If module bytes end in a prefix like 0xfc (numeric prefix), we read out
of bounds (pc + 1). So, if validate flag is set, check the length.
Bug: chromium:1073553
Change-Id: Ia9771419d01f2315723d19dd96630172b5a7a1f5
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2161404
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#67370}
This is a reland of 29c1eab92e
Original change's description:
> [builtins] Clean up the use of class_name / ES5 [[Class]]
>
> Before ES2015, the ES spec had a [[Class]] internal slot for all
> objects, which Object.prototype.toString() would use to figure the
> returned string. Post-ES2015, the [[Class]] slot was removed in spec for
> all objects, with the @@toStringTag well-known symbol the proper way to
> change Object.prototype.toString() output.
>
> At the time, spec-identical handling without the use of [[Class]] was
> implemented in V8 for all objects other than API objects, where issues
> with the Web IDL spec [1] prevented Blink, and hence V8, to totally
> migrate to @@toStringTag. However, since 2016 [2] Blink has been setting
> @@toStringTag on API class prototypes to manage the
> Object.prototype.toString() output, so the legacy [[Class]] handling in
> V8 has not been necessary for the past couple of years.
>
> This CL removes the remaining legacy [[Class]] handling in
> Object.prototype.toString(), JSReceiver::class_name(), and
> GetConstructorName(). However, it does not remove the class_name field
> in FunctionTemplateInfo, as it is still used for the `name` property of
> created functions.
>
> This CL also cleans up other places in the codebase that still reference
> [[Class]].
>
> This change should have minimal impact on web-compatibility. For the
> change to be observable, a script must do one of the following:
>
> 1. delete APIConstructor.prototype[Symbol.toStringTag];
> 2. Object.setPrototypeOf(apiObject, somethingElse);
>
> Before this CL, these changes will not change the apiObject.toString()
> output. But after this CL, they will make apiObject.toString() show
> "[object Object]" (in the first case) or the @@toStringTag of the other
> prototype (in the latter case).
>
> However, both are deemed unlikely. @@toStringTag is not well-known
> feature of JavaScript, nor does it get tampered much on API
> constructors. In the second case, setting the prototype of an API object
> would effectly render the object useless, as all its methods (including
> property getters/setters) would no longer be accessible.
>
> Currently, @@toStringTag-based API object branding is not yet
> implemented by other browsers. This V8 bug in particular has been an
> impediment to standardizing toString behavior. Fixing this bug will
> unblock [3] and lead to a better Web IDL spec, and better toString()
> compatibility for all.
>
> [1]: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28244
> [2]: https://crrev.com/909c0d7d5a53c8526ded351683c65ea7d17531d4
> [3]: https://github.com/heycam/webidl/pull/357
>
> Bug: chromium:793406
> Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.chromium.try:linux-rel
> Change-Id: Iceded24e37afa2646ec385d5018909f55b177f93
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2146996
> Commit-Queue: Timothy Gu <timothygu@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#67327}
Bug: chromium:793406
Change-Id: Ia5d97bd4e1c44cadc6f18a17ffc9d06b038cf8f1
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.chromium.try:linux-rel
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_blink_rel
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2163881
Auto-Submit: Timothy Gu <timothygu@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#67361}
This reverts commit 29c1eab92e.
Reason for revert: Causes Blink test failures:
https://ci.chromium.org/p/v8/builders/ci/V8%20Blink%20Linux/4222
Original change's description:
> [builtins] Clean up the use of class_name / ES5 [[Class]]
>
> Before ES2015, the ES spec had a [[Class]] internal slot for all
> objects, which Object.prototype.toString() would use to figure the
> returned string. Post-ES2015, the [[Class]] slot was removed in spec for
> all objects, with the @@toStringTag well-known symbol the proper way to
> change Object.prototype.toString() output.
>
> At the time, spec-identical handling without the use of [[Class]] was
> implemented in V8 for all objects other than API objects, where issues
> with the Web IDL spec [1] prevented Blink, and hence V8, to totally
> migrate to @@toStringTag. However, since 2016 [2] Blink has been setting
> @@toStringTag on API class prototypes to manage the
> Object.prototype.toString() output, so the legacy [[Class]] handling in
> V8 has not been necessary for the past couple of years.
>
> This CL removes the remaining legacy [[Class]] handling in
> Object.prototype.toString(), JSReceiver::class_name(), and
> GetConstructorName(). However, it does not remove the class_name field
> in FunctionTemplateInfo, as it is still used for the `name` property of
> created functions.
>
> This CL also cleans up other places in the codebase that still reference
> [[Class]].
>
> This change should have minimal impact on web-compatibility. For the
> change to be observable, a script must do one of the following:
>
> 1. delete APIConstructor.prototype[Symbol.toStringTag];
> 2. Object.setPrototypeOf(apiObject, somethingElse);
>
> Before this CL, these changes will not change the apiObject.toString()
> output. But after this CL, they will make apiObject.toString() show
> "[object Object]" (in the first case) or the @@toStringTag of the other
> prototype (in the latter case).
>
> However, both are deemed unlikely. @@toStringTag is not well-known
> feature of JavaScript, nor does it get tampered much on API
> constructors. In the second case, setting the prototype of an API object
> would effectly render the object useless, as all its methods (including
> property getters/setters) would no longer be accessible.
>
> Currently, @@toStringTag-based API object branding is not yet
> implemented by other browsers. This V8 bug in particular has been an
> impediment to standardizing toString behavior. Fixing this bug will
> unblock [3] and lead to a better Web IDL spec, and better toString()
> compatibility for all.
>
> [1]: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28244
> [2]: https://crrev.com/909c0d7d5a53c8526ded351683c65ea7d17531d4
> [3]: https://github.com/heycam/webidl/pull/357
>
> Bug: chromium:793406
> Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.chromium.try:linux-rel
> Change-Id: Iceded24e37afa2646ec385d5018909f55b177f93
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2146996
> Commit-Queue: Timothy Gu <timothygu@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#67327}
TBR=verwaest@chromium.org,timothygu@chromium.org
Change-Id: I678d2ffc1064b1d1ddb62024cc23c6c41b216ef4
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: chromium:793406
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.chromium.try:linux-rel
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2163956
Reviewed-by: Bill Budge <bbudge@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Bill Budge <bbudge@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#67349}
Before ES2015, the ES spec had a [[Class]] internal slot for all
objects, which Object.prototype.toString() would use to figure the
returned string. Post-ES2015, the [[Class]] slot was removed in spec for
all objects, with the @@toStringTag well-known symbol the proper way to
change Object.prototype.toString() output.
At the time, spec-identical handling without the use of [[Class]] was
implemented in V8 for all objects other than API objects, where issues
with the Web IDL spec [1] prevented Blink, and hence V8, to totally
migrate to @@toStringTag. However, since 2016 [2] Blink has been setting
@@toStringTag on API class prototypes to manage the
Object.prototype.toString() output, so the legacy [[Class]] handling in
V8 has not been necessary for the past couple of years.
This CL removes the remaining legacy [[Class]] handling in
Object.prototype.toString(), JSReceiver::class_name(), and
GetConstructorName(). However, it does not remove the class_name field
in FunctionTemplateInfo, as it is still used for the `name` property of
created functions.
This CL also cleans up other places in the codebase that still reference
[[Class]].
This change should have minimal impact on web-compatibility. For the
change to be observable, a script must do one of the following:
1. delete APIConstructor.prototype[Symbol.toStringTag];
2. Object.setPrototypeOf(apiObject, somethingElse);
Before this CL, these changes will not change the apiObject.toString()
output. But after this CL, they will make apiObject.toString() show
"[object Object]" (in the first case) or the @@toStringTag of the other
prototype (in the latter case).
However, both are deemed unlikely. @@toStringTag is not well-known
feature of JavaScript, nor does it get tampered much on API
constructors. In the second case, setting the prototype of an API object
would effectly render the object useless, as all its methods (including
property getters/setters) would no longer be accessible.
Currently, @@toStringTag-based API object branding is not yet
implemented by other browsers. This V8 bug in particular has been an
impediment to standardizing toString behavior. Fixing this bug will
unblock [3] and lead to a better Web IDL spec, and better toString()
compatibility for all.
[1]: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28244
[2]: https://crrev.com/909c0d7d5a53c8526ded351683c65ea7d17531d4
[3]: https://github.com/heycam/webidl/pull/357
Bug: chromium:793406
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.chromium.try:linux-rel
Change-Id: Iceded24e37afa2646ec385d5018909f55b177f93
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2146996
Commit-Queue: Timothy Gu <timothygu@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#67327}
There's no reason for it to be a JSArray; it's an internal data member.
We only have a slow version for constructing a FixedArray from an
Iterable, but since this is not a performance critical code path,
it's fine.
