Rewrites import.meta expressions into null literals. Builds on top
of- and requires dynamic import parsing to simplify the implementation.
Adds a new --harmony-import-meta flag.
BUG=v8:6693
Change-Id: Iadb7ddf6bad8986bf3ad641dbd3826fe730b5f44
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/702678
Commit-Queue: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#48359}
This reverts commit d0651bd108.
Reason for revert: Breaks gc stress with embedded snapshot:
https://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8/builders/V8%20Linux64%20GC%20Stress%20-%20custom%20snapshot/builds/15355
Original change's description:
> [language] Implement optional catch binding proposal
>
> This allows the syntax `try {} catch {}` (with no binding after the
> `catch`).
>
> See https://github.com/michaelficarra/optional-catch-binding-proposal/
>
> Currently behind --harmony-optional-catch-binding.
>
> As part of the implementation, this allows TryCatchStatements to not
> have an associated catch scope; various paths which assumed they
> would have been updated to handle this case.
>
> Cq-Include-Trybots: master.tryserver.v8:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng
> Change-Id: Ic525b45199eef025eb05da562e10fbd4f3d7465f
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/571453
> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
> Commit-Queue: Kevin Gibbons <bakkot@gmail.com>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#48300}
TBR=rmcilroy@chromium.org,adamk@chromium.org,marja@chromium.org,gsathya@chromium.org,bakkot@gmail.com
Change-Id: I63d68160ec75b87e28d3dcdddca2d8b7d0503b46
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Cq-Include-Trybots: master.tryserver.v8:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/702334
Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#48303}
This allows the syntax `try {} catch {}` (with no binding after the
`catch`).
See https://github.com/michaelficarra/optional-catch-binding-proposal/
Currently behind --harmony-optional-catch-binding.
As part of the implementation, this allows TryCatchStatements to not
have an associated catch scope; various paths which assumed they
would have been updated to handle this case.
Cq-Include-Trybots: master.tryserver.v8:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng
Change-Id: Ic525b45199eef025eb05da562e10fbd4f3d7465f
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/571453
Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Kevin Gibbons <bakkot@gmail.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#48300}
The context is the following proposal to make JSON a subset of
JavaScript: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-json-superset
There’s interest in performing a side investigation to answer the
question of what would happen if we stopped treating U+2028 and U+2029
as `LineTerminator`s *entirely*. (Note that this is separate from the
proposal, which just changes how these characters are handled in
ECMAScript strings.) This is technically a breaking change, and IMHO it
would be wonderful if we could get away with it, but no one really has
any data on whether or not we could. Adding this use counter lets us get
that data.
BUG=v8:6827
Cq-Include-Trybots: master.tryserver.chromium.linux:linux_chromium_rel_ng
Change-Id: Ia22e8db1634df4d3f965bec8e1cfa11cc7b5e9aa
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/693155
Commit-Queue: Mathias Bynens <mathias@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#48260}
By adding a per test source file namespace, we can avoid a lot of
symbol collisions in jumbo builds.
While we're at it, let's remove some "using" statements that also
cause trouble.
Bug: chromium:746958
Change-Id: I6f8a723e1ba5905888638e0687b23193f3f012ca
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/676803
Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Mostyn Bramley-Moore <mostynb@opera.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#48102}
As part of J2V8 development (https://github.com/eclipsesource/J2V8),
we realized that we had a subtle bug in how Isolate scope was created
and it's lifetime managed, see:
https://github.com/eclipsesource/J2V8/issues/313.
Mentioned above bug was fixed, however, what we also noticed is that
V8 API has been constantly and slowly moving to such an API, in which
one has to pass Isolate explicitly to methods and/or constructors. We
found two more places that might have been overlooked. This contribution
adds passing of Isolate pointer explicitly to constructors of
String::Utf8Value and String::Value classes.
Cq-Include-Trybots: master.tryserver.chromium.linux:linux_chromium_rel_ng;master.tryserver.v8:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng
Change-Id: I61984285f152aba5ca922100cf3df913a9cb2cea
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/593309
Commit-Queue: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#47656}
Changes the contract of the parser to have a valid character stream passed
in the ParseInfo rather than the current situation where either:
- it is passed explicitly (e.g., for streaming scripts)
- a Script is passed and a character stream is created for this
- or a source and encoding is passed in ParseInfo and the character stream
is created from this.
The parse info also now owns the character stream (in a unique_ptr). It
can be destroyed using a new ResetCharacterStream() function. This will
enable the character stream to be kept live if any functions are asm.js
modules which were parsed, in order to be reused by the asm.js parser.
BUG=v8:5203
Cq-Include-Trybots: master.tryserver.chromium.linux:linux_chromium_rel_ng
Change-Id: Ifda167391b2eadb38ebf9fcb2f565d2ed9ea3c6f
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/616767
Commit-Queue: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#47474}
As specified in Annex B.3.6., initializers are allowed in sloppy mode var
declarations in for-in loops.
As a consequence, "in" is one of the tokens that can follow an
AssignmentExpression - this was not recognized before.
BUG=v8:6715
Change-Id: Idbf79bda39beef4e568d630e0b5e239a34397952
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/620728
Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#47463}
Parse tasks are not currently used, and will need to be changed significantly
for background compilation, so we remove them for now.
BUG=v8:6093,v8:5203
Change-Id: I44559a94ecca85668f0117629d35aaa5f4075745
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/617140
Commit-Queue: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#47446}
The bug was that we didn't track using await as a class name inside
arrow function formal parameters, and hence didn't recognize the error
in this case:
async(x = class await {}) => {}
BUG=v8:6714
Change-Id: Iabe6c947a4f621fb72361671d77f4765ba1a9578
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/616776
Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#47407}
This removes brittle Scope walking in FinalizeForOfStatement()
by making ParserBase call InitializeForEachStatement() while
in the proper Scope.
Bug: v8:6724
Change-Id: I6e828ccb3a5e4d98633a95a2bfb8d255ad0fc0eb
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/614654
Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#47376}
There are two reasons for Scopes to need information about eval calls
inside them:
- Eval in a scope, or any of its inner scopes, turns off a bunch of
scope analysis optimizations (e.g., all variables have to be treated
as "used" and context-allocated).
- Eval in a sloppy declaration scope means allows runtime addition
of var declarations.
This patch aims to make the code better-reflect this reality.
It's meant as a pure cleanup, with no expected change in behavior.
Change-Id: I744c5051bb7a90b11420930e9596e5d6c35eb440
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/602848
Commit-Queue: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#47257}
Splits out AttachOuterScopeInfo from DeclarationScope::Analyze and attaches
the outer scope info after parsing has completed (when parsing on the main
thread, which is the only time we have an outer scope info) instead of
during Compiler::Analyse().
BUG=v8:5203
TBR=yangguo@chromium.org
Change-Id: Idd8d2409fb20f09a9f6bbf5cff7e6edcf90077d7
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/605889
Commit-Queue: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#47243}
Also fix one apparently-harmless bug in the Parser where we failed
to Finalize an empty scope. Without this fix, the DCHECK fails
on any C-style for-loop with a lexical binding that hits the
fast path (this is well-covered by many existing tests in mjsunit).
Thanks to Georg Neis for the suggestion of this DCHECK.
Change-Id: Ie1a8f8809f4d152c87f2da08209c610514645827
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/587750
Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#47046}
Moves parser internalization of ast values out of
ParseAny/Program/Function and instead internalizes during compile
finalization. Currently also internalizes during scope analysis if
there is a ScopeInfo to enable variable name lookups. We also
internalize early for FCG / AstGraphBuilder.
