- Add a no-simd-sse flag to skip SIMD tests on bots with no
hardware support.
Change-Id: I4efdbb5ee39c2e10ea8776a1f1e536ac96823efe
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2629465
Commit-Queue: Deepti Gandluri <gdeepti@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#72682}
This change completes support for import assertions for dynamic import().
A new version of the HostImportModuleDynamically callback taking import
assertions is added to the public API. The name is very verbose; we
could consider removing the "ImportAssertions" part when the old API
is removed.
Bytecode generation is updated to pass the assertions, if present, to
Runtime_DynamicImportCall.
Isolate::RunHostImportModuleDynamicallyCallback extracts the assertions
from the options bag, filters out the assertions not present in the
list specified by the host in HostGetSupportedImportAssertions, and
sorts them by code point order of the keys per
https://tc39.es/proposal-import-assertions/#sec-import-call-runtime-semantics-evaluation.
The resulting array is passed to the host in the callback.
Bug: v8:10958
Change-Id: I931df00f954a9f9c65bff5bcf461ba1c8f11e94e
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2620578
Commit-Queue: Dan Clark <daniec@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Camillo Bruni <cbruni@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#72307}
First step towards the new exception handling proposal:
https://github.com/WebAssembly/exception-handling/issues/125
This is essentially a revert of:
"[wasm] Switch to new 'catch' and 'br_on_exn' proposal."
The changes are:
- "catch" instruction takes a tag immediate,
- "rethrow" instruction takes a label immediate,
- Add "catch_all" instruction,
- Remove "br_on_exn" instruction,
- Do not push exceptions on the stack, only the encoded values
R=clemensb@chromium.org
CC=aheejin@chromium.org
Bug: v8:8091
Change-Id: Iea4d8d5a5d3ad50693f645e93c13e8de117aa884
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2484514
Commit-Queue: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#71602}
The index to be traced can be a full (platform-dependent) pointer sized
integer now. This CL prepares memory tracing for that.
As a drive-by, the "address" field is renamed to "offset", or
"effective_offset", depending on the situation.
R=manoskouk@chromium.org
Bug: v8:10949
Change-Id: I1fabfdb57835f041e1310a4eb4024d6254c08752
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2465825
Reviewed-by: Manos Koukoutos <manoskouk@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#70477}
This is a reland of 0ba115e6a9
Changes compared to last reland:
- Fix Python code trying to write to expected_outcomes, which is now a
computed property.
- Fix remaining place in d8.cc that ignored the --fuzzing flag.
- Expect flag contradictions for --cache in code_serializer variant.
Original change's description:
> Reland^3 "[flags] warn about contradictory flags"
>
> Changes:
> - Also allow second parameter influenced by --cache to be reassigned.
> - Fix --stress-opt to only --always-opt in the last iteration as before.
>
> Original change's description:
> > Reland^2 "[flags] warn about contradictory flags"
> >
> > This is a reland of d8f8a7e210
> > Change compared to last reland:
> > - Do not check for d8 flag contradictions in the presence of --fuzzing
> > - Allow identical re-declaration of --cache=*
> >
> > Original change's description:
> > > Reland "[flags] warn about contradictory flags"
> > >
> > > This is a reland of b8f9166664
> > > Difference to previous CL: Additional functionality to specify
> > > incompatible flags based on GN variables and extra-flags, used
> > > to fix the issues that came up on the waterfall.
> > >
> > > This also changes the rules regarding repeated flags: While
> > > explicitly repeated flags are allowed for boolean values as long
> > > as they are identical, repeated flags or explicit flags in the
> > > presence of an active implication are disallowed for non-boolean
> > > flags. The latter simplifies specifying conflict rules in
> > > variants.py. Otherwise a rule like
> > >
> > > INCOMPATIBLE_FLAGS_PER_EXTRA_FLAG = {
> > > "--gc-interval=*": ["--gc-interval=*"],
> > > }
> > >
> > > wouldn't work because specifying the same GC interval twice
> > > wouldn't actually count as a conflict. This was an issue with
> > > test/mjsunit/wasm/gc-buffer.js, which specifies
> > > --gc-interval=500 exactly like the extra flag by the stress bot.
> > >
> > > Also, this now expands contradictory flags checking to d8 flags
> > > for consistency.
> > >
> > > Original change's description:
> > > > [flags] warn about contradictory flags
> > > >
> > > > Design Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lkvu8crkK7Ei39qjkPCFijpNyxWXsOktG9GB-7K34jM/
> > > >
> > > > Bug: v8:10577
> > > > Change-Id: Ib9cfdffa401c48c895bf31caed5ee03545beddab
> > > > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2154792
> > > > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
> > > > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> > > > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68168}
> > >
> > > Bug: v8:10577
> > > Change-Id: I268e590ee18a535b13dee14eeb15ddd0a9ee8341
> > > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2235115
> > > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> > > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68989}
> >
> > Bug: v8:10577
> > Change-Id: I31d2794d4f9ff630f3444210100c64d67d881276
> > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2339464
> > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69339}
>
> Bug: v8:10577
> Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux64_tsan_rel_ng
> Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux64_tsan_isolates_rel_ng
> Change-Id: I4a69dc57a102782cb453144323e3752ac8278624
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2352770
> Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69433}
Change-Id: Ib6d2aeb495210f581ac671221c265df58e8e5e70
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2398640
Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69954}
This reverts commit dc18b82221.
Reason for revert: still causing failures: https://ci.chromium.org/p/v8/builders/ci/V8%20Linux%20-%20debug/31566
Original change's description:
> Reland^3 "[flags] warn about contradictory flags"
>
> This is a reland of 0ba115e6a9
> Changes:
> - Also allow second parameter influenced by --cache to be reassigned.
> - Fix --stress-opt to only --always-opt in the last iteration as before.
>
> Original change's description:
> > Reland^2 "[flags] warn about contradictory flags"
> >
> > This is a reland of d8f8a7e210
> > Change compared to last reland:
> > - Do not check for d8 flag contradictions in the presence of --fuzzing
> > - Allow identical re-declaration of --cache=*
> >
> > Original change's description:
> > > Reland "[flags] warn about contradictory flags"
> > >
> > > This is a reland of b8f9166664
> > > Difference to previous CL: Additional functionality to specify
> > > incompatible flags based on GN variables and extra-flags, used
> > > to fix the issues that came up on the waterfall.
> > >
> > > This also changes the rules regarding repeated flags: While
> > > explicitly repeated flags are allowed for boolean values as long
> > > as they are identical, repeated flags or explicit flags in the
> > > presence of an active implication are disallowed for non-boolean
> > > flags. The latter simplifies specifying conflict rules in
> > > variants.py. Otherwise a rule like
> > >
> > > INCOMPATIBLE_FLAGS_PER_EXTRA_FLAG = {
> > > "--gc-interval=*": ["--gc-interval=*"],
> > > }
> > >
> > > wouldn't work because specifying the same GC interval twice
> > > wouldn't actually count as a conflict. This was an issue with
> > > test/mjsunit/wasm/gc-buffer.js, which specifies
> > > --gc-interval=500 exactly like the extra flag by the stress bot.
> > >
> > > Also, this now expands contradictory flags checking to d8 flags
> > > for consistency.
