This reverts commit 1301723905.
This only appeared to fix the two bugs it linked because, rather than
being superfluous, the GTK+ grabs resulted in effectively having *none*,
or something, and could cause a critical when closing during a scroll.
This also reverts commit b9989e554b, which
depended on the above.
See next commit, which *should* properly fix what this one claimed to…
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=787274
On clicking release, we call TreeView.get_path_at_pos() &, if we hit a
row, select it (if sensitive) & close the popup. But this alone does
not account for clicks on the expanders within the TreeView, so in
addition to expanding/collapsing, clicking them would close the list.
Check if the click is in the cell_area() & thus “excluding surrounding
borders and the tree expander area” but still including the background
(which TreeView.is_blank_at_pos() doesn’t); if TRUE, don’t select/close.
The popup doesn’t always resize enough… so there’s still breakage here.
The XXX comment on TreeView requests in list_position() may be relevant
to this. But at least this drags such CBs one step closer to adequacy:
expanding by mouse now works ~no worse~ than by keyboard already did.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=788505
Commit c415bef5de introduced support for the new _GTK_EDGE_CONSTRAINTS
atom. If the compositor supports that atom, however, we were always
setting the tiled state, even if no actual tiling information is
available, where the correct action is to completely remove any traces
of the tiled state.
Fix that by correctly removing the tiled state when compositor supports
_GTK_EDGE_CONSTRAINTS Xatom.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=788516
Ditch two items that were white and so weren’t visible on our standard
theme anyway, and use the new space to test extra grid-mode properties.
Note that if we do this then, as before, we set the ListStore on the
ComboBox before appending to it, that produced runtime warnings like:
Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_menu_attach: assertion 'left_attach < right_attach' failed
I didn’t look into that yet, but it may indicate that attaching items
vs. recognising their spans don’t occur in the correct order. For the
purposes of testing this, I just create the CB after filling its model.
ComboBox and TreeMenu warned in the doc for :row-span-column that the
value must not exceed :wrap-width, but :wrap-width does not interact
with the number of rows; it’s the :column-span-column that’s relevant.
Also: Warn that spans must be > 0 for rows too, and that column spans <=
:wrap-width are also not useful for items at menu column positions > 0.
Finally, refer to items having spans, not values, as we were already
talking about values in the model (and rows in the menu).
The last touch on this patch series is making GtkWindow able to
selectively adjust various UI details based on the different
tiled edges. The main driver here is that we don't want to show
shadows on edges that are constrained.
This patch adds the necessary code to do that, while still
maintaining compatibility with the old ways.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=783669
Following the previous patch, where edge constraints support
was added to the Wayland backend, this patch introduces the
necessary code to handle the _GTK_EDGE_CONSTRAINTS atom from
X11 backend.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=783669
Now that GTK windows have the ability to properly handle
per-edge tiling constraints, this patch extends GTK's
internal Wayland protocol to have a proper enum with the
relevant edge data.
Once this approach is validated, we can think of upstreaming
this work as an official Wayland protocol extension.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=783669
GTK windows don't have their tiling states really
hooked into the client-side decoration code, and
the only effect it has is disabling the resizing
edges.
With the introduction of per-edge tiling information,
we are backed by much more precise data on how the
window manager wants the app to behave.
This patch, then, fixes GtkWindow to take into account
per-edge tiling information. For compatibility purposes,
the previous tiled field was kept, and thing will just
continue working if no edge information is supplied.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=783669
These states will be consumed by GtkWindow in order to
have better edge management on tiling situations. Their
values are supplied by the compositor, and will be send
through and X11 Atom or a Wayland protocol extension.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=783669
This reverts commit 15a3747406.
There is a way to get different kinds of borders: it's CSS. It's better
to keep the 4 Frames and demo the different styles we can do using CSS.
The GtkFlowBoxCreateWidgetFunc type lacked GObject Introspection
annotations for its arguments. This made gtk_flow_box_bind_model()
unusable from Python as the callback function would be passed useless
values.
The annotations that I've added match those of the similar callback
type GtkListBoxCreateWidgetFunc.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=780758
gdk_seat_default_grab() grabs POINTER_EVENTS if the capability is
GDK_SEAT_CAPABILITY_ALL_POINTING. But that enumerator is a union that
includes GDK_SEAT_CAPABILITY_TOUCH, but we never grabbed TOUCH_EVENTS,
an unused macro that was presumably created with this purpose in mind.
So, check which of the ALL_POINTING capabilities we have, and set the
right mask of POINTER_EVENTS and/or TOUCH_EVENTS as required.
As part of this, explicitly let TABLET_STYLUS take over pointer events,
as this is the intended behaviour and was the effective result before.
This should fix touch events being lost in migrating from Device.grab()
to Seat.grab(GDK_SEAT_CAPABILITY_ALL_POINTING), as found by Inkscape.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=781757
Clarify that ::destroy, not ::hide*, removes a window from its app, by
replacing the mention of open windows with the blurb on destruction from
:application, completing commit 7db4bee4b6
Also link to the equivalent gtk_application_(add|remove)_window() calls,
since Application.add_window() already links back to Window:application.
* unless you use gtkmm…
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=639931
It was never unref()d, either when replacing the existing GObject in
set_property(), cleaning up in finalize(), or becoming a placeholder.
Fix by using g_set_object() and g_clear_object() to unref as needed.
This also drops the check that the newly set object is a valid cloud
provider account, as we don’t do the equivalent for any of the other
object-typed properties, and Carlos didn’t think this was important.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=787600
The focus outline disappeared as the colour of the swatch got close to
the normal focus outline colour, which is alpha(currentColor, 0.3).
Fix by making the outline an alpha’d version of the tick colour, but
more opaque than normal outlines. 0.6 seems good enough; feel free to
improve it, but at least this ensures the outline can’t vanish anymore.
HighContrast achieves this already because it applies the color property
to the main node, not the overlay. Doing that means the outline is fully
opaque, which is fine for HC obviously but was excessive for Adwaita.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=787757
It used $text_color unconditionally, but in :dark, text is white, so we
overlaid a white tick on any light colours, all the way to white itself.
Using these named colours doesn’t make practical or semantic sense.
Instead, use white/black over dark/light swatches, as in HC, so all
variant–swatch combos work. Light looks the same, & :dark works now.
For backdrop, use alpha 0.5, unlike 0.7 in HC, as that seemed excessive
& different from the current effect. 0.5 is almost identical to how
$backdrop_fg_colour is a 50% mix of $fg_color, & matches backdrop text.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=787531
