This reached consensus in the March 2020 TC39.
https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/1908
This aligns JS with wasm, which allows atomics operations on non-shared
linear memory.
Bug: v8:10687, v8:9921
Change-Id: I7b60473b271cee6bccb342e97a4fd3781aedddb4
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2330802
Commit-Queue: Shu-yu Guo <syg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69392}
This fixes a case where we hit a DCHECK in Debug mode, or silently
discarded bogus data in Release mode without rejecting the module.
Fixed: chromium:1108815
Change-Id: I928ff244a54b016cd8470be1ec4b5faf2c7e3994
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2349768
Commit-Queue: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Manos Koukoutos <manoskouk@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69391}
Two tests already test concurrent allocation. Another one measures
memory, so non-deterministic allocation would lead to higher memory
usage than anticipated.
Bug: v8:10315
Change-Id: If994233c87ea04076b850ffdf024f7783653e9db
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2352781
Reviewed-by: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Dominik Inführ <dinfuehr@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69383}
This extends the skip list feature from step over to step into.
On a step into we can pass a skipList, which contains locations
that we do not want to stop at.
Bug: chromium:1105765
Change-Id: I70a4ded3f6a7eada14f54ae9c2f994c155c7305b
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2345224
Reviewed-by: Simon Zünd <szuend@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Kim-Anh Tran <kimanh@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69376}
Bring the return value of {InterpretWasmModule} in sync with
{CallWasmFunctionForTesting}, because the fuzzers now compare the two.
R=ahaas@chromium.org
Bug: chromium:1115431
Change-Id: I0abf79c4418a4e6cc7365a78148e5e71cf32231b
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2351678
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69374}
TurboFan generates significantly less code than Liftoff for this test,
and depending on timing it can happen that we need to generate thousands
of functions, which takes some time and occasionally runs into timeouts.
Thus disable tier-up for this test, such that we stick with the much
longer Liftoff code, and reach the four separate code spaces quicker.
R=ahaas@chromium.org
Change-Id: I8e9a0cb466c1bdfef29aceeb5dd31aa96d05b70b
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2352490
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69369}
Since it will be patched in later in the cases where it will be used,
there is no need to have it as a parameter.
Bug: v8:7790
Change-Id: I93b27f3baf8c3841a60f5ac5ed09993d1caf19bc
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2351667
Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Santiago Aboy Solanes <solanes@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69366}
Fix containing() w/ n point to surrogate tail.
Bug: v8:6891
Change-Id: I4d7e4083ba409eecaefaf2ec5c67b7226bd7c97c
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2348208
Commit-Queue: Frank Tang <ftang@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69363}
The (now unique)PersistentHandles container follows this path:
1) PersistentHandles created via PersistentHandlesScope inside of
CompilationHandleScope
2) Owned by OptimizedCompilationInfo
3) Owned by JSHeapBroker
4) Owned by the broker's LocalHeap
5) Back to the broker for a brief moment (after tearing down the
LocalHeap as part of exiting LocalHeapScope)
6) Back to OptimizedCompilationInfo when exiting the LocalHeapScope.
There is a special case in GenerateCodeForTesting where the JSHeapBroker
will not be retired in that same method. In this case, we need to
re-attach the PersistentHandles container to the JSHeapBroker.
The identity map of the persistent & canonical handles also gets passed
around like the persistent handles. The only difference is that is
created in the CanonicalHandleScope (i.e step 1) is different).
Bug: v8:7790
Change-Id: I2da77a7e08f3fd360a46b606c5fbda08c0af27df
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2332811
Commit-Queue: Santiago Aboy Solanes <solanes@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Dominik Inführ <dinfuehr@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69360}
Move external memory counters out of IsolateData back into Heap.
The class ExternalMemoryAccounting now stores all counters and is
responsible for updates. This change will allow turning counters into
atomic variables.
