For TypedArray, a fast path is used when using the builtin iterator, and
next method has not been overriden. If we use that fast path for JSArray
too, the method will be about 200x times faster on a large array.
This patch also fixes a bug when a typed array is modified during the
mapper execution. In that case, the modification should not be taken
into account.
Bug: v8:10802
Change-Id: I74e2cbcd6a654def318585b4e08745037584669a
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2358749
Commit-Queue: Arnaud Renevier <arenevier@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: Igor Sheludko <ishell@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Shu-yu Guo <syg@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69655}
With a recent change, we require WebAssembly code to be tiered up to
serialize it, see https://crrev.com/c/2349290. In that CL tests were
adjusted to set the --wasm-tier-up flag when serialization was involved.
However, the test adjusted in this CL was missing, because this test
used the kExprRefNull instruction, which caused a bailout to TurboFan
anyways. With recent changes, Liftoff can compile kExprRefNull now,
and therefore causes problems.
R=thibaudm@chromium.org
Bug: v8:10852
Change-Id: I9b89f37c22f17cbf046110f3ee1c98bfea73e009
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2387574
Reviewed-by: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69648}
The generic wrapper can be used for Wasm functions with int32 parameters
and no return values.
Changed the GC scanning for the generic wrapper.
Added tests for cases when all the parameters of the Wasm function fit
into registers and when some of the parameters are on the top of the
stack.
Change-Id: I511fd04d2a4a2bdc4a6f72d72e2867a03b256f6f
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2381459
Reviewed-by: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Eva Herencsárová <evih@google.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69645}
This regression test does not work on MIPS without SIMD since the scalar
lowering is not complete yet. Skip it for now.
Bug: v8:10831
Change-Id: Icc407488a96d4c965c1cf956f7a74abde078d421
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2385855
Reviewed-by: Bill Budge <bbudge@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69626}
This CL adds support for disjunctions and some quantification in
EXPERIMENTAL regexp patterns. It is implemented using a new bytecode
format and an NFA-based breadth-first interpreter.
R=jgruber@chromium.org
Bug: v8:10765
Change-Id: Idd49a3bbc9a9fcc2be80d822c9d84a638e53e777
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2370634
Commit-Queue: Martin Bidlingmaier <mbid@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Dominik Inführ <dinfuehr@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69621}
The graph assembler calls MergeControlToEnd as part of Unreachable
node creation; this causes issues when used inside the GraphReducer
framework, since the reducer is not notified by gasm that the end node
should be revisited.
The (hacky) fix in this CL is to always mark the end node for
revisitation after a gasm reduction has taken place.
Bug: v8:8888,chromium:1123379
Change-Id: I350bb7144add04a0c3fd7f3d88c07fcfe1cd42e3
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2384772
Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Auto-Submit: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69619}
A recent unrelated change caused these tests to get unlucky in
GC stress mode. Their "assertOptimized" expectations rely on
certain type feedback data not getting flushed at the wrong time.
Bug: v8:10846
Change-Id: I86d0b0c049539e4a69aa764cc6ec92465ca12beb
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2381458
Reviewed-by: Maya Lekova <mslekova@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Maya Lekova <mslekova@chromium.org>
Auto-Submit: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69617}
For SIMD instructions that use aligned moves (like movaps or movapd), we
don't have correct memory alignment for SIMD moves yet. Switch to to
movupd.
Bug: v8:9198
Bug: v8:10831
Change-Id: Ic60fba5d08dda9676f6091ce505ac7be54957d00
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2380240
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Bill Budge <bbudge@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69613}
Those globals must have type float instead of int to preserve the sign
bit.
R=ahaas@chromium.org
Bug: chromium:1069173
Change-Id: I9769f47f087aaba94a6172118be44f70adeded0c
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2379861
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69609}
In order to improve our tiering strategy, it is a good idea to start
by tiering up functions that will be used the most, as this is done in
most JavaScript engines.
To decide which function requires tiering, we use as a basic strategy
to define its compilation priority to 'func_size * number_of_calls',
this roughly approximates the time we spend in the function.
To handle prioritization, it seemed that using a concurrent
priority queue similar to BigUnits was causing concurrencies issues.
I then decided to use different priority queues for each worker thread.
R=clemensb@chromium.orgCC=thibaudm@chromium.org
Bug: v8:10728
Change-Id: I6f314468549000b2a9b51d3d470f04a0cb997879
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2367859
Commit-Queue: Arnaud Robin <arobin@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69585}
This CL is the start to implement reference types support in Liftoff.
As a first step this CL implements the ref.null instruction, and allows
reference types as return values. This allows register allocation to be
extended to support reference types, and also adds an easy way to get a
reference type value for tests. Additionally with ref.null we don't have
to worry about garbage collection because 'null' is an immovable object
and therefore does not have to be scanned by the GC.
R=thibaudm@chromium.org
Bug: v8:7581
Change-Id: I5785dcf522c0d9881e1386f2d8b5d8560a16225c
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2352784
Commit-Queue: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69556}
With in-place representation changes we can transition from a double
field to a Tagged field without changing the map. So it is not always
safe to assume the loaded value would be a HeapNumber. TurboFan takes a
dependency on the field representation to ensure the code is deoptimized
on any changes. With dynamic map checks, it is not possible to take such
a dependency. Hence check the loaded value is a HeapNumber and
deoptimize otherwise.
Bug: chromium:1112155,v8:10582
Change-Id: I910ac1c0781ac8842fdbf272f9173b55b02923ba
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2354810
Commit-Queue: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69521}
To properly test tier-up in the V8 test suite, change the test variant
previously called --turbo-nci-as-highest-tier to
--turbo-nci-as-midtier. As a midtier (between ignition and turbofan),
all major parts of the NCI pipeline (codegen, caching inside the same
native context, tier-up) are exercised by test suite.
Bug: v8:8888
Change-Id: Ic8ee2f3e3d72768c3869f5e0b25800dd0a5f25b7
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2361462
Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69501}
Load extends always load 8 bytes, so the access size does not depend on
MachineType of the load. The MachineType is used for classifying the
lane shape of the 8-byte load.
Also add cctest to load splats and load extends to test OOB. (Note that
load splats access size depends on MachineType).
Add regression test from clusterfuzz, minimized by ahaas@. Remove the
`--no-wasm-trap-handler` flag since we have a no_wasm_traps variant that
should test this flag.
Bug: chromium:1116019
Change-Id: I27ba051d0536ca0f6fd75dd641ca9b78132dafed
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2363291
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69489}
The V8 wasm fuzzer can create regression tests for failing fuzzer cases.
These regression tests use the wasm-module-builder.js. With the addition
of simd to the wasm-compile-fuzzer, the fuzzer can now create test cases
that use simd instructions, but the wasm-module-builder.js did not know
yet about the new instructions. This CL adds some instructions to
wasm-module-builder.js.
R=zhin@chromium.org
Bug: chromium:1116019
Change-Id: I198e4f11c2225a65d6b438f95e351fc14ee66218
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2362694
Commit-Queue: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69467}
GC support works for the current 0 and 1 param version
of the wrapper.
Bug: v8:10701
Change-Id: I9e3822b1481223c44050d23ddee7293936f1e6d4
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2351673
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Eva Herencsárová <evih@google.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69447}
In Liftoff, we were missing kS128 cases to load to/from stack.
