The bench improves from 39 to 30, about half from porting to Sk2f, half from
x.add(x) instead of x.multiply(two).
Remove Sk4f Load2/store2 now that we have Sk2f.
BUG=skia:
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1019773004
(This is essentially a revert of https://codereview.chromium.org/503833002/.)
This was necessary back when SkPaint was flattened even for in-process use. Now that we only flatten SkPaint for cross-process use, there's no need to serialize UniqueIDs.
Note: SkDropShadowImageFilter is being constructed with a croprect and UniqueID (of 0) in Blink. I've made the uniqueID param default to 0 temporarily, until this rolls in and Blink can be changed. (Blink can't be changed first, since unlike the other filters, there's no constructor that takes a cropRect but not a uniqueID.)
BUG=skia:
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1019493002
malloc_usable_size does not exist in UCLIBC, so fall back to just
returning 0 for SkVarAlloc::heap_size().
BUG=skia:
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1006073003
SK_BUILD_FOR_WIN is no longer a valid way to check for building on
Windows (go figure). Build everywhere.
Remove the REPORTER_ASSERT, which was the failing part. It also isn't
necessary for the test, which is just that we are not leaking an
SkColorTable.
Also fix indentation.
TBR=bungeman@google.com,mtklein@google.com
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=skia:3457
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1002583002
Before the fix, we could use a stale cache of the clipbounds in quickReject. Often this could return false negatives, meaning we would try to draw more than we should (it would eventually be really clipped). Occasionally this could also report false positives (if the layer were outside of the normal canvas bounds, e.g. a layer with an offset imagefilter).
BUG=skia:
NOTREECHECKS=True
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/983243003
Clarify asColorFilter ...
1. Rename to isColorFilterNode for DAG reduction
2. Add asAColorFilter for removing the imagefilter entirely (future use-case)
Need layouttest rebaseline suppression before this can land in chrome...
https://codereview.chromium.org/984023004/
BUG=skia:
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/982933002
When computed, the RTree for an SkPicture will have a root
bounds that reflects the best bounding information available,
rather than the best estimate at the time the picture recorder
is created. Given that creators frequently don't know ahead of
time what will be drawn, the RTree bound is often tighter.
Perf testing on Chrome indicates a small raster performance
advantage. For upcoming painting changes in Chrome the
performance advantage is much larger.
BUG=
Committed: https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/2dd3b6647dc726f36fd8774b3d0d2e83b493aeac
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/971803002
The tests assert on Sk_ColorGREEN, which is in BRGA non-premul. Read the
pixels in same color format.
Currently the tests pass on all platforms because GREEN is fully opaque
and the component stays in the same place both on BGRA and
RGBA. However, hypothetically somebody could copy-paste the assertion
for further tests but use, say, RED. This creates latent error that is
only visible on some platforms like mac.
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/989463002
Reason for revert:
Need to suppress these for rebaselining, so reverting for now.
Regressions: Unexpected image-only failures (5)
css3/filters/effect-brightness-clamping-hw.html [ ImageOnlyFailure ]
css3/filters/effect-combined-hw.html [ ImageOnlyFailure ]
virtual/slimmingpaint/css3/filters/effect-brightness-clamping-hw.html [ ImageOnlyFailure ]
virtual/slimmingpaint/css3/filters/effect-combined-hw.html [ ImageOnlyFailure ]
Original issue's description:
> Use ComposeColorFilter in factory to collapse consecutive filters (when possible).
> Change asColorFilter to reflect its reliance on the new factory behavior.
>
> patch from issue 967143002 at patchset 80001 (http://crrev.com/967143002#ps80001)
>
> BUG=skia:
>
> Committed: https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/dac843bf046c2cd79fd955cb177aee241d7a4b0cTBR=senorblanco@chromium.org,robertphillips@google.com,bsalomon@chromium.org
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=skia:
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/978923005
Reason for revert:
Might be breaking deps roll
Original issue's description:
> Update SkPicture cull rects with RTree information
>
> When computed, the RTree for an SkPicture will have a root
> bounds that reflects the best bounding information available,
> rather than the best estimate at the time the picture recorder
> is created. Given that creators frequently don't know ahead of
> time what will be drawn, the RTree bound is often tighter.
>
> Perf testing on Chrome indicates a small raster performance
> advantage. For upcoming painting changes in Chrome the
> performance advantage is much larger.
>
> BUG=
>
> Committed: https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/2dd3b6647dc726f36fd8774b3d0d2e83b493aeacTBR=mtklein@google.com,schenney@chromium.org
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/977413003
Please see if this looks usable. It may even give a perf boost if you use it, even without custom implementations for each instruction set.
I've been trying this morning to beat this naive loop implementation, but so far no luck with either _SSE2.h or _SSSE3.h. It's possible this is an artifact of the microbenchmark, because we're not doing anything between the conversions. I'd like to see how this fits into real code, what assembly's generated, what the hot spots are, etc.
I've updated the tests to test these new APIs, and splintered off a pair of new benchmarks that use the new APIs. This required some minor rejiggering in the benches.
BUG=skia:
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/978213003
When computed, the RTree for an SkPicture will have a root
bounds that reflects the best bounding information available,
rather than the best estimate at the time the picture recorder
is created. Given that creators frequently don't know ahead of
time what will be drawn, the RTree bound is often tighter.
Perf testing on Chrome indicates a small raster performance
advantage. For upcoming painting changes in Chrome the
performance advantage is much larger.
BUG=
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/971803002
Reason for revert:
Fails on mac for some reason.
Also is a bit wrong, but this should not be reason for the failure..
Original issue's description:
> Add image as a draw type that can be filtered
>
> Add image as a draw type that can be filtered.
>
> This is needed when SkImage is added as an object to be drawn so that
> the draw is forwarded to SkBaseDevice. This would be used in making
> filters use SkImages.
>
> BUG=skia:3388
>
> Committed: https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/fa77eb1e51b9317ff993d1be504ada173b561e5fTBR=reed@google.com,bsalomon@google.com
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=skia:3388
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/980273002
Add image as a draw type that can be filtered.
This is needed when SkImage is added as an object to be drawn so that
the draw is forwarded to SkBaseDevice. This would be used in making
filters use SkImages.
BUG=skia:3388
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/960783003
Instead of set(SkPMColor), add a constructor SkPMFloat(SkPMColor).
Replace setA(), setR(), etc. with a 4 float constructor.
And, promise to stick to SkPMColor order.
BUG=skia:
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/977773002
SSE rounds for free (that was a happy accident: they also have a truncating version).
NEON does not, nor obviously the portable code, so they add 0.5 before truncating.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
BUG=skia:
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/974643002
This pushes the cost of the *255 and *1/255 conversions onto only those code
paths that need it. We're not doing it any more efficiently than can be done
with Sk4f.
In microbenchmark isolation, this is about a 15% speedup.
BUG=skia:
NOPRESUBMIT=true
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/973603002
If a quad, cubic, or conic goes back on itself, assume it's not convex.
In a future CL, we could check to see if the curve is linear so that
linear curves are treated the same as lines.
BUG=skia:3469
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/971773002
Sometimes, the intersection returned by check_intersection() is
out-of-bounds for both edges (above both tops or below both bottoms)
due to floating-point inaccuracy. This causes split_edge() to create a
tiny negative-length edge on one side (which would then assert).
Although we could safely remove this assert and allow the negative
length edge to be removed, it's faster/safer to simply avoid its
creation in the first place by adjusting one edge to the other edge's
endpoint.
Added a new unit test to exercise this case.
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/968993002
