This includes the simulator, PPC64 Linux (little endian)
and PPC64 AIX (Big endian) running on P9.
Also enable the related simd tests for PPC64.
Qfma opcodes are added to the selector as part of the enablement.
Change-Id: Idf2bf2eaa9cee489e7315031976bc412358b9868
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2799942
Reviewed-by: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Deepti Gandluri <gdeepti@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Junliang Yan <junyan@redhat.com>
Commit-Queue: Milad Fa <mfarazma@redhat.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#73782}
This is a more canonical type name, and is in line with {kVoidCode}.
Change-Id: Iaae9524b6fb6ecaafd63ce81cf30e3d01ca3e525
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2775565
Commit-Queue: Manos Koukoutos <manoskouk@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Simon Zünd <szuend@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#73557}
Note that top-level await is already on-by-default in blink. This flips
the flag in V8 only for other embedders.
Bug: v8:9344
Change-Id: Ic860b22316718b353a0493799fdf95200a71acc1
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2746843
Commit-Queue: Shu-yu Guo <syg@chromium.org>
Auto-Submit: Shu-yu Guo <syg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Camillo Bruni <cbruni@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#73416}
Simd unsupported in simulator and some machines on mips.
Original Commit Message:
As of https://crrev.com/c/2629465, Simd tests cannot pass on
architectures without Simd support. Tests will need to be
re-enabled once Simd support is fully implemented on PPC.
Port: aaacffa1e0
Change-Id: Ic7451211cbe2bfa13952b994ea440189620579cd
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2717158
Auto-Submit: Liu yu <liuyu@loongson.cn>
Reviewed-by: Deepti Gandluri <gdeepti@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Zhao Jiazhong <zhaojiazhong-hf@loongson.cn>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#73067}
This CL introduces a test runner flag to detect if webassembly has been
disabled. Since all tests that require wasm are alrady skipped in
lite mode, we introduce a has_webassembly flag for the test runner which
checks for v8_enable_webassembly=true and v8_enable_lite_mode=false.
As a drive-by, we also do not set the V8_ENABLE_WEBASSEMBLY
preprocessor flag if lite mode is enabled.
The status files are updated by splitting wasm tests from the
"lite_mode" section and checking for "not has_webassembly" instead.
Note that the v8_enable_webassembly=false configuration is not tested
on any bot currently, but I will make sure that all tests keep passing
on further changes in this configuration.
R=machenbach@chromium.org
Bug: v8:11238
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux64_no_wasm_compile_rel
Change-Id: I1841eb1f1633cb47e0c079f4a4a4d769ca3a9cbb
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2710425
Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#72898}
As of https://crrev.com/c/2629465, Simd tests cannot pass on
architectures without Simd support. Tests will need to be re-enabled
once Simd support is fully implemented on PPC.
Change-Id: I963639f1afa0c0ca7be3ca4b2fc06e874235b903
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2693056
Reviewed-by: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Deepti Gandluri <gdeepti@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Milad Fa <mfarazma@redhat.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#72788}
- Add a no-simd-sse flag to skip SIMD tests on bots with no
hardware support.
Change-Id: I4efdbb5ee39c2e10ea8776a1f1e536ac96823efe
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2629465
Commit-Queue: Deepti Gandluri <gdeepti@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#72682}
This change completes support for import assertions for dynamic import().
A new version of the HostImportModuleDynamically callback taking import
assertions is added to the public API. The name is very verbose; we
could consider removing the "ImportAssertions" part when the old API
is removed.
Bytecode generation is updated to pass the assertions, if present, to
Runtime_DynamicImportCall.
Isolate::RunHostImportModuleDynamicallyCallback extracts the assertions
from the options bag, filters out the assertions not present in the
list specified by the host in HostGetSupportedImportAssertions, and
sorts them by code point order of the keys per
https://tc39.es/proposal-import-assertions/#sec-import-call-runtime-semantics-evaluation.
The resulting array is passed to the host in the callback.