BUG=v8:5203
Cq-Include-Trybots: master.tryserver.chromium.linux:linux_chromium_rel_ng
Change-Id: Ia766795947d847517b87cd5ea39797347083174b
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/582407
Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#46904}
Move ScopeInfo allocation out of DeclarationScope::Analyse and do it later
in the compile when finalizing unoptimized code generation. This is to enable
scope analysis to be done without heap allocation so it could run off-thread.
BUG=v8:5203
Change-Id: I954aacd4353925bbbd5a940d979027de2c52e1fd
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/581108
Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#46862}
Removes the SharedFunctionInfo field from the ParseInfo structure. Instead
require a SharedFunctionInfo to be explicitly passed to ParseFunction.
Also renames GetUnoptimizedCode to CompileUnoptimizedFunction to make it
clear it should only be called for non-top-level code.
BUG=v8:5203
Change-Id: Ibce016e6a5290c3685f7f0a2f5fb1eb2df2ffc3b
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/574589
Commit-Queue: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#46814}
Async functions and generator declarations are only permitted as
StatementListItems, not as ExpressionStatements, and therefore not
as the entire body of an if statement, etc. Previously, they were
incorrectly permitted. However, ChakraCore and SpiderMonkey seem
to ban them in this context, and the feature was introduced relatively
recently, so it is likely to be web-compatible to ship the prohibition.
This patch also unifies the error message wording of async functions
and generators to ordinary functions, explaining more clearly what
the issue is.
Bug: v8:4483
Cq-Include-Trybots: master.tryserver.v8:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng
Change-Id: I31ed7818d6ab3e7e325031bfabb933dbf4512143
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/568979
Commit-Queue: Daniel Ehrenberg <littledan@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#46770}
Only allow BindingIdentifier in BindingRestPattern and
ValidReferenceExpression in AssignmentRestPattern.
Also updated to a better, actionable error message.
Bug: v8:6500, v8:6513
Cq-Include-Trybots: master.tryserver.v8:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng
Change-Id: Ifaba2f85c20bc20e263267e8c76d50a27075b87d
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/550559
Commit-Queue: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#46653}
Additionally, drive-by add a test inspired by a worrying TODO
in the parser.
Cq-Include-Trybots: master.tryserver.v8:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng,master.tryserver.v8:v8_linux64_msan_rel,v8_linux64_tsan_rel,v8_linux_arm64_dbg,v8_linux_gc_stress_dbg,v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng,v8_linux_nosnap_rel
Change-Id: I693a858a638753f8c1091f2f9086710f628b40dd
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/553677
Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Daniel Ehrenberg <littledan@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#46634}
This patch teaches the parser that async functions are not valid
destructuring targets so that it can cleanly exit with a SyntaxError.
Previously, async functions used in the wrong position would lead
to a check failure.
Bug: chromium:740366
Change-Id: Ie5b0cf50326c3f96174c6b29d0ccedb5da4f75a2
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/567002
Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com>
Commit-Queue: Daniel Ehrenberg <littledan@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#46587}
(Reland: NeedsManualRebaseline'd newly-fixed layout test in Chromium.)
This was never legal; the spec only allows '\0' in strict-mode strings
or templates when not followed by a decimal digit. Previously we were
only enforcing that it not be followed by an _octal_ digit.
This was already fixed for numeric literals, but not for escape
sequences in strings.
BUG=v8:6504
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2948903002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#46106}
This method returns position of importing stmt in module source.
R=neis@chromium.org
Bug: chromium:721589
Change-Id: I8639796a001fdfec7cf5aa1bf1a27493f7a757a9
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/541322
Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Aleksey Kozyatinskiy <kozyatinskiy@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#46105}
This was never legal; the spec only allows '\0' in strict-mode strings or templates
when not followed by a decimal digit. Previously we were only enforcing that it
not be followed by an _octal_ digit.
This was already fixed for numeric literals, but not for escape sequences in strings.
BUG=v8:6504
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2950633002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#46046}
This feature has been on by default without incident
since V8 5.8.
Bug: v8:5051
Change-Id: I1baf81922efd87e07448955147c50a5ba5a0aa42
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/532214
Reviewed-by: Daniel Ehrenberg <littledan@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45881}
In some [1] cases where a lexical declaration is not allowed, ASI will
cause a `let` at the end of a line to be interpreted as an
identifier. A recent patch [2] to fix up the error messages from
misplaced `let` usage was a little overzealous in triggering
the error, throwing a SyntaxError in this edge case. This patch
restores the ASI behavior, which is permitted in JSC and
SpiderMonkey as well. Thanks to a test262 test from Andre Bargull
for raising this issue.
[1] https://tc39.github.io/ecma262/#sec-expression-statement
[2] https://codereview.chromium.org/2697193007
Bug: v8:3305
Change-Id: I80ae8ad9a8a93389ff1003323f0d3f003e7a8c8e
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/529225
Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Daniel Ehrenberg <littledan@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45817}
In sloppy mode, allow multiply labelled function declarations, such as
a: b: function c() {}
Such a form is allowed by the specification, as well as ChakraCore,
SpiderMonkey and JSC (though ChakraCore because it doesn't enforce
any lexical label restrictions.)
Thanks to Andre Bargull for adding the test262 test which caught the bug.
Change-Id: I2d3f172830c2e63252f00afa03177a7d17d79a27
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/527639
Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Daniel Ehrenberg <littledan@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45802}
This removes logic tracking whether a number literal in the source
contained a "dot" character or not. The tracking was only needed for
validation of asm.js modules on the AST, it is obsolete now.
R=marja@chromium.org
Change-Id: Ib474e2281db80fe56d43e1af52221a7c66261e01
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/503228
Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45255}
New test262 tests bring up a couple cases with async arrow functions
that V8 didn't seem to handle properly; this patch makes those cases
errors:
- async (...x,) => y -- Rest parameter must be last formal parameter
- async (...x = z) => y -- No default value for rest parameter
- async (...x, y) => z -- Rest parameter must be last formal parameter
Bug: v8:4483, v8:5051
Change-Id: I024d9ba0c854e8e5e75283df2ee53127b1be090d
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/496057
Commit-Queue: Daniel Ehrenberg <littledan@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45116}
let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have
some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop
loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline
performance of for-loops with let variables.
This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that
the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of
this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured
within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger,
similar to other stack-allocated vars.
BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460
R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org
Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247
Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com>
Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
No usage sites are getting the length for uncompiled functions, so we can
postpone setting the correct length until after compilation. This way we don't
need to produce and store it for skipped inner functions.
In the current implementation, getting the function length compiles it (and
users rely on it - so the feature is probably not going to go away).
BUG=v8:5516
Change-Id: Id8c9a05d2391505a6cde613841094170c9a1b808
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/468927
Commit-Queue: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vogelheim <vogelheim@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44679}
Introduce 'contextual keyword' tokens, which are parsed as identifiers but
in some contexts are treated by the parser like proper keywords. These are
usually keywords introduced by recent ECMAScript versions, which for reasons
of backwards compatibility are still permissible as regular identifiers in
most contexts.
Current usage is to check for Token::IDENTIFIER and then do a string
compare. With this change the initial scan will scan them as usual, but
will then record the token as IDENTIFIER plus a secondary token with the
'contextual' value.
BUG=v8:6902
Change-Id: I6ae390382998cf756a23720bd481cb9c0eb78a72
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/459479
Commit-Queue: Daniel Vogelheim <vogelheim@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44189}
A step towards removing isolate from ParseInfo.
Removing isolate from ParseInfo will make it easier to create and
execute parse tasks on background threads.
