Drive-by fix to align what builds the test runner considers to be able
to have shared memory features and what builds can create a shared
Isolate.
Bug: v8:12007
Change-Id: I151513ccbfbee31e5b35c5ce8e9192732eabfee2
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3421507
Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Shu-yu Guo <syg@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#78824}
The allocatable registers have holes, so not all FP registers are one
half of a valid SIMD register. Thus check if {GetAliases} returned an
allocatable SIMD register before looking up if that register is being
used. Otherwise we run into a DCHECK because {simd_reg} is invalid.
The bug was only introduced recently: https://crrev.com/c/3404780R=thibaudm@chromium.org
Bug: chromium:1290079, v8:12330
Change-Id: I99df1645cfeec375daec82dbf41c110b5474339c
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3412075
Reviewed-by: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#78742}
Moves between stack slots are rare; they mostly happen for tail calls
or for multi-return blocks. The bug exists since a long time, but was
only uncovered by the fuzzer now.
R=ahaas@chromium.org
Bug: chromium:1289678
Change-Id: Ibb0917717c6b7a468f5fcbb01be34267ba06a449
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3406749
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#78736}
This is similar to the previous SIMD spilling fixes, but this time at
block merges. The logic is similar to the existing cases, but not quite
the same. I did not find a nice way to unify the different locations
where we check for SIMD register overlap.
R=thibaudm@chromium.org
Bug: chromium:1283395, v8:12330
Change-Id: I5ab9b6831368cbce40b8368e4ec7954e985bff96
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3404780
Reviewed-by: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#78720}
Allow Wasm to generate calls directly to Fast API C functions.
This massively reduces the overhead of these calls (~300%).
Currently options parameter is not supported.
This is a reland of
https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3364356
with a fix to a data race.
Bug: chromium:1052746
Change-Id: I8c1c255419496d03a94ec2b443329842469586d5
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3398394
Reviewed-by: Maya Lekova <mslekova@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Manos Koukoutos <manoskouk@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Camillo Bruni <cbruni@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Paolo Severini <paolosev@microsoft.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#78714}
Use the FatalProcessOutOfMemory function such that tooling recognizes
these crashes as OOM's.
Drive-by: Skip one more test that leads to such stack overflows.
Fixed: v8:12555, chromium:1288456
Bug: v8:12472
Change-Id: Ib9203a4aa0487744f7cea9a212aeeffda579ae23
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3401861
Auto-Submit: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#78692}
Recursive ToNode node generation may overflow the stack for large
graphs. As a quick fix, insert periodic stack overflow checks in
selected ToNode methods.
As a more permanent fix, in the future we could abort gracefully
(instead of crashing on a CHECK), and/or refactor into iterative node
generation.
Bug: v8:12472
Change-Id: Ie5fbe838c5f6a5192d7d9b44bfe6f6c76a8d26e7
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3398112
Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#78667}
This reverts commit bd72152e7d.
Reason for revert: TSAN reports a data race, please see https://ci.chromium.org/ui/p/v8/builders/ci/V8%20Linux64%20TSAN%20-%20isolates/18124/overview
Original change's description:
> [fastcall] Add Wasm entry for Fast API calls
>
> Allow Wasm to generate calls directly to Fast API C functions.
> This massively reduces the overhead of these calls (~300%).
> Currently options parameter is not supported.
>
> This is a rebase of the work originally done by devsnek in:
> https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2718666.
>
> Bug: chromium:1052746
> Change-Id: I1bb1de68b440044cc8a4e528adf9d8e0e6692a07
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3364356
> Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Manos Koukoutos <manoskouk@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Maya Lekova <mslekova@chromium.org>
> Commit-Queue: Paolo Severini <paolosev@microsoft.com>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#78664}
Bug: chromium:1052746
Change-Id: I957708cf1cff6ee8f90678ee48428f5c12f75a53
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3398121
Auto-Submit: Maya Lekova <mslekova@chromium.org>
Owners-Override: Maya Lekova <mslekova@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Rubber Stamper <rubber-stamper@appspot.gserviceaccount.com>
Bot-Commit: Rubber Stamper <rubber-stamper@appspot.gserviceaccount.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#78665}
Allow Wasm to generate calls directly to Fast API C functions.
This massively reduces the overhead of these calls (~300%).
Currently options parameter is not supported.
This is a rebase of the work originally done by devsnek in:
https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2718666.
Bug: chromium:1052746
Change-Id: I1bb1de68b440044cc8a4e528adf9d8e0e6692a07
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3364356
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Manos Koukoutos <manoskouk@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Maya Lekova <mslekova@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Paolo Severini <paolosev@microsoft.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#78664}
Similar to the case of fixed registers, we need to consider both cases:
A SIMD register might collide with either the low or high FP register,
or the FP register might collide with a previously allocated SIMD
register. We did only consider the first case so far.