> > >
> > > Original change's description:
> > > > [flags] warn about contradictory flags
> > > >
> > > > Design Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lkvu8crkK7Ei39qjkPCFijpNyxWXsOktG9GB-7K34jM/
> > > >
> > > > Bug: v8:10577
> > > > Change-Id: Ib9cfdffa401c48c895bf31caed5ee03545beddab
> > > > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2154792
> > > > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
> > > > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> > > > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68168}
> > >
> > > Bug: v8:10577
> > > Change-Id: I268e590ee18a535b13dee14eeb15ddd0a9ee8341
> > > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2235115
> > > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> > > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68989}
> >
> > Bug: v8:10577
> > Change-Id: I31d2794d4f9ff630f3444210100c64d67d881276
> > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2339464
> > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69339}
>
> Bug: v8:10577
> Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux64_tsan_rel_ng
> Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux64_tsan_isolates_rel_ng
> Change-Id: I4a69dc57a102782cb453144323e3752ac8278624
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2352770
> Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69433}
TBR=machenbach@chromium.org,neis@chromium.org,clemensb@chromium.org,tebbi@chromium.org,tmrts@chromium.org
Change-Id: I4ccdd7b931d0ddccbcec1d6cfae8d4874ee49cfc
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: v8:10577
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux64_tsan_rel_ng
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux64_tsan_isolates_rel_ng
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2360414
Reviewed-by: Francis McCabe <fgm@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Francis McCabe <fgm@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69438}
This is a reland of 0ba115e6a9
Changes:
- Also allow second parameter influenced by --cache to be reassigned.
- Fix --stress-opt to only --always-opt in the last iteration as before.
Original change's description:
> Reland^2 "[flags] warn about contradictory flags"
>
> This is a reland of d8f8a7e210
> Change compared to last reland:
> - Do not check for d8 flag contradictions in the presence of --fuzzing
> - Allow identical re-declaration of --cache=*
>
> Original change's description:
> > Reland "[flags] warn about contradictory flags"
> >
> > This is a reland of b8f9166664
> > Difference to previous CL: Additional functionality to specify
> > incompatible flags based on GN variables and extra-flags, used
> > to fix the issues that came up on the waterfall.
> >
> > This also changes the rules regarding repeated flags: While
> > explicitly repeated flags are allowed for boolean values as long
> > as they are identical, repeated flags or explicit flags in the
> > presence of an active implication are disallowed for non-boolean
> > flags. The latter simplifies specifying conflict rules in
> > variants.py. Otherwise a rule like
> >
> > INCOMPATIBLE_FLAGS_PER_EXTRA_FLAG = {
> > "--gc-interval=*": ["--gc-interval=*"],
> > }
> >
> > wouldn't work because specifying the same GC interval twice
> > wouldn't actually count as a conflict. This was an issue with
> > test/mjsunit/wasm/gc-buffer.js, which specifies
> > --gc-interval=500 exactly like the extra flag by the stress bot.
> >
> > Also, this now expands contradictory flags checking to d8 flags
> > for consistency.
> >
> > Original change's description:
> > > [flags] warn about contradictory flags
> > >
> > > Design Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lkvu8crkK7Ei39qjkPCFijpNyxWXsOktG9GB-7K34jM/
> > >
> > > Bug: v8:10577
> > > Change-Id: Ib9cfdffa401c48c895bf31caed5ee03545beddab
> > > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2154792
> > > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
> > > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> > > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68168}
> >
> > Bug: v8:10577
> > Change-Id: I268e590ee18a535b13dee14eeb15ddd0a9ee8341
> > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2235115
> > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68989}
>
> Bug: v8:10577
> Change-Id: I31d2794d4f9ff630f3444210100c64d67d881276
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2339464
> Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69339}
Bug: v8:10577
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux64_tsan_rel_ng
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux64_tsan_isolates_rel_ng
Change-Id: I4a69dc57a102782cb453144323e3752ac8278624
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2352770
Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69433}
This reverts commit 0ba115e6a9.
Reason for revert: Breaks test on TSAN - block-conflicts
https://ci.chromium.org/p/v8/builders/ci/V8%20Linux64%20TSAN%20-%20concurrent%20marking/14230
Original change's description:
> Reland^2 "[flags] warn about contradictory flags"
>
> This is a reland of d8f8a7e210
> Change compared to last reland:
> - Do not check for d8 flag contradictions in the presence of --fuzzing
> - Allow identical re-declaration of --cache=*
>
> Original change's description:
> > Reland "[flags] warn about contradictory flags"
> >
> > This is a reland of b8f9166664
> > Difference to previous CL: Additional functionality to specify
> > incompatible flags based on GN variables and extra-flags, used
> > to fix the issues that came up on the waterfall.
> >
> > This also changes the rules regarding repeated flags: While
> > explicitly repeated flags are allowed for boolean values as long
> > as they are identical, repeated flags or explicit flags in the
> > presence of an active implication are disallowed for non-boolean
> > flags. The latter simplifies specifying conflict rules in
> > variants.py. Otherwise a rule like
> >
> > INCOMPATIBLE_FLAGS_PER_EXTRA_FLAG = {
> > "--gc-interval=*": ["--gc-interval=*"],
> > }
> >
> > wouldn't work because specifying the same GC interval twice
> > wouldn't actually count as a conflict. This was an issue with
> > test/mjsunit/wasm/gc-buffer.js, which specifies
> > --gc-interval=500 exactly like the extra flag by the stress bot.
> >
> > Also, this now expands contradictory flags checking to d8 flags
> > for consistency.
> >
> > Original change's description:
> > > [flags] warn about contradictory flags
> > >
> > > Design Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lkvu8crkK7Ei39qjkPCFijpNyxWXsOktG9GB-7K34jM/
> > >
> > > Bug: v8:10577
> > > Change-Id: Ib9cfdffa401c48c895bf31caed5ee03545beddab
> > > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2154792
> > > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
> > > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> > > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68168}
> >
> > Bug: v8:10577
> > Change-Id: I268e590ee18a535b13dee14eeb15ddd0a9ee8341
> > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2235115
> > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68989}
>
> Bug: v8:10577
> Change-Id: I31d2794d4f9ff630f3444210100c64d67d881276
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2339464
> Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69339}
TBR=machenbach@chromium.org,neis@chromium.org,clemensb@chromium.org,tebbi@chromium.org,tmrts@chromium.org
Change-Id: I1454a05e357ddd704db7fb79e51be65d45a9a16e
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: v8:10577
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2348365
Reviewed-by: Bill Budge <bbudge@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Bill Budge <bbudge@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69341}
This is a reland of d8f8a7e210
Change compared to last reland:
- Do not check for d8 flag contradictions in the presence of --fuzzing
- Allow identical re-declaration of --cache=*
Original change's description:
> Reland "[flags] warn about contradictory flags"
>
> This is a reland of b8f9166664
> Difference to previous CL: Additional functionality to specify
> incompatible flags based on GN variables and extra-flags, used
> to fix the issues that came up on the waterfall.
