This cleans up tools/ code, or code that should have been in tools/.
The only interesting code change trims features off of PictureRenderer.
It's still in use by a few useful-looking tools.
BUG=skia:
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1416913003
suppressed and bugs around conics.
The conic calculation for a subdivided w was just wrong.
Also added debugging to template intersection to initialize
reused structures and dump additional data.
TBR=reed@google.com
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1413763002
Also other minor improvements in sync scripts.
In BUILD.public, include all files under resources as data dependencies for DM. Omit newly failing DM tests and add newly passing DM tests.
Adds the OpenClipart "license" to LICENSE per comment in google3 CL 100158380.
Corresponding google3 CL is 105602927.
BUG=skia:
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1406283002
It's only used by a couple unit tests. We have other ways of getting
the same quality testing of our ref-count code now (e.g. TSAN).
BUG=skia:
CQ_EXTRA_TRYBOTS=client.skia.compile:Build-Ubuntu-GCC-x86_64-Release-CMake-Trybot,Build-Mac10.9-Clang-x86_64-Release-CMake-Trybot
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1408213005
In order to have a central pinch point for bitmap allocation, change all
filters to use Proxy::createDevice() instead of allocating memory
directly with SkBitmap::tryAllocPixels().
This will aid in moving filter backing stores and caches to
discardable memory.
BUG=skia:
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1414843003
Reason for revert:
re-land once layout test have been disabled (so they can be rebased)
Original issue's description:
> Update feSpotLight to match spec
>
> This change updates feSpotLight to match the spec via two changes:
>
> 1) specularExponent is ignored if the spotlight has no coneAngle (GPU
> bug only). This change updates the GPU path so that it matches the
> CPU path and the spec in this regard.
>
> 2) specularExponent is clamped to the 1-128 range. The spec does not
> specify a clamp for the specularExponent attribute of feSpotLight.
> Note that the spec *does* specify this clamp for the
> specularExponent attribute of feSpecularLighting. It looks like we
> incorrectly applied this to both specularExponent attributes.
>
> This change (along with a parallel change in Blink) allows us to pass
> the SVG filter effects conformance test here:
> http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/Test/20110816/harness/htmlObject/filters-light-01-f.html
>
> Additionally, this brings our behavior in line with Safari and Edge’s
> behavior on this filter.
>
> Two new cases were added to gm/lighting.cpp to catch these issues:
> - The existing spotlight case exercised the path where our specular
> exponent was between 1-128 and had a limiting cone angle.
> - The first new spotlight case exercises the path where our specular
> exponent is between 1-128 and we do not have a limiting cone angle.
> - The second new spotlight case exercises the path where the specular
> exponent is not within the 1-128 range, to ensure that we don’t
> incorrectly clip to this range.
>
> BUG=472849
>
> Committed: https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/c84ccb070258db2803a9e8f532bfe7239a737063TBR=senorblanco@google.com,senorblanco@chromium.org,bsalomon@google.com,ericrk@chromium.org
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=472849
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1417463006
This change updates feSpotLight to match the spec via two changes:
1) specularExponent is ignored if the spotlight has no coneAngle (GPU
bug only). This change updates the GPU path so that it matches the
CPU path and the spec in this regard.
2) specularExponent is clamped to the 1-128 range. The spec does not
specify a clamp for the specularExponent attribute of feSpotLight.
Note that the spec *does* specify this clamp for the
specularExponent attribute of feSpecularLighting. It looks like we
incorrectly applied this to both specularExponent attributes.
This change (along with a parallel change in Blink) allows us to pass
the SVG filter effects conformance test here:
http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/Test/20110816/harness/htmlObject/filters-light-01-f.html
Additionally, this brings our behavior in line with Safari and Edge’s
behavior on this filter.
Two new cases were added to gm/lighting.cpp to catch these issues:
- The existing spotlight case exercised the path where our specular
exponent was between 1-128 and had a limiting cone angle.
- The first new spotlight case exercises the path where our specular
exponent is between 1-128 and we do not have a limiting cone angle.
- The second new spotlight case exercises the path where the specular
exponent is not within the 1-128 range, to ensure that we don’t
incorrectly clip to this range.
BUG=472849
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1403403003
premultiplied colors, however the flag for whether or not to do this,
which is present in their parent filters, is dropped when creating the
GL implementations. This change adds logic to forward the value from
the parent filter to the GL implementation.
This makes GPU behavior match software and fixes a WebKit
LayoutTest. See referenced bug.
BUG=473186
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1410553002
Drawing with SkRect::MakeLargest() isn't actually working.
This appears to work correctly, and even be correct.
(It's a case explicitly handled by SkCanvas::onDrawPath).
BUG=skia:
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1411303002
The result is that the set of "generic" imagefilters (e.g. SkColorFilterImageFilter) that use drawing commands to return their results will now stay in the same domain as their src (i.e. gpu-src --> gpu-dst).
ApplyFilterGM exercises this, and now asserts this same-domain invariant.
BUG=skia:4467
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1401053003
imgblur is intended to establish a ground truth for debugging mask blur issues. It performs a brute force (non-separable) Gaussian blur of the provided image.
The blur code itself is in sk_tools_utils so it can be more easily used programmatically in other places (e.g., blur unit tests).
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1384203002
Now, that we are subsetting, fX0 is not necessarily less than
fSrcWidth (since fSrcWidth is really the subset width).
Ex: We may want a 10 pixel subset starting twenty pixels from the
left edge. In that case, fX0=20 and fSrcWidth=10.
Let's rename the width as fSubsetWidth to avoid confusion
and remove the check.
BUG=skia:
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1407603003