Bug: v8:10315
Change-Id: I2abeda298d3cfcc630fd04ca78a3d6d703e3b419
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2346647
Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Dominik Inführ <dinfuehr@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69356}
A minor fix to the {InterpretAndExecuteModule} function: We instantiate
the module twice. If the first instantiation worked, then also the
second instantiation must succeed.
Plus minor drive-by cleanup.
R=ahaas@chromium.org
Bug: chromium:1113681
Change-Id: Ib897cb1907152cdd9b0ed2b513a6c8217a3f400c
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2349288
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69352}
ArrayBufferTracker was superseded by ArrayBufferList and
ArrayBufferSweeper. Now that ArrayBufferSweeper is used in production,
we can remove the unused ArrayBufferTracker mechanism.
Bug: v8:10064
Change-Id: I479169c76b6c5c634672024f77e689bb64a36504
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2339105
Reviewed-by: Simon Zünd <szuend@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Dominik Inführ <dinfuehr@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69351}
This is a reland of 57242a051e
no-sse4.1 builds were failing due to missing simd-scalar-lowering
for s128.const, this reland adds that implementation.
Original change's description:
> [wasm-simd][arm] Use vmov to move all ones to register
>
> vceq(dst, dst, dst) does not seem to always set the register to all
> ones. The right way should be be to use vmov (immediate) anyway. This
> was not supported in the assembler yet, so we need changes to the
> assembler, diassembler, and simulator.
>
> There is an unfortunate fork in logic in the simulator, due to the way
> the switches are set up, vmov (imm) logic is duplicated across two
> different cases, because the switch looks at the top bit of the
> immediate. Refactoring this will be a bigger change that is irrelevant
> for this bug, so I'm putting that off for now. Instead we extract the
> core of vmov (imm) into helpers and call it in the two cases.
>
> Bug: chromium:1112124
> Change-Id: I283dbcd86cb0572e5ee720835f897b51fae96701
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2337503
> Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Bill Budge <bbudge@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69315}
Bug: chromium:1112124
Change-Id: Id450e5cea41f7a569e49be8386a7788ca8f00658
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2346937
Reviewed-by: Bill Budge <bbudge@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69346}
This reverts commit 0ba115e6a9.
Reason for revert: Breaks test on TSAN - block-conflicts
https://ci.chromium.org/p/v8/builders/ci/V8%20Linux64%20TSAN%20-%20concurrent%20marking/14230
Original change's description:
> Reland^2 "[flags] warn about contradictory flags"
>
> This is a reland of d8f8a7e210
> Change compared to last reland:
> - Do not check for d8 flag contradictions in the presence of --fuzzing
> - Allow identical re-declaration of --cache=*
>
> Original change's description:
> > Reland "[flags] warn about contradictory flags"
> >
> > This is a reland of b8f9166664
> > Difference to previous CL: Additional functionality to specify
> > incompatible flags based on GN variables and extra-flags, used
> > to fix the issues that came up on the waterfall.
> >
> > This also changes the rules regarding repeated flags: While
> > explicitly repeated flags are allowed for boolean values as long
> > as they are identical, repeated flags or explicit flags in the
> > presence of an active implication are disallowed for non-boolean
> > flags. The latter simplifies specifying conflict rules in
> > variants.py. Otherwise a rule like
> >
> > INCOMPATIBLE_FLAGS_PER_EXTRA_FLAG = {
> > "--gc-interval=*": ["--gc-interval=*"],
> > }
> >
> > wouldn't work because specifying the same GC interval twice
> > wouldn't actually count as a conflict. This was an issue with
> > test/mjsunit/wasm/gc-buffer.js, which specifies
> > --gc-interval=500 exactly like the extra flag by the stress bot.
> >
> > Also, this now expands contradictory flags checking to d8 flags
> > for consistency.
