morphology, blur.
[Reland with fixed tests.]
Because we're computing "backwards" from a clip rect of destination
pixels to be filled to the required source pixels, we should use tail
recursion rather than head recursion in onFilterBounds().
This actually only makes a difference for drop-shadow, where
the computation is non-commutative. Blur and morphology commute, but I
moved them to tail recursion anyway for clarity (so all onFilterBounds
use tail recursion).
BUG=skia:
R=bsalomon@google.com
Author: senorblanco@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/481273005
Reason for revert:
This CL is currently breaking the Win7 and Win8 bots on some of the new tests (in DM).
Original issue's description:
> Fix recursive computation of filter bounds for drop shadow,
> morphology, blur.
>
> Because we're computing "backwards" from a clip rect of destination
> pixels to be filled to the required source pixels, we should use tail
> recursion rather than head recursion in onFilterBounds().
>
> This actually only makes a difference for drop-shadow, where
> the computation is non-commutative. Blur and morphology commute, but I
> moved them to tail recursion anyway for clarity (so all onFilterBounds
> use tail recursion).
>
> BUG=skia:
>
> Committed: https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/28648fe4a69b0cee8df42b5966e4e645c3aabefbR=bsalomon@google.com, senorblanco@chromium.orgTBR=bsalomon@google.com, senorblanco@chromium.org
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=skia:
Author: djsollen@google.com
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/504773003
morphology, blur.
Because we're computing "backwards" from a clip rect of destination
pixels to be filled to the required source pixels, we should use tail
recursion rather than head recursion in onFilterBounds().
This actually only makes a difference for drop-shadow, where
the computation is non-commutative. Blur and morphology commute, but I
moved them to tail recursion anyway for clarity (so all onFilterBounds
use tail recursion).
BUG=skia:
R=bsalomon@google.com
Author: senorblanco@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/481273005
In SkBBoxHierarchyRecord:
Since the bounds we pass to saveLayer are in the pre-filtering
coordinate space, they aren't correct for determining the actual
device pixels touched by the saveLayer in this case.
The easiest fix for now is to pass the clip bounds, since the final
draw done in restore() will never draw outside the clip.
In SkRecordDraw:
We do adjust the bounds passed to saveLayer, so we just need to make
sure that when we're using a paint that may affect transparent black,
we ignore the calculated bounds of draw ops and use the clip intersected
with those adjusted bounds.
See originally crrev.com/497773002
BUG=skia:
R=reed@google.com, senorblanco@chromium.org, junov@chromium.org, mtklein@google.com
Author: mtklein@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/496963003
The only substantive change in this CL is skipping atlasing
for any layers that are involved in nesting. Prior versions
have allowed nesting layers to be atlased.
--------------------------------------------------------
All times are on Windows with a repeat count of 200.
Format is: <time in ms> (<# of glBindframebuffer calls>)
How to interpret this:
For the boogie page:
both columns should be the same (since boogie has no
nested layers)
without the new API the tiled case doesn't show any real
benefit from hoisting
For the carsvg page:
The nesting change does increase the number of FBO
switches but doesn't kill performance
Because of the location & size of the layers the
tile case does show some improvement (even
without the new API)
boogie
-------
w/o nested change w/ nested change
simple 5.62 (811) N/A
tiled 7.72 (811) N/A
simple w/ hoisting 5.23 (409) 5.77 (409)
(but no caching)
tiled w/ hoisting 7.57 (809) 7.49 (809)
(but no caching)
carsvg
------
w/o nested change w/ nested change
simple 60.37 (141990) N/A
tiled 115.13 (256929) N/A
simple w/ hoisting 41.57 (64570) 42.82 (72279)
(but no caching)
tiled w/ hoisting 84.24 (154352) 84.71 (165630)
(but no caching)
R=bsalomon@google.com
Author: robertphillips@google.com
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/476833004
- Remove SkData double-unref to fix assert.
- Re-enable the test with DEBUG (was disabled due to double-unref assert).
- SkRandom instead of rand() for thread-safety.
- General clean up of the test for readability.
Motivation: I am investigating turning on SkFlate::HaveFlate on Windows.
R=mtklein@google.com
Author: halcanary@google.com
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/464333002
Extreme implicit quartic equations solve to roots that are different
enough that they appear to have failed. In this case, fall back on
binary searching to find an intersection.
Relax the condition when this happens; don't give up just because the
computed implicit root points aren't remotely the same.
TBR=reed
BUG=skia:2808
Author: caryclark@google.com
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/456383003
For now this only creates a degenerate bounding box hierarchy where all ops
just have maximal bounds. I will flesh out FillBounds in future CL(s).