BUG=v8:6093
Change-Id: I0a3546618d01b9232014da94cf8d0f72427a0d1d
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/458006
Commit-Queue: Wiktor Garbacz <wiktorg@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vogelheim <vogelheim@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44176}
A step towards removing isolate from ParseInfo.
Removing isolate from ParseInfo will make it easier to create and
execute parse tasks on background threads.
BUG=v8:6093
Change-Id: Ief4eb3c9873026a93338d5556985f31c9abe17e6
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/458005
Commit-Queue: Wiktor Garbacz <wiktorg@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Clifford <danno@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vogelheim <vogelheim@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44173}
A step towards removing isolate from ParseInfo.
Removing isolate from ParseInfo will make it easier to create and
execute parse tasks on background threads.
BUG=v8:6093
Change-Id: I977eec8faecc8a112506f219994b4e4ec388b180
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/458004
Commit-Queue: Wiktor Garbacz <wiktorg@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vogelheim <vogelheim@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44160}
A step towards removing isolate from ParseInfo.
Removing isolate from ParseInfo will make it easier to create and
execute parse tasks on background threads.
BUG=v8:6093
Change-Id: Iefd2fd01a700509f05d6f1a272cfa39cc545d39b
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/458001
Reviewed-by: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vogelheim <vogelheim@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Wiktor Garbacz <wiktorg@google.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44096}
It was removed so that Parser::DeserializeScopeChain does not have
to get it from ParseInfo.
Only a small step in direction of removing isolate from ParseInfo.
BUG=v8:6093
Change-Id: Iaaf92dc6eb5ec9c4efc05ac73666fbc66e0ed8c1
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/457999
Commit-Queue: Wiktor Garbacz <wiktorg@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jochen Eisinger <jochen@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44057}
The AssignmentExpressions can legally contain destructuring assignments.
BUG=v8:6098
R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org
Change-Id: I99b3a0f4c8d103edfb1dda943ec3e2ab2a5969f7
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/455221
Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44049}
Parse tasks are still WIP so there is really no benefit turning them on.
Turn off irrelevant tests.
Fix duplicate parameters inverted logic.
Fix use_counts tracking.
Fix language mode, super_property, evals.
Fix modules and stack overflow.
BUG=v8:6093
Change-Id: I8567b36eef7b9de6799789e7520810bde9c86e5b
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/455916
Commit-Queue: Wiktor Garbacz <wiktorg@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43903}
A previous patch lifting the restriction on invalid escape sequences in
tagged templates had a bug when two template tokens appeared immediately
adject to each other. This moves invalid escape information from the
tokenizer state proper into the TokenDesc, preventing the overwriting
which caused this issue.
Previous CL is at
https://codereview.chromium.org/2665513002
BUG=v8:6029,v8:5546
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2724003006
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43596}
This implements the proposal at
https://github.com/tc39/proposal-template-literal-revision
staged behind a flag --harmony-template-escapes. The proposal allows
invalid octal, unicode, and hexadecimal escape sequences to appear in
tagged template literals, instead of being a syntax error. These have
a 'cooked' value of 'undefined', but are still accessible through the
'raw' property.
BUG=v8:5546
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2665513002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43384}
When --harmony-async-iteration is enabled, it is now possible to
use the for-await-of loop, which uses the Async Iteration protocol
rather than the ordinary ES6 Iteration protocol.
the Async-from-Sync Iterator object is not implemented in this CL,
and so for-await-of loops will abort execution if the iterated object
does not have a Symbol.asyncIterator() method. Async-from-Sync
Iterators are implemented seperately in https://codereview.chromium.org/2645313003/
BUG=v8:5855, v8:4483
R=neis@chromium.org, littledan@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2637403008
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43224}
ParserBase::is_any_identifier currently does not recognise
Token::ESCAPED_STRICT_RESERVED_WORD as an identifier. This seems different
from what ParserBase::ParseIdentifierName does, and also prevents
"l\u0065t", unlike "let", from becoming a label.
This CL extends is_any_identifier to also accept ESCAPED_STRICT_RESERVED_WORD.
BUG=v8:5692
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2695973003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43204}
Also make them use the helpers that I introduced recently.
BUG=v8:5636
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2684343004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43100}
Move the logic into Scope::DeclareVariable to be more robust.
BUG=v8:5636
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2685293003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43098}
E.g.,
{ function lazy_inner(b = somevar) { let somevar; } }
If we don't produce the same scopes, PreParser thinks that the unresolved
variable inside the default parameter resolves into the variable declared inside
the function. Thus, it's not correctly recorded as a free variable.
One part is already done by https://codereview.chromium.org/2638333002 . But at
the laziness boundary, we still produced different scopes.
Unlike previously thought, this is also needed for lazy inner function
correctness, not only for "preparser scope analysis" (ie., skipping inner
functions).
BUG=v8:5938
Change-Id: I047cd43ef16478bb0f18d1f114845e7d1ab8c5f2
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/439345
Commit-Queue: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43044}
Reason for revert:
False alarm, bot hiccup
Original issue's description:
> Revert of Reland: [Parse] ParseInfo owns the parsing Zone. (patchset #7 id:140001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/2632123006/ )
>
> Reason for revert:
> Speculative revert because of revert needed for https://codereview.chromium.org/2632123006
>
> Original issue's description:
> > Reland: [Parse] ParseInfo owns the parsing Zone.
> >
> > Moves ownership of the parsing Zone to ParseInfo with a shared_ptr. This is
> > in preperation for enabling background compilation jobs for inner functions
> > share the AST in the outer-function's parse zone memory (read-only), with the
> > and zone being released when all compilation jobs have completed.
> >
> > BUG=v8:5203,v8:5215
> >
> > Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2632123006
> > Cr-Original-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42993}
> > Committed: 14fb337200
> > Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2632123006
> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42996}
> > Committed: 9e7d5a6065
>
> TBR=marja@chromium.org,mstarzinger@chromium.org,ahaas@chromium.org,verwaest@chromium.org,rmcilroy@chromium.org
> # Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
> NOPRESUBMIT=true
> NOTREECHECKS=true
> NOTRY=true
> BUG=v8:5203,v8:5215
>
> Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2683733002
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43008}
> Committed: 9fe08ec067TBR=marja@chromium.org,mstarzinger@chromium.org,ahaas@chromium.org,verwaest@chromium.org,rmcilroy@chromium.org
# Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=v8:5203,v8:5215
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2679303003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43015}
Reason for revert:
False alarm, bot hiccup
Original issue's description:
> Revert of [parsing] Fix maybe-assigned for loop variables. (patchset #3 id:40001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/2673403003/ )
>
> Reason for revert:
> Speculative revert because of https://codereview.chromium.org/2679163002/.
>
> Original issue's description:
> > [parsing] Fix maybe-assigned for loop variables.
> >
> > Due to hoisting, the value of a 'var'-declared variable may actually change even
> > if the code contains only the "initial" assignment, namely when that assignment
> > occurs inside a loop. For example:
> >
> > let i = 10;
> > do { var x = i } while (i--):
> >
> > As a simple and very conservative approximation of this, we explicitly mark
> > as maybe-assigned any non-lexical variable whose "declaration" does not
> > syntactically occur in the function scope. (In the example above, it
> > occurs in a block scope.)
> >
> > BUG=v8:5636
> >
> > Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2673403003
> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42989}
> > Committed: a33fcd663b
>
> TBR=marja@chromium.org,adamk@chromium.org,neis@chromium.org
> # Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
> NOPRESUBMIT=true
> NOTREECHECKS=true
> NOTRY=true
> BUG=v8:5636
>
> Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2679263002
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43010}
> Committed: f3ae5ccf57TBR=marja@chromium.org,adamk@chromium.org,neis@chromium.org
# Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=v8:5636
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2686663002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43013}
Reason for revert:
Speculative revert because of https://codereview.chromium.org/2679163002/.