BUG=v8:9808
Change-Id: I5bcfac4cc545880966421a96d3aa3d899bbf6cd5
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2157371
Reviewed-by: Igor Sheludko <ishell@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#67321}
This is a reland of 80843eda31
Original change's description:
> [torque] Allow storing to bitfield structs that are stored in Smis
>
> This change:
> 1. Updates the Torque compiler to allow direct access to bitfields that
> are packed within Smi values, which previously would have required a
> separate untagging step,
> 2. Updates JSRegExpStringIterator to represent its flags in Torque,
> 3. Adds reduction cases in MachineOperatorReducer for when the input to
> a branch or the left-hand side of a Word32Equals is based on a 64-bit
> shift-and-mask operation which has been truncated to 32 bits, as is
> the case in the code generated by step 1, and
> 4. Adds a reduction case in MachineOperatorReducer to remove an extra
> Word64And operation added by step 1.
>
> Bug: v8:7793
> Change-Id: Ib4ac2def6211b3cae6be25a8b2a644be5c7d6d3f
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2119225
> Commit-Queue: Seth Brenith <seth.brenith@microsoft.com>
> Reviewed-by: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#67290}
Bug: v8:7793
Change-Id: I783b6ec080042fec0e922927f6675dede458a072
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2159731
Reviewed-by: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#67305}
This reverts commit 80843eda31.
Reason for revert: Causes compilation failure on macs
https://ci.chromium.org/p/v8/builders/ci/Mac%20V8%20FYI%20Release%20(Intel)/8934?
Original change's description:
> [torque] Allow storing to bitfield structs that are stored in Smis
>
> This change:
> 1. Updates the Torque compiler to allow direct access to bitfields that
> are packed within Smi values, which previously would have required a
> separate untagging step,
> 2. Updates JSRegExpStringIterator to represent its flags in Torque,
> 3. Adds reduction cases in MachineOperatorReducer for when the input to
> a branch or the left-hand side of a Word32Equals is based on a 64-bit
> shift-and-mask operation which has been truncated to 32 bits, as is
> the case in the code generated by step 1, and
> 4. Adds a reduction case in MachineOperatorReducer to remove an extra
> Word64And operation added by step 1.
>
> Bug: v8:7793
> Change-Id: Ib4ac2def6211b3cae6be25a8b2a644be5c7d6d3f
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2119225
> Commit-Queue: Seth Brenith <seth.brenith@microsoft.com>
> Reviewed-by: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#67290}
TBR=tebbi@chromium.org,seth.brenith@microsoft.com,nicohartmann@chromium.org
Change-Id: Ifa683c92631291c9437438682b6efb2e12862682
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: v8:7793
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2159730
Reviewed-by: Francis McCabe <fgm@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Francis McCabe <fgm@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#67291}
This change:
1. Updates the Torque compiler to allow direct access to bitfields that
are packed within Smi values, which previously would have required a
separate untagging step,
2. Updates JSRegExpStringIterator to represent its flags in Torque,
3. Adds reduction cases in MachineOperatorReducer for when the input to
a branch or the left-hand side of a Word32Equals is based on a 64-bit
shift-and-mask operation which has been truncated to 32 bits, as is
the case in the code generated by step 1, and
4. Adds a reduction case in MachineOperatorReducer to remove an extra
Word64And operation added by step 1.
Bug: v8:7793
Change-Id: Ib4ac2def6211b3cae6be25a8b2a644be5c7d6d3f
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2119225
Commit-Queue: Seth Brenith <seth.brenith@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#67290}
We give the optimized code another chance on soft deopts in TurboProp.
If the deopt is happening on infrequently taken paths, then this will
let us reuse the optimized code for the subsequent executions. If the
soft deopts are happening multiple times on the same code, then we would
discard the optimized code. The number of deopts we would wait is
controlled by FLAG_reuse_opt_code_count.
BUG=v8:10433
Change-Id: Iaadea4cffde7d7d55be4875c9586694dca64957c
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2093503
Commit-Queue: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#67289}
This reverts commit f442b03fe2.
Reason for reland: Wrongly reverted.
Original change's description:
> Revert "[turbofan] Fix bug in Number.Min/Max typings"
>
> This reverts commit 4158af83db.
>
> Reason for revert: causing UBSAN failures:
>
> https://ci.chromium.org/p/v8/builders/ci/V8%20Linux64%20UBSan/10729?
>
>
> Original change's description:
> > [turbofan] Fix bug in Number.Min/Max typings
> >
> > They try to be very precise about when the result can be -0,
> > but do so incorrectly. I'm changing the code to just do the
> > simple thing instead. Let's see how that affects performance.
> >
> > Bug: chromium:1072171
> > Change-Id: I9737a84aa19d06685af5b7bca541e348dc37cca8
> > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2157028
> > Reviewed-by: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> > Commit-Queue: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#67246}
>
> TBR=neis@chromium.org,tebbi@chromium.org
>
> Change-Id: I0d9b312e27f5a8bbbebeccdc9819fa94f10af139
> No-Presubmit: true
> No-Tree-Checks: true
> No-Try: true
> Bug: chromium:1072171
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2157646
> Reviewed-by: Francis McCabe <fgm@chromium.org>
> Commit-Queue: Francis McCabe <fgm@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#67249}
TBR=neis@chromium.org,tebbi@chromium.org,fgm@chromium.org
Change-Id: Ida36ca584a5af5da887189328c8da195b26285d4
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: chromium:1072171
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2157368
Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#67263}
This reverts commit 4158af83db.
Reason for revert: causing UBSAN failures:
https://ci.chromium.org/p/v8/builders/ci/V8%20Linux64%20UBSan/10729?
Original change's description:
> [turbofan] Fix bug in Number.Min/Max typings
>
> They try to be very precise about when the result can be -0,
> but do so incorrectly. I'm changing the code to just do the
> simple thing instead. Let's see how that affects performance.
>
> Bug: chromium:1072171
> Change-Id: I9737a84aa19d06685af5b7bca541e348dc37cca8
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2157028
> Reviewed-by: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> Commit-Queue: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#67246}
TBR=neis@chromium.org,tebbi@chromium.org
Change-Id: I0d9b312e27f5a8bbbebeccdc9819fa94f10af139
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: chromium:1072171
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2157646
Reviewed-by: Francis McCabe <fgm@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Francis McCabe <fgm@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#67249}
They try to be very precise about when the result can be -0,
but do so incorrectly. I'm changing the code to just do the
simple thing instead. Let's see how that affects performance.
Bug: chromium:1072171
Change-Id: I9737a84aa19d06685af5b7bca541e348dc37cca8
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2157028
Reviewed-by: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#67246}
The fast store handlers create elements and if we have a typed array
on the prototype chain it is not easy to check when it is OK to create
new elements. The TypedArrays swallow all OOB stores, and there is no
easy way to check if the current store is OOB for JSObjects. So use
slow stub when there are typed arrays on the prorotype chain of
JSObjects.
Bug: chromium:1068492
Change-Id: I9eea9cf00e3eb84931c5545d18ba53c4ec39f353
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2134138
Commit-Queue: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Igor Sheludko <ishell@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#67226}
A new realm doesn't contain the mocks and suppressions on the global
object for correctness fuzzing. We replace Realm.eval with eval to
keep exercising the code.
Bug: chromium:1071133
Change-Id: Iffe82d37bf08829fc5937c17c2089277403e71dc
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2153206
Reviewed-by: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#67187}
SIMD opcodes consist of the prefix byte, then an LEB128 encoded int. We
were decoding this incorrectly as a fixed uint8. This fixes the decoder
to properly handle multi bytes.
In some cases, the multi byte logic is applied to all prefixed opcodes.
This is not a problem, since for values < 0x80, the LEB encoding is a
single byte, and decodes to the same int. If the prefix opcode has
instructions with index >= 0x80, it would be required to be LEB128
encoded anyway.
There are a bunch of trivial changes to test-run-wasm-simd, to change
the macro from BUILD to BUILD_V, the former only works for single byte
opcodes, the latter is a new template-based macro that correct handles
multi-byte opcodes. The only unchanged test is the shuffle fuzzer test,
which builds its own sequence of bytes without using the BUILD macro.
Bug: v8:10258
Change-Id: Ie7377e899a7eab97ecf28176fd908babc08d0f19
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2118476
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Deepti Gandluri <gdeepti@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#67186}
When we create a new elements array we should initialize it with holes.
The capacity of the newly created elements array could be greater than
the actual length of the array and we expect the unused slots to be
filled with holes.
Bug: chromium:1070560
Change-Id: Ia365eed59859e36a9c8b9e27be34f93ab88942bb
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2150599
Commit-Queue: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Stanton <mvstanton@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#67180}
Change-Id: Ic5dbf4c3330c71cbae73aa07b2adb1c8ac087182
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2151348
Auto-Submit: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#67172}
Soft-deopt for mono/polymorphic property accesses that don't have any
maps, and only allow zero-map feedback to be monomorphic. This makes
sure we only emit a megamorphic LoadIC builtin call if the IC was
actually megamorphic.
JSGenericLowering assumed that zero maps meant that a load site is
megamorphic. However, it can be the case that the call-site is
monomorphic or polymorphic, and the maps had died. In this case we don't
want to call the megamorphic IC builtin, as on a stub cache miss we
fallback to a normal LoadIC miss, which can record mono/polymorphic
feedback in the IC. After this, we'll enter a miss loop in the
megamorphic load builtin, and worse the LoadIC assumes that there's
something "wrong" with the feedback, so it'll keep trying to reconfigure
the handler (possibly allocating new load handlers if this is a
prototype field access).