Not quite sure why QuadTree and TileGrid aren't drawing right---haven't even
looked at the diffs yet---so I've disabled those test modes for now. RTree
seems fine, so that'll at least get us coverage for all this new plumbing.
BUG=skia:
R=robertphillips@google.com, mtklein@google.com, reed@google.com
Author: mtklein@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/454123003
The recorder optimizer's pattern matcher was accepting command sequences
when it shouldn't have.
In the submitted case, and the pattern matcher was looking for:
saveLayer, drawBitmap, restore
and in the rendering for the submitted case, the sequence of commands
were:
saveLayer, drawBitmap, drawBitmap, restore
This sequence was improperly accepted by the matcher, and the optimizer
reduced the sequence to:
drawBitmap, drawBitmap
where the opacity from the saveLayer paint argument was applied
to the first drawBitmap only.
The user-visible effect in Chrome was a flashing effect on an image
caused by incorrect (too-high) opacity.
The patch adds a Skia test to check for pixel colour values in
a similarly structured recording. All other Skia tests pass.
Blink layout tests also pass with this change.
BUG=chromium:344987
R=robertphillips@google.com, reed@google.com, mtklein@google.com
Author: dneto@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/430503004
Add a unique ID to SkImageFilter, and use it as part
of a persistent cache of image-filtered results. This is used for
caching frame-to-frame coherent filters.
We also keep track of which filter subtrees do not reference the
src input, and use a GenID of zero for the src input in that case.
That way, subtrees which are not dependent on the filter input can be
cached independently of it.
This gives approximately a 4X speedup on
letmespellitoutforyou.com/samples/svg/filter_terrain.svg on Z620
and Nexus10. The cache key consists of the uniqueID of the filter, the
clip bounds, the CTM and the genID of the input bitmap.
Since this does not yet handle the case where the input primitives
(and part of the resulting filter tree) are unchanged, we have
to keep around the external cache for that painting case.
When the work to cache unchanging input primitives is done, the
old cache can be removed, and the new UniqueIDCache will be renamed
to Cache.
R=bsalomon@google.com, mtklein@google.com
Author: senorblanco@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/414483003
https://codereview.chromium.org/283093002 fixed some bugs in pipe memory
allocation, but also introduced one of its own: nearly every block requested
from needOpBytes() got its own 16K allocation.
The correct logic is to take the requested size, add four more bytes for a
DrawOp, make sure that's 4-byte aligned, then check to see if there's enough
space for that in the current block. If there's not, allocate at least
MIN_BLOCK_SIZE bytes to fit the request.
The bug is that I moved that round-up-to-MIN_BLOCK_SIZE step before checking
for space in the current block. This means most (all?) blocks will be 16K but
never seem to have room to fit another allocation. You need 8 bytes? You get
16K. You need 8 more bytes? Nope, can't fit that. Here's a new 16K...
This reverts the change to the test I made then, which really should have
tipped me off. It was testing exactly this bug.
BUG=372671
R=tomhudson@chromium.org, tomhudson@google.com
Author: mtklein@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/433463003
Refactor CanvasStateTest to pull out functions which can
either be called directly or from a shared library. Add a
command line flag to pass in the path to a library to open
to call those functions from.
Separate different CanvasTest tests into separate DEF_TEST
tests. This allows them to be run in parallel.
Move the ifdefs outside of function declarations to skip
running CanvasTest tests which do nothing.
Add the canvas_state_lib target. It is a shared library that
exports some functions to be called by another version of
Skia.
BUG=b/15693384
R=djsollen@google.com, reed@google.com
Author: scroggo@google.com
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/400043003
Share command flags between dm and unit tests.
Also, allow dm's core to be included by itself and iOSShell.
Command line flags that are the same (or nearly the same) in DM
and in skia_tests have been moved to common_flags. Authors,
please check to see that the shared common flag is correct for
the tool.
For iOS, the 'tool_main' entry point has a wrapper to allow multiple
tools to be statically linked in the iOSShell.
Since SkCommandLineFlags::Parse can only be called once, these calls
are disabled in the IOS build.
Since the iOS app directory is dynamically assigned a name, use '@' to
select it. (This is the same convention chosen by the Mobile Harness
iOS file system utilities.)
Move the heart of dm.gyp into dm.gypi so that it can be included by
itself and iOSShell.gyp.
Add tools/flags/SkCommonFlags.* to define and declare common
command line flags.
Add support for dm to iOSShell.
BUG=skia:
R=scroggo@google.com, mtklein@google.com, jvanverth@google.com, bsalomon@google.com
Author: caryclark@google.com
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/389653004