> >
> > Original change's description:
> > > [flags] warn about contradictory flags
> > >
> > > Design Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lkvu8crkK7Ei39qjkPCFijpNyxWXsOktG9GB-7K34jM/
> > >
> > > Bug: v8:10577
> > > Change-Id: Ib9cfdffa401c48c895bf31caed5ee03545beddab
> > > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2154792
> > > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
> > > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> > > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68168}
> >
> > Bug: v8:10577
> > Change-Id: I268e590ee18a535b13dee14eeb15ddd0a9ee8341
> > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2235115
> > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68989}
>
> Bug: v8:10577
> Change-Id: I31d2794d4f9ff630f3444210100c64d67d881276
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2339464
> Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69339}
TBR=machenbach@chromium.org,neis@chromium.org,clemensb@chromium.org,tebbi@chromium.org,tmrts@chromium.org
Change-Id: I1454a05e357ddd704db7fb79e51be65d45a9a16e
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: v8:10577
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2348365
Reviewed-by: Bill Budge <bbudge@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Bill Budge <bbudge@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69341}
This is a reland of d8f8a7e210
Change compared to last reland:
- Do not check for d8 flag contradictions in the presence of --fuzzing
- Allow identical re-declaration of --cache=*
Original change's description:
> Reland "[flags] warn about contradictory flags"
>
> This is a reland of b8f9166664
> Difference to previous CL: Additional functionality to specify
> incompatible flags based on GN variables and extra-flags, used
> to fix the issues that came up on the waterfall.
>
> This also changes the rules regarding repeated flags: While
> explicitly repeated flags are allowed for boolean values as long
> as they are identical, repeated flags or explicit flags in the
> presence of an active implication are disallowed for non-boolean
> flags. The latter simplifies specifying conflict rules in
> variants.py. Otherwise a rule like
>
> INCOMPATIBLE_FLAGS_PER_EXTRA_FLAG = {
> "--gc-interval=*": ["--gc-interval=*"],
> }
>
> wouldn't work because specifying the same GC interval twice
> wouldn't actually count as a conflict. This was an issue with
> test/mjsunit/wasm/gc-buffer.js, which specifies
> --gc-interval=500 exactly like the extra flag by the stress bot.
>
> Also, this now expands contradictory flags checking to d8 flags
> for consistency.
>
> Original change's description:
> > [flags] warn about contradictory flags
> >
> > Design Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lkvu8crkK7Ei39qjkPCFijpNyxWXsOktG9GB-7K34jM/
> >
> > Bug: v8:10577
> > Change-Id: Ib9cfdffa401c48c895bf31caed5ee03545beddab
> > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2154792
> > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
> > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68168}
>
> Bug: v8:10577
> Change-Id: I268e590ee18a535b13dee14eeb15ddd0a9ee8341
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2235115
> Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68989}
Bug: v8:10577
Change-Id: I31d2794d4f9ff630f3444210100c64d67d881276
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2339464
Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69339}
We shouldn't spill weak pointers onto the stack when calling functions
that can trigger GC. DynamicMapChecks operator was using feedback loaded
from the feedback vector across the TryMigrateInstance function call.
The feedback can be a weak pointer to receiver map for monomorphic cases
and TryMigrateInstance can trigger a GC. This cl fixes it by holding
a holding a strong reference to the feedback.
Bug: v8:10774,v8:10582,v8:9684
Change-Id: Ia36f4d8ad46421ae570f41439bc1f0875081deee
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2336804
Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69338}
This is a reland of 60ee70bb40.
The wasm c-api flakes were fixed in https://crrev.com/c/2349293.
Original change's description:
> [wasm] Ensure that only TurboFan code is serialized
>
> We have the implicit assumption that Liftoff code will never be
> serialized, and we start relying on that when implementing new features
> (debugging, dynamic tiering).
>
> This CL makes the serializer fail if the module contains any Liftoff
> code. Existing tests are changed to ensure that we fully tiered up
> before serializing a module (similar to the logic in Chromium).
> The "wasm-clone-module" test needs to serialize the module before
> enabling the debugger.