As a drive-by, rewrite GetRelevantReceiverMaps to be an in-place
filtering of the maps rather than copying them.
Change-Id: I0c25bfa606367fa81c43223bbd56cdadb5e789ef
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2150586
Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Auto-Submit: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#67152}
In strict mode stores to non-existent properties throw. We should not
install a handler with the property cell for such stores. These handlers
would expect that the value exists when they see a property cell. If
this property cell gets invalidated later, it appears as if it is a
valid property cell with undefined value. This leads to an incorrect
behaviour. This cl checks if we are in strict mode and uses a slow
stub in such cases.
Bug: chromium:1067757
Change-Id: I543c6a6931530bfb13cc9a33d1dabaa756489fd1
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2142255
Commit-Queue: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Igor Sheludko <ishell@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#67151}
Bug: chromium:1070890
Change-Id: I62ad81b8d5bcb9934c7eda4eae595d41339adfdf
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2149425
Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Auto-Submit: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#67147}
When memory.grow was executed concurrently on multiple threads a data
race could happen such that two memory.grow operations result in the
same return value. With this CL the return value of memory.grow is
unique, given that memory.grow actually grows the memory.
As a concrete example, assume a shared WebAssembly memory initially has
a size of 100. Assume two threads call memory.grow concurrently with a
parameter `10`. Then with the existing code, memory would grow correctly
to a size of 120, but the data race may cause both memory.grow
operations to return 100. With the change in this CL one memory.grow
operation would return 100, the other would return 110.
R=gdeepti@chromium.orgCC=rreverser@google.com
Bug: chromium:1067621
Change-Id: Ib22b5135714a56799e0818ccb39e5dce327e5f8e
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2144113
Reviewed-by: Ben Smith <binji@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Deepti Gandluri <gdeepti@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#67135}
For example, when --fuzzing is off, %OptimizeFunctionOnNextCall now
crashes when given a non-function argument.
The following behaviors remain unchanged for now:
- %DeoptimizeFunction continues to do nothing if the function is not
optimized.
- %DeoptimizeNow continues to do nothing if the top-most JS function
is not optimized.
- %OptimizeOSR continues to do nothing if the function already has
optimized code.
Bug: v8:10249
Change-Id: I35d2f3d50ce3f94c8ffccabe50fb4df2b70ce028
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2137406
Commit-Queue: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#67121}
This is a reland of f902ef3257
Original change's description:
> [wasm] Cleanup wasm script creation
>
> - Do not expose CreateWasmScript since we should now use
> WasmEngine:GetOrCreateScript instead,
> - Initialize all Script fields in CreateWasmScript, not in
> WasmModuleObject::New,
> - Do not pass code size estimate argument, since we can always use the
> actual native module's committed code space.
>
> R=clemensb@chromium.org
>
> Bug: v8:10349
> Change-Id: If9250d62ffc271ab6efc3b9c45958a305c9d1827
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2135633
> Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> Commit-Queue: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#67083}
Bug: v8:10349
Change-Id: I38c8b6beb07a1e5d565c6a5fd749daea147817bb
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2144064
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#67087}
This reverts commit f902ef3257.
Reason for revert: Makes gc-stress unhappy: https://ci.chromium.org/p/v8/builders/ci/V8%20Linux%20-%20gc%20stress/27404
Original change's description:
> [wasm] Cleanup wasm script creation
>
> - Do not expose CreateWasmScript since we should now use
> WasmEngine:GetOrCreateScript instead,
> - Initialize all Script fields in CreateWasmScript, not in
> WasmModuleObject::New,
> - Do not pass code size estimate argument, since we can always use the
> actual native module's committed code space.
>
> R=clemensb@chromium.org
>
> Bug: v8:10349
> Change-Id: If9250d62ffc271ab6efc3b9c45958a305c9d1827
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2135633
> Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> Commit-Queue: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#67083}
TBR=clemensb@chromium.org,thibaudm@chromium.org
Change-Id: Iac2978af1a300ec079baebab0feb8c9598711738
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: v8:10349
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2144058
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#67085}
- Do not expose CreateWasmScript since we should now use
WasmEngine:GetOrCreateScript instead,
- Initialize all Script fields in CreateWasmScript, not in
WasmModuleObject::New,
- Do not pass code size estimate argument, since we can always use the
actual native module's committed code space.
R=clemensb@chromium.org
Bug: v8:10349
Change-Id: If9250d62ffc271ab6efc3b9c45958a305c9d1827
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2135633
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#67083}
Apple currently objects to cleanupSome but agrees to shipping the rest
of WeakRefs. Separate out cleanupSome to its own flag so the rest of
WeakRefs may ship.
Bug: v8:8179
Change-Id: I6159fc743c9cb658860d4260b0dcb95e54630fdc
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2141011
Commit-Queue: Shu-yu Guo <syg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#67070}
JSNativeContextSpecialization lowered this operator to a regular
property store, potentially ignoring a request to set the "name"
property of a function.
This CL performs the lowering only if there's no such request.
Bug: chromium:1068494
Change-Id: Ia2eaf05af9c8402f9e6450ee519a7c36c18cd44e
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2139581
Commit-Queue: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Maya Lekova <mslekova@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#67058}
This relands commit 7d955faa76.
Changed the test case to use i16x8 splat instead of i8x16 splat,
the latter was causing issues when doing scalar lowering. This
change still causes the regression test to fail without the fix.
Original change's description:
> [wasm-simd][x64][ia32] Do not overwrite input register
>
> We are ovewriting input register (contains the shift) when we are
> masking it, instead, move to a temporary,then mask it.
>
> Bug: chromium:1065599
> Change-Id: Iab72b94581239447e444746681387350b576e24a
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2125941
> Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Deepti Gandluri <gdeepti@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66997}
Bug: chromium:1065599
Change-Id: I0dc78ddb013652ef88c07d065c3f6877937c5300
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2136220
Reviewed-by: Deepti Gandluri <gdeepti@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#67026}
This is a minimal version of https://crrev.com/c/2135642 intended for
backmerges.
Ensure that the interpreter has space for all required registers.
Bug: chromium:1067270
Change-Id: Iefd016b4845fb8698d1e0ef5f6a03df0e66aa576
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2137403
Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#67013}
Typed array iteration throws a TypeError if the receiver is not
a typed array. The JSCallReducer didn't take that into account.
Bug: chromium:1067544
Change-Id: Ib065ba1b7881dc0b62242fc416fa16023a7fa244
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2135632
Reviewed-by: Maya Lekova <mslekova@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Auto-Submit: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#67010}
This reverts commit 7d955faa76.
Reason for revert: Bad change, modified wrong test file https://ci.chromium.org/p/v8/builders/ci/V8%20Linux/36416
Original change's description:
> [wasm-simd][x64][ia32] Do not overwrite input register
>
> We are ovewriting input register (contains the shift) when we are
> masking it, instead, move to a temporary,then mask it.
>
> Bug: chromium:1065599
> Change-Id: Iab72b94581239447e444746681387350b576e24a
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2125941
> Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Deepti Gandluri <gdeepti@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66997}
TBR=gdeepti@chromium.org,zhin@chromium.org
Change-Id: I50c57906d6eb49758584b477c971179ea3c6e5d3
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: chromium:1065599
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2134655
Reviewed-by: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#67000}
We are ovewriting input register (contains the shift) when we are
masking it, instead, move to a temporary,then mask it.
Bug: chromium:1065599
Change-Id: Iab72b94581239447e444746681387350b576e24a
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2125941
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Deepti Gandluri <gdeepti@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66997}
For keyed stores we recompute handlers based on the receiver maps
we have seen. This is done so that we can transition to the most generic
elements kind we have seen so far. When we recompute this handlers we
get a new prototype validity cell and ignore the existing cell. This
leads to incorrect behaviour if the cell was invalid. Recomputing the
handler may be extra work which is not worth doing at this point. So
we just reuse the existing validity cell and let the IC recompute the
handler if we see the map again.
Bug: chromium:1053939
Change-Id: Ifc891d70f5a4b8b774238e12fb40e29b4d174e37
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2122032
Commit-Queue: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66963}
Double literals without dots should still be parsed as double constants,
not unsigned constants. The static_cast would remove the fractional
part, making constants like "1e-15" come out as "0" unsigned constants.
The precise semantics is not spec'ed, so we still consider literals like
"1e1" to be unsigned, and only switch to double if there is a fractional
part.
R=ecmziegler@chromium.org
Bug: chromium:1065635
Change-Id: I0aac018058a149632e0849572d19fdcc7b2af7aa
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2126922
Reviewed-by: Emanuel Ziegler <ecmziegler@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66949}
The ReduceStringPrototypeStartsWith implementation in TurboFan
was doing the CheckString too late, after returning "false" in
case there are no arguments.
Fixed: chromium:1065741
Change-Id: I1016383d65120d3b050e76d6ac41986497af0b8d
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2129639
Commit-Queue: Maya Lekova <mslekova@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66948}
JSStoreGlobal can become a call into runtime code (SetProperty)
that inspects the context in order to get the language mode. Thus
always passing the native context is not good enough.