Bug: v8:10958
Change-Id: I931df00f954a9f9c65bff5bcf461ba1c8f11e94e
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2620578
Commit-Queue: Dan Clark <daniec@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Camillo Bruni <cbruni@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#72307}
First step towards the new exception handling proposal:
https://github.com/WebAssembly/exception-handling/issues/125
This is essentially a revert of:
"[wasm] Switch to new 'catch' and 'br_on_exn' proposal."
The changes are:
- "catch" instruction takes a tag immediate,
- "rethrow" instruction takes a label immediate,
- Add "catch_all" instruction,
- Remove "br_on_exn" instruction,
- Do not push exceptions on the stack, only the encoded values
R=clemensb@chromium.org
CC=aheejin@chromium.org
Bug: v8:8091
Change-Id: Iea4d8d5a5d3ad50693f645e93c13e8de117aa884
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2484514
Commit-Queue: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#71602}
The index to be traced can be a full (platform-dependent) pointer sized
integer now. This CL prepares memory tracing for that.
As a drive-by, the "address" field is renamed to "offset", or
"effective_offset", depending on the situation.
R=manoskouk@chromium.org
Bug: v8:10949
Change-Id: I1fabfdb57835f041e1310a4eb4024d6254c08752
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2465825
Reviewed-by: Manos Koukoutos <manoskouk@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#70477}
This is a reland of 0ba115e6a9
Changes compared to last reland:
- Fix Python code trying to write to expected_outcomes, which is now a
computed property.
- Fix remaining place in d8.cc that ignored the --fuzzing flag.
- Expect flag contradictions for --cache in code_serializer variant.
Original change's description:
> Reland^3 "[flags] warn about contradictory flags"
>
> Changes:
> - Also allow second parameter influenced by --cache to be reassigned.
> - Fix --stress-opt to only --always-opt in the last iteration as before.
>
> Original change's description:
> > Reland^2 "[flags] warn about contradictory flags"
> >
> > This is a reland of d8f8a7e210
> > Change compared to last reland:
> > - Do not check for d8 flag contradictions in the presence of --fuzzing
> > - Allow identical re-declaration of --cache=*
> >
> > Original change's description:
> > > Reland "[flags] warn about contradictory flags"
> > >
> > > This is a reland of b8f9166664
> > > Difference to previous CL: Additional functionality to specify
> > > incompatible flags based on GN variables and extra-flags, used
> > > to fix the issues that came up on the waterfall.
> > >
> > > This also changes the rules regarding repeated flags: While
> > > explicitly repeated flags are allowed for boolean values as long
> > > as they are identical, repeated flags or explicit flags in the
> > > presence of an active implication are disallowed for non-boolean
> > > flags. The latter simplifies specifying conflict rules in
> > > variants.py. Otherwise a rule like
> > >
> > > INCOMPATIBLE_FLAGS_PER_EXTRA_FLAG = {
> > > "--gc-interval=*": ["--gc-interval=*"],
> > > }
> > >
> > > wouldn't work because specifying the same GC interval twice
> > > wouldn't actually count as a conflict. This was an issue with
> > > test/mjsunit/wasm/gc-buffer.js, which specifies
> > > --gc-interval=500 exactly like the extra flag by the stress bot.
> > >
> > > Also, this now expands contradictory flags checking to d8 flags
> > > for consistency.
> > >
> > > Original change's description:
> > > > [flags] warn about contradictory flags
> > > >
> > > > Design Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lkvu8crkK7Ei39qjkPCFijpNyxWXsOktG9GB-7K34jM/
> > > >
> > > > Bug: v8:10577
> > > > Change-Id: Ib9cfdffa401c48c895bf31caed5ee03545beddab
> > > > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2154792
> > > > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
> > > > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> > > > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68168}
> > >
> > > Bug: v8:10577
> > > Change-Id: I268e590ee18a535b13dee14eeb15ddd0a9ee8341
> > > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2235115
> > > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> > > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68989}
> >
> > Bug: v8:10577
> > Change-Id: I31d2794d4f9ff630f3444210100c64d67d881276
> > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2339464
> > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69339}
>
> Bug: v8:10577
> Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux64_tsan_rel_ng
> Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux64_tsan_isolates_rel_ng
> Change-Id: I4a69dc57a102782cb453144323e3752ac8278624
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2352770
> Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69433}
Change-Id: Ib6d2aeb495210f581ac671221c265df58e8e5e70
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2398640
Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69954}
This reverts commit dc18b82221.