>
> Note that chrome currently only serializes a module after it fully
> tiered up, so that should be fine. If other embedders need the ability
> to serialize a module in an arbitrary state, we will have to fix this
> later. With this CL we will be on the safe side though and (gracefully)
> fail serialization instead of accidentally serializing Liftoff code.
>
> R=ahaas@chromium.org
>
> Bug: v8:10777
> Change-Id: I1245e5f7fda3447a544c1e3525e1239cde759174
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2336799
> Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69276}
Bug: v8:10777
Change-Id: I2a7c1429812ca46d88a2902b8e0a7b7e3d638b56
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2349290
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69335}
We only want to serialize TurboFan code, because Liftoff code could
contain breakpoints, and we start thinking about embedding other
non-relocatable constants.
Thus, wait until top-tier compilation finished before triggering
serialization.
A follow-up CL will make serialization fail if any Liftoff code is
encountered.
R=ahaas@chromium.org
Bug: v8:10777
Change-Id: I73d6c2d868545fcd4069a8cf9850ca7fca375ecb
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2349293
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69332}
This removes the {InterpretWasmModuleForTesting} function in favor of
{InterpretWasmModule}, and uses that in {InterpretAndExecuteModule}.
The latter again is reused in {WasmExecutionFuzzer::FuzzWasmModule},
such that all fuzzers execute the same checks now.
R=ahaas@chromium.org
Bug: chromium:1112099, chromium:1113681
Change-Id: Ia8818b93e9274266a81573edd6852e4e4734b150
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2346283
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69331}
This is the first step in refactoring Worklist to allow arbitrary
number of local worklists with private segments:
- Introduce MarkingWorklistImpl<> which will eventually replace
(and will be renamed to) Worklist.
- MarkingWorklistImpl<> owns the global pool of segments but does not
keep track of private segments.
- MarkingWorklistImpl<>::Local owns private segments and can be
constructed dynamically on background threads.
- Rename the existing MarkingWorklistsHolder to MarkingWorklists.
- Rename the existing MarkingWorklists to MarkingWorklists::Local.
- Rename the existing marking_workists_holder to marking_worklists.
- Rename the existing marking_worklists to local_marking_worklists.
Design doc: https://bit.ly/2XMtjLi
Bug: v8:10315
Change-Id: I9da34883ad34f4572fccd40c51e51eaf50c617bc
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2343330
Reviewed-by: Dominik Inführ <dinfuehr@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69330}
This change adds support for skipping locations that are in a skipList
on step over. This feature is useful for when we are debugging
C++ applications that have DWARF information we only want to stop on
every breakable location in C++, not non every breakable location
on wasm level.
Bug: chromium:1105765
Change-Id: Ie835b011a00cf31e0c5b2df1ac96ebd89f53d23a
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2339458
Reviewed-by: Eric Leese <leese@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Simon Zünd <szuend@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Kim-Anh Tran <kimanh@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69329}
Remove the {ErrorThrower} parameter to {CallWasmFunctionForTesting} (it
was only populated in a subset of failures anyway), and merge it with
{RunWasmModuleForTesting}.
R=ahaas@chromium.org
Bug: chromium:1113681
Change-Id: I5391e2f911928641a907bc5dad5a54677c90acb6
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2346279
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69327}
The "wasm fuzzer" and "wasm async fuzzer" use the
{InterpretAndExecuteModule} function, which did not check for possible
nondeterminism in the interpreter yet. This can lead to wrong reports
of mismatches, or in endless loops being executed in compiled code which
was not executed in the interpreter.
This CL adds the check for nondeterminism in that function, and adds a
TODO to merge the two very similar methods.
R=ahaas@chromium.org
Bug: chromium:1112099, chromium:1113681
Change-Id: I80b01d4c53d04f0632807fa852147dc9fb8075ca
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2346280
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69324}
The interpreter is used for testing (including fuzzing) only, and in
these cases it's often important to see the exact value of a float. Both
decimal and scientific notation does not show the full value though, and
decimal representation can also be really long for large values, making
it hard to compare values.