>
> This also changes the rules regarding repeated flags: While
> explicitly repeated flags are allowed for boolean values as long
> as they are identical, repeated flags or explicit flags in the
> presence of an active implication are disallowed for non-boolean
> flags. The latter simplifies specifying conflict rules in
> variants.py. Otherwise a rule like
>
> INCOMPATIBLE_FLAGS_PER_EXTRA_FLAG = {
> "--gc-interval=*": ["--gc-interval=*"],
> }
>
> wouldn't work because specifying the same GC interval twice
> wouldn't actually count as a conflict. This was an issue with
> test/mjsunit/wasm/gc-buffer.js, which specifies
> --gc-interval=500 exactly like the extra flag by the stress bot.
>
> Also, this now expands contradictory flags checking to d8 flags
> for consistency.
>
> Original change's description:
> > [flags] warn about contradictory flags
> >
> > Design Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lkvu8crkK7Ei39qjkPCFijpNyxWXsOktG9GB-7K34jM/
> >
> > Bug: v8:10577
> > Change-Id: Ib9cfdffa401c48c895bf31caed5ee03545beddab
> > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2154792
> > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
> > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68168}
>
> Bug: v8:10577
> Change-Id: I268e590ee18a535b13dee14eeb15ddd0a9ee8341
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2235115
> Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68989}
Bug: v8:10577
Change-Id: I31d2794d4f9ff630f3444210100c64d67d881276
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2339464
Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69339}
Previously, all ThisExpression's had kNoSourcePositions leading to
incorrect error messages like this:
➜ d8 -e "function t() { for (const x of this) {} } t();"
unnamed:1: TypeError: undefined is not a function
function t() { for (const x of this) {} } t();
^
TypeError: undefined is not a function
at t (unnamed:1:11)
at unnamed:1:43
This patch allows creation of a ThisExpression with a source position,
leading to a better error message:
➜ d8 -e "function t() { for (const x of this) {} } t();"
unnamed:1: TypeError: this is not iterable
function t() { for (const x of this) {} } t();
^
TypeError: this is not iterable
at t (unnamed:1:32)
at unnamed:1:43
This patch does not remove the existing cached version of
ThisExpression and instead creates a new one when required.
Bug: v8:6513
Change-Id: Idee4fe8946a9b821d06ff4a5e7eaefe54874ec59
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2345226
Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69300}
This reverts commit d8f8a7e210.
Reason for revert: Breaks code_serializer variant - https://cr-buildbucket.appspot.com/build/8874070652992164976
Original change's description:
> Reland "[flags] warn about contradictory flags"
>
> This is a reland of b8f9166664
> Difference to previous CL: Additional functionality to specify
> incompatible flags based on GN variables and extra-flags, used
> to fix the issues that came up on the waterfall.
>
> This also changes the rules regarding repeated flags: While
> explicitly repeated flags are allowed for boolean values as long
> as they are identical, repeated flags or explicit flags in the
> presence of an active implication are disallowed for non-boolean
> flags. The latter simplifies specifying conflict rules in
> variants.py. Otherwise a rule like
>
> INCOMPATIBLE_FLAGS_PER_EXTRA_FLAG = {
> "--gc-interval=*": ["--gc-interval=*"],
> }
>
> wouldn't work because specifying the same GC interval twice
> wouldn't actually count as a conflict. This was an issue with
> test/mjsunit/wasm/gc-buffer.js, which specifies
> --gc-interval=500 exactly like the extra flag by the stress bot.
>
> Also, this now expands contradictory flags checking to d8 flags
> for consistency.
>
> Original change's description:
> > [flags] warn about contradictory flags
> >
> > Design Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lkvu8crkK7Ei39qjkPCFijpNyxWXsOktG9GB-7K34jM/
> >
> > Bug: v8:10577
> > Change-Id: Ib9cfdffa401c48c895bf31caed5ee03545beddab
> > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2154792
> > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
> > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68168}
>
> Bug: v8:10577
> Change-Id: I268e590ee18a535b13dee14eeb15ddd0a9ee8341
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2235115
> Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68989}
TBR=machenbach@chromium.org,neis@chromium.org,clemensb@chromium.org,tebbi@chromium.org,tmrts@chromium.org
Change-Id: I7969065b0edbc463a94e530485bc2ab623d77b62
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: v8:10577
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2312782
Reviewed-by: Maya Lekova <mslekova@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Maya Lekova <mslekova@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68992}
This is a reland of b8f9166664
Difference to previous CL: Additional functionality to specify
incompatible flags based on GN variables and extra-flags, used
to fix the issues that came up on the waterfall.
This also changes the rules regarding repeated flags: While
explicitly repeated flags are allowed for boolean values as long
as they are identical, repeated flags or explicit flags in the
presence of an active implication are disallowed for non-boolean
flags. The latter simplifies specifying conflict rules in
variants.py. Otherwise a rule like
INCOMPATIBLE_FLAGS_PER_EXTRA_FLAG = {
"--gc-interval=*": ["--gc-interval=*"],
}
wouldn't work because specifying the same GC interval twice
wouldn't actually count as a conflict. This was an issue with
test/mjsunit/wasm/gc-buffer.js, which specifies
--gc-interval=500 exactly like the extra flag by the stress bot.
Also, this now expands contradictory flags checking to d8 flags
for consistency.
Original change's description:
> [flags] warn about contradictory flags
>
> Design Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lkvu8crkK7Ei39qjkPCFijpNyxWXsOktG9GB-7K34jM/
>
> Bug: v8:10577
> Change-Id: Ib9cfdffa401c48c895bf31caed5ee03545beddab
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2154792
> Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
> Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68168}
Bug: v8:10577
Change-Id: I268e590ee18a535b13dee14eeb15ddd0a9ee8341
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2235115
Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68989}
With this CL d8 exits with an error code if there is an unhandled
promise rejection, e.g. due tue a failed assertion in a promise. Up
until now these assertions were just ignored.
Bug: v8:10556
Change-Id: I25f20e4be45a2de130562deb15f6a144f0ac976f
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2238569
Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Camillo Bruni <cbruni@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68503}
The registers were not spilled correctly in liftoff when tracing
function calls, which caused runtime errors.
R=clemensb@chromium.orgCC=thibaudm@chromium.org
Bug: v8:10559
Change-Id: Ic0a9ae8a286bdee8f8440e006d0b47e52241ea5a
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2245595
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Arnaud Robin <arobin@google.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68340}
Added wasm tracing support for turbofan with the flag --trace-wasm.
The test suite was updated accordingly.
R=clemensb@chromium.org
Bug: v8:10559
Change-Id: Ie6ee2a05142081416d8572d4d72dcd315e0bf285
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2235536
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Arnaud Robin <arobin@google.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68253}
Added display of identation, function index, function names and compiler
used when tracing function calls in wasm.
R=clemensb@chromium.org
Bug: v8:10559
Change-Id: I58b4e7b077365bdee7bae9b5ad8a50178c322147
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2230532
Commit-Queue: Arnaud Robin <arobin@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68198}
Added return value display when tracing function calls in wasm.
The new types handled are I32, I64, F32 and F64.
Only single return value is handled.
R=clemensb@chromium.org
Bug: v8:10559
Change-Id: I726d08fcfdc8bf2c3e43a25ec1932412ff74387b
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2225024
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Arnaud Robin <arobin@google.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68143}
Added --trace-wasm flag which prints function entry in wasm.