For the x64 and ARM64 instruction selector, the calculation of
reverse_slot is incorrect for 128-bit values:
- reverse_slot += 2 (size of 128-bit values, 2 pointers)
- this copies from slot -2 into register
- but the value starts at slot -1, it occupies slots -1 and -2
- we end up copying slot -2 (most significant half) of the register, and
also slot -3, which is where rsi was store (Wasm instance addr)
- the test ends up with a different result every time
The calculation of reverse_slot is changed to follow how ia32 and ARM
does it, which is to start with
- reverse_slot = 0
- in the code-generator, add 1 to the slot
- then after emitting Peek operation, reverse_slot += 2
The fixes for x64 and ARM64 are in both instruction-selector and
code-generator.
ia32 and ARM didn't support writing kSimd128 values yet, it was only a
missing check in code-generator, so add that in.
For ARM, the codegen is more involved, vld1 does not support addressing
with an offset, so we have to do the addition into a scratch register.
Also adding a test for returning multiple v128. V128 is not exposed to
JavaScript, so we use a Wasm function call, and then an involved chain
of extract lanes, returning 6 i32 which we verify the values of. It
extracts the first and last lane of the i32x4 value in order to catch
bugs where we write or read to a wrong stack slot (off by 1).
The simd-scalar-lowering for kCall was only handling single s128 return,
we adopt the way i64-lowering handles kCall, so that is can now handle
any kinds of calls with s128 in the descriptor.
Bug: v8:10794
Bug: chromium:1115230
Change-Id: I2ccdd55f6292bc5794be78053b27e14da8cce70e
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2355189
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Bill Budge <bbudge@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69439}
This reverts commit dc18b82221.
Reason for revert: still causing failures: https://ci.chromium.org/p/v8/builders/ci/V8%20Linux%20-%20debug/31566
Original change's description:
> Reland^3 "[flags] warn about contradictory flags"
>
> This is a reland of 0ba115e6a9
> Changes:
> - Also allow second parameter influenced by --cache to be reassigned.
> - Fix --stress-opt to only --always-opt in the last iteration as before.
>
> Original change's description:
> > Reland^2 "[flags] warn about contradictory flags"
> >
> > This is a reland of d8f8a7e210
> > Change compared to last reland:
> > - Do not check for d8 flag contradictions in the presence of --fuzzing
> > - Allow identical re-declaration of --cache=*
> >
> > Original change's description:
> > > Reland "[flags] warn about contradictory flags"
> > >
> > > This is a reland of b8f9166664
> > > Difference to previous CL: Additional functionality to specify
> > > incompatible flags based on GN variables and extra-flags, used
> > > to fix the issues that came up on the waterfall.
> > >
> > > This also changes the rules regarding repeated flags: While
> > > explicitly repeated flags are allowed for boolean values as long
> > > as they are identical, repeated flags or explicit flags in the
> > > presence of an active implication are disallowed for non-boolean
> > > flags. The latter simplifies specifying conflict rules in
> > > variants.py. Otherwise a rule like
> > >
> > > INCOMPATIBLE_FLAGS_PER_EXTRA_FLAG = {
> > > "--gc-interval=*": ["--gc-interval=*"],
> > > }
> > >
> > > wouldn't work because specifying the same GC interval twice
> > > wouldn't actually count as a conflict. This was an issue with
> > > test/mjsunit/wasm/gc-buffer.js, which specifies
> > > --gc-interval=500 exactly like the extra flag by the stress bot.
> > >
> > > Also, this now expands contradictory flags checking to d8 flags
> > > for consistency.
> > >
> > > Original change's description:
> > > > [flags] warn about contradictory flags
> > > >
> > > > Design Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lkvu8crkK7Ei39qjkPCFijpNyxWXsOktG9GB-7K34jM/
> > > >
> > > > Bug: v8:10577
> > > > Change-Id: Ib9cfdffa401c48c895bf31caed5ee03545beddab
> > > > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2154792
> > > > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
> > > > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> > > > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68168}
> > >
> > > Bug: v8:10577
> > > Change-Id: I268e590ee18a535b13dee14eeb15ddd0a9ee8341
> > > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2235115
> > > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> > > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68989}
> >
> > Bug: v8:10577
> > Change-Id: I31d2794d4f9ff630f3444210100c64d67d881276
> > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2339464
> > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69339}
>
> Bug: v8:10577
> Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux64_tsan_rel_ng
> Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux64_tsan_isolates_rel_ng
> Change-Id: I4a69dc57a102782cb453144323e3752ac8278624
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2352770
> Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69433}
TBR=machenbach@chromium.org,neis@chromium.org,clemensb@chromium.org,tebbi@chromium.org,tmrts@chromium.org
Change-Id: I4ccdd7b931d0ddccbcec1d6cfae8d4874ee49cfc
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: v8:10577
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux64_tsan_rel_ng
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux64_tsan_isolates_rel_ng
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2360414
Reviewed-by: Francis McCabe <fgm@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Francis McCabe <fgm@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69438}
This is a reland of 0ba115e6a9
Changes:
- Also allow second parameter influenced by --cache to be reassigned.
- Fix --stress-opt to only --always-opt in the last iteration as before.
Original change's description:
> Reland^2 "[flags] warn about contradictory flags"
>
> This is a reland of d8f8a7e210
> Change compared to last reland:
> - Do not check for d8 flag contradictions in the presence of --fuzzing
> - Allow identical re-declaration of --cache=*
>
> Original change's description:
> > Reland "[flags] warn about contradictory flags"
> >
> > This is a reland of b8f9166664
> > Difference to previous CL: Additional functionality to specify
> > incompatible flags based on GN variables and extra-flags, used
> > to fix the issues that came up on the waterfall.
> >
> > This also changes the rules regarding repeated flags: While
> > explicitly repeated flags are allowed for boolean values as long
> > as they are identical, repeated flags or explicit flags in the
> > presence of an active implication are disallowed for non-boolean
> > flags. The latter simplifies specifying conflict rules in
> > variants.py. Otherwise a rule like
> >
> > INCOMPATIBLE_FLAGS_PER_EXTRA_FLAG = {
> > "--gc-interval=*": ["--gc-interval=*"],
> > }
> >
> > wouldn't work because specifying the same GC interval twice
> > wouldn't actually count as a conflict. This was an issue with
> > test/mjsunit/wasm/gc-buffer.js, which specifies
> > --gc-interval=500 exactly like the extra flag by the stress bot.
> >
> > Also, this now expands contradictory flags checking to d8 flags
> > for consistency.
> >
> > Original change's description:
> > > [flags] warn about contradictory flags
> > >
> > > Design Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lkvu8crkK7Ei39qjkPCFijpNyxWXsOktG9GB-7K34jM/
> > >
> > > Bug: v8:10577
> > > Change-Id: Ib9cfdffa401c48c895bf31caed5ee03545beddab
> > > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2154792
> > > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
> > > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> > > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68168}
> >
> > Bug: v8:10577
> > Change-Id: I268e590ee18a535b13dee14eeb15ddd0a9ee8341
> > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2235115
> > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68989}
>
> Bug: v8:10577
> Change-Id: I31d2794d4f9ff630f3444210100c64d67d881276
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2339464
> Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69339}
Bug: v8:10577
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux64_tsan_rel_ng
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux64_tsan_isolates_rel_ng
Change-Id: I4a69dc57a102782cb453144323e3752ac8278624
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2352770
Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69433}
This reached consensus in the March 2020 TC39.
https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/1908
This aligns JS with wasm, which allows atomics operations on non-shared
linear memory.