This CL switches this debug output to hexadecimal float values, which
always shows the float value in full precision and is also much shorter
than decimal notation in many cases.
R=ahaas@chromium.org
Bug: chromium:1112099
Change-Id: Ia84824227fcd2f1e763ab89280a202ed44930a71
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2346646
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69323}
This reverts commit 57242a051e.
Reason for revert: regression tests fails:
https://ci.chromium.org/p/v8/builders/ci/V8%20Linux%20-%20debug/31477
Original change's description:
> [wasm-simd][arm] Use vmov to move all ones to register
>
> vceq(dst, dst, dst) does not seem to always set the register to all
> ones. The right way should be be to use vmov (immediate) anyway. This
> was not supported in the assembler yet, so we need changes to the
> assembler, diassembler, and simulator.
>
> There is an unfortunate fork in logic in the simulator, due to the way
> the switches are set up, vmov (imm) logic is duplicated across two
> different cases, because the switch looks at the top bit of the
> immediate. Refactoring this will be a bigger change that is irrelevant
> for this bug, so I'm putting that off for now. Instead we extract the
> core of vmov (imm) into helpers and call it in the two cases.
>
> Bug: chromium:1112124
> Change-Id: I283dbcd86cb0572e5ee720835f897b51fae96701
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2337503
> Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Bill Budge <bbudge@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69315}
TBR=bbudge@chromium.org,jkummerow@chromium.org,v8-arm-ports@googlegroups.com,zhin@chromium.org
Change-Id: I5d9d1dcb81771f71001d959ec5a03a43a11c4233
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: chromium:1112124
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2347211
Reviewed-by: Bill Budge <bbudge@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Bill Budge <bbudge@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69316}
vceq(dst, dst, dst) does not seem to always set the register to all
ones. The right way should be be to use vmov (immediate) anyway. This
was not supported in the assembler yet, so we need changes to the
assembler, diassembler, and simulator.
There is an unfortunate fork in logic in the simulator, due to the way
the switches are set up, vmov (imm) logic is duplicated across two
different cases, because the switch looks at the top bit of the
immediate. Refactoring this will be a bigger change that is irrelevant
for this bug, so I'm putting that off for now. Instead we extract the
core of vmov (imm) into helpers and call it in the two cases.
Bug: chromium:1112124
Change-Id: I283dbcd86cb0572e5ee720835f897b51fae96701
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2337503
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Bill Budge <bbudge@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69315}
With a displacement of int32_t min (-2^31), and a displacement mode of
kNegativeDisplacement, we will try to negate this constant, but the
result will not fit in an int32_t, leading to a runtime crash.
Check for this special case in CanBeImmediate, and return false.
Bug: chromium:1091892
Change-Id: I7f18153d13805f2836dd5c8e1bc098f1e9600566
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2341095
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Bill Budge <bbudge@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69311}
The plain "wasm fuzzer" (which takes the fuzzer input as the wasm wire
bytes) was already running both the interpreter and compiled code, but
it did not compare the results of both.
This CL fixes this by reusing some logic that was already present in the
fuzzers based on the {WasmCompileFuzzer} class.
R=ahaas@chromium.org
Bug: chromium:1113681, chromium:1112099
Change-Id: I9d407f66dfcba0eec90f050630b028edd5fae1d1
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2339624
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69310}
Add missing source position for stack check, used by OSR to find the
correct return address.
R=clemensb@chromium.org
Bug: v8:10235
Change-Id: Ie26dd3b2079168e846f84b3a4ffe18b838649be7
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2339625
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69309}
The {name} parameter was unused, we always picked the exported "main"
function.
R=ahaas@chromium.org
Bug: chromium:1113681
Change-Id: Iee4b8f72e1137a7e366c3c31b4fa4e4ef81863b4
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2345964
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69307}
A new field for signature type was added to WasmExportedFunctionData.
It is set to 0 or 1 depending on the parameter count.
(It's set and being used only in 0 and 1 parameter cases.)
Added new JS tests for 1 parameter wasm functions.