R=clemensb@chromium.org
Bug: v8:10559
Change-Id: I049efeadb0149f4f58ce34a29fd53fbf5688bd4b
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2215052
Commit-Queue: Arnaud Robin <arobin@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#67998}
The serializer currently cannot handle a heap state containing
arbitrary compiled Code objects. As a quick fix for the
--stress-snapshot d8 flag, we clear compiled data from the isolate
prior to the serialize-deserialize-verify pass.
With this change, mjsunit tests pass on x64.
The %SerializeDeserializeNow() runtime function would require more
work, since it is not possible to mutate the heap to this extent while
still preserving a runnable host context and isolate. We will need
another solution there.
Drive-by: Skip the stress_snapshot variant except for the mjsunit
suite.
Tbr: machenbach@chromium.org
Bug: v8:10493,v8:10416
Change-Id: Ie110da8b51613fcd69c7f391d3cf8589d6b04dd8
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2182429
Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#67585}
The interpreter will be moved to be test-only, hence
--wasm-interpret-all also needs to be removed.
Since we don't have any non-compiling tier any more, we also remove the
implication from --jitless to --wasm-lazy-compilation. Instead, we add
another CHECK that we can't be in jitless mode if we trigger any wasm
compilation.
All tests that just ran other tests and additionally passed
--wasm-interpret-all become redundant and are deleted. Also all
regression tests that explicitly specify --wasm-interpret-all are not
needed any more.
R=thibaudm@chromium.org
Bug: v8:10389
Change-Id: I5ddf20a842117a6c05e277a5308f5cfe42e6bfa5
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2164792
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#67419}
To avoid shrinking the unregister token map on each pop of the cleared
cell list, the Torque implementation of the cleanup loop avoids
shrinking the map until the end of the loop.
To support that, PopClearedCellHoldings is refactored to the Torque
PopClearedCell which calls the
JSFinalization::RemoveCellFromUnregisterTokenMap and the runtime
ShrinkFinalizationRegistryUnregisterTokenMap. The former cannot GC is
and is implemented in CSA as a fast C call. The latter can GC and is a
runtime call.
This also incidentally makes uses of FinalizationRegistry without
unregister token a fast path that doesn't have to leave Torque.
Bug: v8:8179
Change-Id: Ia0c3c5800d26e31319a818f164f6bd3267355aa6
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2137950
Commit-Queue: Shu-yu Guo <syg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#67161}
Previously we use the error message for normal invalid private member
access, so for a failed brand check for class C, the error is
TypeError: Cannot read private member C from an object whose class did not declare it
This updates the message to
TypeError: Object must be an instance of class C
Bug: v8:8330
Change-Id: Ida98f46b8387631194a9b7a48bd1f419045ac6e7
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2100688
Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com>
Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Shu-yu Guo <syg@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66923}
We were missing test cases for i16, i64, and f64. It's not super
critical, but it's also an easy addition, and helps bring coverage of
memory-tracing.cc up (close to 100% now).
Change-Id: Ib8433f8615c900d8665ccbc33e12d6fd05d51336
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2121168
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66878}
The deprecated legacy FinalizationGroup APIs are left unchanged for
compat.
Bug: v8:8179
Change-Id: I9bdcaa92360db318c96fc8524c04163ece25118e
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2071236
Commit-Queue: Shu-yu Guo <syg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66437}
Deprecate the following explicit FinalizationGroup APIs in favor of
automatic handling of FinalizationGroup cleanup callbacks:
- v8::Isolate::SetHostCleanupFinalizationGroupCallback
- v8::FinaliationGroup::Cleanup
If no HostCleanupFinalizationGroupCallback is set, then
FinalizationGroup cleanup callbacks are automatically scheduled by V8
itself as non-nestable foreground tasks.
When a Context being disposed, all FinalizationGroups that are
associated with it are removed from the dirty list, cancelling
scheduled cleanup.
This is a reland of 31d8ff7ac5
Bug: v8:8179, v8:10190
Change-Id: I704ecf48aeebac1dc2c05ea1c052f6a2560ae332
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2045723
Commit-Queue: Shu-yu Guo <syg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66208}
This reverts commit 31d8ff7ac5.
Reason for revert: https://crbug.com/v8/10190
Original change's description:
> [weakrefs] Schedule FinalizationGroup cleanup tasks from within V8
>
> Deprecate the following explicit FinalizationGroup APIs in favor of
> automatic handling of FinalizationGroup cleanup callbacks:
> - v8::Isolate::SetHostCleanupFinalizationGroupCallback
> - v8::FinaliationGroup::Cleanup
>
> If no HostCleanupFinalizationGroupCallback is set, then
> FinalizationGroup cleanup callbacks are automatically scheduled by V8
> itself as non-nestable foreground tasks.
>
> When a Context being disposed, all FinalizationGroups that are
> associated with it are removed from the dirty list, cancelling
> scheduled cleanup.
>
> Bug: v8:8179
> Change-Id: Ic09313a11dd00af36d1f698250b3d735155f45e8
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1986392
> Commit-Queue: Shu-yu Guo <syg@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66184}
TBR=ulan@chromium.org,rmcilroy@chromium.org,syg@chromium.org
# Not skipping CQ checks because original CL landed > 1 day ago.
Bug: v8:8179
Change-Id: If7869e9a5841803c10e748691f019a7d28f3b62e
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2043807
Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66190}
Deprecate the following explicit FinalizationGroup APIs in favor of
automatic handling of FinalizationGroup cleanup callbacks:
- v8::Isolate::SetHostCleanupFinalizationGroupCallback
- v8::FinaliationGroup::Cleanup
If no HostCleanupFinalizationGroupCallback is set, then
FinalizationGroup cleanup callbacks are automatically scheduled by V8
itself as non-nestable foreground tasks.
When a Context being disposed, all FinalizationGroups that are
associated with it are removed from the dirty list, cancelling
scheduled cleanup.
Bug: v8:8179
Change-Id: Ic09313a11dd00af36d1f698250b3d735155f45e8
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1986392
Commit-Queue: Shu-yu Guo <syg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66184}
The source position is set to the function call (console.log) not the
spread (..x), in the bytecode generator, as the spread operation is
done as part of the CallWithSpread bytecode.
The CallPrinter stops at the function call and doesn't look at the
arguments as well (in CallPrinter::VisitCall) to see if the error is
from an incorrect spread operation.
With this patch, we pass some state to the CallPrinter in the
CallWithSpread error case and check that in CallPrinter::VisitCall
before returning.
For the given source string:
```
x = undefined;
console.log(1, ...x);
```
Previously, the error was -
```
test.js:2: TypeError: console.log is not iterable (cannot read property Symbol(Symbol.iterator))
console.log(1, ...x);
^
TypeError: console.log is not iterable (cannot read property Symbol(Symbol.iterator))
at test.js:2:9
```
Now, the error is -
```
_test.js:2: TypeError: x is not iterable (cannot read property undefined)
console.log(1, ...x);
^
TypeError: x is not iterable (cannot read property undefined)
at _test.js:2:9
```
Bug: v8:10038
Change-Id: I199de9997f1d949c6f9b7b4f41d51f422b8b5131
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2037431
Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66131}
This relands commit 7c32fa05df.
Some test cases need to be updated, since we will bail out to TurboFan
where previously Liftoff was happy to run, when SIMD is not supported.
Original change's description:
> [wasm-simd][liftoff] Check CpuFeatures for SIMD support
>
> If Wasm simd128 is not supported on this particular hardware, we bail
> out to TurboFan.