Original issue's description:
> [parsing] Fix maybe-assigned for loop variables.
>
> Due to hoisting, the value of a 'var'-declared variable may actually change even
> if the code contains only the "initial" assignment, namely when that assignment
> occurs inside a loop. For example:
>
> let i = 10;
> do { var x = i } while (i--):
>
> As a simple and very conservative approximation of this, we explicitly mark
> as maybe-assigned any non-lexical variable whose "declaration" does not
> syntactically occur in the function scope. (In the example above, it
> occurs in a block scope.)
>
> BUG=v8:5636
>
> Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2673403003
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42989}
> Committed: a33fcd663bTBR=marja@chromium.org,adamk@chromium.org,neis@chromium.org
# Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=v8:5636
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2679263002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43010}
Reason for revert:
Speculative revert because of revert needed for https://codereview.chromium.org/2632123006
Original issue's description:
> Reland: [Parse] ParseInfo owns the parsing Zone.
>
> Moves ownership of the parsing Zone to ParseInfo with a shared_ptr. This is
> in preperation for enabling background compilation jobs for inner functions
> share the AST in the outer-function's parse zone memory (read-only), with the
> and zone being released when all compilation jobs have completed.
>
> BUG=v8:5203,v8:5215
>
> Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2632123006
> Cr-Original-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42993}
> Committed: 14fb337200
> Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2632123006
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42996}
> Committed: 9e7d5a6065TBR=marja@chromium.org,mstarzinger@chromium.org,ahaas@chromium.org,verwaest@chromium.org,rmcilroy@chromium.org
# Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=v8:5203,v8:5215
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2683733002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43008}
Cleanup CHECK_EQ order and simplify CHECK_EQ(true/false).
Cleanup callorder for negative numbers
Cleanup callorder order for capital letter constants.
Cleanup callorder for test.x checks.
BUG=
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2677183002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42997}
Moves ownership of the parsing Zone to ParseInfo with a shared_ptr. This is
in preperation for enabling background compilation jobs for inner functions
share the AST in the outer-function's parse zone memory (read-only), with the
and zone being released when all compilation jobs have completed.
BUG=v8:5203,v8:5215
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2632123006
Cr-Original-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42993}
Committed: 14fb337200
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2632123006
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42996}
Reason for revert:
doesn't compile on ToT
Original issue's description:
> Reland: [Parse] ParseInfo owns the parsing Zone.
>
> Moves ownership of the parsing Zone to ParseInfo with a shared_ptr. This is
> in preperation for enabling background compilation jobs for inner functions
> share the AST in the outer-function's parse zone memory (read-only), with the
> and zone being released when all compilation jobs have completed.
>
> BUG=v8:5203,v8:5215
>
> Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2632123006
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42993}
> Committed: 14fb337200TBR=marja@chromium.org,mstarzinger@chromium.org,ahaas@chromium.org,verwaest@chromium.org,rmcilroy@chromium.org
# Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=v8:5203,v8:5215
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2685543003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42994}
Moves ownership of the parsing Zone to ParseInfo with a shared_ptr. This is
in preperation for enabling background compilation jobs for inner functions
share the AST in the outer-function's parse zone memory (read-only), with the
and zone being released when all compilation jobs have completed.
BUG=v8:5203,v8:5215
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2632123006
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42993}
Due to hoisting, the value of a 'var'-declared variable may actually change even
if the code contains only the "initial" assignment, namely when that assignment
occurs inside a loop. For example:
let i = 10;
do { var x = i } while (i--):
As a simple and very conservative approximation of this, we explicitly mark
as maybe-assigned any non-lexical variable whose "declaration" does not
syntactically occur in the function scope. (In the example above, it
occurs in a block scope.)
BUG=v8:5636
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2673403003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42989}
Turns out is_hidden is not the right condition for "scope should be present in
the preparse data". For now, replaced it with "is hidden leaf scope" (i.e.,
doesn't contain any non-hidden scopes). That's probably not the right condition
either; will be fixed once there's more data to decide what the right condition
is.
BUG=v8:5516
R=vogelheim@chromium.org
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2669163002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42909}
Throw a syntax error on "new import(1)" expression. Adds a new error msg as well.
BUG=v8:5785
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2661113002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42827}
If hidden scopes are ignored, the scopes and variable produced by the PreParser
already matched the scopes and variables produced by the Parser.
BUG=v8:5516
R=vogelheim@chromium.org
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2663043003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42824}
Rewrites import expression into a runtime call. Uses peekahead to
determine if parsing an import declaration or import expression.
The runtime call doesn't actually do the import yet, will be added in
follow on patch.
Adds a new --harmony-dynamic-import flag.
Adds a ignore_error_msg parameter to the test runner to ignore the
discrepancy in the error messages while parsing import expression with
parser and pre parser. This discrepancy will actually never happen in
real code.
BUG=v8:5785
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2661933003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42820}
This unifies the behavior of Scope::DeclareVariableName with
Scope::DeclareVariable.
BUG=v8:5516
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2658063005
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42744}
- Declaring a variable called "this" for preparsed functions was unnecessary;
DeclarationScope ctor already adds the variable.
- "arguments" for preparsed scopes need to be declared after parsing the
function, like it's done in the parser.
- Now arguments_ can be the dummy variable, so adapted code to it.
- A previous refactoring CL ( https://codereview.chromium.org/2638333002 ) was
incomplete; it had added ParserBase::ParseFunctionBody but
PreParser::ParseFunction didn't call it. This CL completes that work. This is
needed for getting "arguments" declared properly for preparsed functions.
- AllocateVariablesRecursively is already called for preparsed scopes (without
this CL, that is), and it bails out early. However, before the bailout it used
to dcheck num_stack_slots_ == 0; that is no longer true since we've done scope
analysis for preparsed scopes.
- Test fix: we cannot have any lazy inner functions in the test, except the
topmost lazy inner function. Such functions would also be lazy in the parser
case, and the parser would just throw away their variables. Then the test
tries to verify the preparsed data against the scopes without variables and fails.
- Disabled a test w/ a sloppy block function, will get that working again in the
upcoming CLs.
BUG=v8:5516
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2655623005
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42685}
The data produced at the moment only contains information about scope type +
positions, and only the most trivial tests pass.
Upcoming CLs will extend the data to contain information about variables (once
PreParser can produce it) and add more test cases.
BUG=v8:5516
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2650703003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42656}
Speculative reason for issue 684481.
BUG=chromium:684481
TBR=marja@chromium.org,mstarzinger@chromium.org,ahaas@chromium.org,verwaest@chromium.org,
Original issue's description:
> [Parse] ParseInfo owns the parsing Zone.
>
> Moves ownership of the parsing Zone to ParseInfo with a shared_ptr. This is
> in preperation for enabling background compilation jobs for inner functions
> share the AST in the outer-function's parse zone memory (read-only), with the
> and zone being released when all compilation jobs have completed.
>
> BUG=v8:5203, v8:5215
> Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2632123006
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42562}
> Committed: 4b0101d369
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2648383005
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42633}
The "sloppy eval in default param" cases will be useful for the future
tests which assert that parser and preparser produce the same scopes.
BUG=v8:5501, v8:5516
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2644333002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42625}
Check that number of properties < Code:kMaxArguments when object
destructuring with a rest property otherwise throw an error.
BUG=v8:5549
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2650863002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42613}
Moves ownership of the parsing Zone to ParseInfo with a shared_ptr. This is
in preperation for enabling background compilation jobs for inner functions
share the AST in the outer-function's parse zone memory (read-only), with the
and zone being released when all compilation jobs have completed.