Bug: v8:10687, v8:9921
Change-Id: I7b60473b271cee6bccb342e97a4fd3781aedddb4
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2330802
Commit-Queue: Shu-yu Guo <syg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69392}
TurboFan generates significantly less code than Liftoff for this test,
and depending on timing it can happen that we need to generate thousands
of functions, which takes some time and occasionally runs into timeouts.
Thus disable tier-up for this test, such that we stick with the much
longer Liftoff code, and reach the four separate code spaces quicker.
R=ahaas@chromium.org
Change-Id: I8e9a0cb466c1bdfef29aceeb5dd31aa96d05b70b
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2352490
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69369}
This is a reland of 57242a051e
no-sse4.1 builds were failing due to missing simd-scalar-lowering
for s128.const, this reland adds that implementation.
Original change's description:
> [wasm-simd][arm] Use vmov to move all ones to register
>
> vceq(dst, dst, dst) does not seem to always set the register to all
> ones. The right way should be be to use vmov (immediate) anyway. This
> was not supported in the assembler yet, so we need changes to the
> assembler, diassembler, and simulator.
>
> There is an unfortunate fork in logic in the simulator, due to the way
> the switches are set up, vmov (imm) logic is duplicated across two
> different cases, because the switch looks at the top bit of the
> immediate. Refactoring this will be a bigger change that is irrelevant
> for this bug, so I'm putting that off for now. Instead we extract the
> core of vmov (imm) into helpers and call it in the two cases.
>
> Bug: chromium:1112124
> Change-Id: I283dbcd86cb0572e5ee720835f897b51fae96701
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2337503
> Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Bill Budge <bbudge@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69315}
Bug: chromium:1112124
Change-Id: Id450e5cea41f7a569e49be8386a7788ca8f00658
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2346937
Reviewed-by: Bill Budge <bbudge@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69346}
This reverts commit 0ba115e6a9.
Reason for revert: Breaks test on TSAN - block-conflicts
https://ci.chromium.org/p/v8/builders/ci/V8%20Linux64%20TSAN%20-%20concurrent%20marking/14230
Original change's description:
> Reland^2 "[flags] warn about contradictory flags"
>
> This is a reland of d8f8a7e210
> Change compared to last reland:
> - Do not check for d8 flag contradictions in the presence of --fuzzing
> - Allow identical re-declaration of --cache=*
>
> Original change's description:
> > Reland "[flags] warn about contradictory flags"
> >
> > This is a reland of b8f9166664
> > Difference to previous CL: Additional functionality to specify
> > incompatible flags based on GN variables and extra-flags, used
> > to fix the issues that came up on the waterfall.
> >
> > This also changes the rules regarding repeated flags: While
> > explicitly repeated flags are allowed for boolean values as long
> > as they are identical, repeated flags or explicit flags in the
> > presence of an active implication are disallowed for non-boolean
> > flags. The latter simplifies specifying conflict rules in
> > variants.py. Otherwise a rule like
> >
> > INCOMPATIBLE_FLAGS_PER_EXTRA_FLAG = {
> > "--gc-interval=*": ["--gc-interval=*"],
> > }
> >
> > wouldn't work because specifying the same GC interval twice
> > wouldn't actually count as a conflict. This was an issue with
> > test/mjsunit/wasm/gc-buffer.js, which specifies
> > --gc-interval=500 exactly like the extra flag by the stress bot.
> >
> > Also, this now expands contradictory flags checking to d8 flags
> > for consistency.
> >
> > Original change's description:
> > > [flags] warn about contradictory flags
> > >
> > > Design Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lkvu8crkK7Ei39qjkPCFijpNyxWXsOktG9GB-7K34jM/
> > >
> > > Bug: v8:10577
> > > Change-Id: Ib9cfdffa401c48c895bf31caed5ee03545beddab
> > > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2154792
> > > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
> > > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> > > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68168}
> >
> > Bug: v8:10577
> > Change-Id: I268e590ee18a535b13dee14eeb15ddd0a9ee8341
> > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2235115
> > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68989}
>
> Bug: v8:10577
> Change-Id: I31d2794d4f9ff630f3444210100c64d67d881276
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2339464
> Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69339}
TBR=machenbach@chromium.org,neis@chromium.org,clemensb@chromium.org,tebbi@chromium.org,tmrts@chromium.org
Change-Id: I1454a05e357ddd704db7fb79e51be65d45a9a16e
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: v8:10577
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2348365
Reviewed-by: Bill Budge <bbudge@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Bill Budge <bbudge@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69341}
This is a reland of d8f8a7e210
Change compared to last reland:
- Do not check for d8 flag contradictions in the presence of --fuzzing
- Allow identical re-declaration of --cache=*
Original change's description:
> Reland "[flags] warn about contradictory flags"
>
> This is a reland of b8f9166664
> Difference to previous CL: Additional functionality to specify
> incompatible flags based on GN variables and extra-flags, used
> to fix the issues that came up on the waterfall.
>
> This also changes the rules regarding repeated flags: While
> explicitly repeated flags are allowed for boolean values as long
> as they are identical, repeated flags or explicit flags in the
> presence of an active implication are disallowed for non-boolean
> flags. The latter simplifies specifying conflict rules in
> variants.py. Otherwise a rule like
>
> INCOMPATIBLE_FLAGS_PER_EXTRA_FLAG = {
> "--gc-interval=*": ["--gc-interval=*"],
> }
>
> wouldn't work because specifying the same GC interval twice
> wouldn't actually count as a conflict. This was an issue with
> test/mjsunit/wasm/gc-buffer.js, which specifies
> --gc-interval=500 exactly like the extra flag by the stress bot.
>
> Also, this now expands contradictory flags checking to d8 flags
> for consistency.
>
> Original change's description:
> > [flags] warn about contradictory flags
> >
> > Design Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lkvu8crkK7Ei39qjkPCFijpNyxWXsOktG9GB-7K34jM/
> >
> > Bug: v8:10577
> > Change-Id: Ib9cfdffa401c48c895bf31caed5ee03545beddab
> > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2154792
> > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
> > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68168}
>
> Bug: v8:10577
> Change-Id: I268e590ee18a535b13dee14eeb15ddd0a9ee8341
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2235115
> Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68989}
Bug: v8:10577
Change-Id: I31d2794d4f9ff630f3444210100c64d67d881276
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2339464
Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69339}
This is a reland of 60ee70bb40.
The wasm c-api flakes were fixed in https://crrev.com/c/2349293.
Original change's description:
> [wasm] Ensure that only TurboFan code is serialized
>
> We have the implicit assumption that Liftoff code will never be
> serialized, and we start relying on that when implementing new features
> (debugging, dynamic tiering).
>
> This CL makes the serializer fail if the module contains any Liftoff
> code. Existing tests are changed to ensure that we fully tiered up
> before serializing a module (similar to the logic in Chromium).
> The "wasm-clone-module" test needs to serialize the module before
> enabling the debugger.
>
> Note that chrome currently only serializes a module after it fully
> tiered up, so that should be fine. If other embedders need the ability
> to serialize a module in an arbitrary state, we will have to fix this
> later. With this CL we will be on the safe side though and (gracefully)
> fail serialization instead of accidentally serializing Liftoff code.
>
> R=ahaas@chromium.org
>
> Bug: v8:10777
> Change-Id: I1245e5f7fda3447a544c1e3525e1239cde759174
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2336799
> Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69276}
Bug: v8:10777
Change-Id: I2a7c1429812ca46d88a2902b8e0a7b7e3d638b56
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2349290
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69335}
This reverts commit 57242a051e.