Bug: chromium:1065737
Change-Id: Iba9537cd3de743a0967325acf7900190aa835b5f
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2130280
Reviewed-by: Nico Hartmann <nicohartmann@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Nico Hartmann <nicohartmann@chromium.org>
Auto-Submit: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66946}
If "use asm" is used inside a "function*" or async function, it should
bail out.
Drive-by: Minor cleanup in {Runtime_InstantiateAsmJs}.
R=ecmziegler@chromium.org
Bug: chromium:1065852
Change-Id: Ice48126b803a30c4b4ff7b5ae22df85a3f36198a
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2126920
Reviewed-by: Emanuel Ziegler <ecmziegler@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66939}
If we want external people to stop shouting WASM, we should start
by avoiding that in our own code base.
This CL replaces almost all occurrences of "WASM" by "Wasm". The
last remaining ones (in frames.cc) are in capitalized contexts where
WASM fits.
TBR=ecmziegler@chromium.org
Bug: v8:10155
Change-Id: I905b92220768b99bb5e1165255691ffe4498dba3
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2126917
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Emanuel Ziegler <ecmziegler@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66917}
Rework the remaining tests in grow-memory to check for first 5 offsets
and last 5 offsets in the relevant pages.
Bug: v8:7783
Change-Id: I59435f3c1a6f50ff808fdd045a6c7039860fc72e
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2116647
Reviewed-by: Deepti Gandluri <gdeepti@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66896}
The asm-wasm-f32 and asm-wasm-f64 tests run through a bunch of different
constants. For the binops, they run through a cross product of the
inputs. This patch trims down the number of constants used.
The selection of constants to remove is quite arbitrary - the intial
patch introduced a lot of magic constants that look random or has some
pattern. I don't think they mean anything special, especially for f64
form since those values all fit in a f64. For f32 we still have a bunch
of values to exceed the maximum integer representable in f32.
Bug: v8:7783
Change-Id: If34b084a11acdf21b1d2933fdd0cab65be1738c9
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2116988
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Deepti Gandluri <gdeepti@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66882}
Yet another corner case how non-deterministic timestamps slipped into
the tests.
Bug: chromium:1064900
Change-Id: I33e8b4c8141b3854b7eca5d7ad9b45b6f5130d9e
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2120584
Reviewed-by: Mathias Bynens <mathias@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66881}
Rework testMemoryGrowPreservesDataMemOp tests so that they only test the
first and last 5 offsets within the page, instead of every offset.
Slight logic change: instead of storing the value C - offset (where C is
a constant that is different for 32 and 16 memops), we store just the
value offset. This allows us to combine the logic for all 3 memops (32,
16, and 8). But we need to add a modulo so that in the 8 bit case, we
don't store a value that exceeds the maximum (the other cases will never
hit a case that exceeds the max).
Bug: v8:7783
Change-Id: Ibfdc77555ba2ca26391eba303050a03538f6012d
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2117633
Reviewed-by: Deepti Gandluri <gdeepti@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66879}
For some input types containing -0 but not +0, the result type of
NumberMin and NumberMax would unnecessarily include +0. However, for
some larger inputs, the result type would not include the spurious +0,
thus breaking monotonicity.
The CL fixes this and addresses a TODO as well.
Bug: chromium:1063661
Change-Id: Icd56d6102fbea12a2d96aa063a803b1052c714b8
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2116199
Commit-Queue: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66854}
Rework the testMemoryGrowReadWrite and testMemoryGrowZeroInitialSize
tests. Combine the different sized tests (32, 16, 8 bit integers) into a
single base tests, taking in function arguments to specify which
load/store function to call from the module exports.
Also reduced the number of checks made in each test. Previously the test
was asserting on every single valid offset. Now it checks the first 5
and the last 5 of each page of memory. From a quick local test using
`time`, it speeds up this test on x64 from ~40s to ~20s.
There is more work to be done: there are other tests below that also
assert on each offset, we can change those in a future patch.
The goal is to be able to run this on arm simulators
sufficiently quickly, and not require to mark this test as slow.
Bug: v8:7783
Change-Id: I2b17cf1811de6c26332d7e8f91efbbac3e89f6e3
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2116601
Reviewed-by: Deepti Gandluri <gdeepti@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66848}
This might help reduce flaky test results caused by too high memory
consumption due to the large Float32Array in regress-crbug-1057653.js.
Bug: v8:10333
Change-Id: Id99ebb67ebe5a7a730e44cd8967ebbea905ccdc5
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2108547
Reviewed-by: Victor Gomes <victorgomes@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Camillo Bruni <cbruni@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66836}
The behaviour was clarified in the spec:
https://github.com/WebAssembly/exception-handling/pull/97
br_on_exn (and also rethrow, which will be added in another CL) should
trap on nullptr. This CL implements this by an explicit check on each
br_on_exn (within {GetExceptionTag}). This check will be redundant if
several br_on_exn follow each other. Since also the runtime call for
{GetExceptionTag} is redundant, and also the fact that we do a runtime
call is suboptimal, I consider the whole implementation prototypical for
now anyway.
R=jkummerow@chromium.orgCC=aheejin@chromium.org
Bug: v8:10128
Change-Id: I234c3183f93fe0884aadd2ab6dbd6c2b7a07c660
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2113381
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66826}
I'm unable to produce an issue with this test locally, so let's
try to enable it again.
Big: v8:6587
Change-Id: Ida834ac4ccf8c25d8f5c1e09fc57479db46a1873
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2108722
Commit-Queue: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Auto-Submit: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66803}
This is a reland of 2c834c5364,
in which node replacement was too aggressive.
Original change's description:
> [turbofan] Clean up ConstantFoldingReducer
>
> Change-Id: Iaf7f83cc157a6f6680da8933560347f7f3503d56
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2098736
> Reviewed-by: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> Commit-Queue: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66706}
Change-Id: I5d306092dde4119629af4c5e7e424a0e9a14310d
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2106193
Commit-Queue: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66742}
to properly choose named or indexed mode
Bug: chromium:1059738
Change-Id: Icd086fee31079f52770742afa54fc946acb1fd81
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2101005
Commit-Queue: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Igor Sheludko <ishell@chromium.org>
Auto-Submit: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Igor Sheludko <ishell@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66702}
When dst is a fp pair, we set both low and high fp regs. Later when we
look at set regs to determine which registers to load into, we examine
both low and high fp. This is wrong - we only need to look at the low
fp, since Fill will load into the correct fp pairs. The bug was
triggered because we were examining into junk values in register_loads
indexed by the high fp.
Fixed: v8:10307
Change-Id: I6cbc212a969090818a5da0fe3dab36a418c23d04
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2091632
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66632}
The test started failing (sometimes flaking) on an unrelated CL.
R=gsathya@chromium.org
Bug: v8:10307
Change-Id: If198c2cf518f7a36e54614307462272774d9e48e
No-Try: true
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2091466
Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66611}
This CL fixes a special case where a WasmExportedFunction is passed to
the WebAssembly.Function constructor. This is a case that was not yet
implemented in V8, and which is also not specified in the proposal yet.
With this CL we do a signature check of the provided function. If it
matches, the function itself is returned. Otherwise a TypeError is
thrown.
I filed an issue: https://github.com/WebAssembly/js-types/issues/13R=jkummerow@chromium.org
Bug: chromium:1057534
Change-Id: Ib09d1ba18abaa6a8dd451aa747fd26c03d927413
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2084813
Commit-Queue: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66610}
When an empty class is nested inside a class with private instance
methods, like this:
class Outer {
constructor() {}
#method() {}
factory() {
class Inner {
constructor() { }
}
return Inner;
}
run(obj) {
obj.#method();
}
}
The bytecode generator previously generate private brand
initialization for the constructor of Inner by mistake,
because during scope chain serialization/deserialization,
the outer scopes of Inner and factory() are not allocated
or serialized (as they are empty). In the eyes of the bytecode
generator, it then appeared as if Outer is the direct outer
scope of Inner's constructor.
In order to work around this information loss, in this patch
we rely on SharedFunctionInfo instead of the Context/ScopeInfo
chain to maintain the information about private brand initialization.
This is done by shrinking expected_nof_properties to 8 bits and
freeing 8 bits for a second bitfield on the SFI.
Design doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/14maU596YbHcWR7XR-_iXM_ANhAAmiuRlJZysM61lqaE/edit#
Bug: v8:9839, v8:8330, v8:10098
Change-Id: I4370a0459bfc0da388052ad5a91aac59582d811d
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2056889
Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com>
Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66575}
Move the recently introduced extra check for 32-bit platforms so
that it covers all code paths that would be hit by custom/future
memory limit settings.
Bug: chromium:1057094
Change-Id: I5e2217a24578ee82c7bfa753b7d5dcd3d00e1b7c
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2083300
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66568}
This is a reland of c6c9d4bf1b
Original change's description:
> Update unicode-regexp-ignore-case-noi18n expectations
>
> There appear to be one or several bugs in noi18n mode such that
> expectations in this test are no longer met. This CL updates
> expectations to the current behavior and re-enables the test so we at
> least preserve coverage in the other cases.
