This does a conversion to/from GBytes and is intended for writing tests.
It's really crude but it works.
And that probably means Alex will (ab)use it for broadway.
I had originally thought I'd use GskShadow for box-shadow, but didn't in
the end.
So now it's only used for text-shadow and icon-shadow, and those don't
have a spread.
VLAs are not supported by Visual Studio and possibly other compilers that
are supported by GTK+-3.90+, and probably never will be, although it is a
C99 specification, and it became optional for C11. It is also not a part
of the newer compiler requirements that are listed out for GTK+-3.90.x.
There exist concerns about the implementation of VLAs in compilers that
support them as well, so change it to a g_newa() approach.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=773299
Instead of a separate allocation for any arrays in the render node
we allocate these as part of the render node itself, using C99
flexible arrays.
This leads to less allocations, which is nice, but the major reason
for this is that it allows us to change the allocation scheme further
in the future. For instance, we want to do stack-like allocation so
that all the render-nodes for an entire frame are allocated in one
(or a few) chunks.
Instead of constantly recalculating this (especially recursively for
parents!) we do it only on construction, because everything is
immutable anyway. Also, most nodes had a bounds already and can
use the new parent member instead.
We also do direct access to the node bounds rather than calling
gsk_render_node_get_bounds in various places, which means
we do less copying.
This causes the snapshotting algorithm to dump all widget nodes into
their own container node. We then name that group accordingly (ie
"GtkSwitch<0xdeadbeef>") so you can easily see which node belongs where.
The feature is toggleable in the inspector's visual tab.
There's a few problems with it, becuse GtkSnapshot optimized container
nodes away if they are not needed, so we are losing some widgets...
When the first/last color stop is not at 0%/100%, we need to start the
repeating at their offsets and not at 0%/100%.
Attached reftest demonstrates the problem.
Instead of making people intiialize a rectangle and then applying border
radius manually, provide a constructor that does it for them.
While doing that, also allow people to instead request the padding box
or the content box.
Refactor all relevant code to use this new constructor.
... and make the icon rendering code use it.
This requires moving even more shadow renering code into GSK, but so be
it. At least the "shadows not implemented" warning is now gone!
The node draws a solid CSS border, which can be used to cover everything
but dashed and dotted borders (double, groove, inset, ...).
For different border styles, we overlay multiple nodes and set their
colors to transparent for sides with non-matching styles.