Reason for revert: regression tests fails:
https://ci.chromium.org/p/v8/builders/ci/V8%20Linux%20-%20debug/31477
Original change's description:
> [wasm-simd][arm] Use vmov to move all ones to register
>
> vceq(dst, dst, dst) does not seem to always set the register to all
> ones. The right way should be be to use vmov (immediate) anyway. This
> was not supported in the assembler yet, so we need changes to the
> assembler, diassembler, and simulator.
>
> There is an unfortunate fork in logic in the simulator, due to the way
> the switches are set up, vmov (imm) logic is duplicated across two
> different cases, because the switch looks at the top bit of the
> immediate. Refactoring this will be a bigger change that is irrelevant
> for this bug, so I'm putting that off for now. Instead we extract the
> core of vmov (imm) into helpers and call it in the two cases.
>
> Bug: chromium:1112124
> Change-Id: I283dbcd86cb0572e5ee720835f897b51fae96701
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2337503
> Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Bill Budge <bbudge@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69315}
TBR=bbudge@chromium.org,jkummerow@chromium.org,v8-arm-ports@googlegroups.com,zhin@chromium.org
Change-Id: I5d9d1dcb81771f71001d959ec5a03a43a11c4233
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: chromium:1112124
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2347211
Reviewed-by: Bill Budge <bbudge@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Bill Budge <bbudge@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69316}
vceq(dst, dst, dst) does not seem to always set the register to all
ones. The right way should be be to use vmov (immediate) anyway. This
was not supported in the assembler yet, so we need changes to the
assembler, diassembler, and simulator.
There is an unfortunate fork in logic in the simulator, due to the way
the switches are set up, vmov (imm) logic is duplicated across two
different cases, because the switch looks at the top bit of the
immediate. Refactoring this will be a bigger change that is irrelevant
for this bug, so I'm putting that off for now. Instead we extract the
core of vmov (imm) into helpers and call it in the two cases.
Bug: chromium:1112124
Change-Id: I283dbcd86cb0572e5ee720835f897b51fae96701
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2337503
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Bill Budge <bbudge@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69315}
A new field for signature type was added to WasmExportedFunctionData.
It is set to 0 or 1 depending on the parameter count.
(It's set and being used only in 0 and 1 parameter cases.)
Added new JS tests for 1 parameter wasm functions.
Bug: v8:10701
Change-Id: I349d881a2860f1a50b91e08d0126ca71c5f6483b
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2339622
Commit-Queue: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69302}
Up until now. we only checked the size of tables defined in a module
at instantiation time. For imported tables we only checked if the
imported table matched the declared import in size. This causes a
problem because we allocate function tables also for imported tabled
before we actually look at the imported table.
With this CL we first check the size of all tables, and only then start
to initialize and load them.
R=jkummerow@chromium.org
Bug: chromium:1114006
Change-Id: Iaf194ed21fb83304fe3a7f0f7ba7b282396e3954
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2339473
Commit-Queue: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69291}
The cast from uint32_t to int caused an integer overflow that let a
bounds check succeed that should have failed.
R=jkummerow@chromium.org
Bug: chromium:1114005
Change-Id: Iea1af70af300be54c2a33d7dd10b3faa34d56eaa
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2339472
Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69289}
The test have been rewritten to be more robust -> maybe they're
robust enough for the GC fuzzer (DelayedTasksPlatform)?
Bug: v8:10239
Change-Id: I743cc2f804357aaef888bff7985dfb68a7feec5f
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2342848
Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69287}
This reverts commit 60ee70bb40.
Reason for revert: wasm-api-tests/WasmCapiTest.Serialize starts flaking: https://crbug.com/v8/10784
Original change's description:
> [wasm] Ensure that only TurboFan code is serialized
>
> We have the implicit assumption that Liftoff code will never be
> serialized, and we start relying on that when implementing new features
> (debugging, dynamic tiering).
>
> This CL makes the serializer fail if the module contains any Liftoff
> code. Existing tests are changed to ensure that we fully tiered up
> before serializing a module (similar to the logic in Chromium).
> The "wasm-clone-module" test needs to serialize the module before
> enabling the debugger.
>
> Note that chrome currently only serializes a module after it fully
> tiered up, so that should be fine. If other embedders need the ability
> to serialize a module in an arbitrary state, we will have to fix this
> later. With this CL we will be on the safe side though and (gracefully)
> fail serialization instead of accidentally serializing Liftoff code.
>
> R=ahaas@chromium.org
>
> Bug: v8:10777
> Change-Id: I1245e5f7fda3447a544c1e3525e1239cde759174
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2336799
> Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69276}
TBR=ahaas@chromium.org,clemensb@chromium.org
Change-Id: Ic1349375bd562bb0a2724c39c27ef3247461c97b
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: v8:10777
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2342845
Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69284}
The test relies on certain maps not dying but didn't ensure that.
Bug: v8:10783
Change-Id: I708f7fc027ee0bf5656be9bb4f29130f5b924597
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2340912
Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Auto-Submit: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69282}
We have the implicit assumption that Liftoff code will never be
serialized, and we start relying on that when implementing new features
(debugging, dynamic tiering).
This CL makes the serializer fail if the module contains any Liftoff
code. Existing tests are changed to ensure that we fully tiered up
before serializing a module (similar to the logic in Chromium).
The "wasm-clone-module" test needs to serialize the module before
enabling the debugger.
Note that chrome currently only serializes a module after it fully
tiered up, so that should be fine. If other embedders need the ability
to serialize a module in an arbitrary state, we will have to fix this
later. With this CL we will be on the safe side though and (gracefully)
fail serialization instead of accidentally serializing Liftoff code.
R=ahaas@chromium.org
Bug: v8:10777
Change-Id: I1245e5f7fda3447a544c1e3525e1239cde759174
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2336799
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69276}
This is a reland of 28ead05405
The failure is a test that is sensitive to adding a function
in a FunctionTemplate in d8: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/v8/issues/detail?id=10783
Original change's description:
> [Atomics.waitAsync] Fix removing multiple nodes when Isolate deinits
>
> RemoveNode already nullifies the next_ pointer of FutexWaitListNode,
> and DeleteAsyncNode was trying to retrieve it.
>
> Bug: v8:10239
> Change-Id: I595885de87f433d263eeacfc825a689efd467f5e
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2332812
> Commit-Queue: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Shu-yu Guo <syg@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69259}
Bug: v8:10239
Tbr: leszeks@chromium.org
Change-Id: Icec590354886433a0b41c8f9b7af7101b54b7690
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2339469
Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69275}
We used to check the size of tables at compile time, and threw a
CompilationError if a given size exceeded the implementation-defined
limit. However, the spec defines that an error should only be thrown
when the implementation-defined limit is reached, which is either at
instantiation time of during runtime at a table.grow.
With this CL the V8 implementation becomes spec compliant in this
regard.
R=jkummerow@chromium.org
Bug: v8:10556
Change-Id: I7d0e688b385a65e4060a569e5ab1dec68947ceea
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2326331
Commit-Queue: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69267}
Just like the optimized code cache, the compiler should check the
isolate cache for NCI code objects and return them if they exist.
Drive-by: Skip additional tests to fix the nci_as_highest_tier test
variant. These are related to interactions with deoptimization, which
NCI code doesn't fully support yet.
Bug: v8:8888
Change-Id: I6253811f96993796cfc38fff0da7ffb4f1a5eb24
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2339095
Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69251}
This test uses a i64x2.shr_s to shift a v128 with all bits set by 1,
resulting in v128 with all bits set (no change). This value is then
dropped, and param[2] (3), is returned.