>
> Bug: v8:9909
> Change-Id: Ie46e154426783ba099b7c0facc906670cda1bdd0
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2029427
> Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66055}
Bug: v8:9909
Bug: v8:10169
Change-Id: I850e1fe6bfbd12fb2eec052aa8367624c09f7a08
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2030354
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66090}
When the file begins with a hashbang, the scanner is in a failed state
when SkipHashbang() is called. This is usually not an issue but when
the parser encounters an ILLEGAL token, it will reset the SyntaxError
location because of it.
Bug: v8:10110
Change-Id: I1c7344bf5ad20079cff80130c991f3bff4d7e9a8
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1995312
Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66038}
Add a case for kWasmS128 in Spill. We encounter this in the
wasm-trace-memory-liftoff test, but that test was skipped on ARM and
ARM64 due to insufficient implementation of Liftoff on those archs. But
with recent changes, they are now capable of running this particular
test, so we enable it.
Drive-by fix for incorrect size used in vld1 for filling S128 values.
Bug: v8:9909
Change-Id: I8addd06ba3c9a40364e432180cd5dbc48debca23
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2007901
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#65904}
Add kWasmS128 to the list of supported types, and implement Fill for all
the architectures so that LocalGet works.
Add a new test file to contain tests that run only on Liftoff, and
assert that the code is indeed compiled by Liftoff.
We cannot rely on the nooptimization variant for testing
because by default, if Liftoff compilation fails, it will fall back to
Turbofan, and we accidentally get a test passing.
We skip these tests on mips architecture that don't support SIMD, since
there is no way to implement these, and we don't have a "lowering" phase
for Liftoff.
As we implement more of SIMD in Liftoff, we can add more
tests to this file and ensure correctness. Future patches will introduce
support for globals and params.
Bug: v8:9909
Change-Id: I7fc911f2d588d60c709ddb258b2efc1f22805fab
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1999470
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#65768}
This is a cleanup to remove unneeded flags after these changes (in
https://crrev.com/c/1988548):
* --future does not imply --wasm-tier-up any more, and
* --wasm-tier-up does not imply --liftoff any more.
Instead, now
* --wasm-tier-up is enabled by default,
* --wasm-tier-up has no effect if --liftoff is not set, and
* --future implies --liftoff.
R=ahaas@chromium.org
Bug: chromium:1040061
Change-Id: I5d04ee1f1d84ddcd0654df0e0a4c6298f80aee9e
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1993280
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#65666}
Currently there are two ways wasm locations are represented in the
inspector. This remains unchanged for now. Also, currently there are
multiple ways location is represented within V8, with the line number
sometimes being a function index and sometimes being 0, and the column
number being a byte offset which is sometimes function relative and
sometimes module relative. With this change, the line number is never
used within V8 (it is always 0), and the column number is always a
byte offset from the beginning of the module. This simplifies
translation logic and keeps it in one place, and will simplify future
changes to wasm location representation in the inspector API.
Bug: chromium:1013527
Change-Id: I8813d47c881988f9ab49d7529fb81fe10dbbccff
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1886915
Commit-Queue: Eric Leese <leese@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Simon Zünd <szuend@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64774}
Currently if the argument to matchAll has a null or undefined .flags
property, the error message will read "String.prototype.matchAll called
on null or undefined", which is very confusing.
Drive-by fix: Remove the related and unused
MethodInvokedOnNullOrUndefined error.
Bug: v8:9895
Change-Id: I3644545282ac8d2156c7a51086e37a0ab7f97a78
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1874619
Commit-Queue: Shu-yu Guo <syg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64530}
Embedded builtins are now unconditionally enabled, which removes the
need to differentiate between enabled/disabled embedded builtins.
This Cl removes the 'embedded_builtins' variant and related
*.status entries.
R=machenbach@chromium.org
Bug: v8:8519
Change-Id: I55d0dd54735b7cc437832af6fa2836fd6c14a317
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1864936
Commit-Queue: Simon Zünd <szuend@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64464}
Increase the embedded vector size to 91 as that is the max size needed to print
a s128 as a 32x4.
- max value of uint32_t has 10 digits in decimal, 1 for a potential sign,
3 spaces in between 4 of them -> 3 + 4 * 11 = 47
- max value of uint32_t has 8 digits in hex, 3 spaces in between -> 3 + 4 * 8 = 35
- the prefix "v128:" -> 5
- " / " to separate the decimal and hex representation -> 3
- null byte
47 + 35 + 5 + 3 + 1 = 91
Bug: v8:9754
Change-Id: I153c30738fa8862b44fb5103cbe62ea0bcea9718
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1814885
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Deepti Gandluri <gdeepti@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64256}
This brings our constants back in line with the changed spec text. We
already use kExprTableGet and kExprTableSet, but for locals and globals
we still use the old wording.
This renaming is mostly mechanical.
PS1 was created using:
ag -l 'kExpr(Get|Set|Tee)Local' src test | \
xargs -L1 sed -E 's/kExpr(Get|Set|Tee)Local\b/kExprLocal\1/g' -i
PS2 contains manual fixes.
R=mstarzinger@chromium.org
Bug: v8:9810
Change-Id: I1617f1b2a100685a3bf56218e76845a9481959c5
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1847354
Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64161}
Adds support for parsing top level await to V8, as well as
many tests.
This is the final cl in the series to add support for top level
await to v8.
Spec is here:
https://tc39.es/proposal-top-level-await/#sec-execute-async-module
Bug: v8:9344
Change-Id: Ie8f17ad8c7c60d1f6996d134ae154416cc1f31e3
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1703878
Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Joshua Litt <joshualitt@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63946}
This is a reland of 1fba044154
Chromium expectation tests have been disabled, and will be enabled
Original change's description:
> [destructuring] Elide coercible check for simple keys
>
> Simple object destructuring, such as `let {a,b} = o`, is less efficient
> than the equivalent assignments `let a = o.a; let b = o.b`. This is
> because it does a nil check of `o` before the assignments. However, this
> nil check is not strictly necessary for simple (i.e. non-computed) names,
> as there will be an equivalent nil check on the first access to o in
> `o.a`. For computed names the computation is unfortunately obervable.
>
> So, we can elide the nil check when the first property (if any) of the
> destructuring target is a non-computed name. This messes a bit with our
> error messages, so we re-use the CallPrinter to also find destructuring
> assignment based errors, and fiddle with the error message there. As
> a side-effect, we also get out the object name in the AST, so we can
> output a slightly nicer error message.
>
> Change-Id: Iafa858e27ed771a146cd3ba57903cc73bb46951d
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1773254
> Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
> Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63453}
TBR=verwaest@chromium.org
Bug: chromium:999473
Change-Id: Ib0b2e4be433c50521ba1722e1c06b672bfefa405
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1777702
Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63477}
This patch implements the access of private accessors by loading the
referenced component from the AccessorPair associated with private
name variables. It also makes the error messages for invalid kind
of private accessor access more specific.
Bug: v8:8330
Design doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/10W4begYfs7lmldSqBoQBBt_BKamgT8igqxF9u50RGrI/edit
Change-Id: I6d441cffb85f8d9cd0417ec9b6ae20f3e34ef418
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1695205
Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63474}
This reverts commit 1fba044154.