>
> The behavior in question should be investigated in the future
> (low priority).
>
> Bug: v8:10120
> Change-Id: Ib7c9a18133a386e6e39ee54d68ce4106d9b28c84
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2081815
> Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66524}
Bug: v8:10120
Change-Id: Ib2ee68e26c2aebe2eeab3ec9f7bc263fd79f3773
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2083291
Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66550}
This reverts commit c6c9d4bf1b.
Reason for revert: Fails on noi18n bot: https://ci.chromium.org/p/v8/builders/ci/V8%20Linux%20-%20noi18n%20-%20debug/30737
Original change's description:
> Update unicode-regexp-ignore-case-noi18n expectations
>
> There appear to be one or several bugs in noi18n mode such that
> expectations in this test are no longer met. This CL updates
> expectations to the current behavior and re-enables the test so we at
> least preserve coverage in the other cases.
>
> The behavior in question should be investigated in the future
> (low priority).
>
> Bug: v8:10120
> Change-Id: Ib7c9a18133a386e6e39ee54d68ce4106d9b28c84
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2081815
> Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66524}
TBR=jkummerow@chromium.org,jgruber@chromium.org
Change-Id: I960b90fe3679ef4c04782ca9ac9b91454e636dbb
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: v8:10120
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2083024
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66525}
There appear to be one or several bugs in noi18n mode such that
expectations in this test are no longer met. This CL updates
expectations to the current behavior and re-enables the test so we at
least preserve coverage in the other cases.
The behavior in question should be investigated in the future
(low priority).
Bug: v8:10120
Change-Id: Ib7c9a18133a386e6e39ee54d68ce4106d9b28c84
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2081815
Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66524}
We can make better inlining decisions in TurboFan if the CallIC will
provide the feedback that it's seen multiple closures that share the
same SharedFunctionInfo. This is not difficult to do, and it fixes
some frustrating performance cliffs.
Thanks to Bmeurer@chromium.org for the prototype CL, rebased from his
project a year ago.
Bug: v8:2206, v8:10100
Change-Id: I4248145ea67216f9a23efa175bbe90e7a9ee0ec4
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2054100
Commit-Queue: Michael Stanton <mvstanton@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66512}
There were a few places that still checked against the limit for
initial memory size rather than the limit for memory size after
growth (which was recently separated from the former).
Bug: v8:7881
Change-Id: Id17d86e2f7a5dfa4f1dd35153b0cefc01f72ed33
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2078574
Commit-Queue: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66496}
This is a reland of 7d1f95d6e4
The reland fixes a performance issue in that we incorrectly marked
every pattern containing a backslash as needing to be escaped,
resulting in a new string allocation instead of reusing the existing
string.
Original change's description:
> [regexp] Correctly escape a backslash-newline sequence
>
> When printing the source string, a backslash-newline sequence ('\\\n',
> '\\\r', '\\\u2028', '\\\u2029') should be formatted as '\n', '\r',
> '\u2028', '\u2029', respectively. Prior to this CL it was formatted as
> a backslash followed by the literal newline character.
>
> Bug: v8:8615
> Change-Id: Iac90195c56ea1707ea8469066b0cc967ea87fc73
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2016583
> Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> Auto-Submit: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#65986}
Bug: v8:8615,chromium:1046678
Change-Id: I5d75904f1ea543ec679649668e54749821116442
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2074159
Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Auto-Submit: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66476}
This reverts commit b12ba06edf.
Reason for revert:
After further discussion we decided to stick with fdlibm.
Original change's description:
> [builtins] stop using imprecise fdlibm pow
>
> This CL reinstates the old pow implementation which calls out to the
> system implementation of pow.
>
> Bug: v8:9622
> Change-Id: I3df997888ced3fb8b5bd4b810098e967649aaa55
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1774898
> Reviewed-by: Hannes Payer <hpayer@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> Commit-Queue: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66303}
TBR=yangguo@chromium.org,neis@chromium.org,hpayer@chromium.org,me@gus.host
# Not skipping CQ checks because original CL landed > 1 day ago.
Bug: v8:9622
Change-Id: I941f70c7432cd2fab86e0eadcb2e1a9ec8195e91
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2072746
Commit-Queue: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66452}
Move load splat and load extend ops into the list of SIMD memory
opcodes, since they similarly take an i32 and an memarg. This fixes the
OpcodeLength calculation in function-body-decoder-impl.h.
And in turn, fixes the mjsunit test code that the fuzzer generates. See
the regress-1055692.js file for the weird S8x16LoadSplat followed by 2
kExprUnreachable, where the kExprUnreachable really is a memarg
{0x0, 0x0}. This bug was caught by the fuzzer, and that was the
generated test (with small fixes to add kExprDrop), so leaving it as it
is.
Bug: chromium:1055692
Change-Id: I743b6beb82350b5fea22c8dd10b546a02741cfed
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2071401
Reviewed-by: Deepti Gandluri <gdeepti@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66439}
The deprecated legacy FinalizationGroup APIs are left unchanged for
compat.
Bug: v8:8179
Change-Id: I9bdcaa92360db318c96fc8524c04163ece25118e
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2071236
Commit-Queue: Shu-yu Guo <syg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66437}
This is a reland of 03d5a7ba9b
Nothing changed here compared to the original test. The tests on the
blink side were invalid, I fixed them in https://crrev.com/c/2066907.
Original change's description:
> [wasm] The name of a custom section can cause a validation error
>
> The WebAssembly spec defines that the name of a custom section can cause
> a validation error. The streaming decoder, however, used a separate
> Decoder object to decode the name, and thereby avoided a validation
> error. With this CL the streaming decoder uses the main decoder to
> decode the name of the custom section.
>
> In addition this CL removes the test mjsunit/regress/wasm/regress-789952.
> This test defined an invalid WebAssembly module and expected it to
> compile. As it is a regression test, it makes no sense to fix the test.
> The module is invalid because it defines the length of the custom section
> to be '0', so there are no bytes in the custom section for its name.
>
> R=clemensb@chromium.org
> CC=thibaudm@chromium.org
>
> Bug: v8:10126
> Change-Id: I8cfc77c9a5916570d5362d5922e0179a29774da8
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2041446
> Commit-Queue: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66348}
Bug: v8:10126
Change-Id: I48aaed8eb9899da1703030fb6809fe46a6e66191
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2069325
Commit-Queue: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66431}
We use the same interrupt to both allocate feedback vectors and
for updating the profiler ticks. If there is a feedback vector already
available, we just increment the profiler ticks that we use to mark
for optimizing function. Calling JSFunction::EnsureFeedbackVector
allocates a feedback vector, but doesn't reset the budget, so we
optimize much earlier than expected. This is currently only a problem
with %PrepareFunctionForOptimize that doesn't reset the budget. Other
code paths do also reset the interrupt budget.
Bug: chromium:10243
Change-Id: I611a9202e5e71077bf897def5959bcfe11b8fdf4
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2064980
Commit-Queue: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66426}
This is a reland of 548fda4afb
regress-1054466 is modified to not use 64x2 operations, since that was
causing problems on noavx/nosse builds, which requires scalar lowering,
and scalar lowering for 64x2 ops is not implemented.
Original change's description:
> [liftoff] Check fp_pair when looking up register for reuse
>
> Given two registers that are both not gp_pair, one could be an fp_pair,
> and the other not, and we will incorrect call == on them. The current
> check needs to be expanded to check that both registers are fp_pair.
>
> Bug: chromium:1054466
> Change-Id: Ib986c002a8a5cadb9668458597a797cecfd971b1
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2070006
> Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66402}
Bug: chromium:1054466
Change-Id: If88f1ff2fb17aaa3727758cda5b368be1c6d9bd6
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2071396
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66423}
Currently implicit returns do not correctly resolve the async generator
objects. This is observable via AsyncGenerator#throw as the implicit
return won't override the rejection.
Bug: v8:10238
Change-Id: I012fc3507d1e4106e7f35b21275be180a6e274c3
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2065343
Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Shu-yu Guo <syg@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66413}
This reverts commit 548fda4afb.
Reason for revert: Segfault on nosse bot: https://ci.chromium.org/p/v8/builders/ci/V8%20Linux/35905?
Original change's description:
> [liftoff] Check fp_pair when looking up register for reuse
>
> Given two registers that are both not gp_pair, one could be an fp_pair,
> and the other not, and we will incorrect call == on them. The current
> check needs to be expanded to check that both registers are fp_pair.
>
> Bug: chromium:1054466
> Change-Id: Ib986c002a8a5cadb9668458597a797cecfd971b1
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2070006
> Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66402}
TBR=clemensb@chromium.org,zhin@chromium.org
Change-Id: I56f13406ef3cc3793c9d0e2273c4dc5fb0e3de38
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: chromium:1054466
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2069327
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66405}
Given two registers that are both not gp_pair, one could be an fp_pair,
and the other not, and we will incorrect call == on them. The current
check needs to be expanded to check that both registers are fp_pair.
Bug: chromium:1054466
Change-Id: Ib986c002a8a5cadb9668458597a797cecfd971b1
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2070006
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66402}
Make sure the "initial pages" memory limit is enforced correctly and
throws a CompileError when exceeded.