Without the fix, -1 is returned, since i64x2.shr_s overwrites the
register for param[2] with 0xffffffff.
Bug: v8:10752
Bug: chromium:1111522
Change-Id: I0310bf6039be780a6738689069cdbcfa3a24bbdb
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2335779
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69233}
If incoming map is deprecated, generate code to migrate the map. Since
this involves generating additional code and a call to runtime, we only
do this if one of the receiver maps was a migration target when
optimizing this function. If not, we deoptimize and discard the
optimized code if we see a deprecated map. This is to avoid bailout
loops when we see deprecated maps.
This change does the following:
// We generated code to migrate deprecated maps only if one of the maps
// in feedback vector is a migration target.
if ( there are migration targets in feedback)
{
if (checkMaps fails) {
if (incoming map is deprecated) {
migrate the map
checkMaps with the new map
} else {
bailout
}
}
} else {
if (checkMaps fails)
bailout;
}
Bug: v8:10582, v8:9684
Change-Id: I8a04c77ed209dd2fb0300a783d844f2335a678c8
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2292231
Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69179}
If we are near the stack limit, calling the proxy method might not work
any more. Instead of crashing because of an empty MaybeLocal, handle
this gracefully.
Drive-by: Minor refactoring in TryGetValue.
R=tebbi@chromium.org
Bug: chromium:1110001
Change-Id: I07e7773768166b3dbea2e6b75a3ab8b24bfeee53
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2332156
Reviewed-by: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69161}
The bug was that the allocation of the result array (before the loop)
was using the outer frame state, thus returning the allocation's result
(an array full of holes) as the return value of the map operation in
case the allocation triggers a lazy deopt.
Bug: chromium:1104514
Change-Id: I9a6db8a5860472e1b438b6b54414938d61e166c1
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2324249
Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69129}
This cl also
1. Fixes a bug in effect-control-linearizer where we should have
converted fixed array length from Smi to integer
2. Also prints deopt location for the new "bailout" deopt type on
--trace-deopt.
Bug: v8:10582, v8:9684
Change-Id: Iafc5e8abbca5252a8783a5a1184a1667a7f708a4
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2297460
Commit-Queue: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69115}
This generic wrapper builtin is currently used only when the wasm
function has no parameters and no return value.
Added a new V8 flag to use this generic wrapper.
Also added a JS test function for this generic wrapper.
Bug: v8:10701
Change-Id: Id8cd1771f26922927363b715d8a6ffd384a143ce
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2307240
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Eva Herencsárová <evih@google.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69097}
This test should've been rewritten in the last
batch rewrite but wasn't.
Bug: v8:10239
Change-Id: Ic2949e6282f72975898ab7e9aefe3210bba71fbf
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2319988
Commit-Queue: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69072}
Using uint8_t[] causes decay to pointer issue, which manifests in
copying garbage values in the call to WriteLittleEndianValue. Change it
to use a std::array, which doesn't have the decaying behavior.
Also add a regression test from comment#6 of the linked bug.
Bug: v8:10731
Change-Id: I4a1ca69fe99806642e9931625ca7aeab6663f955
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2316465
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Bill Budge <bbudge@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69052}
This reverts commit d8f8a7e210.
Reason for revert: Breaks code_serializer variant - https://cr-buildbucket.appspot.com/build/8874070652992164976
Original change's description:
> Reland "[flags] warn about contradictory flags"
>
> This is a reland of b8f9166664
> Difference to previous CL: Additional functionality to specify
> incompatible flags based on GN variables and extra-flags, used
> to fix the issues that came up on the waterfall.
>
> This also changes the rules regarding repeated flags: While
> explicitly repeated flags are allowed for boolean values as long
> as they are identical, repeated flags or explicit flags in the
> presence of an active implication are disallowed for non-boolean
> flags. The latter simplifies specifying conflict rules in
> variants.py. Otherwise a rule like
>
> INCOMPATIBLE_FLAGS_PER_EXTRA_FLAG = {
> "--gc-interval=*": ["--gc-interval=*"],
> }
>
> wouldn't work because specifying the same GC interval twice
> wouldn't actually count as a conflict. This was an issue with
> test/mjsunit/wasm/gc-buffer.js, which specifies
> --gc-interval=500 exactly like the extra flag by the stress bot.
>
> Also, this now expands contradictory flags checking to d8 flags
> for consistency.
>
> Original change's description:
> > [flags] warn about contradictory flags
> >
> > Design Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lkvu8crkK7Ei39qjkPCFijpNyxWXsOktG9GB-7K34jM/
> >
> > Bug: v8:10577
> > Change-Id: Ib9cfdffa401c48c895bf31caed5ee03545beddab
> > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2154792
> > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
> > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68168}
>
> Bug: v8:10577
> Change-Id: I268e590ee18a535b13dee14eeb15ddd0a9ee8341
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2235115
> Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68989}
TBR=machenbach@chromium.org,neis@chromium.org,clemensb@chromium.org,tebbi@chromium.org,tmrts@chromium.org
Change-Id: I7969065b0edbc463a94e530485bc2ab623d77b62
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: v8:10577
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2312782
Reviewed-by: Maya Lekova <mslekova@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Maya Lekova <mslekova@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68992}
This is a reland of b8f9166664
Difference to previous CL: Additional functionality to specify
incompatible flags based on GN variables and extra-flags, used
to fix the issues that came up on the waterfall.
This also changes the rules regarding repeated flags: While
explicitly repeated flags are allowed for boolean values as long
as they are identical, repeated flags or explicit flags in the
presence of an active implication are disallowed for non-boolean
flags. The latter simplifies specifying conflict rules in
variants.py. Otherwise a rule like
INCOMPATIBLE_FLAGS_PER_EXTRA_FLAG = {
"--gc-interval=*": ["--gc-interval=*"],
}
wouldn't work because specifying the same GC interval twice
wouldn't actually count as a conflict. This was an issue with
test/mjsunit/wasm/gc-buffer.js, which specifies
--gc-interval=500 exactly like the extra flag by the stress bot.
Also, this now expands contradictory flags checking to d8 flags
for consistency.
Original change's description:
> [flags] warn about contradictory flags
>
> Design Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lkvu8crkK7Ei39qjkPCFijpNyxWXsOktG9GB-7K34jM/
>
> Bug: v8:10577
> Change-Id: Ib9cfdffa401c48c895bf31caed5ee03545beddab
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2154792
> Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
> Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68168}
Bug: v8:10577
Change-Id: I268e590ee18a535b13dee14eeb15ddd0a9ee8341
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2235115
Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68989}
On desktop systems, we use a very basic tiering strategy: Everything is
initially compiled with Liftoff, and once that is done, the module can
start being used. Concurrently to the execution, we re-compile all code
with TurboFan, and hot-swap each function once TurboFan finishes.
We should start using a more dynamic strategy where each function is
tiered-up when judged necessary. This change will then tier-up each
liftoff function once it has been called 5 times.
I then added a counter in the native module, that is updated directly
from Liftoff code, and a runtime call is then made when the counter
reaches the goal.
R=clemensb@chromium.org
CC=thibaudm@chromium.org
Bug: v8:10728
Change-Id: I8dc2b02fdff8d97781bb1cf496886594b3d7f644
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2306803
Commit-Queue: Arnaud Robin <arobin@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68971}
With work on NCI proceeding, it makes sense to test multiple
pipeline configurations.
The nci variant (passes --turbo-nci) now spawns dedicated NCI
compilation jobs and inserts generated code into the code cache.