Bug: v8:10701
Change-Id: I349d881a2860f1a50b91e08d0126ca71c5f6483b
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2339622
Commit-Queue: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69302}
Previously, all ThisExpression's had kNoSourcePositions leading to
incorrect error messages like this:
➜ d8 -e "function t() { for (const x of this) {} } t();"
unnamed:1: TypeError: undefined is not a function
function t() { for (const x of this) {} } t();
^
TypeError: undefined is not a function
at t (unnamed:1:11)
at unnamed:1:43
This patch allows creation of a ThisExpression with a source position,
leading to a better error message:
➜ d8 -e "function t() { for (const x of this) {} } t();"
unnamed:1: TypeError: this is not iterable
function t() { for (const x of this) {} } t();
^
TypeError: this is not iterable
at t (unnamed:1:32)
at unnamed:1:43
This patch does not remove the existing cached version of
ThisExpression and instead creates a new one when required.
Bug: v8:6513
Change-Id: Idee4fe8946a9b821d06ff4a5e7eaefe54874ec59
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2345226
Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69300}
Up until now. we only checked the size of tables defined in a module
at instantiation time. For imported tables we only checked if the
imported table matched the declared import in size. This causes a
problem because we allocate function tables also for imported tabled
before we actually look at the imported table.
With this CL we first check the size of all tables, and only then start
to initialize and load them.
R=jkummerow@chromium.org
Bug: chromium:1114006
Change-Id: Iaf194ed21fb83304fe3a7f0f7ba7b282396e3954
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2339473
Commit-Queue: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69291}
The cast from uint32_t to int caused an integer overflow that let a
bounds check succeed that should have failed.
R=jkummerow@chromium.org
Bug: chromium:1114005
Change-Id: Iea1af70af300be54c2a33d7dd10b3faa34d56eaa
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2339472
Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69289}
The test have been rewritten to be more robust -> maybe they're
robust enough for the GC fuzzer (DelayedTasksPlatform)?
Bug: v8:10239
Change-Id: I743cc2f804357aaef888bff7985dfb68a7feec5f
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2342848
Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69287}
This reverts commit 60ee70bb40.
Reason for revert: wasm-api-tests/WasmCapiTest.Serialize starts flaking: https://crbug.com/v8/10784
Original change's description:
> [wasm] Ensure that only TurboFan code is serialized
>
> We have the implicit assumption that Liftoff code will never be
> serialized, and we start relying on that when implementing new features
> (debugging, dynamic tiering).
>
> This CL makes the serializer fail if the module contains any Liftoff
> code. Existing tests are changed to ensure that we fully tiered up
> before serializing a module (similar to the logic in Chromium).
> The "wasm-clone-module" test needs to serialize the module before
> enabling the debugger.
>
> Note that chrome currently only serializes a module after it fully
> tiered up, so that should be fine. If other embedders need the ability
> to serialize a module in an arbitrary state, we will have to fix this
> later. With this CL we will be on the safe side though and (gracefully)
> fail serialization instead of accidentally serializing Liftoff code.
>
> R=ahaas@chromium.org
>
> Bug: v8:10777
> Change-Id: I1245e5f7fda3447a544c1e3525e1239cde759174
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2336799
> Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69276}
TBR=ahaas@chromium.org,clemensb@chromium.org
Change-Id: Ic1349375bd562bb0a2724c39c27ef3247461c97b
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: v8:10777
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2342845
Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69284}
The test relies on certain maps not dying but didn't ensure that.
Bug: v8:10783
Change-Id: I708f7fc027ee0bf5656be9bb4f29130f5b924597
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2340912
Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Auto-Submit: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69282}
Now that we are using PersistentHandles, we don't need it anymore.
Bug: v8:7790
Change-Id: Id0b9d555191c00fb08dc2bb9099746076c5ad1b7
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2332161
Commit-Queue: Santiago Aboy Solanes <solanes@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Dominik Inführ <dinfuehr@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69278}