Bump the "maximum pages" memory limit to 65536.
The --wasm-max-mem-pages flag now controls the "initial pages" limit;
the "maximum pages" limit is always 65536 as spec'ed.
This CL depends on https://github.com/WebAssembly/spec/pull/1121.
Bug: v8:7881, v8:8633
Change-Id: I68d07cef56633b8b8ce3b3d047c14e1096daf547
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2035876
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66400}
An enum cache can only be referenced together with the map that owns the
entries that are needed. Otherwise the entires can be trimmed away if
the map dies because of transitions.
Bug: chromium:1050046
Change-Id: I5bc9dd65ca092c3d5ebc08ce553f6f1dc980d41b
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2066959
Commit-Queue: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Igor Sheludko <ishell@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66375}
This can speed up the below micro-bench by 3x and improve JetStream2-tagcloud-SP case by ~2%.
Object.prototype.foo = function() {};
let array = ['a','b','c','d','e'];
let start = Date.now();
for (let i = 0; i < 1e5; i++) {
for (let j in array) {}
}
console.log(Date.now() - start);
Contributed by tao.pan@intel.com
Change-Id: I44c948c2e4c28b8e42192f36802a5ea0f82bbe25
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2049903
Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Shiyu Zhang <shiyu.zhang@intel.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66362}
Converting from Uint32Array to Uint8Array will have"0"
set as the first byte on BE machines:
[0,0,AB,CD]
Using Uint16Array will produce the correct result:
[AB,CD]
Change-Id: I9069f14c60a088a52af6d287c88be4ad437ee04d
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2064528
Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Milad Farazmand <miladfar@ca.ibm.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66357}
This reverts commit 03d5a7ba9b.
Reason for revert: Needs rebaseline:
https://ci.chromium.org/p/v8/builders/ci/V8%20Blink%20Linux/3243
Original change's description:
> [wasm] The name of a custom section can cause a validation error
>
> The WebAssembly spec defines that the name of a custom section can cause
> a validation error. The streaming decoder, however, used a separate
> Decoder object to decode the name, and thereby avoided a validation
> error. With this CL the streaming decoder uses the main decoder to
> decode the name of the custom section.
>
> In addition this CL removes the test mjsunit/regress/wasm/regress-789952.
> This test defined an invalid WebAssembly module and expected it to
> compile. As it is a regression test, it makes no sense to fix the test.
> The module is invalid because it defines the length of the custom section
> to be '0', so there are no bytes in the custom section for its name.
>
> R=clemensb@chromium.org
> CC=thibaudm@chromium.org
>
> Bug: v8:10126
> Change-Id: I8cfc77c9a5916570d5362d5922e0179a29774da8
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2041446
> Commit-Queue: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66348}
TBR=ahaas@chromium.org,clemensb@chromium.org
Change-Id: I5a7ea265ce47b9e685a5056bb83db6dc58f774a9
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: v8:10126
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2065168
Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66356}
The WebAssembly spec defines that the name of a custom section can cause
a validation error. The streaming decoder, however, used a separate
Decoder object to decode the name, and thereby avoided a validation
error. With this CL the streaming decoder uses the main decoder to
decode the name of the custom section.
In addition this CL removes the test mjsunit/regress/wasm/regress-789952.
This test defined an invalid WebAssembly module and expected it to
compile. As it is a regression test, it makes no sense to fix the test.
The module is invalid because it defines the length of the custom section
to be '0', so there are no bytes in the custom section for its name.
R=clemensb@chromium.orgCC=thibaudm@chromium.org
Bug: v8:10126
Change-Id: I8cfc77c9a5916570d5362d5922e0179a29774da8
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2041446
Commit-Queue: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66348}
Regrettably the previous fix was flawed because a zero increment can
change the type of the induction variable.
Bug: chromium:1051017
Change-Id: I2d7aeffb2065e739445118a2d0c5f7732eecdcbb
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2064222
Reviewed-by: Michael Stanton <mvstanton@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66345}
Whenever we use an "arrayType" that is stored as multiple bytes,
the host machine's endianness becomes apparent in the result.
This Cl adds the functionality to check the result based on the
host machine's endianness.
Change-Id: Ie96e8dd04b7e209127eff67ee06e1fa0ee5bc290
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2063861
Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Milad Farazmand <miladfar@ca.ibm.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66343}
JSCreate can have side effects (by looking up the prototype on an
object), so once we walk past that the analysis result must be marked
as "unreliable".
Bug: chromium:1053604
Change-Id: I36625b14f374e74561c9b539bdf7a02ae767cf7f
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2062396
Commit-Queue: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Stanton <mvstanton@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66329}
This adds tests for the mock logic used in differential fuzzing. The
tests uncovered a couple of issues in the mock files that are also
fixed.
This also does some minor code clean up in the mock code.
Bug: chromium:1044942
Change-Id: I5b67f70f8b104bb681548f742ab863395a88360f
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2043843
Commit-Queue: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Mathias Bynens <mathias@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66304}
This CL reinstates the old pow implementation which calls out to the
system implementation of pow.
Bug: v8:9622
Change-Id: I3df997888ced3fb8b5bd4b810098e967649aaa55
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1774898
Reviewed-by: Hannes Payer <hpayer@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66303}
Implement the latest spec changes:
- Allow declarative segments to behave like passive & dropped segments.
- Enforce that only declared functions may be returned or used in globals
as funcref.
- Ensure that table fill does not modify any entries if OOB.
Spec tests for select and br_table are still failing due to proposal issue
Bug: v8:10156
R=ahaas@chromium.org
Change-Id: I5b95be36a67bc7482a84b848908cc4cbdf94af03
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2027458
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Emanuel Ziegler <ecmziegler@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66297}
The previous code was relying on {compilation_unit_builder_} to check if
a section was after or before the code section. This only works for the
first section after code section, since the compilation unit builder is
then reset. Use an additional field to track this instead.
R=clemensb@chromium.org
Bug: chromium:1051912
Change-Id: Id1dfa803ecde2cf77f206ea781c007fc61168942
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2054099
Commit-Queue: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66265}
These tests are likely missing %PrepareFunctionForOptimization
annotation of lambdas. Thus lambdas are no longer inlined and
%DeoptimizeNow does nothing, while the entire point of these tests is
to test deoptimization paths.
Disabling lazy feedback allocation is a quick fix to restore coverage
until we can land a more complete fix (for details see the linked
bug).
Bug: v8:10195
Change-Id: I4038cdc5718230253ffb5bbc57d574342c652377
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2054096
Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
Auto-Submit: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66261}
The fix in b8b6075021 was insufficient.
The bug is that induction variable typing does not take into account
that the value can become NaN through addition or subtraction of
Infinities. The previous fix incorrectly assumed that this can only
happen when the initial value of the loop variable is an Infinity.
Bug: chromium:1051017
Change-Id: I8c9ffb2925288b80c00e18e7bc22a556bf540733
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2051957
Commit-Queue: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Stanton <mvstanton@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66258}
A FinalizationGroup that needs cleanup should not artificially prolong
its lifetime by being on the dirty list.
R=ulan@chromium.org
Bug: v8:8179
Change-Id: I19f102d154a9ac43b549b7d833d0c3ca7e61c6d0
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2051562
Reviewed-by: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Shu-yu Guo <syg@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66251}
These tests rely on predictable opt & deopt timings. Also add the
--opt flag to tests to force optimization even in configurations that
contain the --no-opt flag.
Bug: v8:9972,chromium:1049982
Change-Id: Ic161d188ebfae9aaae6a160d365413abedfee5f1
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2050402
Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
Auto-Submit: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66231}
It's not sufficient to reset only the modules on the current DFS path.
Bug: chromium:1050164
Change-Id: I00e5e12144ad70ac6371eea5e11590b72feaeecc
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2049853
Auto-Submit: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66229}
This fixes a bug in lazy deopts caused by calls to the callback function
in Array.prototype.reduce and reduceRight.
The deopt continuation expects the *next* iteration's index value but
we actually passed the current iteration's value.
The user-visible effect of this bug was that sometimes, an unexpected
additional call to the callback function would occur.
It was introduced by https://crrev.com/c/1934329.
Bug: v8:9972,chromium:1049982
Change-Id: Icfd2ef076209e20602f54d4662220e1d4c5d07ee
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2049850
Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66226}
Deprecate the following explicit FinalizationGroup APIs in favor of
automatic handling of FinalizationGroup cleanup callbacks:
- v8::Isolate::SetHostCleanupFinalizationGroupCallback
- v8::FinaliationGroup::Cleanup
If no HostCleanupFinalizationGroupCallback is set, then
FinalizationGroup cleanup callbacks are automatically scheduled by V8
itself as non-nestable foreground tasks.
When a Context being disposed, all FinalizationGroups that are
associated with it are removed from the dirty list, cancelling
scheduled cleanup.
This is a reland of 31d8ff7ac5
Bug: v8:8179, v8:10190
Change-Id: I704ecf48aeebac1dc2c05ea1c052f6a2560ae332
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2045723
Commit-Queue: Shu-yu Guo <syg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66208}
This makes creating whitelisted runtime functions more permissive on
fuzzers (when --allow-natives-for-fuzzing is passed).
