gtk+ currently depends on the scaling factor and the cairo device scale
of both the backend surfaces and image surfaces to be equal.
Until now we didn't apply a cairo device scale at all and depended on the
automatic scaling of CGContexts. This works when drawing with cairo but
fails in case of image surfaces, which get requested at a too small size.
To make the quartz backend behave more like the X11 one, set the cairo device
scale on the surface in gdk_quartz_ref_cairo_surface(). As this conflicts
with the default scaling done by CGContext (we would get double scaling)
undo the CGContext scaling using CGContextScaleCTM().
This patch is based on the following patches by Brion Vibber:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=740199#c4https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69796#c4https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=763779
When loading a per-theme settings.ini file, look for it in
the same directory where we found the gtk.css file for the
theme. Previously, we were always looking in
$prefix/share/themes/THEME/gtk-3.0/, even if the css was
loaded from somewhere else.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=641354
With this change, we now look in
$XDG_DATA_HOME/themes/THEME/gtk-3.x
$HOME/.themes/THEME/gtk-3.x
$XDG_DATA_DIRS/themes/THEME/gtk-3.x
GTK_DATA_PREFIX/themes/THEME/gtk-3.x
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=641354
If the configure-event gives us the same size as we had before,
which is common for animation resizes, then try to keep the
existing buffer around. This saves us a memfd_create() syscall
on every frame.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=763350
Now that GdkWaylandDeviceData is gone, the functions prefixed
"gdk_wayland_device_" and taking a GdkWaylandSeat as first
parameter feel out of place. Renaming those makes it more obvious
that it's seat functions.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=763859
It's the same than gdk_device_get_seat() nowadays. Also, rename the
usages of GdkWaylandDeviceData to GdkWaylandSeat in the functions
affected by the removal.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=763859
When animating, we might be changing the size allocation of the previous
stack child. However, we were not querying the size in the process
meaning you would often see warnings about allocating the size without
knowing what it should be.
This simply adds an innocuous size request, since responding to last_child
sizing requests is not all that critical in the transition.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=763900