Reason for revert: blocks V8 roll due to layout test failures caused by error message changes:
https://ci.chromium.org/p/v8/builders/ci/V8%20Blink%20Linux/347
Original change's description:
> [destructuring] Elide coercible check for simple keys
>
> Simple object destructuring, such as `let {a,b} = o`, is less efficient
> than the equivalent assignments `let a = o.a; let b = o.b`. This is
> because it does a nil check of `o` before the assignments. However, this
> nil check is not strictly necessary for simple (i.e. non-computed) names,
> as there will be an equivalent nil check on the first access to o in
> `o.a`. For computed names the computation is unfortunately obervable.
>
> So, we can elide the nil check when the first property (if any) of the
> destructuring target is a non-computed name. This messes a bit with our
> error messages, so we re-use the CallPrinter to also find destructuring
> assignment based errors, and fiddle with the error message there. As
> a side-effect, we also get out the object name in the AST, so we can
> output a slightly nicer error message.
>
> Change-Id: Iafa858e27ed771a146cd3ba57903cc73bb46951d
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1773254
> Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
> Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63453}
TBR=leszeks@chromium.org,verwaest@chromium.org
Change-Id: I74cf06ebd987e5b8bbe1831b0042c085edf37f5b
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1776994
Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63465}
Simple object destructuring, such as `let {a,b} = o`, is less efficient
than the equivalent assignments `let a = o.a; let b = o.b`. This is
because it does a nil check of `o` before the assignments. However, this
nil check is not strictly necessary for simple (i.e. non-computed) names,
as there will be an equivalent nil check on the first access to o in
`o.a`. For computed names the computation is unfortunately obervable.
So, we can elide the nil check when the first property (if any) of the
destructuring target is a non-computed name. This messes a bit with our
error messages, so we re-use the CallPrinter to also find destructuring
assignment based errors, and fiddle with the error message there. As
a side-effect, we also get out the object name in the AST, so we can
output a slightly nicer error message.
Change-Id: Iafa858e27ed771a146cd3ba57903cc73bb46951d
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1773254
Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63453}
This is a reland of 89d93e3851
Original change's description:
> Reland "Let all early errors be SyntaxErrors."
>
> This is a reland of 99fd5b9b9d which includes a missed update to
> test/test262/test262.status.
>
> Implement the spec change from the following TC39 PR:
> https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/1527
>
> Bug: v8:9326
> Change-Id: Ie3aac60db550e90fb648fc30886a05419fa41afe
> TBR: adamk@chromium.org
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1682989
> Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org>
> Commit-Queue: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#62500}
Bug: v8:9326
Change-Id: Ic30280400dfa5b83a4a397888e563eee479446c5
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1688271
Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#62553}
This assertion was borked, as it accepted obviously "same" values like
the same object. This fixes the predicate by switching both assertSame
and assertNotSame to use {Object.is} underneath. It also adds a new
respective regression test (gotta test the tester).
R=ahaas@chromium.org
TEST=message/mjsunit/fail/assert_not_same
Change-Id: I6ba20c4b8b96a736ab924715b1cad78f2f43a120
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1687541
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#62512}
This reverts commit 89d93e3851.
Reason for revert: Breaks layout tests: https://ci.chromium.org/p/v8/builders/ci/V8-Blink%20Linux%2064/32929
Original change's description:
> Reland "Let all early errors be SyntaxErrors."
>
> This is a reland of 99fd5b9b9d which includes a missed update to
> test/test262/test262.status.
>
> Implement the spec change from the following TC39 PR:
> https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/1527
>
> Bug: v8:9326
> Change-Id: Ie3aac60db550e90fb648fc30886a05419fa41afe
> TBR: adamk@chromium.org
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1682989
> Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org>
> Commit-Queue: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#62500}
TBR=adamk@chromium.org,gsathya@chromium.org,verwaest@chromium.org,rkirsling@gmail.com
Change-Id: Ia56dcda6780a2b1249749e1e7978b35b5e33fbcf
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: v8:9326
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1687678
Reviewed-by: Clemens Hammacher <clemensh@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Clemens Hammacher <clemensh@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#62509}
This is a reland of 99fd5b9b9d which includes a missed update to
test/test262/test262.status.
Implement the spec change from the following TC39 PR:
https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/1527
Bug: v8:9326
Change-Id: Ie3aac60db550e90fb648fc30886a05419fa41afe
TBR: adamk@chromium.org
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1682989
Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#62500}
Implement the spec change from the following TC39 PR:
https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/1527
Bug: v8:9326
Change-Id: I9639903b12e7621e323990e2335f00e0313a59c3
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1643171
Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#62451}
d8 treats files with the .mjs extension as modules instead of
classic scripts. Thus, the `// MODULE` pragma and its corresponding
logic in test runners can be removed in favor of explicitly adding
the extension.
Bug: v8:7950, v8:9395, v8:9406
Also-By: tmrts@chromium.org
Change-Id: Ic74328dc5c5f176bb4bdf6d74bdd4d3966279ba5
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1675958
Commit-Queue: Mathias Bynens <mathias@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
Auto-Submit: Mathias Bynens <mathias@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#62421}
Perform a best-effort check for module context and provide an
appropriate error.
As seen from the import-blah-script.js test, we could have invalid
import expressions in a script context that could result in an error
saying "Cannot use import statement outside a module" which isn't
the ideal error because the error is an incorrect import
expression.
But, when the developer changes to a module context, the
correct error is thrown.
To fix this, we'd have to refactor and call ParseImportDeclaration,
and then throw an appropriate error, which seems like a lot of
overhead for not enough gain.
Bug: v8:9392, v8:6513
Change-Id: I520ebb490fff4d95743a7c751d4095db9a35d41b
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1675948
Reviewed-by: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#62358}
We have a global test/OWNERS that has "file://COMMON_OWNERS".
This CL removes redundant OWNERS files in test/ subdirectories and
removes redundant entries from OWNERS files we need to keep for
special per-file entries.
R=yangguo@chromium.org, machenbach@chromium.org
CC=jkummerow@chromium.org
Bug: v8:9247
Change-Id: Ic2e8cbe8e379d7d23c86c6164305e65807f28ed3
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1674024
Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Clemens Hammacher <clemensh@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#62336}
This patch implements the access of private methods:
- When building property loads, check whether it requires
a brand check. If so, build the brand check and load the
property (the method) from the context instead.
- Throw type errors when there is an attempted write to private
methods.
Design: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1T-Ql6HOIH2U_8YjWkwK2rTfywwb7b3Qe8d3jkz72KwA/edit#
Bug: v8:8330
Change-Id: Ic917d2a0030196c1940b0c0ba65a340af736c769
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1610383
Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com>
Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#62292}
Currently, in wasm-function stack traces, v8 displays the decimal offset
from the start of the function. However, the WebAssembly WebAPI
specification says that it should be a hex offset into the module.
This change makes the stack trace display with hex module offsets, as
well as fixing all the unit tests that depended on the old behaviour.
R=fgm@chromium.org, titzer@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org
Bug: v8:9172
Change-Id: I73737a319a42dd665521ab8a4b825199ae11c87f
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1646846
Reviewed-by: Ben Titzer <titzer@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Simon Zünd <szuend@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Guanzhong Chen <gzchen@google.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#62103}
Quotes have been added around the token to make the message clearer.