Reason for revert: still causing failures: https://ci.chromium.org/p/v8/builders/ci/V8%20Linux%20-%20debug/31566
Original change's description:
> Reland^3 "[flags] warn about contradictory flags"
>
> This is a reland of 0ba115e6a9
> Changes:
> - Also allow second parameter influenced by --cache to be reassigned.
> - Fix --stress-opt to only --always-opt in the last iteration as before.
>
> Original change's description:
> > Reland^2 "[flags] warn about contradictory flags"
> >
> > This is a reland of d8f8a7e210
> > Change compared to last reland:
> > - Do not check for d8 flag contradictions in the presence of --fuzzing
> > - Allow identical re-declaration of --cache=*
> >
> > Original change's description:
> > > Reland "[flags] warn about contradictory flags"
> > >
> > > This is a reland of b8f9166664
> > > Difference to previous CL: Additional functionality to specify
> > > incompatible flags based on GN variables and extra-flags, used
> > > to fix the issues that came up on the waterfall.
> > >
> > > This also changes the rules regarding repeated flags: While
> > > explicitly repeated flags are allowed for boolean values as long
> > > as they are identical, repeated flags or explicit flags in the
> > > presence of an active implication are disallowed for non-boolean
> > > flags. The latter simplifies specifying conflict rules in
> > > variants.py. Otherwise a rule like
> > >
> > > INCOMPATIBLE_FLAGS_PER_EXTRA_FLAG = {
> > > "--gc-interval=*": ["--gc-interval=*"],
> > > }
> > >
> > > wouldn't work because specifying the same GC interval twice
> > > wouldn't actually count as a conflict. This was an issue with
> > > test/mjsunit/wasm/gc-buffer.js, which specifies
> > > --gc-interval=500 exactly like the extra flag by the stress bot.
> > >
> > > Also, this now expands contradictory flags checking to d8 flags
> > > for consistency.
> > >
> > > Original change's description:
> > > > [flags] warn about contradictory flags
> > > >
> > > > Design Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lkvu8crkK7Ei39qjkPCFijpNyxWXsOktG9GB-7K34jM/
> > > >
> > > > Bug: v8:10577
> > > > Change-Id: Ib9cfdffa401c48c895bf31caed5ee03545beddab
> > > > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2154792
> > > > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
> > > > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> > > > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68168}
> > >
> > > Bug: v8:10577
> > > Change-Id: I268e590ee18a535b13dee14eeb15ddd0a9ee8341
> > > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2235115
> > > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> > > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68989}
> >
> > Bug: v8:10577
> > Change-Id: I31d2794d4f9ff630f3444210100c64d67d881276
> > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2339464
> > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69339}
>
> Bug: v8:10577
> Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux64_tsan_rel_ng
> Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux64_tsan_isolates_rel_ng
> Change-Id: I4a69dc57a102782cb453144323e3752ac8278624
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2352770
> Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69433}
TBR=machenbach@chromium.org,neis@chromium.org,clemensb@chromium.org,tebbi@chromium.org,tmrts@chromium.org
Change-Id: I4ccdd7b931d0ddccbcec1d6cfae8d4874ee49cfc
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: v8:10577
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux64_tsan_rel_ng
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux64_tsan_isolates_rel_ng
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2360414
Reviewed-by: Francis McCabe <fgm@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Francis McCabe <fgm@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69438}
This is a reland of 0ba115e6a9
Changes:
- Also allow second parameter influenced by --cache to be reassigned.
- Fix --stress-opt to only --always-opt in the last iteration as before.