R=thibaudm@chromium.org
Bug: chromium:1286253, v8:12330
Change-Id: Id4c995586cc8b97a2e131ee9d3417525e409bcef
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3380597
Reviewed-by: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#78633}
The original CL introduced a test that does not work when it is executed
concurrently on multiple isolates. This CL skips this test
configuration.
Original change's description:
> [wasm] Lazy compilation after deserialization
>
> The serialization format contains one boolean flag per function which
> specifies whether the function code exists in the serialized module or
> not. With this CL, this boolean flag is extended to a three-value flag
> which indicates whether the function exists, and if not, whether the
> function was executed before serialization. This information can then be
> used upon deserialization to compile only those functions that were
> executed before serialization.
>
> Design doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1U3uqq4njqLqFhr1G2sU_bmpQxY-3bvfG55udSb-DvA4/edit?usp=sharing
>
> Bug: v8:12281
Change-Id: I36ce90b37736172aa01c47ab04e154ec8ea2d8aa
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3380590
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#78564}
The test was added in https://crrev.com/c/3372910, but needs to be
skipped on non-SIMD hardware because it contains SIMD instructions.
R=thibaudm@chromium.org
Bug: v8:12330, chromium:1284980
Change-Id: Ifaede466b24aea4f9ef6b062414a31698bcca864
No-Try: true
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3372917
Auto-Submit: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Deepti Gandluri <gdeepti@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Deepti Gandluri <gdeepti@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#78517}
If a fixed register is defined for an input, we did only spill the
sibling SIMD register if the other sibling was allocated. This is not
correct. If only the sibling is in use (e.g. s1 colliding with q0) we
also have to spill that sibling.
R=mslekova@chromium.org
Bug: chromium:1283042, v8:12330
Change-Id: I6a22eaf461774a0b4603ec3ff17062134a528161
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3359615
Reviewed-by: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Maya Lekova <mslekova@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#78483}
The mid-tier register allocator did not handle block merges correctly
where a SIMD register was partially overlapping with a non-SIMD
register. This CL fixes that, and reorders the code to allow for early
exits.
R=mslekova@chromium.org
Bug: chromium:1282224, v8:12330
Change-Id: I2e9275d5c1aaa764ecb63fbf8fa197b68d6b6c3c
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3358294
Reviewed-by: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Maya Lekova <mslekova@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#78482}
Without simple FP aliasing, a SIMD register will overlap with two
floating-point registers. If we spill an FP register to use it for a
SIMD operation, we need to make sure to also spill the "sibling" FP
register.
R=leszeks@chromium.org
Bug: v8:12330, chromium:1271244
Change-Id: I7fdc6cb8da35d66b4862a8a913ba4ff906cf05aa
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3347576
Reviewed-by: Maya Lekova <mslekova@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#78414}
This CL renames a number of things related to the V8 sandbox.
Mainly, what used to be under V8_HEAP_SANDBOX is now under
V8_SANDBOXED_EXTERNAL_POINTERS, while the previous V8 VirtualMemoryCage
is now simply the V8 Sandbox:
V8_VIRTUAL_MEMORY_CAGE => V8_SANDBOX
V8_HEAP_SANDBOX => V8_SANDBOXED_EXTERNAL_POINTERS
V8_CAGED_POINTERS => V8_SANDBOXED_POINTERS
V8VirtualMemoryCage => Sandbox
CagedPointer => SandboxedPointer
fake cage => partially reserved sandbox
src/security => src/sandbox
This naming scheme should simplify things: the sandbox is now the large
region of virtual address space inside which V8 mainly operates and
which should be considered untrusted. Mechanisms like sandboxed pointers
are then used to attempt to prevent escapes from the sandbox (i.e.
corruption of memory outside of it). Furthermore, the new naming scheme
avoids the confusion with the various other "cages" in V8, in
particular, the VirtualMemoryCage class, by dropping that name entirely.
Future sandbox features are developed under their own V8_SANDBOX_X flag,
and will, once final, be merged into V8_SANDBOX. Current future features
are sandboxed external pointers (using the external pointer table), and
sandboxed pointers (pointers guaranteed to point into the sandbox, e.g.
because they are encoded as offsets). This CL then also introduces a new
build flag, v8_enable_sandbox_future, which enables all future features.
Bug: v8:10391
Change-Id: I5174ea8f5ab40fb96a04af10853da735ad775c96
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux64_heap_sandbox_dbg_ng,v8_linux_arm64_sim_heap_sandbox_dbg_ng
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3322981
Reviewed-by: Hannes Payer <hpayer@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Igor Sheludko <ishell@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Samuel Groß <saelo@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#78384}
This is a reland of 863bc2b88a
Diff to original:
- Don't eliminate GC observable stores that were temporarily
unobservable during traversal.
- Skip the previously added test for single-generation
- Add new test
Original change's description:
> [turbofan] Improve StoreStoreElimination
>
> Previously, StoreStoreElimination handled allocations as
> "can observe anything". This is pretty conservative and prohibits
> elimination of repeated double stores to the same field.
> With this CL allocations are changed to "observes initializing or
> transitioning stores".
