this patch makes btultra do 2 passes on the first block,
the first one being dedicated to collecting statistics
so that the 2nd pass is more accurate.
It translates into a very small compression ratio gain :
enwik7, level 20:
blocks 4K : 2.142 -> 2.153
blocks 16K : 2.447 -> 2.457
blocks 64K : 2.716 -> 2.726
On the other hand, the cpu cost is doubled.
The trade off looks bad.
Though, that's ultimately a price to pay to reach better compression ratio.
So it's only enabled when setting btultra.
this improves compression ratio by a *tiny* amount.
It also reduces speed by a small amount.
Consequently, bit-fractional evaluation is only turned on for btultra.
distance between levels is slightly increased
to compensate for level 1 speed improvements
and the will to have stronger level 19
extending the range of speed to cover.
for FSE symbols.
While it seems to work, the gains are negligible compared to rough maxNbBits evaluation.
There are even a few losses sometimes, that still need to be explained.
Furthermode, there are still cases where btlazy2 does a better job than btopt,
which seems rather strange too.
for proper estimation of symbol's weights
when using dictionary compression.
Note : using only huffman costs is not good enough,
presumably because sequence symbol costs are incorrect.
Make sure that $(INCLUDEDIR) exists before copying the headers there.
Otherwise, the contest of header files is copied over
$(DESTDIR)$(INCLUDEDIR), making it a regular file.
While at it, remove $(DESTDIR)$(INCLUDEDIR) from the list of directories
to create in the install-pc target. The install-pc target does not need
this directory.
reported by @let-def.
It's actually a bug in ZSTD_compressBegin_usingCDict()
which would pass a wrong pledgedSrcSize value (0 instead of ZSTD_CONTENTSIZE_UNKNOWN)
resulting in wrong window size, resulting in downsized seqStore,
resulting in segfault when writing into the seqStore later in the process.
Added a test in fuzzer to cover this use case (fails before the patch).
Whilst working on the Reproducible Builds effort [0], we noticed
that zstd could not be built reproducibly.
This is due to the manual page encoding the number of CPUs from the
build machine and thus varies across builds.
This was originally filed in Debian as #897904 [1].
[0] https://reproducible-builds.org/
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/897904
Signed-off-by: Chris Lamb <lamby@debian.org>