BUG=v8:5203,v8:5215
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2632123006
Cr-Original-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42539}
Committed: 839b06b64f
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2632123006
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42562}
Reason for revert:
Crashes on Windows in:
CompilerDispatcherJobTest.CompileFailureToFinalize
CompilerDispatcherJobTest.ScopeChain
Original issue's description:
> [Parse] ParseInfo owns the parsing Zone.
>
> Moves ownership of the parsing Zone to ParseInfo with a shared_ptr. This is
> in preperation for enabling background compilation jobs for inner functions
> share the AST in the outer-function's parse zone memory (read-only), with the
> and zone being released when all compilation jobs have completed.
>
> BUG=v8:5203,v8:5215
>
> Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2632123006
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42539}
> Committed: 839b06b64fTBR=marja@chromium.org,mstarzinger@chromium.org,ahaas@chromium.org,verwaest@chromium.org
# Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=v8:5203,v8:5215
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2645613008
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42542}
Moves ownership of the parsing Zone to ParseInfo with a shared_ptr. This is
in preperation for enabling background compilation jobs for inner functions
share the AST in the outer-function's parse zone memory (read-only), with the
and zone being released when all compilation jobs have completed.
BUG=v8:5203,v8:5215
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2632123006
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42539}
This rewrites the rest property into a runtime call which sets up the
correct properties in the newly created object.
- Changes flag to --harmony-object-rest-spread
- Changes pattern rewriter to desugar rest property
- Adds new runtime function CopyDataPropertiesWithExcludedProperties
BUG=v8:5549
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2620943002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42430}
Reduce duplication of the inner function declaration + now we get the
test for inner arrow functions for free (if we later implement lazy
inner arrow functions).
BUG=v8:5501, v8:5516
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2637003005
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42412}
Creates an AstStringConstants container which pre-initializes the
string constants used by AstValueFactory. This ensures that all
AstValueFactories will produce the same AstValue objects for constants,
and so they can be used by the BytecodeGenerator without having to pass
the AstValueFactory to it, enabling construction off-thread.
BUG=v8:5203
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2630343002
Cr-Original-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42381}
Committed: d611496b8e
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2630343002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42394}
Reason for revert:
Seems to break modules-namespace2 on gcstress.
Original issue's description:
> [Parser] Introduce AstStringConstants to share constants across AstValueFactory
>
> Creates an AstStringConstants container which pre-initializes the
> string constants used by AstValueFactory. This ensures that all
> AstValueFactories will produce the same AstValue objects for constants,
> and so they can be used by the BytecodeGenerator without having to pass
> the AstValueFactory to it, enabling construction off-thread.
>
> BUG=v8:5203
>
> Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2630343002
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42381}
> Committed: d611496b8eTBR=ahaas@chromium.org,marja@chromium.org
# Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=v8:5203
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2638783002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42382}
Creates an AstStringConstants container which pre-initializes the
string constants used by AstValueFactory. This ensures that all
AstValueFactories will produce the same AstValue objects for constants,
and so they can be used by the BytecodeGenerator without having to pass
the AstValueFactory to it, enabling construction off-thread.
BUG=v8:5203
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2630343002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42381}
- Generalize the sloppy block function data structures to allow
PreParser adding and hoisting sloppy block funcs.
- This completes PreParser scope analysis.
BUG=v8:5501, v8:5516
R=verwaest@chromium.org
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2636543002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42368}
Now we have declarations too, so it doesn't matter whether preparser
produces the same unresolved variables as the parser.
BUG=v8:5501, v8:5516
R=verwaest@chromium.org
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2623583004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42174}
This adds tracking the following:
- Let / var declarations in for loops
BUG=v8:5501, v8:5516
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2616393002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42169}
Downside: this adds all kinds of weird includes in the .cc files.
(See design doc linked in the bug.)
BUG=v8:5402
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2622503002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42140}
This adds tracking the following:
- Declarations created by catch (potentially destructuring)
- Declarations created by for-each (potentially destructuring)
- Class declarations
BUG=v8:5501, v8:5516
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2617923003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42129}
1) Fix confusion between for of and for in.
2) If a for loop doesn't declare its variables, no new variables
are introduced (the outer scope variables are used).
3) Add more cases for destructuring for and destructuring catch.
BUG=v8:5501, v8:5516
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2614023004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42125}
This patch adds parsing of spread object property.
-- Changes ParsePropertyName to parse Token::ELLIPSIS.
-- Throws if rest is encountered by setting a pattern error.
-- Adds a new PropertyKind enum (SPREAD)
-- Adds a new ObjectLiteralProperty::kind (SPREAD)
-- Adds a new harmony-object-spread flag and protects the parser code
with it.
-- Adds a new runtime function called CopyDataProperties
-- Does not add any support for this feature in fullcodegen.
-- Ignition calls out to a runtime function CopyDataProperties to
perform spread operation.
-- Move FastAssign from builtins-objects.cc to objects.cc
-- Refactor Builtin_ObjectAssign to use SetOrCopyDataProperties
Object rest will be implemented in a follow on patch.
BUG=v8:5549
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2606833002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42102}
This makes the context allocation less pessimistic in case of name
clash.
This is also required for being able to skip inner functions.
BUG=v8:5501, v8:5516
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2610823003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42087}
(Missing includes discovered during the objects.h splitting work.)
BUG=v8:5402
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2610643002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42029}
Instead of unconditionally setting maybe_assigned for parameters, treat
parameters like other variables except that at the end we set maybe_assigned if
the function has a sloppy arguments object.
R=adamk@chromium.org, mstarzinger@chromium.org
BUG=v8:5636
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2578103002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#41731}
The assignment in default parameters (e.g., function foo(a = somedefault) { }
doesn't flow through PreParserFactory::NewAssignment even if the comment claims so.
Thus, piping through the variables is not needed.
Kudos to neis@ for pointing this out.
BUG=v8:5501
R=neis@chromium.org
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2569983003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#41670}
The deserialization of the {Scope::asm_module} predicate relies on a
context being present for such modules. This ensures we always allocate
such a context, even in cases where no variables are allocated in it.
R=neis@chromium.org
TEST=cctest/test-parsing/AsmModuleFlag
BUG=v8:5653
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2561103004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#41611}
This CL attempts to set the maybe-assigned flag for variables that are written
to as part of a destructuring or loop header.
For instance, in the following two cases we now mark x as maybe-assigned.
a) [x] = [1];
b) for (x of [1,2,3]) {};
There's more work to do here, this is just a first step.
R=adamk@chromium.org, mstarzinger@chromium.org
BUG=v8:5636
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2562443003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#41582}
This makes the context allocation less pessimistic in the following cases:
function outer() {
var a; // Won't be context allocated
function inner1() { var a; a; }
function inner2(a) { a; }
function inner3([a]) { a; }
function inner4({ a: b}) { a; }
}
BUG=v8:5501
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2407163003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#41521}
It originates from the era where we used to run a separate preparse step
before parsing and store the function data. Now the usage of preparser
is something completely different, so this flag doesn't make sense any
more.
In addition, this way we get more test coverage for preparser (for small
scripts).
BUG=
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2513563002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#41110}
This fixes the bogus implementation of the function in question and adds
test coverage for the deserialization of the corresponding flags from
the serialized scope info. Note that the tests so far only cover cases
where the module and the function contain context-allocated variables.
R=verwaest@chromium.org
TEST=cctest/test-parsing/AsmFunctionFlag
BUG=v8:5653
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2507063004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#41093}
This brings the two utf-8 decoders (bulk + incremental) in line.