> This way it is guaranteed that initializing stores to a freshly created
> object or stores that are part of a map transition are not eliminated
> before allocations (that can trigger GC), but allows elimination of
> non-initializing, non-transitioning, unobservable stores in the
> presence of allocations.
>
> Bug: v8:12200
> Change-Id: Ie1419696b9c8cb7c39aecf38d9f08102177b2c0f
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3295449
> Commit-Queue: Patrick Thier <pthier@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Maya Lekova <mslekova@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#78230}
Bug: v8:12200, chromium:1276923, v8:12477
Change-Id: Ied45ee28ac12b370f7b232d2d338f93e10fea6b4
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3320460
Reviewed-by: Maya Lekova <mslekova@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Patrick Thier <pthier@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#78349}
Treat all stack pointers as roots:
- Maintain a global linked-list of StackMemories
- Update StackFrameIterator to process inactive stacks
- Visit roots in all inactive stacks (including root marking and root
pointer updating).
Drive-by:
- Fix some issues uncovered by the test
- Refactor the builtin constants
R=mlippautz@chromium.org,ahaas@chromium.org
Bug: v8:12191
Change-Id: I5b6381f9818166e2eabf80dd59135673dddb2afc
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3310932
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Lippautz <mlippautz@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#78291}
This is a reland of 3ee4804f83.
The CL was originally reverted for blink test failures. Since the
revert, the blink top-level await flag has been removed.
Original change's description:
> [top-level-await] Remove --harmony-top-level-await
>
> TLA has been shipped since v8.9.
>
> Bug: v8:9344, chromium:1271114
> Change-Id: Ibebf21da8bacb1f0d212390133847495ad8553e5
> Reviewed-on:
https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3307103
> Commit-Queue: Shu-yu Guo <syg@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Camillo Bruni <cbruni@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Igor Sheludko <ishell@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#78169}
Bug: v8:9344, chromium:1271114
Change-Id: I96a9641967a23a12ba2467a69e5859ad8647f3e3
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3318717
Commit-Queue: Shu-yu Guo <syg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#78261}
Capture group names were extended in
https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/1869/fileshttps://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/1932/files
RegExpIdentifierName now explicitly enables unicode (+U) for
unicode escape sequences; likewise, surrogate pairs are now allowed
unconditionally.
The implementation simply switches on unicode temporarily while
parsing a capture group name.
Good news everyone, /(?<𝒜>.)/ is now a legal pattern.
Bug: v8:10384
Change-Id: Ida805998eb91ed717b2e05d81d52c1ed61104e3f
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3233234
Auto-Submit: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#77722}
The old "gc-safe" implementation to get the off-heap type information
wasn't quite as gc-safe as it needs to be.
Due to parallel compaction, we shouldn't check for forwarding pointers;
instead we should rely on the old location of the Foreign, but make sure
not to look at its Map (which might be a forwarding pointer).
Bug: v8:12185
Change-Id: I4570b00a5300a0d7ed8c042fa21d355373e0e691
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3260513
Commit-Queue: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Lippautz <mlippautz@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#77707}
There is a bit of a contradictory register requirement in the
instruction selector for i64x2.mul. We want dst == lhs (when AVX not
supported), but we also want lhs and rhs to be unique (to ensure that
that they don't alias the temp).
We remove the requirement for dst == lhs, since the code gen can handle
both cases (dst == lhs, dst != lhs), at the expense of 1 movaps.
Bug: chromium:1264462
Change-Id: Ia48572412b1f6e0da3551880d8b68a03f42fe2a3
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3253661
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#77625}
The stack-switching test is not expected to pass yet if a GC happens
in the runtime call or in the wasm call.
R=ahaas@chromium.org
Bug: v8:12191, v8:12344
Change-Id: Iba66be58c1abd2ffbb22bbd7d34f8df0246a2a92
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3250900
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#77594}
This is a reland of dca83ff7e7
Relanding without changes, looks like the bot that failed succeeded
again before the revert landed (https://ci.chromium.org/ui/p/v8/builders/ci/V8%20Linux64%20TSAN/38915/overview)
Original change's description:
> [snapshot] Fix two stress_snapshot failures
>
> 1. Stress snapshot discards code on SFIs, which breaks flushing
> invariants. Add --stress-snapshot to those invariants.
> 2. Another test failing on IsScript, added it to the disabled list.
>
> Change-Id: Ic415923a9cc96d34b74f7450b29be99c1b53d077
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3229375
> Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
> Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
> Auto-Submit: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#77430}
Change-Id: I18fd290c3794d90addc2a94765d57a3ee3ceab86
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3229563
Auto-Submit: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#77447}
1. Stress snapshot discards code on SFIs, which breaks flushing
invariants. Add --stress-snapshot to those invariants.
2. Another test failing on IsScript, added it to the disabled list.
Change-Id: Ic415923a9cc96d34b74f7450b29be99c1b53d077
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3229375
Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Auto-Submit: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#77430}
