in a non-test (ie, value or effect) context. (It is implicitly not in
a test context because the code generator does not support expressions
in a test context yet.)
Compilation is essentially the same as in the optimized code
generator. The expression (e0 || e1) is compiled as if it were
(let (temp = e0) temp ? temp : e1).
On ia32 and x64 a single shared ToBoolean stub is used to convert a
value to a flag. The inlined checks assumed by the stub are reordered
to compare to undefined (the common case in toplevel code?) first. On
ARM a call to the runtime is used. In the interest of code size no
checks are yet inlined on ARM.
Review URL: http://codereview.chromium.org/334006
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@3118 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
fast code generator is optimized for compilation time and code size.
Currently it is only implemented on IA32. It is potentially triggered
for any code in the global scope (including code eval'd in the global
scope). It performs a syntactic check and chooses to compile in fast
mode if the AST contains only supported constructs and matches some
other constraints.
Initially supported constructs are
* ExpressionStatement,
* ReturnStatement,
* VariableProxy (variable references) to parameters and
stack-allocated locals,
* Assignment with lhs a parameter or stack-allocated local, and
* Literal
This allows compilation of literals at the top level and not much
else.
All intermediate values are allocated to temporaries and the stack is
used for all temporaries. The extra memory traffic is a known issue.
The code generated for 'true' is:
0 push ebp
1 mov ebp,esp
3 push esi
4 push edi
5 push 0xf5cca135 ;; object: 0xf5cca135 <undefined>
10 cmp esp,[0x8277efc]
16 jnc 27 (0xf5cbbb1b)
22 call 0xf5cac960 ;; code: STUB, StackCheck, minor: 0
27 push 0xf5cca161 ;; object: 0xf5cca161 <true>
32 mov eax,[esp]
35 mov [ebp+0xf4],eax
38 pop eax
39 mov eax,[ebp+0xf4]
42 mov esp,ebp ;; js return
44 pop ebp
45 ret 0x4
48 mov eax,0xf5cca135 ;; object: 0xf5cca135 <undefined>
53 mov esp,ebp ;; js return
55 pop ebp
56 ret 0x4
Review URL: http://codereview.chromium.org/273050
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@3067 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
while, and for loops.
Previously they were distinguished by a type field, which required
runtime asserts to avoid invalid nodes (since not all loop types have
the same internal structure). Now they C++ type system is used to
require well-formed loop ASTs.
Because they do not share compilation code, we had very large
functions in the code generators that merely did a runtime dispatch to
a specific implementation based on the type.
Review URL: http://codereview.chromium.org/269049
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@3048 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
snapshot creation in a better way.
Encode whether or not the stub should use sse3 instructions in the
minor key of the stub. The stubs generated during snapshot creation
will have sse3 disabled, but they will not be found when sse3 is
enabled. Therefore they will only affect the code generated as part
of the snapshot.
Review URL: http://codereview.chromium.org/172086
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@2705 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
This issue was raised by Brett Wilson while reviewing my changelist for readability. Craig Silverstein (one of C++ SG maintainers) confirmed that we should declare one namespace per line. Our way of namespaces closing seems not violating style guides (there is no clear agreement on it), so I left it intact.
Review URL: http://codereview.chromium.org/115756
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@2038 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00