The nci_as_highest_tier variant (passes --turbo-nci-as-highest-tier)
simply replaces TF with NCI code (no extra jobs, no extra caching).
This mode stresses NCI generated code more than the nci variant, in
which NCI code only runs on cache hits.
Bug: v8:8888
Change-Id: I4c2a43cce5271a6c288e7aba195dcc9daed6af9d
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2299361
Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68964}
The CanTailCall check only passes if the return locations are the
same in the caller and the callee. However, stack returns are expected
to be at a different offset depending on the stack space reserved for
parameters.
R=clemensb@chromium.org
Bug: v8:7431
Change-Id: Iaac15fce889d6cd7d1ac88f320a872202281fb5a
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2289789
Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68933}
The {operator==} on {VarState} did not check the spill offset, so when
merging stack states, we forgot to move stack values if both source and
destination were stack slots, but at different offsets.
This CL fixes this by removing the {operator==}, because the semantics
(and use) are not clear, and it's only used in one place anyway.
The equality check was mostly redundant, so inlining it also makes the
code smaller and faster.
R=ahaas@chromium.org
Bug: v8:10702
Change-Id: I6c8b2cfd1002274175c9a17d305692e4631fd7dc
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2304574
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68916}
We cannot allocate large arrays exceeding the size of
kMaxRegularHeapObjectSize in young space. Bailout of optimization in
such cases.
Bug: chromium:1105746
Change-Id: I4f7357c2dd7b3e70d747f9067660725ecf6ae768
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2300481
Reviewed-by: Nico Hartmann <nicohartmann@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68889}
The snapshot code assumes that the entire snapshot's length fits into
an int, which implies that it doesn't support individual objects that
are bigger than that. That's okay, because it isn't reachable from
user code, and embedders would notice at compile time when they run
into this limit. So we can just continue to skip the few regression
tests we have for huge TypedArrays in the stress_snapshot variant.
Change-Id: Ib37c0582763d549a3d5c5ccc3a78d200b176f3b4
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2299373
Commit-Queue: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Auto-Submit: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68874}
mjsunit/regress/regress-896326.js failed on mips simulator, because mips
simulator has larger stack size and won't throw the expected RangeError
exception.
This CL set sim-stack-size to 100K in regress-896326 just like setting
the native machine's stack-size.
Change-Id: I51328b10a7b54addab2adb90401680c0581d7ee2
Bug: v8:10709
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2299880
Commit-Queue: Zhao Jiazhong <zhaojiazhong-hf@loongson.cn>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68865}
This is a follow-up fix for
https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2292230
In this CL fixes the case when the property cell is added to the
dictionary but the value is not actually stored which leaves
PropertyCell with the hole in the dictionary.
Now the logic for GlobalDictionary matches the logic for
NameDictionary - the property cell is added to the dictionary in
LookupIterator::ApplyTransitionToDataProperty().
Bug: chromium:1104711, chromium:1105383
Change-Id: I56da16d85d13288fbc41fd60dbce556fec5e7d18
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2297472
Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Igor Sheludko <ishell@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68860}
The named LoadIC code was missing a check for "names" that
convert to TypedArray indices. This was flushed out by the
recent bump of the max TypedArray size from 2^32-1 to 2^32.
Named StoreICs had the same bug; fixed here as well.
Bug: v8:4153
Fixed: chromium:1104608
Change-Id: I6bd2552d6ccc238104f92e7b95d19970d4a75dae
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2295606
Reviewed-by: Igor Sheludko <ishell@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68840}
For 64-bit binary operations, Liftoff on arm made the assumption that
register pairs are always ordered, i.e. the register code for the low
word is lower than the register code for the high word.
Ensuring this was only implemented in {GetUnusedRegister} in
https://crrev.com/c/2168875. Other cases were missing though, e.g.
return values, but also different places were we
construct register pairs internally.
Thus, this CL removes this constraint again and instead handles
unordered register pairs in 64-bit binary operations on arm.
R=thibaudm@chromium.org
Bug: chromium:1101304
Change-Id: I4cd9fb1577f82ab06d34c9dde6533cf04a2cade7
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2287870
Reviewed-by: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68752}
Due to an optimization in how resumable functions are compiled, we can
actually see another Oddball type as StrictEquality inputs. I'm giving
up on getting the DCHECK right and removing it entirely.
Bug: chromium:1102683
Change-Id: Ia210777c66641e898e96900713710a51ebed311d
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2287494
Auto-Submit: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Nico Hartmann <nicohartmann@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Nico Hartmann <nicohartmann@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68735}
Native context independent code generation should, at the moment, not
use any collected feedback.
We implement this by returning InsufficientFeedback from the heap
broker's ReadFeedbackForX methods if currently compiling nci code.
Thus all feedback.IsInsufficient() calls inside the compiler will
return true (disabling feedback-based optimizations).
FeedbackSource::IsValid() (used in generic lowering) can still return
true.
Bug: v8:8888
Change-Id: I198b6457276073e7376c777b206c50726f1b3645
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2284494
Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68726}
Rather than only removing the continuation range for the last return
statement prior to a synthetic return statement, remove the
continuation tracking for whatever statement occurs prior to the
synthetic return.
Bug: v8:10628
Change-Id: Ieb8e393479c9811cf1b9756840bbfdbe7f44a1b8
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2280585
Commit-Queue: Benjamin Coe <bencoe@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Sigurd Schneider <sigurds@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68719}
ForInNext can get lowered to a low-level call to the ForInFilter
builtin. We currently type low-level Call nodes simply as Any, leading
to a CHECK failure when the verifier expects a primitive.
This CL fixes the issue simply by manually setting the type as part of
the lowering. An alternative would be to have the Call typing inspect
its input similar to what the JSCall typing does. We can consider this
if we hit the same issue in other cases.
Bug: chromium:1102053
Change-Id: I6682d8cf95c6a3ebaff9c8de677aa20ca676573f
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2282523
Reviewed-by: Nico Hartmann <nicohartmann@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68688}
After r68405 reduced the default stack size on Arm64 a couple of tests
hit stack limits on the Arm64 android bots. Reduce the argument count
on these tests to avoid this issue.
BUG=chromium:1099623
Change-Id: I8957043b74bd416bb78223599b1a661a4887f54a
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2280095
Commit-Queue: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org>
Auto-Submit: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68670}
It seems that the mix of atomic and non-atomic updates to the same
memory location is not working correctly. One fix is changing all memory
updates to be atomic. Another fix is removing the non-atomic access that
happens while the workers are already running (using atomic accesses).
This CL implements the latter.
R=ahaas@chromium.org
Bug: v8:10647, v8:10650
Change-Id: I84b4f3f442b6be3c4ea6e51962a523f443f5e43b
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2273133
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68603}
An 'arguments' array cannot be allocated in young space when its size
exceeds kMaxRegularHeapObjectSize. In this case the optimizations in
JSCreateLowering::ReduceJSCreateArguments are skipped.
Bug: chromium:1098565
Change-Id: I30fdc78a1eb6e51fcd293785a46c9fd78995da9a
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2273121
Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Nico Hartmann <nicohartmann@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68585}
The test was taking more than a minute before CL
https://crrev.com/c/2259933. Afterwards, it takes a lot longer, but I
could never reproduce a hang locally.
Let's re-enable and mark SLOW to increase the chance that it runs to
completion. We can then see how much slower it really got.
Also add some output that helps triaging in case it really hangs.