Original change's description:
> Reland^2 "[flags] warn about contradictory flags"
>
> This is a reland of d8f8a7e210
> Change compared to last reland:
> - Do not check for d8 flag contradictions in the presence of --fuzzing
> - Allow identical re-declaration of --cache=*
>
> Original change's description:
> > Reland "[flags] warn about contradictory flags"
> >
> > This is a reland of b8f9166664
> > Difference to previous CL: Additional functionality to specify
> > incompatible flags based on GN variables and extra-flags, used
> > to fix the issues that came up on the waterfall.
> >
> > This also changes the rules regarding repeated flags: While
> > explicitly repeated flags are allowed for boolean values as long
> > as they are identical, repeated flags or explicit flags in the
> > presence of an active implication are disallowed for non-boolean
> > flags. The latter simplifies specifying conflict rules in
> > variants.py. Otherwise a rule like
> >
> > INCOMPATIBLE_FLAGS_PER_EXTRA_FLAG = {
> > "--gc-interval=*": ["--gc-interval=*"],
> > }
> >
> > wouldn't work because specifying the same GC interval twice
> > wouldn't actually count as a conflict. This was an issue with
> > test/mjsunit/wasm/gc-buffer.js, which specifies
> > --gc-interval=500 exactly like the extra flag by the stress bot.
> >
> > Also, this now expands contradictory flags checking to d8 flags
> > for consistency.
> >
> > Original change's description:
> > > [flags] warn about contradictory flags
> > >
> > > Design Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lkvu8crkK7Ei39qjkPCFijpNyxWXsOktG9GB-7K34jM/
> > >
> > > Bug: v8:10577
> > > Change-Id: Ib9cfdffa401c48c895bf31caed5ee03545beddab
> > > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2154792
> > > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
> > > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> > > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68168}
> >
> > Bug: v8:10577
> > Change-Id: I268e590ee18a535b13dee14eeb15ddd0a9ee8341
> > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2235115
> > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68989}
>
> Bug: v8:10577
> Change-Id: I31d2794d4f9ff630f3444210100c64d67d881276
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2339464
> Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69339}
Bug: v8:10577
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux64_tsan_rel_ng
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux64_tsan_isolates_rel_ng
Change-Id: I4a69dc57a102782cb453144323e3752ac8278624
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2352770
Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69433}
This reverts commit 0ba115e6a9.
Reason for revert: Breaks test on TSAN - block-conflicts
https://ci.chromium.org/p/v8/builders/ci/V8%20Linux64%20TSAN%20-%20concurrent%20marking/14230
Original change's description:
> Reland^2 "[flags] warn about contradictory flags"
>
> This is a reland of d8f8a7e210
> Change compared to last reland:
> - Do not check for d8 flag contradictions in the presence of --fuzzing
> - Allow identical re-declaration of --cache=*
>
> Original change's description:
> > Reland "[flags] warn about contradictory flags"
> >
> > This is a reland of b8f9166664
> > Difference to previous CL: Additional functionality to specify
> > incompatible flags based on GN variables and extra-flags, used
> > to fix the issues that came up on the waterfall.
> >
> > This also changes the rules regarding repeated flags: While
> > explicitly repeated flags are allowed for boolean values as long
> > as they are identical, repeated flags or explicit flags in the
> > presence of an active implication are disallowed for non-boolean
> > flags. The latter simplifies specifying conflict rules in
> > variants.py. Otherwise a rule like
> >
> > INCOMPATIBLE_FLAGS_PER_EXTRA_FLAG = {
> > "--gc-interval=*": ["--gc-interval=*"],
> > }
> >
> > wouldn't work because specifying the same GC interval twice
> > wouldn't actually count as a conflict. This was an issue with
> > test/mjsunit/wasm/gc-buffer.js, which specifies
> > --gc-interval=500 exactly like the extra flag by the stress bot.
> >
> > Also, this now expands contradictory flags checking to d8 flags
> > for consistency.
