. I may add modes if different matrices need to be applied or if I add color profile support here.
I'll try to keep these cls short and easy to review, but there should be a few of them coming once this one is in.
BUG=skia:
R=senorblanco@chromium.org, senorblanco@google.com, reed@google.com, bsalomon@google.com
Author: sugoi@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/378503006
