The key repeat is stopped as soon as a key is pressed, so if the user
quickly presses a key while another is already pressed and being
repeated, key repeat gets cancelled:
- key1 press
- key1 repeat
- key2 press -> key1 repeat stopped
- key1 release
- key 2 is not repeated even though it's kept depressed
This is a different behavior from X11, which confuses migrating users.
To mimic the X11 behavior, keep track of the number of keys pressed
simultaneously and cancel key repeat only when none is pressed.
This way, if a user pressed a key while another one is being repeated,
the new key press can possibly be repeated as well.
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=778019
When resizing an xdg_popup immediately after the initial mapping, there
is a race condition between the client and the compositor which is
processing the initial size given by the xdg_positioner, leading to the
xdg_popup to be eventually of the wrong size.
Only way to make sure the size is correct in that case is to hide and
show the window again. Considering this occurs before the initial
configure is processed, it should not be noticeable.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=772505
This reverts commit 901e5ff3a3.
This causes criticals in e.g. the Text View: Multiple Buffers demo.
More work is required to get a fix for Bug 778853 that does not cause
anything else to regress.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=778853
The fact that it doesn’t reuse the existing GtkLabel if present is not
immediately obvious to users (or is it just me?), so clarify that the
pre-existing :label-widget, if any, is always removed and replaced.
It was only testing the default configuration where overlay-scrolling is
TRUE and the policy is POLICY_AUTOMATIC. We should also test FALSE and
POLICY_ALWAYS. This commit adds those tests and makes the !overlay &&
POLICY_ALWAYS case pass by excluding the size of the relevant scrollbar,
as we are only interested in whether the content size is as requested.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=778853
POLICY_AUTOMATIC means scrollbars are only shown when needed, i.e. when
the size of the window is not large enough to show the entire child. So
when measuring the preferred size, such scrollbars should be ignored.
But measure() was adding size for bars for which policy_may_be_visible()
was TRUE, which it returns for POLICY_ALWAYS (good) & _AUTOMATIC (bad).
So we reserved space for child plus scrollbars, & because we have enough
space for the child, POLICY_AUTOMATIC hides the scrollbar, leaving the
extra reserved space empty at the right/bottom sides of the child. This
is very noticeable/inconvenient for non-overlay, automatic scrollbars.
Fix this by only requesting size for scrollbars that use POLICY_ALWAYS,
rather than basing the decision on policy_may_be_visible().
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=778853
Using Ctrl + left/right to skip between words, or left/right to cancel a
selection, were causing movement on the screen in the opposite direction
of the glyph on the key. This was surprising and awful UX for RTL users.
This is based on a patch covering the former case by:
Author: Mehdi Sadeghi <mehdi@mehdix.org>
Date: Sat Feb 18 02:16:00 2017 +0000
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136059
Using Ctrl + left/right to skip between words, or left/right to cancel a
selection, were causing movement on the screen in the opposite direction
of the glyph on the key. This was surprising and awful UX for RTL users.
This is based on a patch covering the former case by:
Author: Ori Avtalion <ori@avtalion.name>
Date: Tue Apr 20 08:06:23 2010 +0000
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136059
It was "Missing name of pseudo-class", but the real problem is exactly
the opposite: we /have/ been given a name, but it is not a valid one.
Change it to "Invalid name of pseudo-class" to minimise confusion.
gboolean ret for whether gtk_text_iter_backward_line() moved the iter
was declared but not used anywhere. I presume it was meant to be
checked, and it passes now, so let’s do it.
the scrollbar passed in better be either priv->hscrollbar or
priv->vscrollbar. Ensure that by using a simple else instead of an
else-if and a g_assert.