R=ahaas@chromium.org
Bug: v8:9506
Change-Id: I09a935ca0018517d45c6c008a099b8052bc45c47
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2273117
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68582}
This is a reland of f7a1932ef9
There was a wpt test in Chrome that expected the incorrect behavior.
I disable the test in https://crrev.com/c/2264418 so that we can land
the fix here.
Original change's description:
> [wasm] Re-exported globals preserve their identity
>
> V8 fails a recently added spec test that when an imported global get
> re-exported, it should preserve its identity. This CL fixes the behavior
> in V8.
>
> Drive-by change: fix the object printer of globals: a global which
> stores a reference type only has a tagged buffer, a global which stores
> a value type only has an untagged buffer.
>
> R=clemensb@chromium.org
>
> Bug: v8:10556
> Change-Id: I949d147fe4395610cfec6cf60082e1faecb23036
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2235702
> Commit-Queue: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68513}
Bug: v8:10556
Change-Id: I8e1b08fc9f72dde166cba167e6e320e714796769
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2264097
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68552}
Similar tests are already skipped on tsan, using the same bug to also
skip this test. Note that it's a slightly different test, but based on
the same "worker-ping-test.js".
TBR=ahaas@chromium.org
Bug: v8:9506
Change-Id: Ie8d0aab5b1fd3ae6c77a65fa04ac4772b2836a1c
No-Try: true
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2267301
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68548}
This reverts commit f7a1932ef9.
Reason for revert: Breaking wasm wpt tests: https://ci.chromium.org/p/v8/builders/ci/V8%20Blink%20Linux/5408
Original change's description:
> [wasm] Re-exported globals preserve their identity
>
> V8 fails a recently added spec test that when an imported global get
> re-exported, it should preserve its identity. This CL fixes the behavior
> in V8.
>
> Drive-by change: fix the object printer of globals: a global which
> stores a reference type only has a tagged buffer, a global which stores
> a value type only has an untagged buffer.
>
> R=clemensb@chromium.org
>
> Bug: v8:10556
> Change-Id: I949d147fe4395610cfec6cf60082e1faecb23036
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2235702
> Commit-Queue: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68513}
TBR=ahaas@chromium.org,clemensb@chromium.org
Change-Id: I06eb1996cafe7d4e93a7e59d21679fea239cf961
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: v8:10556
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2264956
Reviewed-by: Shu-yu Guo <syg@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Shu-yu Guo <syg@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68528}
V8 fails a recently added spec test that when an imported global get
re-exported, it should preserve its identity. This CL fixes the behavior
in V8.
Drive-by change: fix the object printer of globals: a global which
stores a reference type only has a tagged buffer, a global which stores
a value type only has an untagged buffer.
R=clemensb@chromium.org
Bug: v8:10556
Change-Id: I949d147fe4395610cfec6cf60082e1faecb23036
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2235702
Commit-Queue: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68513}
With this CL d8 exits with an error code if there is an unhandled
promise rejection, e.g. due tue a failed assertion in a promise. Up
until now these assertions were just ignored.
Bug: v8:10556
Change-Id: I25f20e4be45a2de130562deb15f6a144f0ac976f
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2238569
Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Camillo Bruni <cbruni@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68503}
The IsInBounds function is used in a few different places, when used for
bounds checks on 32-bit platforms, size_t for max_memory_size leads to
incorrect out of bounds accesses as size_t is not guaranteed to be
64-bit on all platforms. Use specific uint32_t, uint64_t methods for
Wasm bounds checking instead of size_t.
Bug: chromium:1080902
Change-Id: I0e21f0a310382c8ed0703c8302200d3352495c13
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2256858
Commit-Queue: Deepti Gandluri <gdeepti@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68500}
Due to recent spec changes, this CL removes the type immediate of
ref.is_null again. Instead we check if the type of the input parameter
is nullable.
R=jkummerow@chromium.org
Bug: v8:10556
Change-Id: If07d30fe4dd27664be7774422573b2ab2b0dfa20
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2247654
Commit-Queue: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68484}
Just a test for now to document how trailing space after async
functions is not removed by SourceRangeAstVisitor.
Bug: v8:10628
Change-Id: I40f0d911c59540ea835c807a2be5b0d1488291d9
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2259852
Auto-Submit: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Sigurd Schneider <sigurds@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Sigurd Schneider <sigurds@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68476}
Adjust atomics.wait, atomics.notify semantics for when they are used
with non-shared Wasm memory to mirror the spec change introduced
in: https://github.com/WebAssembly/threads/pull/147. This does not
need to be gated by the flag here, as this will only decode if
the flag is enabled.
Bug: v8:9921
Change-Id: I7f2e018fed6bd131ad4c386def1e838626c28a4d
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2256863
Reviewed-by: Ben Smith <binji@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Deepti Gandluri <gdeepti@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68468}
This changes black/white list to block/allow list.
Bug: v8:10619
Change-Id: Id55d72f90891670ca57b62dfeb6b3251025927dc
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2257228
Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Dan Elphick <delphick@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68464}
Replace by "consistency check", or "validity check", or more specific
wording as appropriate.
R=ecmziegler@chromium.org
Bug: v8:10619
Change-Id: Ifd7852d8f703d5b784d53671b82d65db15722ede
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2253855
Reviewed-by: Emanuel Ziegler <ecmziegler@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68440}
Make sure that the workers do not start running before the main thread
told them so by setting the memory to the first element in the sequence.
Otherwise it can happen that the main thread resets the memory after the
workers already started doing their updates, which results in a hang
(see linked bug).
R=marja@chromium.org
Bug: v8:10625
Change-Id: I959018279e0049900d44457b72146bc37a12bcb4
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2252191
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68429}
When preparsing and detecting a sloppy block function redefinition then
don't mark the variable as assigned to make it consistent with the eager
parser.
Bug: chromium:1053364
Change-Id: Iec7c24db80014bfe73ee41a4f3bb7a41a354cef2
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2241511
Auto-Submit: Dan Elphick <delphick@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Dan Elphick <delphick@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68415}
This subsumes the old behavior of --allow-natives-for-fuzzing under
--fuzzing as well. Both flags are used in a redundant way in fuzz
configs. Only --allow-natives-for-fuzzing wasn't specified as a
required argument, leading to the bug below.
We still need the flag --allow-natives-for-differential-fuzzing
to allow different functions when using differential fuzzing.
Bug: chromium:1094866
Change-Id: I398791779e58ed4d80e896c1cfea343848159212
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2246568
Commit-Queue: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68401}
... for nci code, in which several phases of the compiler are not
active:
LowerJSCreateCatchContext
LowerJSCreateEmptyLiteralObject
LowerJSCreateIterResultObject
LowerJSCreateWithContext
LowerJSGetIterator
LowerJSGetTemplateObject
With this change, the nci variant passes the test suite. Tests
relying on turbofan-specific behavior (e.g. deopts) are skipped.
Bug: v8:8888
Change-Id: I709178241e9b25e7480a39b4fb64bdcf576483be
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2245604
Auto-Submit: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68381}
Changes:
- Simplify and generalize ToValueTypeString.
- Fix some error messages in msjunit so that they reflect the underlying
error better.
- Change 'exn' -> 'exnref' to match exception-handling proposal.
Bug: v8:7581
Change-Id: I264f6c9aa598a57f39d5a4d01399af64db83a2b9
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2243214
Commit-Queue: Manos Koukoutos <manoskouk@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68364}
We recently changed uc32 to be an unsigned type, and with the invalid
marker being static_cast<uc32>(-1) this DCHECK no longer holds. After
this CL it expicitly checks for the invalid marker.
