Nobody ever does a NULL check there so all that causes is crashes. So
we better return a non-primary monitor than NULL.
Fixes gdk-wayland always returning NULL.
gtk_widget_destroy() removes widgets from their container. However
_internal_ widgets must be unref'ed using gtk_widget_unparent() instead.
This is symmetric with the fact that these widgets were ref'ed by direct
call to gtk_widget_set_parent(). It's also the method that was used in
gtk_headerbar_destroy().
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=772859
> Due to Gtk+ keeping a reference to the window internally,
> gtk_window_new() does not return a reference to the caller.
> To delete a GtkWindow, call gtk_widget_destroy().
Caller(s) aren't expecting a need to delete help_overlay themselves
once they've installed it. (E.g. see gtk_application_window_added()).
I didn't notice any direct precedents, but there's a parallel in the
current implementation of gtk_container_destroy() which uses
gtk_widget_destroy() on any added widget.
This avoids leaking 100s of kB per window, when I tested nautilus.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=772859
This allows the use of a "text-direction" hint set to one of "none", "rtl",
or "ltr" to enforce the text direction of a "horizontal-buttons"
display-hint.
This is useful when a menu has buttons that map to physical space in the
UI and therefore must match the application widgetry.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=772775
ClutterEmbed on Wayland uses a subsurface and relocates it on configure
events, but when placed within a scrolled window, no configure event is
emitted and the ClutterEmbed subsurface remains static.
Emit a configure event for native windows in GdkWindow's internal
move_native_children() so that custom widgets relying on configure
events such as ClutterEmbed can relocate their stuff.
Similarly, when switching to/from normal/maximized/fullscreen states
which change the shadows' size and possibly shows/hides a header bar,
we need to emit a configure event even if the abs_x/abs_y haven't
changed to make sure the subsurface is size appropriately.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=771320https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=767713
to hilight drop target there is a wildcard selector which turns
the border and shadow to green, this clearly shouldn't happen when
the whole window is a drop target.
...by putting it in a stack. The busy_spinner and eject_button are
mutually exclusive, but only the latter was coded to ensure that its
visibility did not cause the rest of the row to reflow. By putting both
widgets in a stack and setting child_visible on that, the row allocates
enough space to show one - or none - at once, avoiding any misalignment.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=772345https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=772348
Calling eglGetDisplay forces libEGL to guess what kind of pointer you
passed it. Different EGL libraries will do different things here, and in
particular glvnd will do something different than Mesa. Since we do have
an API that allows us to explicitly type the display, use it.
The explicit call to eglGetProcAddress is working around a bug in
libepoxy 1.3, which does not understand the EGL concept of client
extensions. Since it does not, the normal epoxy resolver for
eglGetPlatformDisplayEXT would not find any provider for that entry
point, and crash when you attempted to call it.
Signed-off-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=772415
EGLDisplays are already opaque pointers, and eglGetDisplay returns an
EGLDisplay not a pointer to one.
Signed-off-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=772415