- Runtime functions with too few arguments are replaced with undefined.
- Superfluous arguments are ignored.
This reduces syntax-error rate on fuzzers. Also prevents
dcheck errors when fuzzing debug builds and fuzzers use too many
arguments for runtime functions.
Bug: chromium:1044942
Change-Id: I23b45398421c50bc82d1e8bfdf019f565253db96
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2039352
Commit-Queue: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66202}
This reverts commit 31d8ff7ac5.
Reason for revert: https://crbug.com/v8/10190
Original change's description:
> [weakrefs] Schedule FinalizationGroup cleanup tasks from within V8
>
> Deprecate the following explicit FinalizationGroup APIs in favor of
> automatic handling of FinalizationGroup cleanup callbacks:
> - v8::Isolate::SetHostCleanupFinalizationGroupCallback
> - v8::FinaliationGroup::Cleanup
>
> If no HostCleanupFinalizationGroupCallback is set, then
> FinalizationGroup cleanup callbacks are automatically scheduled by V8
> itself as non-nestable foreground tasks.
>
> When a Context being disposed, all FinalizationGroups that are
> associated with it are removed from the dirty list, cancelling
> scheduled cleanup.
>
> Bug: v8:8179
> Change-Id: Ic09313a11dd00af36d1f698250b3d735155f45e8
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1986392
> Commit-Queue: Shu-yu Guo <syg@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66184}
TBR=ulan@chromium.org,rmcilroy@chromium.org,syg@chromium.org
# Not skipping CQ checks because original CL landed > 1 day ago.
Bug: v8:8179
Change-Id: If7869e9a5841803c10e748691f019a7d28f3b62e
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2043807
Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66190}
Deprecate the following explicit FinalizationGroup APIs in favor of
automatic handling of FinalizationGroup cleanup callbacks:
- v8::Isolate::SetHostCleanupFinalizationGroupCallback
- v8::FinaliationGroup::Cleanup
If no HostCleanupFinalizationGroupCallback is set, then
FinalizationGroup cleanup callbacks are automatically scheduled by V8
itself as non-nestable foreground tasks.
When a Context being disposed, all FinalizationGroups that are
associated with it are removed from the dirty list, cancelling
scheduled cleanup.
Bug: v8:8179
Change-Id: Ic09313a11dd00af36d1f698250b3d735155f45e8
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1986392
Commit-Queue: Shu-yu Guo <syg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66184}
We used to optimize functions that are expected to executed only
once by not allocating feedback slots for some of the bytecodes. This
would help in reducing the memory and avoiding initializing feedback
that would be never used. With lazy feedback allocation, we don't
allocate feedback vectors for most of such functions anyway.
The generated bytecode for oneshot optimized functions is different and
if we don't properly track this information we might end up generating
different bytecode for the same function. This could causes problems
when there is a mismatch between the feedback slots used by the new
bytecode and the old bytecode. Since we potentially get most of the
benefits of this optimization with lazy feedback vector allocation
we can simplify the code by disabling this optimization.
Bug: chromium:1045824
Change-Id: Ib94605c8c766adc99f54c8333f780d2448caff5e
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2030918
Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66172}
This is a reland of 410ca4c50e
Skip new test for unsupported liftoff architecture.
Previously, if there is some unsupported liftoff functions, it fall
through Turbofan but recompilation didn't catch and count it. This CL
fixes it by using requested_tier on finished units.
Avoid to tier down asm.js.
Introduce reached recompilation tier to monitor recompilation progress.
Original change's description:
> [wasm] Tierdown wasm module upon "Debugger.enable"
>
> Put a logic in Wasm Engine to tier down all existing modules per isolate
> when debugger is enabled. This CL does not handle new module added after
> debugger is enabled yet.
>
> Bug: v8:9654
> Change-Id: I87060f5c416506543fcaf231bff9999d06ba4c0d
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2013692
> Commit-Queue: Z Nguyen-Huu <duongn@microsoft.com>
> Reviewed-by: Simon Zünd <szuend@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66017}
TBR=szuend@chromium.org,bmeurer@chromium.org
Bug: v8:9654
Change-Id: I6014ae52d1e04726e64ee9267c5ce559090414d7
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2031744
Commit-Queue: Z Nguyen-Huu <duongn@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66164}
This relands commit 5cfe053e45.
Original change's description:
> [wasm-simd][liftoff] Add S128 case for stack movements
>
> The two cases we are fixing here are Construct and
> LoadCallerFrameSlot, which are closely related.
>
> Construct is called during PrepareCall, where we build up
> LiftoffStackSlots when we need to move an arg from caller's stack frame
> into callee's stack frame. LoadCallerFrameSlot is the parallel to
> this, called in ProcessParameter during decoding of the callee's
> function body.
>
> In most cases, Construct needs a new case to handle kWasmS128, and calls
> the relevant assembler to push a s128 onto the stack.
>
> ARM64 requires 16-byte alignment of sp, so we need to Claim the right
> number of kXRegSize slots first, which requires
> us traversing the list of slots to figure out how many s128 values there
> are. This is a straightforward way to fix this, if efficiency is a
> problem, we can change LiftOffStackSlots::Add to sum up the slot sizes.
>
> On IA32, pushing s128 values will require 4 calls to push. Instead, we
> use a sub and two movdqu, which will generate less code in most cases.
>
> On x64, there is no 128-bit push, so we call push twice.
>
> Bug: v8:9909
> Change-Id: I3af35b8462ea9c3b9b2d90800c37d11b5e95be59
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2015945
> Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#65956}
Bug: v8:9909
Change-Id: Icdaead289abe13faf75bb9e049929f7fd7c59a08
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2036760
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66119}
If we need a byte register, but {src} is none, we should definitely use
another register.
R=ahaas@chromium.org
Bug: chromium:1048241
Fixed: chromium:1048241
Change-Id: I3396826986e1823250ad6855b84f4b05faaf3b90
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2036073
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66095}
This relands commit 7c32fa05df.
Some test cases need to be updated, since we will bail out to TurboFan
where previously Liftoff was happy to run, when SIMD is not supported.
Original change's description:
> [wasm-simd][liftoff] Check CpuFeatures for SIMD support
>
> If Wasm simd128 is not supported on this particular hardware, we bail
> out to TurboFan.
>
> Bug: v8:9909
> Change-Id: Ie46e154426783ba099b7c0facc906670cda1bdd0
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2029427
> Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66055}
Bug: v8:9909
Bug: v8:10169
Change-Id: I850e1fe6bfbd12fb2eec052aa8367624c09f7a08
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2030354
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66090}
After allowing larger strings on 64-bit builds, this test OOMs on
Android devices that don't have enough memory.
Tbr: machenbach@chromium.org
Change-Id: I05c44d7074388a4306e5266ba1aa9da760c83377
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2035877
Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66089}
This is a reland of 9781aa076f
Original change's description:
> Reland "[wasm] Cache streaming compilation result"
>
> This is a reland of 015f379aa1
>
> Original change's description:
> > [wasm] Cache streaming compilation result
> >
> > Before compiling the code section, check whether the
> > bytes received so far match a cached module. If they do, delay
> > compilation until we receive the full bytes, since we are likely to find
> > a cache entry for them.
> >
> > R=clemensb@chromium.org
> >
> > Bug: v8:6847
> > Change-Id: Ie5170d1274da3da6d52ff1b408abc7cb441bbe3c
> > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2002823
> > Commit-Queue: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66000}
>
> Bug: v8:6847
> Change-Id: I0b5acffa01aeb7dade3dc966392814383d900015
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2022951
> Commit-Queue: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66047}
Bug: v8:6847
Change-Id: I272f56eee28010f34cc99df475164581c8b63036
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux64_tsan_rel
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux64_msan_rel
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2030741
Commit-Queue: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66081}
This relands commit e8832647b6.
The flaky test failures seems to be related to tiering, Liftoff
generating different call descriptors from TurboFan when Simd128
is unsupported (since TurboFan will lower the graph, but Liftoff
can continue running simd-call.js just fine).
We temporarily disable tiering for this test, until we get a proper fix,
like https://crrev.com/c/2029427/, but that fix requires this change
since more tests will fail without the lowering fixed.
Bug: v8:10169
Bug: v8:10154
Original change's description:
> [wasm-simd] Fix scalar lowering of kParameter
>
> Lowers the call descriptor of a wasm function if it contains simd.
>
> Also fixes a couple of issues with the lowering of kParameter:
> - the old_index == new_index check is incorrect, it would only work if
> the s128 parameter is the first parameter
> - the old_index was also not adjusted to account for Parameter[0] being
> the wasm instance object
> - new_index needs to be adjusted to account for the instance object too
>
> These fixes make it more similar to the lowering of kParameter in
> int64-lowering.c.
>
> Also add a new mjsunit test to exercise this logic.
