[Retry of crrev.com/293993021, which caused problems with 'ninja all' in Chromium. First patch set if a clean apply
of crrev.com/293993021. Subsequent sets are the actual fix
for that issue.]
If the embedder chooses, the 'natives' (library sources) and the
precompiled startup blob can be written to files during the build
process and handed over to V8 at startup. The main purpose would be
to reduce the size of the compiled binary for space constrained
platforms.
The build-time option is off by default. Nothing should change if
it's not enabled.
BUG=
R=jochen@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/315033002
git-svn-id: https://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@21696 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
If the embedder chooses, the 'natives' (library sources) and the
precompiled startup blob can be written to files during the build
process and handed over to V8 at startup. The main purpose would be
to reduce the size of the compiled binary for space constrained
platforms.
The build-time option is off by default. Nothing should change if
it's not enabled.
BUG=
R=bmeurer@chromium.org, jochen@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/293993021
git-svn-id: https://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@21646 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
v8::DontDelete is set for Unforgeable properties, so just not setting PROHIBITS_OVERWRITING should be enough.
The secondary "feature" of not allowing accessors to be installed in extending objects is incorrect and confusing, given that it only applies to accessors but not to regular properties:
Object.defineProperty({__proto__:window}, "location", { value: 10 })
works where
Object.defineProperty({__proto__:window}, "location", { get: function() {} })
doesn't work.
LOG=y
R=dcarney@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/306203002
git-svn-id: https://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@21596 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
If the embedder calls V8::TerminateExecution while we're running microtasks, bail out
and clear any pending microtasks.
All other exceptions are simply swallowed. No current Blink or V8 microtasks throw, this
just ensures something sane happens if another embedder decides to pass a throwing
microtask (or if ours unexpectedly throw due to, e.g., stack exhaustion).
BUG=371566
LOG=Y
R=mstarzinger@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/294943009
git-svn-id: https://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@21574 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
[2nd try, after the previous version broke the build]
Currently, this code will compile:
SomePointer* p = ...;
ReturnValue r = ...;
r.Set(p);
What happens is that ReturnValue::Set has no pointer-ish overloads, but
a bool one, and hence C++ will convert the pointer to a bool and use
the Set(bool) overload. In other words, the example above is equivalent
to: r.Set(p ? true : false); Which probably isn't what the author had
in mind. This change adds a Set(void*) overload whose body forces a
compile error, to prevent this from happening inadvertently. The only
use of this indeed turned out to be an error.
(Said error was fixed/removed in crrev.com/267393002.)
Why was crrev.com/240013004 reverted?
The orginal version compiled fine on gcc (+ MSVC), but not on clang.
There's no clang try-bots, but the ASAN-based buildbots used clang
and hence the build broke. I'm slightly unsure on why, but clang -
unlike those other compilers - eagerly compiled the non-compilable
setter, which predictably broke. Now, the non-compilable setter uses
the same template logic that all other, comparable cases use. I've
tried 'make qc' with both gcc and clang versions.
BUG=
R=dcarney@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/279883002
git-svn-id: https://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@21228 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
Reason for revert:
Looks like this broke the "V8 Linux64 ASAN" build.
Original issue's description:
> Prevent calls to ReturnValue::Set with pointer-valued types.
>
> Currently, this code will compile:
> SomePointer* p = ...;
> ReturnValue r = ...;
> r.Set(p);
>
> What happens is that ReturnValue::Set has no pointer-ish overloads, but
> a bool one, and hence C++ will convert the pointer to a bool and use
> the Set(bool) overload. In other words, the example above is equivalent
> to: r.Set(p ? true : false); Which probably isn't what the author had
> in mind. This change adds a Set(void*) overload whose body forces a
> compile error, to prevent this from happening inadvertently. The only
> use of this indeed turned out to be an error.
>
> (Said error was fixed/removed in crrev.com/267393002.)
>
> BUG=
> R=dcarney@chromium.org
>
> Committed: https://code.google.com/p/v8/source/detail?r=21217R=ishell@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/271113002
git-svn-id: https://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@21219 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
Currently, this code will compile:
SomePointer* p = ...;
ReturnValue r = ...;
r.Set(p);
What happens is that ReturnValue::Set has no pointer-ish overloads, but
a bool one, and hence C++ will convert the pointer to a bool and use
the Set(bool) overload. In other words, the example above is equivalent
to: r.Set(p ? true : false); Which probably isn't what the author had
in mind. This change adds a Set(void*) overload whose body forces a
compile error, to prevent this from happening inadvertently. The only
use of this indeed turned out to be an error.
(Wait for issue 364025 before submitting.)
BUG=
R=dcarney@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/240013004
git-svn-id: https://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@21217 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