Technically, either behaviour was correct, since the utf-8 spec
demands incomplete utf-8 be handled, but does not specify how.
Unicode recommends that "the maximal subpart at that offset
should be replaced by a single U+FFFD," and with this change we
consistently do that. More details + spec references in the bug.
BUG=chromium:662822
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2493143003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#41025}
This shares the pending_error_handler from the parser to the preparser, allowing the preparser to directly log errors to it. This removes LogMessage from the loggers. ParserLogger::LogMessage was already unused, so this also removes error info from the preparse data altogether.
BUG=
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2502633002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#40984}
This
- removes the ParserRecorder base class,
- devirtualizes the LogFunction and LogMessage functions,
- reuses the SingletonLogger for all preparser calls
In a subsequent step the preparser should probably log directly to the CompleteParserRecorder rather than indirectly through the singleton logger...
BUG=
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2474393003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#40803}
Parameters of a lazily parsed function used to be parsed eagerly, and parameter
handling was split between Parser::ParseFunctionLiteral and
ParseEagerFunctionBody, leading to inconsistencies.
After this CL, we preparse (lazy parse) the parameters of lazily parsed
functions.
(For arrow functions, we cannot do that ofc.)
This is needed for later features (PreParser with scope analysis).
-- CL adapted from marja's https://codereview.chromium.org/2411793003/
BUG=
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2472063002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#40771}
This reduces per-scope overhead from minimally 6 words to 2 words, with one additional pointer per entry, rather than an average of 2 per entry for larger-than-4 element lists. For temp zone parsed functions it additionally makes the declaration-list actually freeable.
This introduces ThreadedList to implement the details of dealing with such a list.
BUG=v8:5209
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2457393003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#40703}
This adds more useful information to the v8-heap-stats tool.
BUG=v8:5489
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2394213003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#40361}
It doesn't need to have this logic.
ParseLazyFunctionLiteralBody is basically just ParseStatementList
+ log the function position. But PreParser doesn't need to have
the "which functions to log" logic, since logging the function is
always done exactly when Parser falls back to PreParser. (See
PreParseLazyFunction.)
So in the current state, PreParser would log several functions in
a SingletonLogger, and only the last one would take
effect (that's the one Parser also logs in SkipLazyFunctionBody).
Also updated test-parsing/Regress928 to produce the preparse data
the way we do now (i.e., not running the PreParser directly, but
running the Parser).
Error reporting: when PreParser finds an error, it doesn't need
to ReportUnexpectedToken in PreParseLazyFunction, since it
already has reported the error whenever it found it.
BUG=v8:5515
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2421833002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#40315}
Reason for revert:
Stability thief found, relanding speculative reverts.
Original issue's description:
> Revert of Preparse inner functions (new try) (patchset #21 id:420001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/2352593002/ )
>
> Reason for revert:
> We currently have some stability issues on Canary. Let's reland this after we verified that we "fixed" Canary again.
>
> Original issue's description:
> > Preparse inner functions (new try)
> >
> > This is an overly pessimistic approach where PreParser only keeps
> > track of unresolved variables, but doesn't declare anything. This
> > will result in context-allocating variables in the outer function
> > unnecessarily, if the variable names clash with variable names
> > used by the inner function (even if the variables are not the
> > same). However, we have been unable to prove that this approach
> > wouldn't be good enough for the practical purposes.
> >
> > Fixes after the previous try ( https://codereview.chromium.org/2322243002/ ):
> > Keep the context-allocation decision stable when compiling fully eagerly.
> >
> > Tests which exercise this functionality:
> > mjsunit/fixed-context-shapes-when-recompiling.js
> >
> > Design document (chromium):
> >
> > https://docs.google.com/a/chromium.org/document/d/1rRv5JJZ0JpOZAZN2CSUwZPFJiBAdRnTiSYhazseNHFg/edit?usp=sharing
> >
> > BUG=
> >
> > Committed: https://crrev.com/7c73cf32c60484cdf37c84f1d61b4640e87068d7
> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#39719}
>
> TBR=verwaest@chromium.org,adamk@chromium.org,marja@chromium.org
> # Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
> NOPRESUBMIT=true
> NOTREECHECKS=true
> NOTRY=true
> BUG=
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/1e6296b2a7cfc307fd9e722e619f42965da4a267
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#39730}
TBR=verwaest@chromium.org,adamk@chromium.org,marja@chromium.org,hablich@chromium.org
# Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2377513006
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#39755}
Reason for revert:
We currently have some stability issues on Canary. Let's reland this after we verified that we "fixed" Canary again.
Original issue's description:
> Preparse inner functions (new try)
>
> This is an overly pessimistic approach where PreParser only keeps
> track of unresolved variables, but doesn't declare anything. This
> will result in context-allocating variables in the outer function
> unnecessarily, if the variable names clash with variable names
> used by the inner function (even if the variables are not the
> same). However, we have been unable to prove that this approach
> wouldn't be good enough for the practical purposes.
>
> Fixes after the previous try ( https://codereview.chromium.org/2322243002/ ):
> Keep the context-allocation decision stable when compiling fully eagerly.
>
> Tests which exercise this functionality:
> mjsunit/fixed-context-shapes-when-recompiling.js
>
> Design document (chromium):
>
> https://docs.google.com/a/chromium.org/document/d/1rRv5JJZ0JpOZAZN2CSUwZPFJiBAdRnTiSYhazseNHFg/edit?usp=sharing
>
> BUG=
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/7c73cf32c60484cdf37c84f1d61b4640e87068d7
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#39719}
TBR=verwaest@chromium.org,adamk@chromium.org,marja@chromium.org
# Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2373443003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#39730}
This is an overly pessimistic approach where PreParser only keeps
track of unresolved variables, but doesn't declare anything. This
will result in context-allocating variables in the outer function
unnecessarily, if the variable names clash with variable names
used by the inner function (even if the variables are not the
same). However, we have been unable to prove that this approach
wouldn't be good enough for the practical purposes.
Fixes after the previous try ( https://codereview.chromium.org/2322243002/ ):
Keep the context-allocation decision stable when compiling fully eagerly.
Tests which exercise this functionality:
mjsunit/fixed-context-shapes-when-recompiling.js
Design document (chromium):
https://docs.google.com/a/chromium.org/document/d/1rRv5JJZ0JpOZAZN2CSUwZPFJiBAdRnTiSYhazseNHFg/edit?usp=sharing
BUG=
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2352593002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#39719}
There's no reason (anymore) to have empty imports in special_imports. Remove
them from there and rename special_imports to namespace_imports to be more
precise.
R=adamk@chromium.org
BUG=v8:1569
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2368613002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#39693}
It looks like it tried to trigger lazy inner function parsing by
inserting a comment into an inner function.
1) We don't have lazy inner functions yet.
2) Even if we had, there's no way this heuristic could trigger laziness:
we need to do the laziness decision upfront, without looking at the
contents / size of the function.
3) Some of the combinations were weird: lazy_outer but non-lazy inner?
In the current heuristics, only the total script size affects laziness;
in particular, it doesn't matter where the long comment is.
R=mstarzinger@chromium.org
BUG=
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2364003002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#39673}
Avoid internalizing on-the-fly now that scope analysis and natives syntax
runtime calls no longer require internalized AST values. This should be
more efficient by avoiding extra branches on every AST value creation.
BUG=v8:5215, chromium:634953
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2328593002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#39531}
We must keep track of the exact order in which modules are requested.
To do so, maintain a map from module specifiers to position while
parsing (in ModuleDescriptor). Descriptor entries now refer to that
position rather than the string. When generating the ModuleInfo, turn
this map into an array of specifiers. We don't need the map anymore
later on, so we do not reconstruct it when deserializing again.