Bug: v8:10568,chromium:1094226
Change-Id: Idd9efe055b38387e3e37b132cb786cca130767b3
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2245592
Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Auto-Submit: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68333}
We want to enable the wasm-bigint implementation by default. However,
at the moment there exist several tests which fail when wasm-bigint
gets enabled. With this CL we adjust or delete these tests so that they
pass once wasm-bigint gets enabled. At the same time we disable these
tests for now, and re-enable them in the CL that flips the flag.
R=jkummerow@chromium.org
Bug: v8:7741
Change-Id: I733bfe7ff19e403913b143e6ea86ab13602ab993
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2243212
Commit-Queue: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68328}
The condition was too strong since we never store Smis into
{previously_materialized_objects}.
Bug: chromium:1094132
Change-Id: I680eb7f175f12d3c44882fd8a9eff0d062eda55f
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2241517
Commit-Queue: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Nico Hartmann <nicohartmann@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Nico Hartmann <nicohartmann@chromium.org>
Auto-Submit: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68317}
Foozie came up with a mind-boggling example hitting a similarly
mind-boggling bug: object construction (JSObject::New) wants to create
the constructor's function initial map (JSFunction::GetDerivedMap ->
JSFunction::EnsureHasInitialMap). To do so, it calls
JSFunction::CalculateExpectedNofProperties. This harmless sounding
function triggers compilation of the function. Since we're running with
--always-opt, this is an optimizing compilation. Turbofan ends up
depending on the function's "prototype" property, for which it wants to
create the initial map so that it can install the code dependency. That
is, EnsureHasInitialMap is reentered. At this point there is no further
compilation attempt because the bytecode now exists. The initial map is
created and installed on the function, and TF records the code
dependency on that map. When CalculateExpectedNofProperties returns
control to the outer EnsureHasInitialMap, yet another initial map is
created and set on the function, forgetting the previous one and thus
the code dependency.
I'm not sure if this bug can only be observed with --always-opt. The fix
is general.
Bug: chromium:1092011
Change-Id: I8b972748e49b9eb8f06fa17ea9ca037de2bd7532
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2238570
Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68292}
Previously, for the various customisation points of String builtins
(like String.prototype.replace), we skipped the customisation symbol
lookup (like for Symbol.replace) for Smis.
But, we do need to do the lookup for Smis in case Number.prototype or
Object.prototype have the Symbol. This missing lookup was creating an
observable difference between Smis and HeapNumbers.
Bug: chromium:1092896
Change-Id: I8928d237fa74abeaa2aa81318b8903087c507f0d
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2238030
Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Auto-Submit: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Shu-yu Guo <syg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68285}
As per the latest update to the 'reference types' wasm proposal, the
nullref type is removed. Following that, all its uses in V8 were also
removed. This CL:
- Removes now dead code referencing nullref.
- Changes names of functions/exceptions containing 'nullref' to 'null'.
- Changes nullref to the corresponding nullable type in some tests.
Bug: v8:7748
Change-Id: I5b4606671d7b24dd48a45a3341e8a1c056fcd1d0
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2238026
Commit-Queue: Manos Koukoutos <manoskouk@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68283}
The reference types wasm proposal dropped all subtyping. Subsequently,
the 'anyref' type was renamed to externref.
This changes all references of the *type* anyref to externref.
Additionally, the flag that permits this extension is renamed to
"reftypes" to mirror the proposal name.
Bug: v8:7748
Change-Id: Icf323f13b9660fd10540e65125af053fca3a03f9
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2232941
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Kim-Anh Tran <kimanh@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68270}
The test takes several minutes, because the {slice} call does thousands
of runtime calls, which again call {ValidateElements} for every single
added element (in debug mode).
Hence this CL skips the test in the slow_path variant.
R=leszeks@chromium.org
Change-Id: I2fbaaf32809ecb34de1f563f34bd65ce8b7ab238
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2237628
Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68265}
This caused a CHECK failure after my recent CL.
Bug: chromium:1084820, chromium:1092650
Change-Id: Icdc2a755c6b30ad01dccc908e0e5e137fedf8918
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2237145
Reviewed-by: Nico Hartmann <nicohartmann@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68263}
Promise.{all,allSettled,any,race} should check resolve is a function before
opening their iteratable.
PR: https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/1912
PR for Promise.any: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-promise-any/pull/65
This CL includes the following cleanup changes:
- Made it more explicit that the constructor is a Constructor.
- Removed unnecessary nested try blocks (a try can have both a catch and a label).
- Moved commonly used definitions out of promise-race.tq where they don't belong.
- Made the parameter order of PerformPromiseAll match the spec.
Bug: v8:10578
Change-Id: I9deb5d5106db7350a0d0ad52f165ff2469e7074b
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2232544
Commit-Queue: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Igor Sheludko <ishell@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Shu-yu Guo <syg@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68260}
A previous CL removed the kNoThrow flags from both
SpeculativeBigIntAdd and SpeculativeBigIntSubtract. This introduced a
bug, because the JSTypeHintLowering phase, where these operators are
introduced during inlining, does not support the generation of throwing
operators.
Since these operators always deoptimize in case of an error, instead of
throwing the exception directly, it is safe to mark them as kNoThrow.
Bug: chromium:1091461
No-Try: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
Change-Id: I551616b0c462647574e5af8824d9ed7b3252659d
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2235113
Commit-Queue: Nico Hartmann <nicohartmann@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68254}
Object materialization did not correctly deal with a mismatch between
current representation of a field value and expected representation.
This is an attempt to repair the situation.
Bug: chromium:1084820
Change-Id: Ib337cbaf5e36a5a616b6a6cb0ddf51018d49b96a
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2228330
Commit-Queue: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Nico Hartmann <nicohartmann@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68231}
Due to recent spec changes, We do not have to check if ref.func
instructions in global declarations only refer to declared functions.
Additionally functions referenced in exports and globals are now
considered declared.
R=ecmziegler@chromium.org
Bug: v8:10556
Change-Id: I79856c7d68155a04eb36769ceed8a58fe62a9f9f
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2228653
Commit-Queue: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Emanuel Ziegler <ecmziegler@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68190}
Speculative BigInt addition fails to throw the expected exception
when called with non-BigInt inputs when the result of the computation
is unused. In paricular, this CL does:
- Remove kNoThrow on speculative BigInt operators
- Fix AddWithFeedback to not lose type feedback if builtin throws
to elide existing deopt loops
- Add handling of TypeCheckKind in RepresentationChanger where this
was previously ignored
Bug: chromium:1073440
Change-Id: I953a5b790fc3b37a6824f0b6546a0488c51fbb3b
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2228493
Reviewed-by: Nico Hartmann <nicohartmann@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org>
Auto-Submit: Nico Hartmann <nicohartmann@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68181}
We use StoreOwnIC to initialize the object after creating a new object
with CreateObjectLiteral. CreateObjectLiteral stores kHoleNaNInt64
to indicate an uninitialized double field. When we actually try
to store a NaN value into that field later using StoreOwnIC, IC avoids
actually storing the new value since the existing value is "same as"
the value we try to write. The float comparison treats all NaNs as
equal. In this particular case, we should actually store the new value
since kHoleNaNInt64 value is used to represent an uninitialized field.
This cl just stores the new value even when the existing value is same
as the new value for double fields. The check is still required to
correctly track const fields.
Bug: chromium:1082293
Change-Id: Ib37061802f2403545cffa6d6fef08be074b0825d
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2228886
Reviewed-by: Igor Sheludko <ishell@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68167}