Bug: chromium:943636
Change-Id: Ic38f3e6d307157af2c0146e69fb611a2cfb46564
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1593307
Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#62074}
Bug: v8:9247
Change-Id: Id6860e7b0f932990ac3cda39e369b0809e4f6a2b
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1632072
Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Clifford <danno@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Hannes Payer <hpayer@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#61928}
This is a reland of 3dd5661204
The reland introduces a new flag "--experimental-stack-trace-frames".
The flag is disabled by default, but enabled for relevant tests.
The flag stays disabled by default until API frames are eagerly
symbolized to prevent leaks in blink web tests.
Original change's description:
> [stack-trace] Include API functions in Error.stack stack trace
>
> This CL extends Error.stack to include frames of functions declared
> with the C++ FunctionTemplate API. For example, "print" in d8.
>
> Two changes are necessary:
> - HandleApiCall and friends need to go through an BUILTIN_EXIT frame
> instead of an EXIT frame. The existing stack-trace machinery will
> then pick up FunctionTemplate frames without additional changes.
> - Turbofan doesn't go through HandleApiCall, but instead uses an
> ASM builtin to enter FunctionTemplate functions. A "marker"
> frame state is needed to include these frames in the stack trace.
>
> Note: This CL only includes these frames in Error.stack,
> but not (yet) in the stack-trace API (v8.h).
>
> Bug: v8:8742,v8:6802
> Change-Id: Ic0631af883cf56e0d0122a2e0c54e36fed324d91
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1609835
> Commit-Queue: Simon Zünd <szuend@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Sigurd Schneider <sigurds@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#61602}
Bug: v8:8742, v8:6802
Change-Id: I1d3b79cdf0b2edcbaeff1ec15e10deeca725f017
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1621925
Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Sigurd Schneider <sigurds@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Simon Zünd <szuend@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#61683}
This adds two more message tests to test compile errors in
WebAssembly.compileStreaming and WebAssembly.instantiateStreaming.
R=mstarzinger@chromium.org
Bug: v8:9266
Change-Id: I34d1df4ce0fb02e14f3e5011569c8ba1d1374658
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1619746
Commit-Queue: Clemens Hammacher <clemensh@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#61660}
This fixes the error message generated for compile errors during
asynchronous instantiation. It shows "WebAssembly.instantiate()" now
instead of "WebAssembly.compile()".
R=mstarzinger@chromium.org
Bug: v8:9266
Change-Id: Ieae478d1c4f6843fbc17e15debb6c49f72059d99
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1617940
Commit-Queue: Clemens Hammacher <clemensh@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#61654}
This adds three message tests to test the message stack trace we show
for
- synchronous compilation,
- asynchronous compilation, and
- asynchronous instantiation.
Note that the message for the asynchronous cases currently contain the
"WebAssembly.Module()" prefix, which will be fixed in a separate CL.
R=mstarzinger@chromium.org
Bug: v8:9266
Change-Id: I370f4211b5f577ea1b5da026a78b292b50c6a339
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1617938
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Clemens Hammacher <clemensh@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#61653}
This reverts commit 3dd5661204.
Reason for revert: causes leak tests in blink layout tests to fail: https://ci.chromium.org/p/chromium/builders/ci/WebKit%20Linux%20Trusty%20Leak/34295
Steps to reproduce:
- Build blink_tests with following GN args
is_component_build = false
is_debug = false
strip_absolute_paths_from_debug_symbols = true
- Run
third_party/blink/tools/run_web_tests.py --additional-expectations third_party/blink/web_tests/LeakExpectations --time-out-ms 48000 --enable-leak-detection external/wpt/wasm/webapi/body.any.html
Original change's description:
> [stack-trace] Include API functions in Error.stack stack trace
>
> This CL extends Error.stack to include frames of functions declared
> with the C++ FunctionTemplate API. For example, "print" in d8.
>
> Two changes are necessary:
> - HandleApiCall and friends need to go through an BUILTIN_EXIT frame
> instead of an EXIT frame. The existing stack-trace machinery will
> then pick up FunctionTemplate frames without additional changes.
> - Turbofan doesn't go through HandleApiCall, but instead uses an
> ASM builtin to enter FunctionTemplate functions. A "marker"
> frame state is needed to include these frames in the stack trace.
>
> Note: This CL only includes these frames in Error.stack,
> but not (yet) in the stack-trace API (v8.h).
>
> Bug: v8:8742,v8:6802
> Change-Id: Ic0631af883cf56e0d0122a2e0c54e36fed324d91
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1609835
> Commit-Queue: Simon Zünd <szuend@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Sigurd Schneider <sigurds@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#61602}
TBR=yangguo@chromium.org,sigurds@chromium.org,jgruber@chromium.org,bmeurer@chromium.org,szuend@chromium.org
# Not skipping CQ checks because original CL landed > 1 day ago.
Bug: v8:8742, v8:6802
Change-Id: I4942cd32c6ee5e249dae046eea6b9b2f7120b8ba
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1617933
Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Simon Zünd <szuend@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#61639}
This CL extends Error.stack to include frames of functions declared
with the C++ FunctionTemplate API. For example, "print" in d8.
Two changes are necessary:
- HandleApiCall and friends need to go through an BUILTIN_EXIT frame
instead of an EXIT frame. The existing stack-trace machinery will
then pick up FunctionTemplate frames without additional changes.
- Turbofan doesn't go through HandleApiCall, but instead uses an
ASM builtin to enter FunctionTemplate functions. A "marker"
frame state is needed to include these frames in the stack trace.
Note: This CL only includes these frames in Error.stack,
but not (yet) in the stack-trace API (v8.h).
Bug: v8:8742,v8:6802
Change-Id: Ic0631af883cf56e0d0122a2e0c54e36fed324d91
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1609835
Commit-Queue: Simon Zünd <szuend@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Sigurd Schneider <sigurds@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#61602}
This fixes the source position printed in the stack trace for exceptions
rethrown from within Wasm code. This only affects the message propagated
to the console, not the trace stored as part of the exception object.
Note that there still is a more fundamental issues with preserving the
original message of a caught exception and funneling it through to each
rethrow site, which is still missing. This change just makes sure that
the interpreter and TurboFan are consistent.
R=clemensh@chromium.org
TEST=message/fail/wasm-exception-rethrow
BUG=v8:8091
Change-Id: Iac04149ded3c54f5b23faeb83b1228081bbd3dfa
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1598754
Reviewed-by: Clemens Hammacher <clemensh@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#61374}
This fixes the source position printed in the stack trace for exceptions
thrown from within Wasm code. Specifically this affects the stack trace
attached to the exception object, as well as the message propagated to
the console. Both are tested by the new message test.
R=clemensh@chromium.org
TEST=message/fail/wasm-exception-throw
BUG=v8:8091
Change-Id: I5b2f76191cf47457ac113dce9d9601a8a810ee19
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1591603
Reviewed-by: Clemens Hammacher <clemensh@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#61239}
- Add a new ClassScope for block scopes created for classes.
- Add a VariableMap in the class scope for private name resolution,
and a separate UnresolvedList for private names that will be resolved
only using ClassScopes. These are stored in RareData and will only be
allocated when there are private name declaration or access in the
class.