BUG=v8:1569
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2353633002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#39519}
- Smaller, more consistent streams API (Advance, Back, pos, Seek)
- Remove implementations from the header, in favor of creation functions.
Observe:
- Performance:
- All Utf16CharacterStream methods have an inlinable V8_LIKELY w/ a
body of only a few instructions. I expect most calls to end up there.
- There used to be performance problems w/ bookmarking, particularly
with copying too much data on SetBookmark w/ UTF-8 streaming streams.
All those copies are gone.
- The old streaming streams implementation used to copy data even for
2-byte input. It no longer does.
- The only remaining 'slow' method is the Seek(.) slow case for utf-8
streaming streams. I don't expect this to be called a lot; and even if,
I expect it to be offset by the gains in the (vastly more frequent)
calls to the other methods or the 'fast path'.
- If it still bothers us, there are several ways to speed it up.
- API & code cleanliness:
- I want to remove the 'old' API in a follow-up CL, which should mostly
delete code, or replace it 1:1.
- In a 2nd follow-up I want to delete much of the UTF-8 handling in Blink
for streaming streams.
- The "bookmark" is now always implemented (and mostly very fast), so we
should be able to use it for more things.
- Testing & correctness:
- The unit tests now cover all stream implementations,
and are pretty good and triggering all the edge cases.
- Vastly more DCHECKs of the invariants.
BUG=v8:4947
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2314663002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#39464}
This is one part of a WIP implementation of the stage-2 proposal to add
fields to classes: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-class-public-fields
See design doc:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WRtNm3ZLNJT1WVr8aq4RJuByYgfuAFAhj20LwTW6JVE/
This adds support for parsing fields in classes, including
infrastructure. In particular, it adds:
* Two booleans on function literal AST nodes
* Two compiler hints on SharedFunctionInfos representing said bools
* A new type of ClassLiteralProperty, FIELD
* Parser support for the syntax
* Syntax tests
* A flag to enable it.
Currently the fields are parsed and then droppped. Subsequent
patches will add semantics, mostly by desugaring in the parser and
the remainder in the non-crankshaft backends.
BUG=v8:5367
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2315733003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#39459}
We don't need the context anymore for parsing, the scope info chain is
enough.
BUG=v8:5215
R=marja@chromium.org,jgruber@chromium.org,mstarzinger@chromium.org
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2342443004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#39457}
To avoid a dependency on the heap during parsing, we only create a scope chain
without linking to the associated ScopeInfo objects before parsing. This is
enough to avoid special cases during parsing of arrow functions / eval.
Looking at the outer scope's variables during parsing was only needed for hosting
sloppy block functions inside eval. To be able to do this now, we hoist for the
outer-most eval scope after parsing, in DeclarationScope::Analyze.
DeclarationScope::Analyze is also where we replace the outer scope chain with the
fully deserialized version, so variables can be resolved.
Also, this unifies background and foreground thread parsing, as we don't have to
worry about ScopeInfos getting accessed before we're back on the main thread.
BUG=v8:5215
R=verwaest@chromium.org,marja@chromium.org,adamk@chromium.org
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2306413002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#39452}
Lexically declared "arguments" in sloppy mode will throw redeclaration error
currently, this patch fixes it by delaying the declaration of arguments until we
fully parse parameter list and function body.
BUG=v8:4577
LOG=N
Committed: https://crrev.com/70a613dd0a5f5d205b46559b55702764464851fa
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2290753003
Cr-Original-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#39109}
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#39230}
Reason for revert:
Breaks layout tests:
https://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8.fyi/builders/V8-Blink%20Linux%2064/builds/9470
Original issue's description:
> Allow lexically declared "arguments" in function scope in sloppy mode.
>
> Lexically declared "arguments" in sloppy mode will throw redeclaration error
> currently, this patch fixes it by delaying the declaration of arguments until we
> fully parse parameter list and function body.
>
> BUG=v8:4577
> LOG=N
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/70a613dd0a5f5d205b46559b55702764464851fa
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#39109}
TBR=adamk@chromium.org,mythria@chromium.org,lpy@chromium.org
# Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=v8:4577
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2304853002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#39115}
Lexically declared "arguments" in sloppy mode will throw redeclaration error
currently, this patch fixes it by delaying the declaration of arguments until we
fully parse parameter list and function body.
BUG=v8:4577
LOG=N
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2290753003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#39109}
This patch arranges that property names are parsed in a single pass,
reporting the name as well as the type of the property, instead of
parsing qualifiers like 'static' or 'get' initially as names and then
re-parsing. This change is easier to reason about, very slightly (4%)
faster in some cases (although slower in other, less common ones, though
this slowdown will be fixed in an upcoming patch), and is a prerequisite
for separating the parsing of object and class literal properties, which
will become increasingly important as ECMAScript adds more class features.
This is a reland of https://codereview.chromium.org/2278153004/,
which fixes the issue causing the revert and adds more tests.
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2300503002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#39056}
Previously the calls to ExpressionClassifier::Accumulate() each chose
slightly different sets of productions to accumulate, and it turned
out that these were in some cases broader than needed and in some
cases less broad.
The existence of some grab-bag production bitmasks like
ExpressionClassifier::ExpressionProductions made this situation more
error-prone (for example, that production was missing AsyncArrowFormalParametersProduction).
This patch removes all "grab-bags" besides AllProductions. In some of
the places where code was using those grab-bags for convenience, it
switches them to use negation of AllProductions. In other, specifically
those having to do with expressions that are disallowed anywhere in
a sub-expression of a parameter list, I've added a new method on
ExpressionClassifier to centralize the logic.
The aforementioned centralization/addition of
AsyncArrowFormalParametersProduction fixes several cases where we were
failing to report an error for 'await' in some contexts; I've added
those test cases.
The patch also narrows all cases to exactly the set or productions
necessary, with a comment on each explaining the choice.
BUG=v8:4483
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2271063002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#38918}
This flag was only set on receiver scopes (declaration scopes) already. This makes it statically obvious.
BUG=v8:5209
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2268333002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#38828}
- The static method CopyChars was actually used and has been extracted.
- It was used in tests, where it's been replaced w/ ExternalOneByteString...
- Only one test actually relied on Utf8 handling (as opposed to ASCII only),
and that was the test testing Utf8ToUtf16CharacterStream itself.
+66 -277 LOC :)
BUG=v8:4947
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2256273002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#38824}
This avoids checking for outer_scope == nullptr in Scope::Scope
BUG=v8:5209
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2266973002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#38812}
The following code was previously accepted:
async function f() {
let g = (await) => {};
}
But per the spec, using 'await' is disallowed in arrow parameters
by an early error rule (just as 'yield' is disallowed in arrow
params inside generators).
There was special logic in ParseUnaryExpression which seems to have been
there only to allow that case. Having removed it, we get a SyntaxError in
the right cases anyway when ParseUnaryExpression chokes on whatever
illegal token follows 'await' in the cases this code previously handled.
Also removes the unnecessary AsyncBindingPatternProduction enum value.
R=caitp@igalia.com, littledan@chromium.org
BUG=v8:4483
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2258313002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#38802}
This makes us able to get rid of dependencies to parser.h from places
which only need the ParseInfo, and also gets rid of the curious Parser
<-> Compiler circular dependency.
Also IWYUd where necessary.
BUG=
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2268513002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#38777}
This patch subsumes CoverInitializedNameProduction to create an ObjectLiteralProduction which is now used to report the duplicate proto error as well.
This patch also changes ObjectLiteralChecker::CheckProperty
to record an ObjectLiteralProduction error instead of
bailing out immediately. Once we realize that we're in a
pattern, we rewind the error, otherwise we report the
error.