>
> Bug: v8:10154
> Change-Id: Ia767a464c26a6a78fd931eab9e6897890a0904e8
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2020521
> Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Deepti Gandluri <gdeepti@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66032}
Change-Id: I1e27825025aefc5a42aeeb87d0447d6594388fa4
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2029147
Reviewed-by: Deepti Gandluri <gdeepti@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66072}
This adds two flags for whitelisting natives on fuzzers:
--allow-natives-for-fuzzing:
Enables a small subset of runtime functions and replaces others with
undefined.
--allow-natives-for-differential-fuzzing
Restricts the allowed runtime functions even further, excluding the
ones that break differential fuzzing.
Bug: chromium:1044942
Change-Id: I890bd4a6ff7c2e483dd74155290a7ace06f85239
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2020773
Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66068}
Factory::NewFunction now requires names passed into it to be flat.
Make sure to flatten Wasm function names when creating new Wasm JS
functions.
Fixes: chromium:1047368
Change-Id: I7bd2d8bc83ae8fab901ab469872bce0f703fc3ec
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2030738
Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Auto-Submit: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66064}
This shipped in v7.9, which is stable since six weeks. We do not test
the previous configuration any more and don't plan to move back, hence
remove the flag and clean up the code.
R=ahaas@chromium.org
Bug: v8:10155
Change-Id: I6b981f4be686473a911f041952cb684749d9fe7e
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2030732
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66063}
As discussed offline, the current implementation implement each
situation separately. I think we can simplify the code a lot by sharing
code between the different paths.
This CL does that by
1) implementing the kI64Store case separately, because it does not have
all the register contraints that the others have, and
2) moving all logic to ensure that the {src} register is usable before
the switch, such that it's shared by all the compare-exchange cases.
As a side produce, this also fixes issue 1045225, because for i64 stores
which actually only use the lower half of {src}, only that half will be
pinned.
R=ahaas@chromium.org
Bug: chromium:1045225, v8:10108
Change-Id: I0be025b9706d563835ae6337d45b88e0233eacad
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2029414
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66062}
There was a bug in the function body decoder where
type checking of brtable only happened if the brtable
instruction is reachable. However, type checking is
required in all cases where brtable "not unreachable".
The difference between reachable and "not unreachable"
is a state called spec-reachable where a clever
compiler can already infer that the code will be
unreachable (e.g. a memory access is out of bounds
just by the offset and therefore unconditionally
traps), but the spec can not. If an instruction is
only spec-reachable, it still has to be type checked.
R=clemensb@chromium.org
FIX=chromium:1046472
Change-Id: I7e9f1108597871615c0d443a0e94de35a0207b5e
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2027990
Commit-Queue: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66049}
This is a reland of 015f379aa1
Original change's description:
> [wasm] Cache streaming compilation result
>
> Before compiling the code section, check whether the
> bytes received so far match a cached module. If they do, delay
> compilation until we receive the full bytes, since we are likely to find
> a cache entry for them.
>
> R=clemensb@chromium.org
>
> Bug: v8:6847
> Change-Id: Ie5170d1274da3da6d52ff1b408abc7cb441bbe3c
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2002823
> Commit-Queue: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66000}
Bug: v8:6847
Change-Id: I0b5acffa01aeb7dade3dc966392814383d900015
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2022951
Commit-Queue: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66047}
This reverts commit e8832647b6.
Reason for revert: Causes flaky fails on the tree, reverting as this test should be deterministic pass/fail.
https://logs.chromium.org/logs/v8/buildbucket/cr-buildbucket.appspot.com/8889903130443940000/+/steps/Check_-_nosse3__flakes_/0/logs/simd-call/0
Original change's description:
> [wasm-simd] Fix scalar lowering of kParameter
>
> Lowers the call descriptor of a wasm function if it contains simd.
>
> Also fixes a couple of issues with the lowering of kParameter:
> - the old_index == new_index check is incorrect, it would only work if
> the s128 parameter is the first parameter
> - the old_index was also not adjusted to account for Parameter[0] being
> the wasm instance object
> - new_index needs to be adjusted to account for the instance object too
>
> These fixes make it more similar to the lowering of kParameter in
> int64-lowering.c.
>
> Also add a new mjsunit test to exercise this logic.
>
> Bug: v8:10154
> Change-Id: Ia767a464c26a6a78fd931eab9e6897890a0904e8
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2020521
> Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Deepti Gandluri <gdeepti@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66032}
TBR=gdeepti@chromium.org,ahaas@chromium.org,zhin@chromium.org
Change-Id: I69589e2331c857c0f197ac53b8fb8a241376c632
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: v8:10154
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2028830
Reviewed-by: Deepti Gandluri <gdeepti@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Deepti Gandluri <gdeepti@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66034}
Lowers the call descriptor of a wasm function if it contains simd.
Also fixes a couple of issues with the lowering of kParameter:
- the old_index == new_index check is incorrect, it would only work if
the s128 parameter is the first parameter
- the old_index was also not adjusted to account for Parameter[0] being
the wasm instance object
- new_index needs to be adjusted to account for the instance object too
These fixes make it more similar to the lowering of kParameter in
int64-lowering.c.
Also add a new mjsunit test to exercise this logic.
Bug: v8:10154
Change-Id: Ia767a464c26a6a78fd931eab9e6897890a0904e8
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2020521
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Deepti Gandluri <gdeepti@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66032}
Copying one object's named properties is always fine, even if one of
the names could be a large index on a TypedArray. Mark the LookupIterator
as OWN_SKIP_INTERCEPTOR to avoid the DCHECK.
Bug: chromium:1044909
Change-Id: I6918186a4b50df7865de3572cb674fd7d6eadb78
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2023558
Commit-Queue: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Auto-Submit: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66027}
... which didn't check writability of array length on appending
a new element to an array.
Bug: chromium:1041251
Change-Id: I6935e505a4844e5b22abe9d4a42786619499daa6
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2023551
Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Igor Sheludko <ishell@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66023}
This reverts commit 7d1f95d6e4.
Reason for revert: Speculative revert for https://crbug.com/1046678
Original change's description:
> [regexp] Correctly escape a backslash-newline sequence
>
> When printing the source string, a backslash-newline sequence ('\\\n',
> '\\\r', '\\\u2028', '\\\u2029') should be formatted as '\n', '\r',
> '\u2028', '\u2029', respectively. Prior to this CL it was formatted as
> a backslash followed by the literal newline character.
>
> Bug: v8:8615
> Change-Id: Iac90195c56ea1707ea8469066b0cc967ea87fc73
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2016583
> Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> Auto-Submit: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#65986}
TBR=neis@chromium.org,jgruber@chromium.org
# Not skipping CQ checks because original CL landed > 1 day ago.
Bug: v8:8615,chromium:1046678
Change-Id: If28626a1c6868ed848310c0d30cf61a73326f2c1
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2027452
Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66022}
The compiler assumes (for loads) that the property cell of a
non-configurable global property never gets invalidated.
Bug: chromium:1044919
Change-Id: I27f6ce30fb9a21e2c1e5310f25e9bb973ebbc266
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2023562
Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66021}
Converting an object to an array length can freeze the array whose
length is being set, but SetLength for the frozen elements accessor
is supposedly unreachable. This fix extends the existing special
handling for suddenly-readonly lengths to cover this case as well.
Prior art: https://codereview.chromium.org/2543553002
Bug: chromium:1044911
Change-Id: I85d2e79446a8d9c1d22cd86ddf828328bf51a1a1
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2023555
Auto-Submit: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66020}
This reverts commit 015f379aa1.
Reason for revert: Msan is unhappy: https://ci.chromium.org/p/v8/builders/ci/V8%20Linux%20-%20arm64%20-%20sim%20-%20MSAN/30702
Original change's description:
> [wasm] Cache streaming compilation result
>
> Before compiling the code section, check whether the
> bytes received so far match a cached module. If they do, delay
> compilation until we receive the full bytes, since we are likely to find
> a cache entry for them.
>
> R=clemensb@chromium.org
>
> Bug: v8:6847
> Change-Id: Ie5170d1274da3da6d52ff1b408abc7cb441bbe3c
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2002823
> Commit-Queue: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66000}
TBR=clemensb@chromium.org,thibaudm@chromium.org
Change-Id: Idfa5b3f354816eb600ae7aab7857063d5d0d27ca
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: v8:6847
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2022949
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66001}
Before compiling the code section, check whether the
bytes received so far match a cached module. If they do, delay
compilation until we receive the full bytes, since we are likely to find
a cache entry for them.
R=clemensb@chromium.org
Bug: v8:6847
Change-Id: Ie5170d1274da3da6d52ff1b408abc7cb441bbe3c
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2002823
Commit-Queue: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66000}
Fix the string representation of functions exported from asm.js modules
in the presence of imported functions.
R=jkummerow@chromium.org
Bug: chromium:1045767, chromium:667678
Change-Id: I55714252036511598eeec7fe7b81985213f7e4f2
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2022142
Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#65993}
When printing the source string, a backslash-newline sequence ('\\\n',
'\\\r', '\\\u2028', '\\\u2029') should be formatted as '\n', '\r',
'\u2028', '\u2029', respectively. Prior to this CL it was formatted as
a backslash followed by the literal newline character.
Bug: v8:8615
Change-Id: Iac90195c56ea1707ea8469066b0cc967ea87fc73
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2016583
Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Auto-Submit: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#65986}