> >
> > Original change's description:
> > > [flags] warn about contradictory flags
> > >
> > > Design Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lkvu8crkK7Ei39qjkPCFijpNyxWXsOktG9GB-7K34jM/
> > >
> > > Bug: v8:10577
> > > Change-Id: Ib9cfdffa401c48c895bf31caed5ee03545beddab
> > > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2154792
> > > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
> > > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> > > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68168}
> >
> > Bug: v8:10577
> > Change-Id: I268e590ee18a535b13dee14eeb15ddd0a9ee8341
> > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2235115
> > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68989}
>
> Bug: v8:10577
> Change-Id: I31d2794d4f9ff630f3444210100c64d67d881276
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2339464
> Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69339}
TBR=machenbach@chromium.org,neis@chromium.org,clemensb@chromium.org,tebbi@chromium.org,tmrts@chromium.org
Change-Id: I1454a05e357ddd704db7fb79e51be65d45a9a16e
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: v8:10577
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2348365
Reviewed-by: Bill Budge <bbudge@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Bill Budge <bbudge@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69341}
This is a reland of d8f8a7e210
Change compared to last reland:
- Do not check for d8 flag contradictions in the presence of --fuzzing
- Allow identical re-declaration of --cache=*
Original change's description:
> Reland "[flags] warn about contradictory flags"
>
> This is a reland of b8f9166664
> Difference to previous CL: Additional functionality to specify
> incompatible flags based on GN variables and extra-flags, used
> to fix the issues that came up on the waterfall.
>
> This also changes the rules regarding repeated flags: While
> explicitly repeated flags are allowed for boolean values as long
> as they are identical, repeated flags or explicit flags in the
> presence of an active implication are disallowed for non-boolean
> flags. The latter simplifies specifying conflict rules in
> variants.py. Otherwise a rule like
>
> INCOMPATIBLE_FLAGS_PER_EXTRA_FLAG = {
> "--gc-interval=*": ["--gc-interval=*"],
> }
>
> wouldn't work because specifying the same GC interval twice
> wouldn't actually count as a conflict. This was an issue with
> test/mjsunit/wasm/gc-buffer.js, which specifies
> --gc-interval=500 exactly like the extra flag by the stress bot.
>
> Also, this now expands contradictory flags checking to d8 flags
> for consistency.
>
> Original change's description:
> > [flags] warn about contradictory flags
> >
> > Design Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lkvu8crkK7Ei39qjkPCFijpNyxWXsOktG9GB-7K34jM/
> >
> > Bug: v8:10577
> > Change-Id: Ib9cfdffa401c48c895bf31caed5ee03545beddab
> > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2154792
> > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
> > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68168}
>
> Bug: v8:10577
> Change-Id: I268e590ee18a535b13dee14eeb15ddd0a9ee8341
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2235115
> Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68989}
Bug: v8:10577
Change-Id: I31d2794d4f9ff630f3444210100c64d67d881276
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2339464
Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69339}
Previously, all ThisExpression's had kNoSourcePositions leading to
incorrect error messages like this:
➜ d8 -e "function t() { for (const x of this) {} } t();"
unnamed:1: TypeError: undefined is not a function
function t() { for (const x of this) {} } t();
^
TypeError: undefined is not a function
at t (unnamed:1:11)
at unnamed:1:43
This patch allows creation of a ThisExpression with a source position,
leading to a better error message:
➜ d8 -e "function t() { for (const x of this) {} } t();"
unnamed:1: TypeError: this is not iterable
function t() { for (const x of this) {} } t();
^
TypeError: this is not iterable
at t (unnamed:1:32)
at unnamed:1:43
This patch does not remove the existing cached version of
ThisExpression and instead creates a new one when required.
Bug: v8:6513
Change-Id: Idee4fe8946a9b821d06ff4a5e7eaefe54874ec59
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2345226
Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69300}
This reverts commit d8f8a7e210.
Reason for revert: Breaks code_serializer variant - https://cr-buildbucket.appspot.com/build/8874070652992164976
Original change's description:
> Reland "[flags] warn about contradictory flags"
>
> This is a reland of b8f9166664
> Difference to previous CL: Additional functionality to specify
> incompatible flags based on GN variables and extra-flags, used
> to fix the issues that came up on the waterfall.