BUG=v8:5121
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2255353002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#38764}
Currently when redefining eval or arguments in non-simple parameter list and
destructuring binding, V8 doesn't throw any error, this patch fixes it.
BUG=v8:5201
LOG=N
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2185223002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#38762}
This moves the module_descriptor_ field to that subclass, as well as other module-only methods.
BUG=v8:5209
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2252223002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#38703}
1, restrict use of LiteralBuffers to the tokens that actually need it.
- E.g., previously the Token::FUNCTION would have a literal buffer
containing "function", which was never actually used.
- This eliminates copies of the string data for every call to
PeekAhead or SetBookmark.
2, document & enforce the "secret" Scanner API contract w/ DCHECK
- Document & check the correspondence of token value and literal buffer.
- Document & check preconditions for calling PeekAhead, ScanRegExp*,
ScanTemplate*.
BUG=v8:4947
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2240513003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#38677}
This changes Scope::function_ (for holding the name binding
for named function expression) from a VariableDeclaration
to a Variable. No work is done when visiting this declaration,
since it's kCreatedInitialized, so we can treat it like
other function-specific variables.
This simplifies a wide variety of code, and centralizes
the logic for constructing the variable inside scopes.cc.
This may one day make it easier to eliminate the CONST_LEGACY
VariableMode.
R=neis@chromium.org, verwaest@chromium.org
BUG=v8:5209
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2232633002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#38558}
Introduces a new VariableLocation MODULE for variables that live in a
module's export table. Scope analysis sets this for the approriate variables.
Not yet supported by any backend.
Also, treats all imports as CONST bindings (including namespace imports), rather
than having new special variable modes.
BUG=
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2199283002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#38426}
This also gets rid of the pending_error_handler field on DeclarationScope which wasn't actually used.
BUG=v8:5209
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2218083002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#38400}
This reduces peak zone memory usage by ~10% on codeload and ~5% on mandreel.
BUG=v8:5209
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2209573002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#38367}
Thrown exceptions must be handled before another exception is thrown.
This fixes all remaining test failures exposed by not clearing pending
exceptions in JSEntryStub.
BUG=v8:5259
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2207923002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#38324}
In contrast to the generic stream, this character stream works without
accessing the heap, and can be used on a background thread.
BUG=v8:5215
R=vogelheim@chromium.org,marja@chromium.org
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2184393002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#38154}
The uses_arguments() bool is not needed for correct
behavior, since that same information is available after scope analysis
based on whether we allocated the Scope::arguments_ var.
BUG=v8:5209
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2168293002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#37990}
Replace the zonelist with a link from a scope to any of its inner scopes, and a link to any sibling scope.
This makes scopes that track inner scopes use roughly the same amount of space as previously scopes without inner scopes would use for the empty zonelist (pointer to the memory + length field, which, granted could be slightly smaller on 64bit).
BUG=v8:5209
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2162143005
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#37941}
This additionally makes the invariant obvious that outer_scope==nullptr+is_with_scope is impossible.
BUG=v8:5209
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2165923002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#37902}
This frees up a field in Scope and untangles scope a little from the parser.
BUG=v8:5209
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2160943004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#37887}
Highlights:
- Record all imports and exports in the ModuleDescriptor.
- Remove ImportDeclaration; instead, introduce a new variable kind for imports.
- Set name on default exported anonymous functions.
Still to do: declaration of namespace imports.
BUG=v8:1569
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2108193003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#37815}
When the scanner finds a '-->', it's either part of an HTMLCloseComment
or a '--' followed by a '>'. Previously, only a preceding newline would
make it an HTMLCloseComment. Now, a preceding multiline comment also
makes it an HTMLCloseComment. The effect is that now the following is
not a SyntaxError:
x/*
*/-->this is now a comment
BUG=v8:5142
LOG=y
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2119763003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#37656}
Add a flag harmony_trailing_commas_in_parameters that allows trailing
commas in function parameter declaration lists and function call
parameter lists. Trailing commas are allowed in parenthetical lists like
`(a, b, c,)` only if the next token is `=>`, thereby making it an arrow
function declaration. Only 1 trailing comma is allowed, not `(a,,)`. A
trailing comma must follow a non-rest parameter, so `(,)` and `(...a,)`
are still SyntaxErrors. However, a trailing comma is allowed after a
spread parameter, e.g. `a(...b,);`.
Add parser tests for all of the above.
BUG=v8:5051
LOG=y
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2094463002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#37355}
Previously, an async arrow function would be parsed if any valid
ConditionalExpression began with the identifier "async", and its following token
was on the same line.
So for example, `async.bar foo => 1` was parsed as a valid async arrow function.
This patch corrects this behaviour by asserting that the following token is a
valid arrow parameters start.
BUG=v8:4483
R=littledan@chromium.org, henrique.ferreiro@gmail.com
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2089733002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#37154}
Reporting use counts by invoking a callback once per occurrence has
a large overhead cost in certain situations, for example when it needs
to be dispatched to a different thread (which is the case for Web Workers).
Parsing large scripts can produce a lot of occurrences (strict/sloppy mode
once per function).
Chromium (the only known user of UseCounters so far) does not actually care
about number of occurrences, but simply whether they happened at least once.
This commit changes behavior to report features at most once, which dramatically
improves performance for impacted use cases, and should not affect the only
known real world usage.
R=littledan@chromium.org
BUG=chromium:614775
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2062203002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#36979}
Annex B 3.3 applies only for ordinary FunctionDeclarations, not
GeneratorDeclarations or AsyncFunctionDeclarations. This patch
- Skips applying Annex B 3.3 to async functions
- Adds a flag to refrain from applying it to generators
- UseCounter for how often duplicate function in block occurs
with generators (unclear how to measure need for hoisting from block)
BUG=v8:4806
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/1995863002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#36557}
Some IdentifierNames are only included in the set of FutureReservedWords
for strict mode code. Outside of strict mode, these IdentifierNames may
be used as Identifiers. Notably, this includes their use as
BindingIdentifiers in LexicalBindings.
From ES2015 12.1.1 Static Semantics: Early Errors (Identifiers):
> It is a Syntax Error if this phrase is contained in strict mode code
> and the StringValue of IdentifierName is: "implements", "interface",
> "let", "package", "private", "protected", "public", "static", or
> "yield".
http://www.ecma-international.org/ecma-262/6.0/#sec-identifiers-static-semantics-early-errors
Due to a error in its heuristic for disambiguating the `let` token, V8
does not currently allow any of the strict-mode-only FutureReservedWords
to be used as a BindingIdentifier outside of strict mode.
Update V8's heuristic for disambiguating the `let` keyword to account
for strict mode, enabling these IdentifierNames to be used
BUG=v8:4918
LOG=N
R=adamk@chromium.org
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/1891453005
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#36296}
Yield expressions are not allowed in formal parameter initializers of
generators, but we weren't properly catching the case where the yield
expression appeared in the 'extends' clause of a class expression.
They also aren't allowed in arrow functions, which we were failing to
catch due to not looking at the obscurely-named "FormalParameterInitializerError"
bit of ExpressionClassifier.
This patch passes along an ExpressionClassifier when parsing class
expressions and accumulates the proper error for that case.
For the arrow function case, the fix is simply to check for the
"formal parameter initializer" error once we know we've parsed
an arrow function. The error message used for this has also
been made specific to yield expressions.
Tests are added both for the error case and the non-error cases (where
yield is used in such a position inside the class body).
BUG=v8:4966, v8:4968, v8:4974
LOG=n
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/1941823003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#35957}