Design: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1l-D70uaHzXU8QVgQZ3ACikb3FLO6LTAfQVdGDXsh5mw/edit?usp=sharing
TBR: hpayer@chromium.org
Bug: v8:8330
Bug: v8:7468
Change-Id: I78191fc075f7f195f6c56c959773c382346cce8a
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1488271
Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com>
Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#60726}
Added a new Error Message for Missing Function Name.
The program:
function(){}
...now produces:
SyntaxError: Function statements require a valid function name.
...instead of:
SyntaxError: Unexpected Token (
Bug: v8:3698, v8:6513
Change-Id: I3c12dfcfe80b94209aa9af434ae1d212970cf362
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1500914
Commit-Queue: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#60376}
I thought about potentially adding the identifer ref to the error but
that would require allocating a new string or at the very least
increasing the size of the resulting cons string. Given that the
parser is pretty performance sensitive, I've decided to not display
the identifier.
Previously, the error was:
_test.js:3: Error
a[foo].c = () => { throw Error(); };
^
Error
at a.(anonymous function).c (_test.js:3:26)
at _test.js:5:1
With this patch, the error becomes:
_test.js:3: Error
a[foo].c = () => { throw Error(); };
^
Error
at a.<computed>.c (_test.js:3:26)
at _test.js:5:1
Bug: v8:8823
Change-Id: I557b3517e317652c447ca06c5a400e9625353d9b
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1495017
Commit-Queue: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Mathias Bynens <mathias@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#59985}
This makes the asm.js validator reject source with trailing expressions
after the module exporting return statement. Most of the time trailing
statements would not affect semantics, since they are unreachable. In
some cases we might hide an expected ReferenceError tough.
R=leszeks@chromium.org
TEST=mjsunit/regress/regress-crbug-934138
BUG=chromium:934138
Change-Id: I790366204f5e9c943715a065b5229f2442e2c86e
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1481216
Commit-Queue: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#59766}
This is part 1 of 2 of clean up. C++ change in Part 2 next.
Bug: v8:8705
Change-Id: Ibf4425c141391581b963f4775286b65b652452e2
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1461172
Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Frank Tang <ftang@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#59581}
Currently, PRIVATE_NAME / PrivateIdentifier is not valid in
ObjectLiterals or other places expecting the PropertyName production.
A SyntaxError here prevents an access violation later on when attempting
to dereference a null property key
BUG=v8:8808
R=gsathya@chromium.org, littledan@chromium.org
Change-Id: Idde9c669cb48c1595b83115351a8fe0caed40eef
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1461161
Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#59515}
This is a reland of 81eec150f6
Original change's description:
> Reland "[test] refactor testsuite configuration"
>
> This is a reland of 7f92ad0ab6
>
> Original change's description:
> > [test] refactor testsuite configuration
> >
> > Every testsuite configuration consist of at least 30% code duplication.
> >
> > The code age ranges from 10 years old to 5 years old. Implementing anything that
> > touches the testsuite code becomes a technical fight to the death.
> >
> > This CL removes all the duplication by refactoring the common functionality.
> >
> > This CL contains structural changes without any logical changes % small bug
> > fixes.
> >
> > R=machenbach@chromium.org
> > CC=yangguo@chromium.org,sergiyb@chromium.org
> >
> > Bug: v8:8174, v8:8769
> > Change-Id: Iee299569caa7abdc0307ecf606136669034a28a2
> > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1445881
> > Commit-Queue: Sergiy Belozorov <sergiyb@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#59361}
>
> Bug: v8:8174, v8:8769
> Change-Id: I8e7078cfb875ceb3777e57084e6f8dfac09693e7
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1454485
> Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
> Commit-Queue: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#59369}
Bug: v8:8174, v8:8790
Change-Id: I38ab9d37bca76057441a970f26e2102e4387a857
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1454724
Commit-Queue: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#59387}
This reverts commit 81eec150f6.
Reason for revert: windows mozilla test failures
Original change's description:
> Reland "[test] refactor testsuite configuration"
>
> This is a reland of 7f92ad0ab6
>
> Original change's description:
> > [test] refactor testsuite configuration
> >
> > Every testsuite configuration consist of at least 30% code duplication.
> >
> > The code age ranges from 10 years old to 5 years old. Implementing anything that
> > touches the testsuite code becomes a technical fight to the death.
> >
> > This CL removes all the duplication by refactoring the common functionality.
> >
> > This CL contains structural changes without any logical changes % small bug
> > fixes.
> >
> > R=machenbach@chromium.org
> > CC=yangguo@chromium.org,sergiyb@chromium.org
> >
> > Bug: v8:8174, v8:8769
> > Change-Id: Iee299569caa7abdc0307ecf606136669034a28a2
> > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1445881
> > Commit-Queue: Sergiy Belozorov <sergiyb@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#59361}
>
> Bug: v8:8174, v8:8769
> Change-Id: I8e7078cfb875ceb3777e57084e6f8dfac09693e7
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1454485
> Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
> Commit-Queue: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#59369}
TBR=machenbach@chromium.org,sergiyb@chromium.org,tmrts@chromium.org
Change-Id: I8f5650b5f46be299c004e2fa8b708fa2c17a4dc2
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: v8:8174, v8:8769
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1454607
Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#59370}
This is a reland of 7f92ad0ab6
Original change's description:
> [test] refactor testsuite configuration
>
> Every testsuite configuration consist of at least 30% code duplication.
>
> The code age ranges from 10 years old to 5 years old. Implementing anything that
> touches the testsuite code becomes a technical fight to the death.
>
> This CL removes all the duplication by refactoring the common functionality.
>
> This CL contains structural changes without any logical changes % small bug
> fixes.
>
> R=machenbach@chromium.org
> CC=yangguo@chromium.org,sergiyb@chromium.org
>
> Bug: v8:8174, v8:8769
> Change-Id: Iee299569caa7abdc0307ecf606136669034a28a2
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1445881
> Commit-Queue: Sergiy Belozorov <sergiyb@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#59361}
Bug: v8:8174, v8:8769
Change-Id: I8e7078cfb875ceb3777e57084e6f8dfac09693e7
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1454485
Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#59369}
This reverts commit 7f92ad0ab6.
Reason for revert: https://ci.chromium.org/p/v8/builders/luci.v8.ci/V8%20Win32/19148
Original change's description:
> [test] refactor testsuite configuration
>
> Every testsuite configuration consist of at least 30% code duplication.
>
> The code age ranges from 10 years old to 5 years old. Implementing anything that
> touches the testsuite code becomes a technical fight to the death.
>
> This CL removes all the duplication by refactoring the common functionality.
>
> This CL contains structural changes without any logical changes % small bug
> fixes.
>
> R=machenbach@chromium.org
> CC=yangguo@chromium.org,sergiyb@chromium.org
>
> Bug: v8:8174, v8:8769
> Change-Id: Iee299569caa7abdc0307ecf606136669034a28a2
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1445881
> Commit-Queue: Sergiy Belozorov <sergiyb@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#59361}
TBR=machenbach@chromium.org,sergiyb@chromium.org,tmrts@chromium.org,v8-reviews@chromium.org
Change-Id: I473f0d4c6b9c0239923b8c03699dbc38b7f85030
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: v8:8174, v8:8769
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1454599
Commit-Queue: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Clemens Hammacher <clemensh@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Hammacher <clemensh@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#59362}