>
> This also changes the rules regarding repeated flags: While
> explicitly repeated flags are allowed for boolean values as long
> as they are identical, repeated flags or explicit flags in the
> presence of an active implication are disallowed for non-boolean
> flags. The latter simplifies specifying conflict rules in
> variants.py. Otherwise a rule like
>
> INCOMPATIBLE_FLAGS_PER_EXTRA_FLAG = {
> "--gc-interval=*": ["--gc-interval=*"],
> }
>
> wouldn't work because specifying the same GC interval twice
> wouldn't actually count as a conflict. This was an issue with
> test/mjsunit/wasm/gc-buffer.js, which specifies
> --gc-interval=500 exactly like the extra flag by the stress bot.
>
> Also, this now expands contradictory flags checking to d8 flags
> for consistency.
>
> Original change's description:
> > [flags] warn about contradictory flags
> >
> > Design Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lkvu8crkK7Ei39qjkPCFijpNyxWXsOktG9GB-7K34jM/
> >
> > Bug: v8:10577
> > Change-Id: Ib9cfdffa401c48c895bf31caed5ee03545beddab
> > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2154792
> > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
> > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68168}
>
> Bug: v8:10577
> Change-Id: I268e590ee18a535b13dee14eeb15ddd0a9ee8341
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2235115
> Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68989}
TBR=machenbach@chromium.org,neis@chromium.org,clemensb@chromium.org,tebbi@chromium.org,tmrts@chromium.org
Change-Id: I7969065b0edbc463a94e530485bc2ab623d77b62
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: v8:10577
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2312782
Reviewed-by: Maya Lekova <mslekova@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Maya Lekova <mslekova@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68992}
This is a reland of b8f9166664
Difference to previous CL: Additional functionality to specify
incompatible flags based on GN variables and extra-flags, used
to fix the issues that came up on the waterfall.
This also changes the rules regarding repeated flags: While
explicitly repeated flags are allowed for boolean values as long
as they are identical, repeated flags or explicit flags in the
presence of an active implication are disallowed for non-boolean
flags. The latter simplifies specifying conflict rules in
variants.py. Otherwise a rule like
INCOMPATIBLE_FLAGS_PER_EXTRA_FLAG = {
"--gc-interval=*": ["--gc-interval=*"],
}
wouldn't work because specifying the same GC interval twice
wouldn't actually count as a conflict. This was an issue with
test/mjsunit/wasm/gc-buffer.js, which specifies
--gc-interval=500 exactly like the extra flag by the stress bot.
Also, this now expands contradictory flags checking to d8 flags
for consistency.
Original change's description:
> [flags] warn about contradictory flags
>
> Design Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lkvu8crkK7Ei39qjkPCFijpNyxWXsOktG9GB-7K34jM/
>
> Bug: v8:10577
> Change-Id: Ib9cfdffa401c48c895bf31caed5ee03545beddab
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2154792
> Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
> Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68168}
Bug: v8:10577
Change-Id: I268e590ee18a535b13dee14eeb15ddd0a9ee8341
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2235115
Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68989}
With this CL d8 exits with an error code if there is an unhandled
promise rejection, e.g. due tue a failed assertion in a promise. Up
until now these assertions were just ignored.
Bug: v8:10556
Change-Id: I25f20e4be45a2de130562deb15f6a144f0ac976f
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2238569
Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Camillo Bruni <cbruni@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68503}
The registers were not spilled correctly in liftoff when tracing
function calls, which caused runtime errors.
R=clemensb@chromium.orgCC=thibaudm@chromium.org
Bug: v8:10559
Change-Id: Ic0a9ae8a286bdee8f8440e006d0b47e52241ea5a
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2245595
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Arnaud Robin <arobin@google.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68340}
Added wasm tracing support for turbofan with the flag --trace-wasm.
The test suite was updated accordingly.
R=clemensb@chromium.org
Bug: v8:10559
Change-Id: Ie6ee2a05142081416d8572d4d72dcd315e0bf285
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2235536
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Arnaud Robin <arobin@google.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68253}
Added display of identation, function index, function names and compiler
used when tracing function calls in wasm.
R=clemensb@chromium.org
Bug: v8:10559
Change-Id: I58b4e7b077365bdee7bae9b5ad8a50178c322147
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2230532
Commit-Queue: Arnaud Robin <arobin@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68198}
Added return value display when tracing function calls in wasm.
The new types handled are I32, I64, F32 and F64.
Only single return value is handled.
R=clemensb@chromium.org
Bug: v8:10559
Change-Id: I726d08fcfdc8bf2c3e43a25ec1932412ff74387b
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2225024
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Arnaud Robin <arobin@google.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68143}
Added --trace-wasm flag which prints function entry in wasm.
R=clemensb@chromium.org
Bug: v8:10559
Change-Id: I049efeadb0149f4f58ce34a29fd53fbf5688bd4b
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2215052
Commit-Queue: Arnaud Robin <arobin@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#67998}
The serializer currently cannot handle a heap state containing
arbitrary compiled Code objects. As a quick fix for the
--stress-snapshot d8 flag, we clear compiled data from the isolate
prior to the serialize-deserialize-verify pass.
With this change, mjsunit tests pass on x64.
The %SerializeDeserializeNow() runtime function would require more
work, since it is not possible to mutate the heap to this extent while
still preserving a runnable host context and isolate. We will need
another solution there.
Drive-by: Skip the stress_snapshot variant except for the mjsunit
suite.
Tbr: machenbach@chromium.org
Bug: v8:10493,v8:10416
Change-Id: Ie110da8b51613fcd69c7f391d3cf8589d6b04dd8
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2182429
Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#67585}
The interpreter will be moved to be test-only, hence
--wasm-interpret-all also needs to be removed.
Since we don't have any non-compiling tier any more, we also remove the
implication from --jitless to --wasm-lazy-compilation. Instead, we add
another CHECK that we can't be in jitless mode if we trigger any wasm
compilation.
All tests that just ran other tests and additionally passed
--wasm-interpret-all become redundant and are deleted. Also all
regression tests that explicitly specify --wasm-interpret-all are not
needed any more.
R=thibaudm@chromium.org
Bug: v8:10389
Change-Id: I5ddf20a842117a6c05e277a5308f5cfe42e6bfa5
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2164792
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#67419}
To avoid shrinking the unregister token map on each pop of the cleared
cell list, the Torque implementation of the cleanup loop avoids
shrinking the map until the end of the loop.
To support that, PopClearedCellHoldings is refactored to the Torque
PopClearedCell which calls the
JSFinalization::RemoveCellFromUnregisterTokenMap and the runtime
ShrinkFinalizationRegistryUnregisterTokenMap. The former cannot GC is
and is implemented in CSA as a fast C call. The latter can GC and is a
runtime call.
This also incidentally makes uses of FinalizationRegistry without
unregister token a fast path that doesn't have to leave Torque.
Bug: v8:8179
Change-Id: Ia0c3c5800d26e31319a818f164f6bd3267355aa6
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2137950
Commit-Queue: Shu-yu Guo <syg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#67161}
Previously we use the error message for normal invalid private member
access, so for a failed brand check for class C, the error is
TypeError: Cannot read private member C from an object whose class did not declare it
This updates the message to
TypeError: Object must be an instance of class C
Bug: v8:8330
Change-Id: Ida98f46b8387631194a9b7a48bd1f419045ac6e7
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2100688
Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com>
Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Shu-yu Guo <syg@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66923}
We were missing test cases for i16, i64, and f64. It's not super
critical, but it's also an easy addition, and helps bring coverage of
memory-tracing.cc up (close to 100% now).
Change-Id: Ib8433f8615c900d8665ccbc33e12d6fd05d51336
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2121168
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66878}
The deprecated legacy FinalizationGroup APIs are left unchanged for
compat.
Bug: v8:8179
Change-Id: I9bdcaa92360db318c96fc8524c04163ece25118e
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2071236
Commit-Queue: Shu-yu Guo <syg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66437}
